Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How could an increase in carbon dioxide levels affect ocean life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Carbon Cycle is a major component of the Biogeochemistry of the planet. Across the Lithosphere and Biosphere, carbon plays a large role in the creation of biomass as well as decomposition. The carbon cycle in the hydrosphere, particularly in the oceans, is not as well known. We do know, however, that oceans play a critical role in the carbon cycle because it acts as a large sink of carbon as it is rapidly exchanged with the atmosphere. The carbon cycle in the oceans involves both organic compounds and inorganic compounds. The distribution of these carbon forms are then largely controlled by the Solubility and Biological Pumps. The Solubility Pump works because of the fact that CO2 is more than twice as soluble in cold water than warm water. This allows carbon to be removed from the atmosphere at the poles, and then pumped into the deep ocean that contains this similar cold, high-density water. The Biological Pump is driven by the biota in the oceans. When CO2 is absorbed from the atmosphere into the oceans it is converted into Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC). At the ocean’s surface, the primary production of marine phytoplankton then converts this DIC into organic material. Certain phytoplankton also have the ability to combine dissolved calcium with dissolved carbonate to create Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3). This calcium carbonate is used to make up the hard shell coatings of many marine organisms from small plankton such as coccolithophores and phytoplankton, to larger organisms such as mollusks, crustaceans, and echinoderms. The biological pump can mostly be explained as the cycling of these organisms and their shells. When an organisms dies, the fixed carbon from its soft or hard tissue is mostly contained in the upper lev... ... middle of paper ... ...on of drawing CO2 from the atmosphere into the deep oceans. As always, much more research needs to be done on this CO2 removal option and better determine the positive and negative effects. It has been proven that the carbon cycle is essential to the Earth’s Biogeochemical cycles, but much is still to be learned about the processes that go on in the Earth’s oceans. Whether it be through natural transference from the atmosphere, or anthropogenic pumping, the CO2 levels in the oceans are increasing. Many studies have taken place to try and understand the effects that this increase will have on oceans and its biogeochemical cycling, and most have proven to be negative. These negative effects, such as dissolution of calcium carbonates and hypercapnia on water breathing organisms, can have long term effects on populations, species and the overall food web of the ocean.
According to a scientists in the video, if all of the carbon that sits at the bottom of the ocean were released back into the atmosphere, the amount of carbon currently in our atmosphere would double1. The scientists in the video explains that they know carbon exists down at the ocean’s depths because marine life that dies will sink to the bottoms of the ocean to decay producing this organic carbon1. This is important to know because it is such an important system, that without these phytoplankton at the start of the process that brings carbon to the ocean floor, then the atmosphere would contain two times its carbon
Cellular respiration and photosynthesis are important in the cycle of energy to withstand life as we define it. Cellular respiration and photosynthesis have several stages in where the making of energy occurs, and have diverse relationships with organelles within the eukaryotic cell. These processes are central in how life has evolved.
The reduction in photosynthesising biomass led to an increased reliance on the Worlds other carbon sink, Oceans. Between 26-44% of CO2 in the atmosphere is absorbed by oceans by photosynthesising organisms, mainly phytoplankton (Archer, D. and Pierrehumbert, R., 2011), seawater chemically reacts with aqueous Carbon Dioxide, one of the end products is Hydrogen ions (H+) (NOAA, 2013). The increased concentration of H+ results in the ocean becoming more acidic, since pH is determined by concentration of Hydrogen ions.
Throughout world civilization, numerous empires have dominated geographical areas with powerful military forces, effective rulers and strong economy’s. However, majority of the worlds empires have declined after centuries of dominance. The most significant similarity in all of the worlds empires is the greed of expansion. History has proven this significance to result in the falling of great empires. When empires fall, new ones are established and this is the process known as the dynastic cycle. The dynastic cycle is based off the different dynasties that once ruled China, however, the process can be used with the rise, fall and replacement of other empires. The dynastic cycle has occurred in the once dominant Ottoman empire, that dominated in Europe and the Middle East for nearly 500 years and also the Russian empire (1721-1917).
With carbon dioxide levels continuing to rise over the past few decades (fig. 1) and now into the future, concern has been brought to what is happening to the carbonate chemistry of the oceans. Because of these changes in chemistry, the ocean is becoming more acidic. Along with climate change, ocean acidification may be one of the greatest threats to our planet. The higher the ocean’s acidity level goes, the lower the calcium carbonate levels will drop. Even though this is a big scale issue, my goal is to focus on and underline what these changes will mean for the marine life that depend on the calcium carbonate in seawater. I will go in depth with specific regards to a study regarding pteropods or sea butterflies.
