Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The function of literary critics
Literature and different cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The function of literary critics
In the literature of Azerbaijan, one of the pieces that caused a big controversy is the novel of Azerbaijani writer Akram Aylisli, Stone Dreams, in which the author portrays crimes against Armenians in Azerbaijan. The critical evaluation analyzes the article of the writer, Mikail Mamedov, who suggests that the Stone Dreams has the features which are related to minor literature. Starting from the early times when the written work has published, until now, literature has a big impact on the society, in terms of controlling and developing people with the variety of ideas and arguments in it. In addition to the influence of literature on the communities, communities also had a huge impact on the literature. In the other words, there is a reality …show more content…
One of the types of contemporary literature is the minor literature, which was first stated by Deleuze and Guattari. According to them, minor literature consists of 3 characteristics that defines it as a whole; deterritorialization, political nature and collective value. When the author writes about the ideas of minority in a major language, which are related to the politics and have a collective value towards the other writers, then this piece of work is considered to belong to minor literature. Because of its concept being related to the characteristics of minor literature, Aylisli’s controversial novel, Stone Dreams, can be the part of it. Although the critical analysis of Mikal Mamedov is justifieble with regard to the novel’s giving signs of the minor literature, there are some arguments that are not well-analyzed and not …show more content…
He states that in spite of the novel’s being unacceptable by the society and ruling elite, it is similar to the other literary works with the same theme and all these works can be one of the sources of dealing with issues of war, reunion and authority. In the beginning he mentions the external responses about Aylisli's reason of writing the novel, and gives a brief information about Akram Aylisli, his famous novels' being staged and published in and beyond the Soviet borders. Throughout the article, Armenian-Azerbaijanian relations and deportations of both Armenians and Azeris are indicated. Besides the characters and plot of Stone Dreams, there are some mentioned parts of the novel which caused scandal, such as Sadyghly's statement that he wants to beg the God to forgive Muslims for their crimes and break apart of Dr.Fazani's family because of their son's seeing circumcision as a violence. The main part of Mamedov's article is about the both local and foreign contemporary works, which have the similar theme with Stone Dreams. For the comparison and contrast and the differences in the reaction to the similar works, he gives an example of Maiden Dreams, Artush and Zaur, Gugark, Fotografiya and Kirve. As a conclusion, the author links the endings of each novel, as well as, Stone Dreams and
The essay “Tlilli Tlapalli: The Path of the Red and Black Ink” written by Gloria Anzaldua grants the reader insight into a writer's mind. The essay reveals the reasons and process of becoming a writer and therefore an artist.
The novel is nurtured with a very soft but sophisticated diction. The essay itself portrays the author’s style of sarcasm and explains his points in a very clear manner. In addition, the author has used vocabulary that is very easy to understand and manages to relate the readers with his simplistic words. The author is able to convey a strong and provoc...
“A Wall of Fire Rising”, short story written by Edwidge Danticat, presents one man’s desire for the freedom and also, the gap between reality and fantasy which is created by the desire. Two different perspectives of evaluating the life bring the conflict between the Guy and Lili who are parents to the little guy. Throughout the story, the Guy implies that he wants to do something that people will remind of him, but Lili who is opposing to the Guy, tries to settle the Guy down and keep up with the normal life that they are belong to. The Guy is aggressive, adventurous and reckless while Lili is realistic and responsible. The wall of fire is the metaphorical expression of the boundary where divides two different types of people. One is for the people who accept their position and try to do the best out of it, and the other for the people who are not satisfied with the circumstances and desires to turn the table. Through this essay, I am going to reveal how the contradiction in an unwise idealist’s attitude and his speech, and also how it drove the whole family into a horrible tragedy as well.
Critics have already begun a heated debate over the success of the book that has addressed both its strengths and weaknesses. The debate may rage for a few years but it will eventually fizzle out as the success of the novel sustains. The characters, plot, emotional appeal, and easily relatable situations are too strong for this book to crumble. The internal characteristics have provided a strong base to withstand the petty attacks on underdeveloped metaphors and transparent descriptions. The novel does not need confrontations with the Middle East to remain a staple in modern reading, it can hold its own based on its life lessons that anyone can use.
In describing the setting, the general locale is the prison in the coldest part of Russia- Siberia, geographically but socially depicting the social circumstances in the prison, but draws analogies to the general social, political and economic circumstances of Russia during the Stalinist era (form 1917 revolution up to 1955). The symbolic significance of the novel and the film (genres) reflects experiences, values and attitudes of the Russian society. The genres reflect the origins of the Russian social disorders and massive counts of political misgivings which watered down real communism in Russia. We are constantly reminded of the social and cultural heritage and originality of Russian ethnic groups through those different levels of meanings
Therefore, the information that has been portrayed in the article is organized upon his propositional thesis statement and criticism in the categories of the predominant myths that have manifested in society. The necessary sections have been labeled thoroughly for the audience to understand the myths, statistics and Ross’ criticism.
