The Butterfly Effect according to Chaos Theory is a concept that states that just like the flap of a butterfly's wings might eventually cause a tornado, any small cause can have a large effect. The term for this already known theory was coined by Edward Lorenz who is well known for the Chaos Theory and Lorenz Attractor. From short stories such as "A Sound of Thunder" to the cult classic "Back to the Future", the Butterfly Effect has always been apart of pop culture in some form. In the 1998 iconic film "Sliding Doors" the main protagonist is shown in parallel of her missing the train, and her getting on the train and the events that occur because of each scenario. The ever so popular video game "Life is Strange" main plot is centered on Max Caulfield who is given the power to rewind time after she tries desperately to save her friend's life. However because her friend did not die when she was supposed to, a storm is now threatening to destroy her hometown and everyone in it so …show more content…
that the universe can be in order like it once was. Not only that but her rewinding of time and changing certain things in the past causes an array of problems to arise in which she has to try and solve. Even in popular children's shows such as "The Amazing World of Gumball" the Butterfly Effect has made an appearance. Movies, Tv shows, novels, and video games have always been in love with the Butterfly Effect and for good reason too. The thought that moving a single grain of sand could cause an unimaginable effect on the earth, or that killing a single bee could cause the end of humanity is simply intriguing isn't it?! It's an extremely extraordinary phenomenon that I can spend hours upon hours of my day researching, talking about or just trying to understand more of. It's everywhere and can be seen every day not just in movies. That's what makes it so interesting. Though it does not happen right away, and when it does we may not notice it, every day people like you and me can and more than likely have experienced this occurrence. A simple action such as waking up 30 minutes earlier could be what lands someone a promotion at work. Giving a homeless person a dollar could be what saves your life. The Butterfly Effect is so amazing that it scratched that part of my mind and I am constantly craving new information or new facts to learn.
When that need arrives I can always count on the internet to keep me interested. I can spend hours on end searching the internet from social medias to Wikipedia to websites like OpenMind looking for more and more information or people that simply share my love of the topic. If there are questions that can't be answered online about the Butterfly Effect, I can turn to my high school biology teachers who, both have a love for all things scientific. They always try their best to provide answers to the 10,000 questions I may have. A simple action such as waking up 30 minutes on Monday can be what lands you a promotion on Friday. Giving a homeless person a dollar could be what saves your life. Each and every one of our actions no matter how trivial they may seem can and will affect our future and it's terrifyingly amazing to think
about.
“Chaos theory proves that unpredictability is built into our daily lives.”(Crichton 313). Ian Malcolm’s words resolve the book, Jurassic Park, in a very absolute way. Throughout the book, Malcolm, spoke about chaos theory and his self proclaimed “Malcolm Effect” to explain his reasoning in his predictions. Ian Malcolm had predicted the demise of Jurassic Park even before its opening, as well as its multiple problems and difficulties. Malcolm’s theory is evidenced countless times throughout the story of Jurassic Park; dinosaurs are breeding, dinosaurs are escaping, and systems fail.
According to Edward Lorenz (founder of the Chaos Theory) chaos is the science of surprises, of the nonlinear and the unpredictable. It teaches us to expect the unexpected. Chaos Theory deals with nonlinear things that are effectively impossible to predict or control, like turbulence, weather, the stock market, our brain states, and so on. (Lorenz 1995: 187)
If a single butterfly, despite its size, can cause such an impact, how much can a human being impact the world with his/her deeds/actions? Though Lorenz’s idea appeared ridiculous and was taken as a joke by the conference attendees, his idea is very significant today such that it has become a staple of science fiction. A single act of good or bad can impact the future in unimaginable
As the credits roll we see the blinds of a three-pane window slowly being lifted up, after they finish the camera moves forward revealing to our gaze the reality on the other side of the open window. It faces the back of many other buildings, the courtyard they enclose, and a sliver view of the backstreet. More importantly, it faces many other windows just like it. Behind each one of those there are people, going about their day, doing mundane tasks, unaware of being observed. In his 1954 movie “Rear Window” Alfred Hitchcock invites us to engage in the guilt free observation of the lives of others. The main character, photographer L. B. Jefferies, is home stuck with a broken leg encased in a cast that goes all the way to his hip, providing the perfect excuse for him to amuse himself in this hot Manhattan summer by engaging in the seemly harmless act of looking into the many windows he can see from his back apartment. Casual, harmless, voyeurism has been part of the human behavior for ages but in the sixty years since the movie was released it has gained increasing traction. Reality television, Movies, TV shows, YouTube, blogging, Instagram and Facebook are examples of modern tools that allow us to engage in the observation of others while remaining protectively hidden from their returning gaze. In its essence the casual voyeuristic actions we engage in while observing others when using these new media tools follows the same pattern of behavior described in the movie, with the same positive and negative consequences. Casual voyeurism distinguishes itself from pathological voyeurism, which is characterized by a preference in obtaining sexual gratification only from spying others, by the removal of the sexual component from the equat...
Gone with the Wind is a classic fictional love story that depicts life in the old south before, during and after the Civil war. The book was originally written in 1936 by Margret Mitchell, the movie adaptation was released in 1939, directed by Victor Fleming, and staring Clark Gable and Vivian Leigh. Ms. Mitchell grew up listening to Civil war stories from confederate veterans. It was reported that they told her everything; everything that is, except that they had lost the war, she found that out when she was 10 years old. Though the book was written 71 years after the Civil War ended, Ms. Mitchell did her research and appears to have drawn inspiration from those childhood stories that she was told. This is apparent in the detailed description of the clothing, houses, and everyday discussions and interactions of the characters throughout the book. Though not all historically correct most of what is in the book is accurate. During the time the movie was released, “damn” was considered to be vulgar and controversial and they used the term “darkies” to describe the slaves.
