In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, it is evident that people act differently when put in certain situations. For example, when good people are put in a bad environment, they blur moral lines justifying the “greater good”. This can be observed through the actions of most of the boys, who misuse their power and treat people such as Piggy, Simon, and the littluns unfairly. A large portion of the biguns mistreat Piggy, Simon, and the littluns.
Throughout the novel, Piggy is constantly mistreated by the biguns. Piggy is an easy target, so they treat him poorly without thinking about how it may negatively affect him. One example is the first time the boys light the fire, they use Piggy’s specs without asking him for permission. “‘His specs –
…show more content…
use them as burning glasses!’ Piggy was surrounded before he could back away.” (Golding 40). Piggy cannot see without his glasses but despite that, Jack still grabs the glasses off of Piggy’s face without his approval. Piggy repeatedly demands for his glasses back, but they ignore him and go about lighting the fire. Although the intentions surrounding this act of theft were for the benefit of the whole group, they still treat Piggy as though his feelings do not matter nor do they let him have a say in any decisions. Later in the novel, Jack and his tribe steal Piggy’s glasses again to light a fire. Piggy is blind without his glasses – illustrating his weakness, all the while showcasing Jack’s assertion of power. The first example of physical violence on the island is when Jack “stuck his fist into Piggy’s stomach.” (Golding 75). This confirms that no matter what Piggy does, Jack always belittles him. Jack takes this a step too far by also breaking Piggy’s glasses and leaving him with only one clear lens. Piggy repeats exactly what Ralph says to Jack about letting the fire go out, but Jack only punches Piggy. Due to his admiration for Ralph – Jack’s supposed ‘enemy’ – Piggy is detested by Jack. Instead of confronting his enemy Ralph, physically, Jack takes out all his anger on Piggy clearly because of an apparent gap between Ralph and Piggy’s levels of physical strength. This is an act of bullying and it shows Jack’s true nature of violence and how he abuses his power on characters he feels inferior to him. After the hunters hunt their first piglet, they celebrate by chanting and eating its meat altogether. When Jack gives each person a piece, he skips Piggy because he “had meant to leave him in doubt, as an assertion of power.” (Golding 78). After Jack does this, Simon offers Piggy his meat making Jack furious. Although Jack says that he will not provide Piggy with meat since he did not hunt, he offers Ralph and Simon a share, who did not hunt either. The real reason behind Jack’s abuse of Piggy is because he wants to punish him for the fight they had earlier, and to show Piggy that he will never be able to outsmart him. As stated in the quote, Jack also does this to show Piggy that he is better than him and that he does not fear him. It is also another example of Jack asserting power over Piggy. Another reason he does this is to show the boys that just as he provided them with meat, he can also take it away. Jack uses Piggy as an example – again, because he views Piggy as the weakest link. Clearly, Jack believes he is superior to Piggy and harasses him. Piggy is mistreated by one of the biguns, Jack. Simon is known as the figure with a vast imagination but does not say much.
However, when he does speak, it is often incredibly important to the event taking place. The first thing Simon does when he meets Ralph and Piggy is faint and that is when Jack Merridew says, “‘He’s always throwing a faint’” (Golding 16). Jack does not attempt to help Simon due to the fact that he has seen it several times, causing his lack of care towards the situation. Now that the boys are on the island with no adults, Jack feels like he can rule over them and do whatever he wishes. All of the boys are following their leader’s – Jack’s – footsteps and they too do not assist Simon when he faints. During another instance, when the boys are having an assembly to discuss the beast, Simon says that “‘maybe it’s only us.’” (Golding 96). This irritates the boys greatly because Simon never speaks, but when he finally does, it is quite foolish in their opinion. Piggy also yells insults at Simon. This is an injustice because they do not grant Simon the chance to explain and instead they choose to ignore his sentiments. This also plays on the theme of inequality within the group because each boy has their own opinion, however due to Simon’s lack of popularity within the group, he is afforded less a right to speak than the more popular, Jack. The group only views Simon for his outward appearance and not his inner-self. Simon is viewed to be weak by the boys because he faints frequently, a symptom of his …show more content…
epilepsy. However, he is truly intelligent and it is later confirmed in the novel that what Simon says, is true. By the end of the novel, the boys have turned into savages, which has caused them to be blinded by all their actions. In the final reenactment of the killing of the piglet, the boys are so keen on the dance that when Simon crawls into the center, they mistake him for the beast and kill him. “Simon’s dead body moved towards the open sea” (Golding 170). Evidently, an injustice because the boys are so blinded by their actions that they kill Simon, the most innocent person on the island. The boys would have also done this if it were anyone else because by this point they have now lost all sight of themselves. However, if the victim were someone Jack cared about, such as Roger, punishment would have been seen as a repercussion. Ralph is the only one who wants to talk about what happens, but even Sam and Eric lie and say that they left early and Piggy comes up with five excuses, one of which he blames Simon for his own death. Simon is treated unfairly by almost all the biguns. The littluns play a minor role in the Lord of the Flies.
