Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is wikipedia a reputable source
Is wikipedia a reputable source
Is wikipedia a reputable source
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is wikipedia a reputable source
Wikipedia is an online resource platform that acts as the encyclopedia in all disciplines. The reliability of the information that is found from it has always been doubtful by professors when used in studies as the reliable reference point. The information that is retrieved from Wikipedia by the teachers and professors makes it to be difficult to become a reliable source, since there is no credit that is accorded to it. Wikipedia can be easily accessible in two senses, its content can be used freely as well as the free contribution given to individuals who are able to create content in the Wikipedia platform. Wikipedia authorities free development and spread of human knowledge in the sense, which is more general (Wikipedia, 2016). Therefore, …show more content…
On the other hand, it has been praised as being able to provide useful information, such as the more useful links that are made available, enabling the learner to retrieve the required information, in a shorter period. Again, it has been pointed by some scholars as being accurate minus the mistakes that are obvious. Similarly, the editorial context in Wikipedia, poses the challenge in relation to the content made available in their system. Without having in place, the system that checks the kind of information released by individuals, the issues of biasness can be viewed, because the individuals making inputs can present what they feel is critical to …show more content…
The challenges that are faced include the aspect of plagiarism. The various teachers have out rightly advised their students to apply Wikipedia as the area of commencing their research, but when it comes to academic work, they should be careful since it is not a safe haven. This positions the threat to the level of information retrieved from Wikipedia, prompting many scholars to shy away from accessing the system. The authenticity of the information accessed is put into test as the material accessed cannot be ably relayed in peer-reviewed work. These are very important to note in bid to ascertain the exact situation in which one is to retrieve the information from the system (Brian, 2012).
...second using the search engine, people lose their motivation to read and the attention to think about the answer. (Crovitz 353) In Plato’s Phaedrus, Greek philosopher Socrates claims that people who get information without proper instruction as ignorant since they only conceit of the answer instead of the wisdom to find out and understand the answer. (Carr 341) With such access to information, we do spread information and expand human knowledge in a rapid rate. However, we lose our creativity, intelligence and the spirit of inquiry.
As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it.
...ie, 31 (1) 27-49.Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674. doi:10.1002/asi.20870
The best thing about Wikipedia is that it concisely provides topic wise systematic information on every topic for ‘short and quick reference’ of the summary on our search topic, a distinguishable and easy to note introduction. We also credit it for providing information in a very systematic and orderly manner and is quite too detailed in providing information and pictures on an article. Wikipedia is a good source for starting with basic information as it gives a summary in the beginning that almost gives the reader an approximate knowledge of what he is reading.
Despite our English teachers’ best efforts each and every one of us at some point in our writing careers have stumbled upon a source of information from the infamous website Wikipedia. In this article the writer discusses both the pros and the cons of the controversial online encyclopedia in an attempt to allow us to come up with our own conclusions about it’s credibility as a source. Wikipedia provides a vast array of articles, over 31 million, on numerous topics. Some of the benefits of Wikipedia include its user friendly site. With its easy to maneuver layout and useful sub-links to help direct you, it’s easy to see why some favor this popular search. This setup allows for you to find new possible connections between subjects while also brainstorm different unique ideas to link with your paper.
Now that we are living in an ever changing world, technology is viewed as the most resourceful tool in keeping up with the pace. Without the use of technology, communication would be limited to using mail for delivery and encyclopedias for research. Although technology has improved the way we communicate and find information for research, the information is not always valid. Unfortunately, for those of us who use the internet for shopping, research, or reading articles of personal interest the information is not treated the same as a your magazine or book. While such literature is reviewed by an editorial staff, internet literature or information can be published by anyone. In order to reap the full benefit of having the use of technology for any purpose, there are five basic criteria’s one must keep in mind as an evaluating tool for deciding whether or not the particular website is a reliable source for information.
On the other hand, students can use other peer reviewed articles that have known authors and editors from other websites such as Google Scholar, which can be more dependable than Wikipedia. These examples show that students should avoid using Wikipedia in their academic
Firstly, most people today get all their information from the internet instead of books . While the internet is great there are some problem with getting information online. One of those things is sources anyone can create a website with information. The problem is that anyone can write information on the subject and the information could be wrong. Today everyone has the option to