Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Importance of Christian Ethics
How religion affects political decisions
Moral justifications of suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Importance of Christian Ethics
I don’t think the Bible condones suicide, but it sounds to me like God doesn’t appreciate folks messing over the lives of little kids. I should probably mix in widows, elderly, disabled, and animals too. The idea that it is suggested that a person is better of tying a 1500kg grinding stone around their necks, then to disabuse the innocent mind of a child or weaker vessel, tells us all we need to know about how God feels about this form of abuse.
Stories like the one(s) uncovered by the Boston Globe team of journalists in Spotlight opens us up to all kinds of reactions and judgments about who the real enemies are. It's not that it's impossible or unfathomable to imagine a person or institution falling short. We all fall short in some way every
…show more content…
Still, the Bible functions as a source of advisement to and for us even in areas of public relations as it pertains to damage control, and internal controls and protocols on how to go about handling both light and weightier matters.
To paraphrase in layman’s terms, if someone, anyone (i.e., a significant other, brother, sister, friend, associate, co-worker, supervisor, a perceived enemy, etc.) offends you in some way, you should go to them first. Don’t talk behind their backs or recklessly confide in someone else before you first confront that person. Obviously, you want to approach them in a manner that’s cordial and concordant. If they receive what you have to say, you’ll more than likely earn their trust and respect. If going to them in private doesn’t work out, then you are instructed to get counsel. That doesn’t mean you should bring in your best friend or running buddy to help you work things out. Counsel should be administered by a professional, neutral party, or some one in your respective circles who both of you would agree is a wise and viable liaison. If that doesn’t work, now you can open things up a bit. In the case of the church, individuals may be brought to bear their souls before a small or large body of
…show more content…
Do we really want the same politics seeping over into organized religion too? I love how Annie Apple, mother of NY Giants cornerback Eli Apple, put it in her Survivin’ America “My Beef with Republican and Democrats” Blog:
“Every presidential election season, Republicans make pro-life the only issue, while Democrats want you to either profess that God doesn't exist or you're not to believe what He clearly says. Democrats want you to deny your faith to walk the line of the party, but who are we without faith in our Creator? Republicans claim to be the God party and morality police, but their hate for President Obama seems stronger than their love for God. Their commitment to deregulation at all cost and often disdain for those who don't look like them or agree with then often nullifies their morality message.
Democrats want to be all things to all people all of the time. You can't be all things to all people all the time. You have to put your foot down every now and then and say heck no. Democrats have become the white walls in a new apartment. Paint whatever color you want and when you leave, make sure it's white again so someone else can paint whatever color he or she wants. That's not reality. Republicans have become less pro-people and more pro-self and politics. Republicans have become the party who's counting on voters love for unborn babies and hate of others to
The Bible is Pro-Choice. Without question, the Bible is overwhelmingly pro-choice. Although the Hebrews were influenced by many of the laws of their Assyrian, Sumerian, and Babylonian neighbors, all of which forbade abortion, the Hebrew scriptures had no laws forbidding abortion, not a single one. This was chiefly because the Hebrews placed a higher value on women than did their neighbors. There are, however, some references to the termination of pregnancy.
The message of political alignment is a vast and varying concept, one that will be debated for as a long as party divisions exist. This divide however exists in not just the Christian community. We begin with the metaphor of a shepherds flock, blindly following what an individual says over ones own thinking. Boyd furthers this concept of alignment and how “many who left sincerely believe there is little ambiguity in how true Christian faith translates into politics. Since God is against abortion, Christians should vote for the pro-life candidate, they believe- and the preacher should say so” (Boyd 2). This blind adherence to one topic, one issue is unfortunately a failure on an intellectual level of all people, whether Christian or not. The
Religion has ingrained itself into mainstream American politics. The current Reform Party and many portions of the Republican party platforms evidence this.
In the eyes of the people the church is one place you are spared from judgment and critique. It is the one place you should feel safe, to express your thoughts and opinions, pray to the higher power in which you believe and your faith resides and be free of society qualms, demands, and realism. In a part
There are justifiable criticisms such being, giving help to the poor and needy, which hold strong Democratic views in which Republicans are not always supportive of. Although Isaiah 10:1-4 it tells us to give justice to the poor and that is not a type of political ideology it is the word of God. However, I do not believe in free hand outs. People should not be allowed to take advantage of the system and there should be limitations and particular circumstances that help should be assisted. Republicans believe in limiting the Welfare budgets to save costs for different things, such as if someone is in need of assistance for a period of time and are approved to receive welfare if they are able and healthy the welfare will slowly decrease over time to insure that Americans are not taking advantage of the system. Republicans also believe that cutting the costs of welfare and use access money towards child education will insure that children are well educated and also decrease the amount of Americans needing
One of the major issues in the cultural war is the idea of abortion. The Republican Party supports the human life amendment while opposing abortion funding. They “assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed [upon]” (Republican Party Platform ). The Republican Party also strongly promotes adoption and abst...