Literature is the key to our world or language. Many writers have emerged from this subject such as Homer who wrote The Odyssey and Euripidies who wrote about the evil Medea. Also mentioned in this paper are the Thousand and One Arabian Nights which is a collection of folktales and stories that are compiled into one. Each of these works of literature has a woman character that has many similarities in solving their problems. In The Odyssey the woman character that will be in comparison is Penelope which is Odysseus’s wife. In the story of Medea, Medea is of course the character we will be discussing and Shaharazad is the woman character from the Thousand and One Arabian Nights that will also be in comparison. Each of these women find themselves in a particularly “sticky situation.” However, Penelope, Medea, and Shahrazad are three strong women whose perseverance and cleverness help them to attain their goals.
Though throughout the novel, the only consistent nihilist is Bazarov, a reader notes how both the generation of the fathers and the generation of the sons are affected by his influence and by nihilistic views. With examination, one can attribute the profundity of
The Tunnel explores a struggling painter’s feelings of despair and of complete and utter solitariness which are all displayed throughout his dreams. They give reason as to why Castel acts the way he does and also reveal much of his eccentric selfdom. His dreams predict as well as influence Castel’s future behavior and give the reader insight into Castel’s thought process. He internalizes, visualizes and rationalizes each action he is planning to take. He displays intelligent judgment in his dreams whereas in reality, his behavior is illogical and nonsensical. Castel is not able to apply the dreams’ meanings in a positive way to his daily life. Ultimately, Castel ignores the dreams’ valuable suggestions and destroys Maria’s existence in order to liberate his own.
Fyodor Dostoyevsky was a Russian novelist during the 19th century. Dostoyevsky's literary work explored the human mind which is now coined as psychology. Psychology is a very broad school that focuses on the human consciousness. This can include your emotions, and your emotions are effected by everything; by your mood, personality, other individuals, and your environment. The psychology of himself, the psychology of the protagonist, as well as the psychology of the readers are explored in Notes from Underground. Notes from Underground is broken up into two sections: the first section introduces the underground man. Explaining his current state of mind and his antagonist stance on society. The second section previously occurs from the first section, and this section serves to show the audience how the underground man progressed from the perspective of Romanticism, with the idea of "the beautiful and the lofty" to his more rational egoist stance. This paper will explore both why and how the underground man progressed from having a 'love for the world' view to such a cynical perspective while at the same time trying to clarify the contradictory the underground man presents. The underground man overanalyzes everything; including himself. Dostoyevsky does well at showing that the audience can sympathize with the underground man but at the same time being able to distinguish themselves from the underground man.
The dreams in Epic of Gilgamesh resemble the poem as a whole. In general, they are a foreshadow of the poem. Gilgamesh and Enkidu both have dreams with strange symbolic images. These images are flowed into the poem as a very important message to the main characters. In the olden Mesopotamian days, dreams were important to people; dreams represented the future of their well being or their misfortune. It was another way of God sending a future hint to a person. Dreams are essential to these people, similar to the main characters in the poem, Epic of Gilgamesh.
Literature is a medium that offers insight and into the values, customs, and traditions of the different cultures that produce works all around the world. The works The Epic of Gilgamesh, Dante Alighieri’s The Divine Comedy, and Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis all illustrate what values their respective cultures held at the times of their creations. By observing and analysing each piece of literature with an open mind, we as readers are offered a window into the cultures of the works, which we can then use to gain insight and appreciation for different values, beliefs, and traditions.
While confronting Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground seems a difficult task initially, one must be able to transcend the elaborate diction and parodies, and comprehend the author himself, while also taking root the message Dostoevsky had originally intended in the time it was addressed. Understanding the author himself, along with the period in which the work was written, augments one’s overall discernment of the passage. In the age he wrote, Dostoevsky must have seemed eccentric and outlandish; nevertheless, looking back on him from today with a literary understanding of modernism, he appears ahead of his time. His central premise, although difficult to determine amongst the satire, is humanity’s necessity for freedom and religion, specifically Christianity.
Literature plays an important role as a part of the cultural heritage. Thus, literature is the soul of our civilization, the center of our religion, and the machine we can travel back in the time of our old civilizations. In addition, literary works are able to take the readers beyond the limited experiences of readers’ lives. They show the lives of others. The literary works covey the social, political, and cultural backgrounds of the time when the stories or novels were written. The author of the book, “The Death of the Author,” Roland Barthes expresses that authors are always the agents of their times. According to the statement conducted by Roland, to get the fully understanding of the text, he recommends
Dostoevsky’s noteworthy literary works each contain similarities in theme, character development, and purpose when analyzed beyond face value. Dostoevsky’s early life and ideals, intertwined with life-changing events that shifted his ideologies, and critiques of fellow Russian writers during his time period lay the groundwork for Dostoevsky’s recurring arguments for the way which Russian society would be best-off, as well as ways in which the people of Russia would be suited to live the most fulfilling, non-corrupt lives.