Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A case of murder analysis
Analysis Of A Case Of Murder
Analysis a case of murder
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A case of murder analysis
17-year-old Cameryn Mahoney's dad is the town's coroner, and Cameryn wants to follow in his footsteps. She eventually persuades him to hire her as his new assistant, but she has no idea that one of the first deaths, she'll investigate is one of her good friends Rachel. Rachel is the fourth victim in a series of killings known as Christopher Killings, girls who are strangled and then left with St. Christopher medals on their corpses. The book The Christopher Killer is an adequate book, even though it somewhat lacks energy, does not focus on the plotline very well but had an exciting ending. The Christopher Killer lacked much energy, especially in the beginning. By that I mean the book lacks many twists and turns to keep the reader …show more content…
The author would rather focus on Cameryn and her unrelated thoughts rather than murder. Also, the first 50 pages of the book had been just Cameryn and her grandmother arguing about what she was going to do with her life after school which was not interesting at all. “No, that's because there are more interesting things to do."Her grandmother looked at her sharply. "Like cutting into dead bodies" Carmeryn swallowed back her irritation. "Yeah-the live one kick too much.” (Ferguson 35) As the book went on the plot became more engaged, but the first few chapters were boring and uneventful. After all of Cameryn’s investigating, she finally caught the murder, which no one would expect. Nobody believed her at first because the killer ended up being Dr. Jewel a psychic who was “helping” with the case. Finally, she got evidence to prove he was the killer and Dr. Jewel was arrested. “The admission sent a cold shock through her,likes wave of ice water.So there would be no more deception,no veneer of truth covering the lie. Dr.Jewel had just admitted he was the Christopher Killer.” (Ferguson 240) The Christopher Killer is just an okay book because it lacked much energy, was slow, but it had an exciting ending. The book would be better if the first few chapters had a little bit more importance because in my opinion
Evaluation: I thought the book was very exciting and suspenseful like her other books. The book had very good detail and an interesting plot. I liked the twist when Juan and the girl’s father came upon Glenn walking down the road. I also liked how the author described the action in great detail. It made me feel like I was right there seeing it all happen firsthand. I don’t think that the author could’ve made this book any better than she did already.
The book is great with the plot mainly focused in the courtroom, but it feels like the author put the plot of the story from different events that happened to younger people and not from one whole event. Finally, the document went into depth of how the defense attorney went on to get every piece of evidence as possible to make the eyes of the jury see that Brenton Butler was not the person that shot and killed the
Fans of the novel found that the way the novel is written, you never want to put it down and the action keeps things moving and is quite entertaining. The novel pulls you in and makes you love each of the main characters in it. This is a great series for anyone to read, and it is audience friendly for whoever reads them. There is quite a bit of suspense that will make the novel exceed readers 's expectations, and the twists and turns keeps you guessing and lets nothing be predictable. Some like the way this group of people bands together when they really need to and keep things together so they can all stop the
...him down. She might have written more paragraphs on each of her main points. There are many more examples in the novel. She had more thoroughly EXPLAINED how each of the direct quotations and situations she used showed that Chato was being let down and how he felt about it. The reader could have gained MORE insight into Chato's life. I wanted to hear more about the relationship between Chato and his family. I wanted to know more about WHY his sister was keeping secrets, and why Chato was so let down by her calling him a little "snitch." It all sounded pretty much like ordinary bickering between a brother and a sister to me. I wanted her to better explain WHY Chato was being let down.Overall, I just wanted to know MORE. She needed to develop each of these examples more fully. She needed to get more "into" the feelings of Chato and explain them to her reader.
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
There are a number of limitations if the story is written with omniscient perspective, which we can only see how he reacts to all the situations without any explanation of why would he do that. And because Christopher is a special character, who is lacking in ability to understand peoples ' intention, it would be easier for us to get the picture of him by knowing the reason he does such things and not just know how he reacts. His logic and matter-of-fact attitude makes him so unreliable since the story turns out the ways he wants. It also causing dramatic irony when the readers know more than Christopher because we can guess who killed Wellington while it takes Christopher a long journey for him to find out the truth. But at the same time, we cannot tell how would he react to the
There is a constant stream of action in this story, which makes it rather difficult to process what's going on as it happens. The story rarely drags and it is written so that it feels very real and alive. Slang terms are used often too, which are also hard to understand. But after the first few chapters it seems that most readers are able to get around this and start enjoying the fast paced style in which the book is written. This style also adds to the mood of panic and paranoia that encompass the entire book as Marge, Hicks, and Converse try to flee with their dope.
It involves too much fighting from one viewpoint to another. The bad guys were impressive, and the fight placements were excellent but there was too much. Forest cares about her friends to a point of putting herself at risk to keep them safe. Forest even cares for the spirits and souls that she supports, as long as they are not evil. If they are evil, she does everything in her power to stop them; she is very powerful. The whole novel is all about fighting spiritual ghosts after spiritual ghosts. When the characters defeated one spirit, another spirit pops up that they have to
...cked, what would I say? Luckily, I honestly enjoyed the book. The last third of it especially grabbed me; I stayed up late to finish it because I didn't want to put it down. But it was still a little jarring to read at times. Amelia has taken 'write what you know' quite seriously, so I've actually been to the house that Michael and Kate's house is based on; characters have backgrounds that match backgrounds of real people I know, and at one point Kate's voicemail message is the same unique one used by a friend. So that introduced a whole new level of cognitive estrangement for me. But a) that shouldn't affect 99% of the readers out there, and b) during the last third of the book all that fell away. So definitely take my review with a grain of salt. But seriously, give "Loving Dead" a try. At the very least, it's different than anything else you'll read this year.
Judith Wright's poem `The Killer' explores the relationship between Humans and Nature, and provides an insight into the primitive instincts which characterize both the speaker and the subject. These aspects of the poem find expression in the irony of the title and are also underlined by the various technical devices employed by the poet.
Imagine walking down town on a nice sunny day and all of a sudden you collapse to the ground because there are too many people around you. Or you start hitting someone because they simply touched you. There’s no reason to why you do these things other than the fact that something in your brain makes it that way. These are the types of things Christopher Boone deals with everyday. Christopher will always need someone to take care of him, because he thinks logically and can’t infer emotions like what people need to survive in the real world.
Her use of suspense and open-ended questions enhances her book always leaving the reader on edge. The only downfall that some readers may find is that it is very hard to figure out who the real murderer is, but anyone (especially young adults) who enjoy brain teasers and murder mysteries should read ATTWN and will quickly fall in love with it. And Then There Were None deserves all four and a half out of five stars it receives from multiple book stores and websites. A four and a half out of five stars is what it deserves, because there are almost no flaws throughout the whole book and it never seems boring. As Christie said, “Very few of us are what we
As the story begins, Christopher is unable to even talk to a stranger until he examines him/her for weeks and determines him/her to be safe to interact with. However, as the story progresses Christopher appears to open up a bit more to strangers. His determination surpasses his fear as he forces himself to talk to strangers such as Mrs. Alexander to ask them about the mystery. He is still unable to trust strangers completely as seen when he flees Mrs. Alexander because he believes she may call the police, but he definitely opens up more as the story progresses. His determination to escape his father who he believes will murder him also leads him to face his fear; he is so afraid that he tries to escape to London, requiring him to interact with many strangers. While he still does not interact well with strangers, this experience awakens him to the fact that not all strangers are necessarily evil. He begins to see that the real world and the strangers in it are not as scary as he initially
In this paper, I will be defining what victimology is, its history and how it developed over the years. In addition, I will briefly explain how out of criminology, sociology and psychology we were able to develop victimology.
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.