The littluns are just starting to learn how to live on the island and are beginning to forget their former ways. They built castles and decorated them tirelessly, but Roger, abusing his power, “led the way straight through the castles, kicking them over … Maurice followed, laughing, and added to the destruction.” (Golding 62). This magnifies the inequality spread throughout the island. The littluns have not done anything to Roger nor Maurice, yet they feel superior to them and feel as though they can do anything because there are no adults present, meaning there are no consequences. This is an injustice because it is a form of bullying and the littluns have put an exceeding amount of effort in their castles to make them appealing. Although Maurice immediately feels guilty about what he has done, he makes an excuse right away and heads off to the beach. Golding states that the littluns keep on playing with their sand castles, this proves that violence has become a natural occurrence on the island. In chapter 5, Ralph calls an assembly to talk about the beast, and to comfort the littluns by letting them know that there is nothing to be afraid of. Jack, on the other hand, accuses them for not helping, building, or hunting – stating that they are “a lot of cry babies and sissies” (Golding 88). This alone shows how Ralph is a better leader than Jack when it comes to helping and respecting the littluns. Ralph listens to
their troubles and attempts to be of assistance to them while Jack does absolutely nothing and just scares them even more. The littluns do not understand the events that happen on the island, all they want is to be assured there is no beast and to go back home. Jack does not listen to their problems and all he does is make them feel terrible about themselves. However, his job as a bigun is to be a caretaker to the littluns and as a leader he should not yell at his followers. This is seen as unfairness because Jack does not understand that they are children and they have the right to be afraid of the beast. During the second mock killing, the boys are dancing, chanting, and poking at Robert with their spears that they eventually begin hurting him. Robert quickly drags himself out of the game and suggests that they use a real pig next time, but Jack says they should “‘Use a littlun’… and everybody laughed” (Golding 126), The fact that they laugh about what Jack says is more chilling than them actually doing that because it shows their descent into savagery. Jack does not mind sacrificing one of his own followers just for pleasure. Using one of the littluns is an injustice because Jack abuses the fact that they still have not matured and that they do not understand what is happening on the island. The biguns abuse the littluns’ intellect. In conclusion, biguns such as Jack, Roger, and Maurice misuse their power and treat people such as Piggy, Simon, and the littluns unfairly. Piggy’s glasses are stolen numerous times, he is punched by Jack, and is not given an equal share of the meat hunted. Simon is not cared for or listened to and he ends up being killed by the group. The littluns are not listened to by Jack, their sand castles are ruined by Roger and Maurice, and their lack of maturity is abused by the biguns. A great quantity of the biguns mistreat Piggy, Simon, and the littluns.
