The Cask Of Amontillado Fortunato's Downfall

619 Words2 Pages

In Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor lures in Fortunato, using Fortunato’s knowledge of wine as a catalyst, to his own death. Fortunato “prided himself on his connoisseurship in wine,” which suggests that he would go to great lengths in search of rare subjects (Poe 250). To, perhaps, the same “‘length’” Montresor would go for vengeance (250). Fortunato’s hubric nature serves as a vice in Montresor's malicious scheme. Given an amplitude of opportunities to recede from the plot, John Freehafer asserts that “It is Fortunado, not Montresor, who is made to insist upon descending to the vaults and going down to the place of his death” (John Freehafer 316) Furthermore, Fortunato descends with the desire of proving himself greater …show more content…

The earliest signal of the, unnamed, protagonist’s downfall is marked by his souls transition to “a more than fiendish malevolence, gin-nurtured” counterpart (Poe 520). Although the black cat “loved” the protagonist, the protagonist's claims “I slipped a noose about its neck. . .,” ending the black cat's life (521). In context the black cat symbolizes the protagonists prideful nature. The cat assumes an immortal presence, clouding the protagonist judgement. As asserted by Stark Joseph, “by depicting a motiveless murderer whose actions cannot be sufficiently examined” Poe develops a protagonist with vague emotions. The protagonist’s transition, from loving his wife and cat to loving the disposal of their bodies, attests to Stark Joseph's assertion. Accordingly, the protagonist “felt satisfied that all was right” (524) following “the task of concealing the body” (523). Ironically the protagonist “burned to say if but one word, by way of triumph. . .” in search of praise for his perfect crime (524). It is the “Arch-Fiend”, shadowing the protagonist like his own pride, who “consigned [him] to the hangman” (524). Appropriately, the “beast who had seduced [him] into murder,” coerced with pride, ended the protagonist's …show more content…

The protagonist begins his journey with no knowledge of the intolerable conditions ahead. Soaring all the way to “seventy-five degrees below,” temperatures are unbearable (London 3). However, the protagonist claims “the temperatures did not matter” (2). Reaffirming the protagonist’s lack of competence on the dangers of the yukon. Being a “newcomer” to the land, the “strangeness and weirdness of it all. . .” did not deter him from continuing(2). His previous “quick and alert[ness] in the things of life” gave him the false pride in his own skill set (2). No veteran of the yukon would dare “travel alone in the Klondike after fifty below” (6). However, the protagonist separates himself from “the old-timers rather womanish. . .” doctrine by “keep[ing] his head” (6). Only moments after this claim, by his own ignorance, the protagonist’s last hope fire is “blotted out” echoing “his own sentence of death” (6). Such irony can be explained by Jeanne Campbell Reesman, “the kind of knowledge the unnamed hero possesses and the kind he needs, [is] a discrepancy that costs him his life.” Accordingly, the protagonist’s pride self destructs not only any hope of meeting up with the boys but also any chance of living another

Open Document