In “The Case for Working with Your Hands”, Matthew B. Crawford explains that kids nowadays are forced to think that the only acceptable jobs are ones behind a desk rather than making things with their hands. Crawford supports this view by saying “A gifted young person who chooses to become a mechanic rather than to accumulate academic credentials is viewed as eccentric, if not self-destructive.” Crawford owns a motorcycle shop and loves it. This hands-on job gave him a sense of happiness, something he says he would never have gotten from working in a cubicle in an office job. He tells the audience that in 1990s, inveterate educators replaced high-schools’ classes like woodshop and Home Ec, with computer labs. He believes that the schools wanted to train amendable, young minds to believe that the only acceptable jobs are working as a …show more content…
white-collar, cubicle worker of society. Because of this, people nowadays don’t have basic skills to do simple things such as unclog the sink or fix their cars.
They must now rely on countries like China, who work with their hands, to step up and fix our problems. As Blinder puts it, “You can’t hammer a nail over the Internet.” Nor can the Indians fix your car. Because they are in India.” Students who are creative and want to build, make or paint are classified as weird because others believe that one cannot be successful in life unless they are like everyone else. But everyone else is stuck in a cubicle. Crawford found working in the academic job market rather bleak and instead, rebuild a motorcycle in the basement of an apartment building. This sparked an interest in him and he started his new career as motorcycle repairman. Crawford hints in his article that he disliked his previous job writing summaries in the Bay Area. He had his own cubicle in the building and dreams of being creative and impressing his boss. But to his dismay, it was mind-numbing, tedious and repetitive. His only escape, besides getting to go home, was walking outside to the food court for
lunch. The visual scenery and wildlife, such as the seagulls and ponds, thrilled him and reset his sanity level before it was time to go back to work. Crawford describes a good job as something you can express yourself freely and use your hands to create something amazing and useful. There is no use for academics in this line of work, only creativity and happiness. His perspective is that if everyone is working behind a desk, who will repair cars, unclog sinks and invent new contraptions? We can’t rely on other countries to help us do those things. We need to go back to earlier times when Home Ec and Woodshop was a required class. Crawford isn’t disrespecting working in an office but rather telling his experience and opinions on the fact of modern acceptable concerning jobs. He only wants to restore the connections between people and free thinking that corporates and other higher-ups have taken away from us. Crawford encourages those who can’t stand another second working as a pencil pusher to go out and work outside the box. “For anyone who feels ill-suited by disposition to spend his days sitting in an office, the question of what a good job looks like is now wide open.”
“We must start thinking of students as workers,” a high school official states (334). In the article, “Preparing Minds for Markets”, children had been asked what they wanted to be when they grew up. When asked, it seemed as though they had
After describing his multi-talented and skilled uncle, Joe, Rose strives to provide generalised argumentation about how blue-collars apply knowledge, skills, and efficiency to their workspace. Mathematical and Verbal skills, Rose suggests, is applied regularly by blue-collars. In addition, Rose describes the academic education of his family over generations; remarking that only he finished high school and went to university. Later, he became a faculty member in a school of education after completing his graduate degree in education and cognitive psychology. Rose claims, “we also often ignore the experience of everyday work in administrative deliberations and policymaking”
Although, Conventional wisdom dictates that the age at which children started work was connected to the poverty of the family. Griffith presents two autobiographies to put across her point. Autobiography of Edward Davis who lacked even the basic necessities of life because of his father’s heavy drinking habit and was forced to join work at a small age of six, whereas the memoir of Richard Boswell tells the opposite. He was raised up in an affluent family who studied in a boarding school. He was taken out of school at the age of thirteen to become a draper’s apprentice.
As American’s we place a high level of importance on attending school and receiving a certain level of education. Across the world, the recommendations for attending school vastly differ based on the culture of the society. In America, we require our children to attend school until they are almost of legal age, push high school graduates to attend college and we constantly emphasize structured learning. Many children in today’s world lack many skills that would allow them to “teach” themselves outside of school leading to an increased interest in televisions, computers, and phones. Technology has taken away society’s attention away from independent learning such as reading, writing, and outside experiences. John Taylor Gatto’s emotional voice in his writing “Against School” has allowed me reveal my psychological voice regarding the educational system.
