Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canada health care policy
Canada health care system strengths and weaknesses
Canada health care system strengths and weaknesses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Canada health care policy
In this day and age, the Canadian healthcare system is characterized by a fast-paced industrial pursuit to distribute treatments, often in the form of pharmaceuticals, that focus on the individual’s ailment rather than the person as a whole. Consequently, our healthcare system is at an all time low. Patients, the major stakeholders in all of this, are losing trust in the very system supposedly dedicated to saving them. “This year’s wait time—the longest ever recorded in this survey’s history—is 115% longer than in 1993, when it was just 9.3 weeks…It is estimated that, across the 10 provinces, the total number of procedures for which people are waiting in 2016 is 973,505.” (Barua and Ren 2016). Evident from this, one of the biggest issues our …show more content…
“Research has demonstrated that culture and ethnicity are important to individual and community health because they influence an individual’s interaction with the health care system, their acceptance of and participation in preventative health programs and services, their lifestyle choices, and their access to health information.” (NAHO, 2008). Thus, by involving the patient in the many decision-making processes, reaching out to them as an individual, and recognizing their ethnic and cultural needs, the healthcare system creates a platform for trust. In the long run this may not only benefit the individual, as they spread a message promoting the services they received. Finally, Locality Development rests on the idea that people can and want to work together and when they do, certain tangible advantages can occur. At an industrial level the Canadian Healthcare system has prioritized professional salary increase, and authority over systematic change, specific patient needs and involvement. By utilizing a new approach both in the clinic and the boardroom, government officials, patients and medical professionals may all directly benefit. These benefits include a reduction in individuals feeling worthless, dependant, alienated, apathy, cynicism, and …show more content…
In order to integrate different ways of knowing, it is most important to allow those in possession of the knowledge the time and respect they deserve. Locality development indicates we should inspire, guide, persuade, and teach. However, it is also important to recognize that this information must be taken willingly as using the locality model, community developers don’t force change but provide the tools for change. Thus, the community developer will teach and what is accepted will be what is changed. Therefore, to ensure change is more readily accepted, community developers must make change look advantageous to the community. Currently, the industry is capitalizing on the misappropriation of traditional knowledge.” (Turi, 2016). “When you take it [naturally occurring resource], out of traditional context, you don’t know its full effects.” (Turi, 2016). Many medicines are now manufactured in laboratories and factory settings. Thus, it would be important to put forward the risks associated with these chemically developed drugs and highlight the advantages indigenous medicine brings to out health. Through this, the advantages of indigenous values are put forth and it is more likely change will be accepted and
Racial and ethnic inequalities in healthcare results in non-white patients receiving lower quality care that White patients. Additionally, people who speak limited English encounter more communication issues with doctors and nurses that people whose primary language is English. (AHRQ, 2011). Consequently, as people with chronic conditions utilize more healthcare services, they are more likely to complain of issues with the doctor-patient relationship. They feel as though they are not able to participate in their care, their doctors do not allow them to contribute to their medical decisions and they feel like doctors are not disclosing all information related to care. People who encounter this type of cultural ignorance become dissatisfied with their treatment and overall healthcare experience and are at high risk for negative
The Saskatchewan heath care system is made up of several provincial, regional and local organizations, which provide the people their basic right to reasonable health care (“Health Systems,” 2014). Not having enough health care providers seem to be a problem, which Canada as a whole has struggled with (“College of Family,” 2014). The shortages of medical providers have lead to major discrepancies in the level of patient care between major urban centers and rural areas (Howlett, 2013). In the case of Saskatchewan many communities are facing this challenge, not only rural areas but also the capital city of the province (“Saskatchewan ER,” 2013). Stats Canada has showed that the number of physicians is at a historic high, yet Saskatchewan still face shortages (Howlett, 2013).
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
In this paper, there will be a comparative analysis to the United States (U.S.) healthcare system and Canadians healthcare system highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of both.
A Canadian Dermatologist who once worked in the United States breaks down the pros and cons of Canada’s health care system and explains why he thinks the Canadian system is superior to America’s. Canada runs a single payer health care system, which means that health care is controlled by the government rather than private insurance companies. One of the main pros of the Canadian health care system is that everyone is insured. He says that in the province of Ontario, the Ministry of Health insures all of its citizens, all important health needs such as physician visits, home nursing and physical therapy are covered. Since every resident is covered under the government plan the problem of patients being turned away due to lacking medical coverage
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
Health care providers not knowing their surrounding community impacts the way they provide health care to a patient. I hope to use my background in community work with underrepresented populations and the qualities I gained to hopefully reduce and someday diminish the concern that health care isn’t keeping up with the demographics of the surrounding community. The third health care concern I will talk about is another near and dear to me which is the severely low quality health care women in developing countries receive.