What makes a film interesting? What makes it stand out from other films? What makes it unique? The visual design aspects of color and lighting in a film play a major role in giving the film meaning and depth. A lot of thought goes into what colors and lighting should be used that will help convey a mood and theme central to the film. You wouldn’t see dark colors and lighting used in a children cartoon, instead you see bright color and bright lighting. And vice versa; most horror films don’t focus on bright colors and bright lighting. In The Wizard of Oz (Dir. Victor Fleming, 1939) , the director uses bright colors and lighting to portray the moods of happiness, joy and innocence in Dorothy’s life. In contrast, dark colors and lighting that go hand in hand with the evil parts of Oz portray the
Scene Analysis of The Sixth Sense In the film the Sixth Sense a young boy named Cole has paranormal contact with the dead. He can see things that other people cannot. namely the ghosts of the dead walking around him. The scene which I have chosen to analyse to answer my title is the scene where he is at school and brings up facts about what used to go there like people being hanged and eventually he erupts at this former pupil now teacher.
It has been said that one small moment can create large effects; the butterfly effect. For Betty Williams, her small moment occurred on August 10th, 1976 when she witnessed an innocent family get mauled by a runaway car driven by an IRA member in her hometown Belfast, Ireland. Three children were killed and their mother, Anne Maguire, was seriously injured and later committed suicide. Williams was greatly moved by this tragic event. Two days after witnessing the accident, she obtained six thousand signatures on a petition for peace. Later, Williams teamed up with Anne Maguire’s sister to form The Women For Peace, now known as the The Community For Peace. The organization was known for holding mass protests. William’s spearheaded a peaceful march of ten thousand Protestant and Catholic women. The march was diffused by the Irish Army, but it did not stop the movement. The next march was attended by 3,500 people, proving that nonviolent protesting was effective. The loss of three children eventually led one woman to
The scientist Edward Lorenz identified what is known as the butterfly effect. Which states that a single flap of a butterfly wing could conceivably transform storm systems on the opposite side of the world. ...
It teaches us to expect the unexpected. A famous example of chaos theory, referred to as the "butterfly effect, “postulates that the beat of a butterfly's wing could trigger a breath of breeze
...ed me recognize how I have turned out the way I am and that I have the power to change my own future and I hope by taking the initiative to control my anxiety that my actions could influence another to do the same. It may not seem like much, as I am just one person in this world- but if anything, Griffin’s project has revealed that it only takes the action of one individual to change the life of another.
Chaos Theory has made quite an impact on the modern world. Even in its infancy it has been a powerful tool in shaping popular thought of the natural world. Once dismissed as a theoretical science with no practical application, chaos theory has blossomed into an intricate and beautiful pattern, much like the fractals it deals with. Chaos theory is a complex combination of math and physics, but with its mastery comes a new era in the human understanding of the world around us.
While we live our lives, we often wonder whether the things we do will impact the future; and sometimes, our actions end up for the better and other times, for the worse. This “little-cause big-effect” idea we have is what we call the butterfly effect. Like those speeches organizations give when trying to get you to donate money, the butterfly effect tells us that the things we do at the beginning, even the tiny ones, have an inexpressible impact in the world later in time. In fact, the butterfly effect lives up to its name pretty well. Its discovery lead to the popularization of the Chaos Theory, the loss of the true message from its discoverer, and a impact in the way weather is forecasted and the entertainment world. In this sense, the
Chaos Theory is a relatively new theory to the Social Work practice. This theory suggests that systems are constantly changing. As explained by Bussolari and Goodell (2009), Henri Ponicare tried to show that though systems are simple, they may produce unexpected behavior. One of the main concepts of the chaos theory is the butterfly effect. The butterfly effect simply sates that any small change “can greatly alter the emergent pattern” or result (Bussolari & Goodell, 2009). The origin of the butterfly effect is scientific. It comes from Edward Lorenz, a meteorologist who found that a slight decimal change in his calculations drastically changed his computer output (Bussolari & Goodell, 2009). For example, in the short story, “A Sound of Thunder” Ray Bradbury tells a story of a hunter named Eckels who travels back in time and inadvertently steps on a butterfly. When Eckles gets back to the future, he finds that things have changed drastically such as the results of a recent election (Bradbury, 1952). A seemingly minute change such as crushing a butterfly significantly altered the future.
However, the long-term future cannot be predicted due to the same reasons as weather can only be predicted only three weeks into the future. The stock market is a nonlinear dynamical system as it contains positive and negative feedback. Positive feedback such as when you make a profit after investing in the stock market causes people to again invest money into the stock market leading to more buying which raises price. Highly complex systems are not always chaotic instead they will behave predictably for a certain period and then seemingly randomly ill shift into chaotic behaviour. These types of systems can be mapped using simple chaotic systems which often exhibit patterns called strange attractors which demonstrate the system jumping into different modes of behaviour. The chaos in stock markets are caused due to the human psychology of trading which is never completely rational due to many outside factors. By analysing the statistical data, it is possible to find fractal which are infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales. These fractals are created by repeating straightforward process over and over in an ongoing loop and due to the simplicity of the fractals they can be used to predict the short-term future. The long-term prediction is practically impossible just like weather due to similar reasons as well. The butterfly effect means that variables that seemingly have a very minute effect on the overall outcome of the stock market slowly have an increased amount of effect in the outcome. Therefore, the short-term future of the stock market can be predicted using the Lorenz attractors and fractals however the lack of information causes long term predictions to be practically