Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors responsible for the fall of an empire
Cause of the fall of empires
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Roman and Gupta Empires fell for a number of reasons. The Gupta Empire was brought down primarily by outside forces, while the Roman Empire was first weakened by internal forces before being overcome by external forces. Both empires had very different approaches to leadership and government. Despite this, foreign invasions, a declining economy, and inner rebellion all played a part in the decline of the Roman and Gupta Empires.
If neither empire had had a declining economy, they might not have fallen as soon. As it was, the economy made it impossible for either empire to deal with the other problems they were already facing, such as barbarian invasions and rebellions within the empire. Towards the end of the Gupta Empire, trade declined
…show more content…
because the demand for Indian exports became less. To supplement the wealth they were losing, the empire attempted to raise taxes on merchants, but this only made the economy worse. This made it hard for them to pay for military quests to keep invaders out since several wars had already taken a lot of their money. This severely hurt the economy, which only added to the problems of rebellion and invasion. Rome faced a similar situation because their economy relied on slaves but, when rebellion forced them to stop expanding, the number of slaves available to them decreased. This was on top of the loads of money they also lost through the constant wars being fought that they had to support. Because of all of this, Rome was forced to increase taxes, which lead to rebellion. In the Gupta Empire, rebellions sprung up from the Pushyamitra tribe.
The government was too weak to control these rebellions, and they exhausted a lot of military force on them. These rebellions didn’t overthrow the Gupta leaders, but they did weaken the political system. Similar to what happened in the Gupta Empire, around 418 CE, a tribe called the Visigoths migrated to Rome and made an agreement with the Roman leaders that allowed them to live within the borders. They often became Roman citizens and fought as part of their armies. However, the people of the tribe were often treated badly by the government and charged higher taxes than the native Romans, which led them to rebel against the Romans. This, just like in India, occupied the government and weakened the army, which left it open to invasion from barbarian …show more content…
tribes. Although economy and rebellion weakened these empires, foreign invasions were the final step in their decline. For the Gupta Empire, the White Huns began to overtake the empire, and their weakened economy could only support the military presence that was keeping the Huns out for a limited amount of time. The government couldn’t do much because it was based locally and had a very slow and unreliable communication system. However, after this, the Huns continued the culture and revived Hinduism. In Rome, the barbaric Germanic tribes overthrew the Romulus Augustulus, Rome’s final emperor. The army couldn’t stop this invasion because a declined economy had made it smaller. The people had also somewhat been split geographically since the Roman Empire had been expanded so far. Although these common factors brought both empires down, they were also both brought down by their opposite extremes of leadership.
In the Gupta Dynasty, weak leadership added to its economic decline, rebellions, and invasions, and ultimately led to its demise. Because the Gupta Dynasty didn’t rely on a centralized government, it was easy for outside forces to come in and overthrow them. The Roman Empire made the opposite mistake. Instead of their leaders being too weak, they were too power-hungry and focused on conquest. This convinced the Roman emperors to spread their empire too far out, making it hard to rule or communicate. This slowly divided the people into sections so that when there was a rebellion or attack, Rome shattered into pieces, and couldn’t be reunified. This is what happened to the Han dynasty as well; they couldn’t go back to being under one government leader, so they dispersed into separate entities instead. This specifically was the reason for the fall of Eastern Rome, and it was later the cause of Western Rome’s fall as
well. In conclusion, the decline of the Roman and Gupta Empires was caused by a combination of inefficient leadership, outside invasion, inside rebellion, and a drained economy, although each of these had a different cause in each empire. This is proved through the barbaric tribes that entered the empires towards the beginning of their decline, and the ones that eventually took over. In addition, the Roman Empire lasted much longer than the Gupta Empire, but both had an impact on the societies that followed them.
In a period of four centuries the Han, Roman, and Gupta empires fell. First in China, then in the Mediterranean, and lastly in India. The civilizations deteriorated from foreign invasion, internal conflicts, and internal weakness that made it to where invaders could invade and cause the decline of these major civilizations.
Han China and Rome, despite having some political and cultural differences, fell in ways that were almost directly parallel to one another. Both civilizations experienced declines in everything from culture and population to economy and government, as well as both suffering from attacks by nomadic invaders. However, each civilization's fall had their own unique factors, and the lasting impact of their falls differed greatly.
Finally, both the Ottoman empire and the Ming Dynasty declined because of the same reason. The reason both empires fell was because of weak rulers. The latter Ming Emperors were weak and corrupt, and because the Ming Dynasty was imperial, the rulers weakness deteriorated the empire drastically. The Ottomans locked up the heirs in the royal palace, which left them with no experience with governing.
In the Classical Era, the collapse of the Roman Empire was similar to the collapse of the Han Dynasty in that they both fell due to external and internal conflict. However, they differed in that the Roman Empire became politically and culturally fragmented while the Han Dynasty was reconstituted as a political and cultural whole.
These strengths were a strong foundation, standardization of many elements across the empire, and strong leaders who were able to effectively rule. The loss of these strengths would ultimately lead to the downfall of the Roman Empire. As time passed, the empire grew further from its original foundation, losing sight of many of its original attributes inherited from the Republic. In addition, they grew over-extended as an empire, making standardization very difficult if not virtually impossible. As future emperors attempted to extend aspects of the empire to these outlying areas, their power to do so was challenged by external influences. All of this caused an erosion of the cohesion which the standardization had brought, especially when the empire was divided between East and West. Lastly, as emperors stopped effectively using the strengths which had been used by past emperors, specifically the manipulation of the upper class and the Senate, the empire grew gradually weaker. Unable to manage such a massive empire virtually alone, even strong emperors were often left in weak positions, unable to deal with the frequent Germanic intrusions and military revolts. In short, many of the things which enabled the Roman Empire to survive for over 400 years were also the things which ultimately led to or enabled its
The Romans were on one of the greatest people of all. They had power, wealth, and even a half of the world. They built one of the strongest and vast empire that world has ever seen. They came from nothing to something awesome. It started of as a city and ended up being one of the greatest empire of all. This essay is going to focus on the Roman Empire from the rise to the fall and the government, architecture, mythology, Family Structure, and Food of the Romans.
