The Botany Of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View Of The World

891 Words2 Pages

In Michael Pollen’s The Botany of Desire: A Plant’s-Eye View of the World, there are consistent contrasts between the world today and the world of Ancient Greece. His comparison between the disorder of Dionysus and the order of Apollo in nature emphasizes the importance of plants’ ability to satisfy human desire as well as the reciprocal. It is not a singular organism that influences one or the other; plants influence animals as we influence them. However, through our desire for sweetness, beauty, intoxication and control, humans have created a cycle in which our wants affect plants’ evolution and plants’ ways of life control our way of life.
While conducting research for his book, Pollen grew genetically modified potatoes, called NewLeafs, …show more content…

Pollen claims that natural selection was likely to favor the flower that had “an astonishing array of devices—visual, olfactory, and tactile” (69) to attract the attention of mammals, insects and birds. This attraction leads to greater fitness of the tulip population and adaptations that appeal to mobile organisms. According to Pollen, this strive for perfect Apollonian order only lasts for so long until the “Dionysian pull of things as they really are” (99) begins to overrule. For example, instead of creating clones to reproduce, tulips are pollinated when bees cover themselves in pollen, thus distributing the flowers’ genes. In another comparison to Greek mythology, Pollen claims the bees are to Odysseus’s crew as the flowers are to Circe (72). The sorceress put the crew under a spell for her own benefit similar to the way the flowers lure the bees in order to “effectively [disseminate] the flower’s genes” (70) and …show more content…

Pollen mentions an unpredictable windstorm at the Apollonian unchaotic Versailles garden ruining many centuries-old paintings to draw out the possibility that a “less emphatically ordered” (184) and Dionysian garden structure could have prevented the destruction of such valuable artifacts. This conclusion highlights the distinct link between disorder and stability. As seen in the microbiome unit, large amounts of disturbance cause instability in ecosystems. The same is true for a complete absence of disturbance. However, an intermediate amount of disturbance leads to the most stable environment because the organisms are able to learn and adapt to these new occurrences. An “invitation to a new disorder” (185) is what allows for the middle ground between the two extremes of disturbance to be possible, thus permitting the greatest stability. A community with many disturbances, such as a person who washes his hands too frequently, can be a parallel to the “garden’s perfect geometries” (184) without any disorder. Similarly, the introduction of a single pathogen causes the person to become very ill because he doesn’t have the necessary microbes to fight the pathogen due to the frequency of disturbance. The community is completely without fault meaning that one minor disruption in the order causes the devastation of the entire community, which was true at Versailles. Therefore, this suggests that

Open Document