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
In Canada, access to health care is ‘universal’ to its citizens under the Canadian Health Care Act and this system is considered to the one of the best in the world (Laurel & Richard, 2002). Access to health care is assumed on the strong social value of equality and is defined as the distribution of services to all those in need and for the common good and health of all residents (Fierlbeck, 2011). Equitable access to health care does not mean that all citizens are subjected to receive the same number of services but rather that wherever the service is provided it is based on need. Therefore, not all Canadians have equal access to health services. The Aboriginal peoples in Canada in particular are a population that is overlooked and underserved
Canada’s Health Care system is gradually growing to be a major concern in today’s society with providing Canadians with the standard of care they deserve. Health care has become an issue because of the shortage of doctors in Canada; many of them are either going to the U.S.A. or going to other countries to practice in hospitals and clinics. The earning cap imposed by the government has forced doctors to work fewer hours than are necessary to serve the public. Many Canadians are without a doctor to help them with their needs and emergency rooms are filled to capacity with no available beds for those who have to be admitted to the hospital. Waiting time for specialist and specialty tests have become so long that someone diagnosed with a major illness may die before they can be properly treated. Nurses and others in the medical field are overworked and understaffed because the government has made cut-backs to the Health Care System. We live in a country where our health care is a privilege to have, but getting ill is becoming a problem if there is not adequate facilities and professionals to care for the sick. Today’s society is aging longer than ever and will need health care longer than before; patients recovering from hospital stays are being sent home more quickly than ever before, and terminal patients are being sent home for their last days.
The diversity among the U.S. population is very large and continue to grow, especially the Hispanic group. More so, health promotion can be defined or perceived in many ways depends on the minority group and their culture beliefs. As health care provider, recognizing and providing cultural competent is very important. In addition, assessing the health disparities among the minority group and teaching them how to promote good health will benefit along the way. Furthermore, health care providers have the role to promote good health but without proper education and acknowledge cultural awareness will be impossible to accomplish.
An individual’s culture and belief may significantly impact the type of services they require. In addition, it may affect the time, place, and method in the delivery of health care
For one, private healthcare has more accurate information available. This is due to the fact that the current health-care system in Canada is too big for the federal government to be able to accurately and effectively handle all of the patient’s information. This being the responsibility of smaller medical companies would be more efficient. Compared to public health, which has different wait times in each province, the way private healthcare is structured may help wait times be more consistent and lowered due to multiple companies handling health care. This is crucial in helping Canadians who are in dire medical situations. While many Canadians think that public health care is better for Canada, other Canadians think that the option to have private health insurance should be allowed if it provides better options and opportunities for the patient . In this case, private healthcare could be a very viable option for Canadian citizens. Overall, private healthcare may outdo public healthcare due to private healthcare being the more efficient
Intro Occupational injury, illness, and fatality are an unfortunate feature of any labour force globally. Both the international Labour Organisation (ILO) and World Health Organisation (WHO) have estimated that 5-7% of all fatalities in developed countries are the result of either work-related illness or occupational injury (1,2). These work-related illnesses and occupational injuries place a burden on health systems and also on economic systems in the form of lost work-time and decreased productivity. Global burden of lost work time The economic burden and cost of work injuries and illnesses are carried by three main groups; employers, workers, and the community. Employers face the cost of staff turnover and training of new staff, there
Every year, approximately 230, 000 to 400. 00 deaths are caused by iatrogenic deaths ( in other words, these are deaths caused by wrong medical treatments). Two of the prominent yet some what contrasting types of medicine are, Ayurveda, the Indian traditional medicine, and Modern (aka western) medicine. Both of these have their own processes and methods of healing, which over the years have created their own followers. While Ayurveda addresses the root causes of the disease through identifying the imbalances in the elements, called “Doshas”, it also emphasizes on a spiritual lifestyle which for most people in today's world is a sea change. On the other hand, western medicine addresses the symptoms and provides instant albeit temporary relief for suffering. Needless to say there are more followers of the western medicine due to its immediate impact on subsiding the pain. Out of lack of awareness to the significance of traditional medicine, especially Ayurveda, many doctors and researchers are against the use of Ayurvedic and traditional medicines, which limits the potential of curing certain ailments of patients without additional side effects.