Simon is a lot different from all of the other boys not just because he can do spells but because he constantly expressed concern of the other boys. All other boys have different reactions to his fainting spell, like Piggy. Piggy falls to the floor and his glasses fall off his face. Piggy doesn't know what happened and can’t get up quite yet. All the other boys understand what kind of spells Simons doing. But they still tend to have effect such as illusions and hallucinations. Simon and the boys relate in some way, half of it because of the spells simon does.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a novel about human nature and the functions of society. One of the main characters in this novel is Ralph, who is chosen to be the leader of a group of boys. He assigns tasks to the boys and tries to keep them accountable for it. However, the boys begin to slack because they can no longer see the point of these tasks and rules. As a result of the constant slacking the boys soon turned into savages. Ralph’s struggle to maintain order amongst the boys shows how without rules it is human nature to descend into savagery due to the avoidance of authority.
When viewing the atrocities of today's world on television, the starving children, the wars, the injustices, one cannot help but think that evil is rampant in this day and age. However, people in society must be aware that evil is not an external force embodied in a society but resides within each person. Man has both good qualities and faults. He must come to control these faults in order to be a good person. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding deals with this same evil which exists in all of his characters. With his mastery of such literary tools as structure, syntax, diction and imagery, The author creates a cheerless, sardonic tone to convey his own views of the nature of man and man’s role within society.
Humans, by nature, are genuinely good people who show compassion and concern for others, right? Well true, if we all lived in a utopian land. Unfortunately, humans are, in fact, evil and easily corrupted by others. In William Golding’s 1954 published Lord of the Flies, the boy’s on the island learn that a peaceful civilization is easily destroyed without cooperation or agreement. The frustration manifested itself, making a transformation of the boys into meat hungry, hunters, who even try to hunt the other boys who don’t follow the pack. Golding analyzes the flaws of human society, directly related to human nature.
Throughout the novel several different characters are introduced to the reader, such as Ralph, Jack, Simon and Piggy. With all these characters presented to the reader, one can get to see into their minds-eye, which allows the reader to analyze their character. In this case one could examine their basic morals and distinguish between the person’s natural instinct to rely on civilization or savagery to solve their problems. The author of the novel, William Golding, had a “first-hand experience of battle line action during World War II” which caused him to realize, “[that] The war alone was not what appalled him, but what he had learnt of the natural - and original- sinfulness of mankind did. It was the evil seen daily as commonplace and repeated by events it was possible to read in any newspaper which, he asserted, were the matter of Lord of the Flies” (Foster, 7-10). This being said by Golding leads one to the central problem in the novel the Lord of the Flies, which can be regarded as the distinction between civility and savagery. This can be seen through the characters that are presented in the novel, and how these boys go from a disciplined lifestyle, to now having to adapt to an unstructured and barbaric one in the jungle.
The lack of civilization and human goodness leads the young children to evils and a bad environment that they have never faced. Simon, a “skinny, vivid boy, (pg. 24)” is a member of Jack’s choir but soon leaves his tribe and joins Ralph because he is not able to deal with the cruel leadership. As all the other characters fail to maintain responsibilities and their commitments to the rules of the island, Simon is the only person who dedicates to them as things begin to fall apart. He is a character with a respectful, spiritual personality and has a human goodness with nature as he deals with the littluns and the older boys. For example, he helps the littluns pick fruit to eat, recovers Piggy’s glasses when they fly off his face, gives Piggy his own share of meat when he was refused a piece and gives ...
Importance of Leadership Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look for the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader.
“I cannot believe there is caste system in society; I cannot believe people are judged on the basis of their prosperity.” No matter how much you’ve got to bring to the table, society will always find a way to put you down and aim for something else whether that something is worst or better than what you have to offer. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding has shown this external conflict several times throughout the story with characters such as Ralph and piggy. The conflict of character vs. society is present in these characters: Ralph, the elected chief of the group of British schoolboys is constantly having to remind the group of the bigger picture; Piggy, ultimately the brain of the
There are many aspects that determine how humans behave around one another. This is shown throughout William Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies. This book is about a group of British boys that are stranded on an island without any adults due to a plane crash. At first, all goes well; the boys cooperate in attempting to maintain the fire signal, gather food and making shelters. However, human nature takes over and their democracy that they have created fails. This leads to the majority of the boys becoming complete savages when the evil within them takes over. Different qualities help determine whether a person is a good or a bad leader. Although, Piggy and Jack have some leadership qualities, Ralph is the best leader.
