Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Issues of honour killing
The problems with honor killings
Introduction of honour killing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Issues of honour killing
Intro
Picture yourself opening the door to a policeman telling you to sit down, telling you that he’s sorry to inform you but your child has been found dead, with his body being burnt to the extent where it was difficult to identity him. If this was your baby, your child, your own flesh and blood, what is an adequate punishment for a murder like this, life in prison or is the judicial system lacking in the real sense of justice? In a modern society you would expect the law to decide what happens with the perpetrator but some cultures believe that killing the murder or a member of their family would be a sufficient punishment and give them their much-needed closure. But what is the effect on the people taking part in the honor killing or as part of the Kanun law and on their families. “Kanun Law is a 500-year-old code of conduct, which covered every aspect of medieval life, from births to marriages to hunting and grazing rights” (Freeman). An aspect of Kanun law is an eye-for-an-eye meaning when someone is killed revenge can be taken not only on the killer but from all males in his ‘clan’ (Freeman)
Is it worth the effect on the children and wives of the affected families to get revenge on those who disrespect them?
I walk into my house through my large white door after a strenuous day at school.
As I proceed taking my dirtied and battered converse I am welcomed by a few strange questions from my dad, “Have you heard from our family friend John recently, either by phone or Facebook?” I replied “No Dad, why are you asking me this?” he answered “All his family and friends are saying he’s not picking up and they are really worried about him, can you quickly Google search a story about a car being set on flames?” All kind of thing...
... middle of paper ...
...VO, AND
MONTENEGRO." International Centre for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations (IMIR) (2004): 1-15. Print.
Cohen, Nadia. "Blood feuds still boiling in Albania." USATODAY.COM. Usatoday.com,
30 July 2012. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
Freeman, Colin. "Albania's Modern-day Blood Feuds." The Telegraph. Telegraph Media
Group, 01 July 2010. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
Pope, Nicole. Honor Killings in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2012. Print.
Arnold, Kathryn C. "Are the Perpetrators of Honor Killings Getting Away With Murder?
Article 340 of the Jordanian Penal Code Analyzed Under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women." American University International Law Review 6.2 (2001): 1-68. Print.
Emerick, Carolyn. "Broken April and Albanian Blood Feud." (n.d.): 1-
8.Http://www.academia.edu/. Web.
Brown, A. Widney., and LaShawn R. Jefferson. "VI. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES." Afghanistan, Humanity Denied: Systematic Denial of Women's Rights in Afghanistan. New York, NY.: Human Rights Watch, 2001. 16+. Print
In the story “In Camera, Saadawi illustrated how women were treated by the legal system in Arabic country when they did something against the system. The protagonist, Leila Al-Fargani, who was a young woman on trial for calling the “mighty one”, which is a respective title for the President of their country, a stupid man. Moreover, during the time she was waiting for the court date, she was brutally beaten and raped by ten men who seem to be the guards. At the time she was in the court, she was still suffering from the pain both in physical and mental way, but she did not collapse. When the time the judge and those with him declared that ten men raped Leila and also her father’s honor got trampled. (This is the way we torture you women- by depriving you of the most valuable thing you possess”). For the response she said: “You fool! The most valuable thing I possess is not between my legs. You are all stupid. And the most stupid among you is the one who leads you.” In one hand, this quote completely showed that the man thought this sexual violence was totally right when the woman had committed a crime. In anther hand, it also showed that in the very deep of Leila, the...
MICHAELSEN, C., THE RENAISSANCE OF NON-REFOULEMENT? THE OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. .
This paper will examine the pros and cons of the death penalty. Is it a deterrent or is that a myth. Does it give the family of the victim peace or does it cause them to suffer waiting for appeal after appeal. What are the forms of execution and any evidence of them being cruel and usual punishment. Is the death penalty fair if there are glaring, disparities in sentencing depending on geographic location and the color of the offender and victim’s skin?
Overall, Islam and Gender is a valuable addition to the field of ethnography by examining the everyday struggles, experience, and involvement of women within the Islamic law. Hosseini targets a Western audience and hopes to leave them with a better understanding of the Islamic judiciary system and Iranian feminism. She successfully provides her readers with an unprejudiced account of the shari’ah and family law, and even includes the ideologies of those opposing her personal beliefs. Hosseini specifically requests Muslim women to take a stand develop their own local, Islamic feminist movement and openly advocates new discourse within Islamic jurisprudence.