In absence of calcium carbonate, coral and shellfish can’t survive. The ecosystem of ocean depends on these organisms because they offer a large source of food at the bottom of the food chain. They need to be abundant in order t...
Some studies have found “that atmospheric CO2 concentration is approximately 383 parts per million by volume (ppmv), a level not seen in at least 650,000 years, and it is projected to increase by 0.5% per year throughout the 21st century.” (Guinotte) “This is because…the ocean absorbs about a third of fossil fuel emissions, but this amount is likely to increase to 90% in the future.” (Bralower) As a result, “the chemistry of the world's oceans is changing at a rate not seen for 65 million years, with far-reaching implications for marine biodiversity and food security, according to a new United Nations study...” (Knight) “…This change is cause for serious concern [for] many marine organisms…, [because they] may not be able to adapt quickly enough to survive these changes.” (Guinotte)
Carbon sinks have been a hot topic surrounding global climate change. To understand this debate it is first essential to understand what carbon sinks are and what they do. Plants have the natural ability to soak up carbon dioxide from atmosphere, storing it as carbon. In relation to global climate change, plants, especially trees, can help to absorb some of the carbon dioxide that humans have emitted into the atmosphere. This becomes one possible solution in mitigating climate change. As with many possible solutions to climate change, there are positive and negative sides of carbon sinks as a mitigation option. There is also quite a divergence of viewpoints between countries. The issue of carbon sinks continues to be debated today. Is this an area in which consensus and cooperation can occur? Unfortunately, this has just been another area in which there has been controversy in global environmental politics. After an in depth look at the negative and positive aspects of carbon sinks in relation to global climate change, it seems at this time the negative aspects outweigh the positive. Due to scientific uncertainty, an inadequate monitoring and measuring system, as well as a lack of rules and guidelines, the use of carbon sinks will prove to be more of a problem than a solution to the global climate change problem.
Oceans are such so vast that people underestimate the impact their actions —seeming so insignificant— have on them. Humans have by and large taken the oceans for granted; not considering how important a healthy ocean is to our survival. A popular mind-set is that the oceans are a bottomless supply of fish, natural resources, and an infinite waste dump. There are myriad reasons why the oceans should be saved and the most obvious one is marine life. With 71% of the Earth being covered by water, it is obvious that sea creatures are predominant form of life, making up 80% of the species of life on Earth. However, as important as marine life is, that is not the only reason why saving the oceans is crucial. The ocean floor provides natural resources such as, oil, natural gas, petroleum, minerals, medications, and ingredients for foods and products. The economic benefits of the oceans are huge and significant, as well. Fishing and fish products have provided employment to 38 million people and have generated about $124 billion in economic benefits. However, oceans are on the verge of crisis, marine life, natural resources, transportation, the economy, and important ingredients are at risk due to overfishing, pollution, and acidification. Thus, in this essay I will argue that, oceans are not impervious to human activity and threatening the health of the ocean threatens the health of humanity, since oceans key to our survival.
...ology, but presumably they can indeed not offset the cost incurred in carbon storage. Hence overall the economics are negatively contributed (36). Although this doesn’t factor-in significantly in the growth or fall of CO2-EOR projects still it has reasonable contribution in putting a foundation for the future of such a technology.
These results agree with the hypothesis that our “untouched and super-productive world” is affecting marine life ecosystems (Vannela, 2012). All of these results combined confirm the overall hypothesis that pollution is getting worse in the ocean and more marine life ecosystems are being affected, but there
Plankton are marine microorganisms that live in various aquatic environments. The term “plankton” may include organisms such as protists, bacteria, as well as small plants and animals. Plankton move by drifting through water; they are also are photosynthetic organisms, meaning they absorb sunlight in order to obtain energy. According to NOAA, “Most phytoplankton are buoyant and float in the upper part of the ocean, where sunlight penetrates the water. Phytoplankton also require inorganic nutrients such as nitrates, phosphates, and sulfur which they convert into proteins, fats, and carbohydrates” (NOAA, 2009).
"China Plans to Regulate Some of Its Carbon Emissions for the First Time Ever." Smithsonian. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.
causing more carbon dioxide to be released into the atmosphere. Once this process starts, it is
Have you ever wondered if plankton are really that important to us? Before this lab, I never even thought about plankton, or how they even contribute to us. Phytoplankton are able to convert carbon dioxide into carbohydrates and oxygen used for life (through photosynthesis), and they account for about 95% of the ocean’s primary productivity, while providing about half on Earth.