The U.S educational system’s purpose is to control the minds of its students that will be the future leaders of the country. Juveniles are being taught that in order to have a nice car, branded clothes and the house of their dreams, by getting into an expensive mortgage, they have to be an employee of a huge corporation. In addition, they have to undergo to a prestigious school, study hard, have excellent grades in order to become popular and respectable in the world. However, many people would not become those super leaders, but these majorities of people have a great role in the capitalistic society of the US. As Gatto says, “We buy televisions, and then we buy the things we see on the television. We buy computers, and then we buy the things we see on the computer. We buy $150 sneakers whether we need them or not, and when they fall apart too soon we buy another pair” (38).
Although hiswork in hauling and spreading manure is entirely different from my work in fixing bicycles, Berry and I were still able to achieve the satisfaction that we sought for because we each have developed our own distinct definition of satisfaction. Nevertheless, by not strictly seeking for convenience and comfort, Berry and I were able to turn hassles into opportunities that establish our own legacy and inspire our future desires. As for me, thanks to the dirty bike work, I now want to become an engineer.
Winterburn, P. "Learning to Trust. On the Treasure Coast, Tech Prep Proves a Trove for Educators Long Divided." Vocational Education Journal 70, no. 4 (April 1995): 28-29, 44.
Murray, Charles. ""What's Wrong with Vocational School?"." Practical Argument: A Text and Anthology. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2011. 631-634. Print.
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
Murray, Charles. “What’s wrong with Vocational School?” Practical Argument. Ed. Lauren G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. Pg. 632. Print.
Porfeli, E. J. (2009). Hugo Munsterberg and the ORIGINS OF vocational Guidance. Concrete Mixers, Cengage Learning.
John Taylor Gatto, in his essay “Against School: How Public Education Cripples our Kids, and why”, argues that the contemporary purpose of education in public schools is to produce “harmless electorate,” “a servile labor force,” and “mindless consumers” (28). According to Gatto, he is blaming public schools by explain that the purpose of education is to shape students to certain expectations and habits without their interests. He argues that students “want to be doing something real” (Gatto 23). Also, He explains that they produce a manageable working class and “mindless consumers” (27-28). His point is that students want to learn something new that help them in their life better than actual books from school which don’t apply their interests and their experience (23). So he recommends home-schooling as option to schools (24). Gatto claims that contemporary schools “adopted one of the very worst aspect...
Although education has become readily available to millions of people in the modern world, many people are still forced to work blue-collar jobs because of their circumstances. While blue-collar jobs may be viewed in society as a “low intelligence”, unskilled labor, it is my belief that such careers require their own form of knowledge and offer an experience that cannot be obtained working white-collar careers. Additionally, those who are capable of working blue-collar jobs may have an easy time finding other careers compared to those educated because their skills are already developed whereas educated people may not have any viable work skills already developed and only retain their academic knowledge which they may or may not be able to convert into work skills. However, even though I may sound biased towards blue-collar career, I still acknowledge those who have the courage and perseverance to work towards a white-collar career path. White-collar careers are difficult and specific in their requirements, but there is just as much thought and skill to be put into blue-collar jobs. In Mike Rose’s Blue Collar Brilliance, he attempts to show the audience how a blue-collar career has its own intelligence and skill through the usage of visuals, examples, and written language.
While traditional societies relied on ascribed characteristics to determine an individual’s role in society, modern societies use the education system as a means to sort individuals on the basis of achievement, using measures such as grades, test scores, and work ethic to guide high-achieving students into jobs that recognize and utilize their skills, and low-achieving students into jobs that are less skill-demanding. For example, a high-school student with high-grades, high test scores, and a strong work ethic will be readily accepted into colleges and universities and afforded with opportunities to pursue more intellectually demanding occupations, but a high-school student with low-grades, low test-scores, and a low-to-moderate work ethic will not be accepted into college, and rather, must enter the workforce with only a high school degree, limiting his career options to categories that require low-to-average cognitive skills. Thus, the education system ensures that only the most qualified individuals end up in challenging occupations, directly serving the needs of industrial society. Specifically, functionalists argue that education as a system of role differentiation is beneficial in two ways. Firstly, it is able to address
Wills, P. (1977) Learning to Labour: How working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Hampshire: Gower Publishing.