Kevin Powers and Geoffrey Canada both describe violence and its effects on people in their novels. They assert that violence profoundly changes a person; however, they differ on the merits of these changes. Canada concludes that violence teaches people and helps them grow, while Powers concludes that it dehumanizes and scars them. The two authors also disagree on the necessity of violence. Specifically, Canada argues that violence is necessary and is used to gain distinction and status, while Powers argues that violence is unnecessary and causes people to lose their singularity and identity. Even further, Canada believes violence protects the boys and their lives, while Powers believes violence kills the young soldiers. From their personal experiences, Canada claims boys in the South Bronx need to be violent to gain respect and to survive, while Powers claims the violence of war is a waste of young men’s lives as they lose respect and even their lives.
Since the first day they met, everyone knew that Katie and Ted would stay together forever. He was always telling everyone how he loved her and that she was the perfect wife and mother. However, behind closed doors was another story. Ted was not a kind man in “his” house, he was verbally abusive and constantly accusing Katie of cheating on him. These fits of rage were promptly followed by flowers and apologies. Katie was abused by Ted, however, she did love him and he did promise never to hurt her again.
After the first part of the Hughes chapter on Middle Eastern Muslim women, the emphasis shifts, from Quranic doctrine regarding women to how Muslim law and scholarship have interpreted the Quran’s direct admonitions to women. However, this shift is unfortunately subtle. The authors fail to make a clear distinction between the Quran, a sacred text believed to be the verbatim word of God; and Muslim law, which was formulated by (male) Muslim jurists who consulted the Quran and whose consensus was later declared infallible (Ahmed 58). Such a distinction is necessary because the Quran itself is vastly different from a legal document; Ahmed observes in “Early Islam and the Position of Women” that “Quranic precepts consist mainly of broad, general propositions chiefly of an ethical nature, rather than specific legalistic formulations” (59). Indeed, the Qura...
Deen, Thalif. "Adultery Laws Unfairly Target Woman, U.N.Says." 9, 2014 . Inter Press Service Document. 10 April 2014
Let's talk about absolutely ridiculous pronouncements people make that either ignore simple fact or border on insanity. How about this one: Violence is no way to settle anything! Evidence suggests that violence is a very effective way of settling things. How about a few examples? In 1776, violence settled whether the thirteen colonies would be independent or remain under King George's thumb. In 1865, violence settled whether there'd be a Confederacy and a Union or just a Union. Between 1941 and 1945, violence settled whether Japan would control the Far East and whether Germany would control Europe. Violence settled whether American Indians owned and controlled the land now call United States or whether it would be European settlers and their progeny. In fact, violence has settled the question of land use-rights virtually everywhere.
Everyone experiences anger at some point in their life. We all have those topics that if it gets brought up we automatically go into our defense mood, whether it be sex, religion or politics . We all have had those skeletons in our closets that we don’t like to bring out. Commonly anger and aggression are used together but they aren’t the same thing according to the Interpersonal Conflict textbook, “Anger differs from aggression is an attack whereas anger is the feeling connected to a perceived unfairness or injustice. Anger can help people set boundaries when they need to be set and to right wrongs.”
...n into their police force. While the United States have been using women some sixty years before the Jordanians, both recruit women for the same purpose: sensitivity. Women are generally more caring and understanding and easier to talk to than men. In the United States, this was used as a way to communicate and help prostitutes as well as other women dealing with some form of domestic abuse. In Jordan, they suffer some of the same problems, but women play a more sensitive role in the Public Security Force. Because Jordan is mostly an Islamic nation, women have certain rules they must abide by as well as unique issues that are a huge threat to them specifically, such as rape and other forms of sexual abuse (Lia, 2006). The women of the Jordan Public Security Force have been able to reason with women and comfort them in a much more proficient manner than the men have.
In the early modern era in Europe, public executions were the primary punishment given to members of society who were involved in criminal behavior. This form of punishment served to showcase the absolute power of the state, King and church to take away the life of any citizen who disrupts peace. It was a way to make the criminal justice system visible and effective in an era when the criminal justice system was in its beginning stages of demonstrating orderliness (Spierenburg). More specifically, it was a relatively straightforward and psychological way to evoke deterrence. The potential of gruesome violence, public persecution and religious betrayal were tools thought to be strong enough to make public executions a successful form of deterrence because within the community, social bonds and religion were the foundation of everyday life.... ...
Islam is the second largest religion in the world today. Many of us do not understand the religion Islam and women’s rights within the Islamic faith. American society has the idea that Muslim women are weak, disrespected, belittled, mistreated, and oppressed. “And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them according to what is equitable; but men have a degree (of advantage) over them.” (Qur’an 28:229).Contrary to common belief, Islam regards women as equal to men in many aspects and that women have a unique place in Islam. Finally, with this research I hope to end all misconceptions and misunderstandings of Muslim women rights relating to their spiritual, economic, social, political, and legal rights.
Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family. These family members feel l...