The empire lost about 80 percent of its original landmass, and eventually declined and fell entirely. At one time, the reforms made by the Young Turks worked well, but only for a short time. Overthrowing the tyranny of Hamid should have been enough to help establish a new government, but the triumvirate also became quite oppressive during their reign. Turkism established a new form of nationalism that left out various nationalities, races, and cultures, and this led to the decline of the empire.
The fall of the Western Roman Empire was a major problem, and the political aspects were partly to blame. One reason why the political demeanor of the Western Roman Empire was partially the cause of the fall, was that Western Rome had several unfit rulers. The emperors were greedy, and cruel enough to do unfair actions for power. These emperors inherited the throne, and that led to these ability lacking rulers. In addition, there was no cycle for the Emperors. In the United States Of America, if the president is no longer able to rule, the vice president takes over.
One of the most common causes of the decline of an empire results from having weak military power and martial spirit. In order for an empire to be successful, that empire must present a strong will to fight or sacrifice property and life in order to defend its state. If an empire does not possess this characteristic, it often will quickly diminish. For example, the Roman Empire became successful because of the willingness of the males to defend the state. Shortly after, the males lost their willingness to defend and the empire had to recruit unreliable mercenaries to fight in war. Unlike the successful army of the past, these mercenaries did not have true loyalty to Rome. Because of constant warfare, the Romans had heavy military spending. The Roman Empire had become too large to control effortlessly. Families and soldiers in parts of the Roman Empire adopted local customs. The Roman Empire was made up not only of natives from the Italian peninsula, but it was also made up of barbarians from the conquered lands. The barbarians were very knowledgeable when it came to Roman warfare and military tactics. Corruption became widespread throughout the Em...
The decline and fall of the Roman Empire is a scholarly article written by Justin Ott about the Roman Empire and the events leading up to its fall. The article mostly focuses on the military and economy of Rome in the third century A.D. It lists in the beginning a few of the different theories people have of how Rome fell, including led poisoning and the spread of Christianity. The article seems to want to disprove these theories, showing how they are not the main causes for the collapse of Rome. “Gibbon’s arguments in these sections can be accurately summarized as “the insensible penetration of Christianity in the empire fatally undermined the genius of a great people.” The problem with this conclusion is two-fold. First of all, this explanation is too narrow as it is difficult to believe one single factor brought down the empire. More importantly, it is clear that the Eastern Roman Empire was by far more Christian than the West, therefore if Christianity was behind the fall, the East should have fallen first.” The article’s audience appears to be historians, or those who are interested in history, or just the Roman Empire. It
The Roman Republic ultimately failed due to the lack of large-scale wars and other crises that had united the Roman populous early in the history of the Roman Republic. Roman leadership and honor became compromised. In the absence of war and crisis, Rome’s leaders failed to develop the honor and leadership necessary to maintain the Republic.
Ineffective leaders are one reason why the Roman Empire came to its demise. After the reign of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, the Roman Empire started to decline. His son, Commodus, was next in line for the throne. Commodus managed government affairs horrendously. One major mistake he made, was to sell government offices to the highest bidder(Fsmitha). This allowed for corrupt and overall bad people to gain positions of power in the government. He also gave the guards the freedom to be abusive and torment the citizens(Fsmitha). These actions did not make him very popular with the senate or the masses. He tried to rectify this mistake by holding gory public performances to win him popularity. He also often went in the arena, to fight and club animals that were tied down(Gibbon 118). While he did win some popularity, most thought that himself fighting was demeaning of the Emperor position. Commodus was also concerned about military governors contending for his position. He was so paranoid that he had their children under his care( Fsmitha). Essentially, he had military governor’s children held hostage. This, instead of fixing his problem, led t...
There were many reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. Each one interweaved with the other. Many even blame the initiation of Christianity in 337 AD by Constantine the Great as the definitive cause while others blame it on increases in unemployment, inflation, military expenditure and slave labour while others blame it on the ethical issues such the decline in morals, the lack of discipline of the armies and the political corruption within the Empire. Three major contributions that led to the collapse of the once great empire were: the heavy military spending in order to expand the Empire, the over-reliance on slave labour which led to an increase in unemployment, and the political corruption and abuse of power by the Praetorian Guard leading to the unfair selection of many disreputable emperors and the assassination of those not favoured by the Guard.
Throughout history, there have been a variety of great and powerful empires. However, regardless of how powerful they were able to become, each empire had it's unfortunate downfall and ultimate ending. Perhaps two of the most powerful empires ever to exist and crumble were the Roman and Egyptian empires, both of which enjoyed long periods of wealth and success in their pasts. While the two empires operated on extremely different terms and conditions, there is undoubtedly good reason for comparison of their downfalls considering that the causes generally surrounded the fact that the empire suffered invasions. Of course, this was not the only reason in either case, but in both circumstances invasion played a significant role in the fall.
The decline and fall of the Mediterranean and Chinese civilizations was a result of population decrease, weak government, a frail economy, and invasion. A combination of these causes sparked the slow decline of these once great empires. Unlike that of China, the decline of Rome was much more upsetting, having a much larger impact on the surrounding world. Decrease in population made it more difficult to have a strong military. The army that was already intact was demanding payment, which greatly weakened the budget of Rome.