Piggy’s personality is superego, as he is very judgmental towards those who oppose his views. After Jack’s tribe steals Piggy’s glasses, Piggy attempts to reason with them and get his glasses back. During the altercation, Piggy’s temper escalates and yells at the tribe, “which is better – to be a pack of painted ******* like you are, or to be sensible like Ralph is? (200). Piggy’s personality is heavily influenced by the superego aspect, as he judges everyone in Jack’s tribe. Piggy has a strong dislike towards Jack’s tribe because of how they have become savages. Piggy is Ralphs best friend and believes that getting rescued should be the priority. Nobody in Jack’s tribe shares the same views as Piggy, so Piggy judges them on their decisions. Jacks tribe is full of savages, and they are acting in a way that is not imaginable to Piggy. So due to Piggy's Superego personality, he judges them. Then, Simon acts appropriate in society, because of his Superego personality. Nearing the beginning most of the boys are playing with each other, and nobody seems focused on survival. While Ralph is building the shelters, he makes remarks to the other boys that, “Simon. He helps” (55). Simons personality is superego because, despite all the other boys playing and enjoy their time on the island, Simon is doing what needs to be done. The boys are on an island with no way to
In Lord of the Flies, Golding is able to exemplify intelligence, violence, and leadership, through the behaviors, responses, and actions of Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, respectively. Golding provides insight into the delicate touch-and-go basis of human nature, something that to this day has yet to be fully understood.
As much as everyone would like to believe that all people are inherently good, the illusion of innocence that is often presumed throughout childhood makes the revelation of human nature especially hard to bear. Arthur Koestler said, “Nothing is more sad than the death of an illusion”, and this one is certainly a very hard reality to cope with. In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding tells the story of a group of British schoolboys who crash land on an uninhabited island in the midst of a world war, and how they regress from civilization to savagery. By conveying Ralph’s reactions to the deaths of Simon and Piggy, providing detailed, symbolic imagery of the cliffs and the lagoon, and showing Ralph’s despair at his new understanding
In the novel The Lord of the flies, William Golding illustrates the decline from innocence to savagery through a group of young boys. In the early chapters of The Lord of the Flies, the boys strive to maintain order. Throughout the book however, the organized civilization Ralph, Piggy, and Simon work diligently towards rapidly crumbles into pure, unadulterated, savagery. The book emphasized the idea that all humans have the potential for savagery, even the seemingly pure children of the book. The decline of all civilized behavior in these boys represents how easily all order can dissolve into chaos. The book’s antagonist, Jack, is the epitome of the evil present in us all. Conversely, the book’s protagonist, Ralph, and his only true ally, Piggy, both struggle to stifle their inner
In Lord of the Flies, William Golding expresses the idea that humans are naturally immoral, and that people are moral only because of the pressures of civilization. He does this by writing about a group of boys, and their story of survival on an island. The civilized society they form quickly deteriorates into a savage tribe, showing that away from civilization and adults, the boys quickly deteriorate into the state man was millions of years ago. This tendency is shown most in Jack, who has an animalistic love of power, and Roger, who loves to kill for pleasure. Even the most civilized boys, Ralph and Piggy, show that they have a savage side too as they watch Simon get murdered without trying to save him. Simon, the only one who seems to have a truly good spirit, is killed, symbolizing how rare truly good people are, and how quickly those personalities become corrupted.
“Everybody has good and evil within them. All we're trying to say is that people are not all good or all bad. People are more complicated than you think, and one has to be more knowledgeable about the complexities.” This quotation from Stephen Schwartz establishes that even the best of people can be bitter by their own nature. In the novel, Lord of the Flies, William Golding removes the restraints of society to prove that it is human nature to live primitively and that evil lies within all of us. The sanctions of society begin to deteriorate due to the loss of communication, Jack’s obsession with hunting, and the inhumane nature of Jack and his “tribe”.