The Democratic Party has over gone many changes over the years since its creation in seventeen ninety two. One of the biggest changes has to be the change in name from originally being known as the Anti-federalist or the Democratic Republicans to being known of today as the Democratic Party. They did not originally support the constitution and was against large government. The party was formed by Thomas Jefferson, he supported a limited government that reserved much power to the states, and supported the little man of America. One major conflict of the party was the election of eighteen sixty. Before the election the party was split on the issue of slavery. In the election the party was forced to run two candidates o...
The Democratic party typically supports polices that promote equality and fairness for all. Some of the policies promoted by Democrats that I completely support include those pertaining to immigration, reproductive rights, and the rights of the LGBT community. According to the article Immigration Reform (2017), “Democrats will continue to work toward comprehensive immigration reform that fixes our nation’s broken immigration system, improves border security, prioritizes enforcement so we are targeting criminals – not families, keeps families together, and strengthens our country” (democrats.org). The article, Democratic Party on Abortion (2012), states that, “the Democratic party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay” (ontheissues.org). A policy that supports a woman’s right to choose also supports the idea that the government should not make reproductive decisions for any woman, it is her body and her choice. Regarding gay rights, Democrats are often strong supporters of gay marriage, and more recently we have seen democrats supporting the rights of transgender individuals. The article, Democratic Views on Gay Marriage (2014), states that Democrats, “support marriage equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under law for
After the fall of the Roman Empire, and as the Middle Ages unfolded over Europe for a thousand or so years, any remnants of ancient Roman and Greek approval for mercy killing or suicide disappeared. The Christian opposing view of suicide took root steadily, it became so accepted that there was no debate over the subject. Any favorable opinions toward suicide were met with harsh punishment such as flogging or beheading. Theologians such as John of Salisbury, Jean Burdien and Abelard Dun Scouts claimed that in no way was it possible to take his or her own life under the rule of Christianity. Thomas Aquinas, the leading Theologian of the Middle Ages believed that suicide deprived individuals of their natural lives and their roles in society; it
Not many people realize that the death of a child is NOT in accordance to God’s NORMAL scheme of things. It is unnatural. God did not mean for a child to go first. A child buries the parent. Not the parent buries the child.
The role of religion in politics is a topic that has long been argued, and has contributed to the start of wars, schisms (both political and religious), and other forms of inter and intra-state conflict. This topic, as a result of its checkered past, has become quite controversial, with many different viewpoints. One argument, put forth by many people throughout history, is that religion and the government should remain separate to avoid any conflicting interests. This view also typically suggests that there is one, or several, large and organized religions like the Roman Catholic Church, which would be able to use their “divine” authority to sway the politics of a given state by promising or threatening some form of godly approval or disapproval. By leveraging their divine power, individual figures within a religion, as well as the religion as a whole, could gain secular power for themselves, or over others. A second view, which was developed by many theologians through history, suggests that that without religion there would be a general lack of morality in the people and leaders of a given state, which would give way to poor political decisions that would not be in the interest of the people and perhaps even God (or the gods). This argument, however, does not address the fact that morality can exist without religion. In sociology, it is commonly accepted that social norms, which include morality, can result from any number of things. Religion, laws, or the basic desire of survival can all create these norms, so it suffices to say that as a society, our morals reflect our desire to live in relative peace through the creation of laws that serve to help us to survive. The argument of whether or not religion and politics should mix...
The most common argument for Euthanasia, is the idea of quality of life. This term was first created in the 1970’s as a term used to describe, the general welfare of a individual. This was gradually adopted as a term to describe a persons overall existence. This ideology, has practically become the argument used to morally justify the killings of hundreds upon thousands of unborn babies, who have genetic defects such as down syndrome and the international starving of brain damaged adults and terminally ill patients. To Christian, this argument has no meaning as we were all created in the image of God and it is believed that each human has a purpose to serve. They see each human as having its own intrinsic worth and to destroy any life, whether a young born child or an elderly person is the murder of a potential. The Christians also mock the quality of life argument as they believe that it is a biased opinion and we have no grounds or framework to judge by. The book of Job, argues against the quality of life argument. In this book, Job claims that suffering is part of being human along with happiness, sadness and anger. This points that if you are suffering, you should live through it and it will make you a stronger person. Paul says in Corinthians 2, For when I am weak then I am strong. He says this when he is trying to describe how he appreciates his “problem/thorn in his flesh” because although he wanted God to take it away he realises that it helps to make him a stronger person and a good Christian, because it reminds him to be humble. It is based upon this that he refuses to take his own life. The Christian sees a good life in respects to a persons response, to a particular situations, whereas the humanists will see only in terms of suffering and pain experienced.
Suicide, may be said to happen, if and only if, there is an intentional end of someone's life. The doctrine converses that we should never break off anyone’s life, including ours, because life is internally estimable that we should cherish. Therefore chances of that the act, suicide, violating this concept depends on whether a life worthwhile or not. So how do we define a worthwhile life? There is no satisfactory answer. It is ponderable that fragile at best because in moments of despair, nothing seems worthwhile and a Prozac later, everything may be all right again.
...express their beliefs as well as listen to the words of the Lord. As Jesus said at his last meal with his disciples before his execution, “Do this in memory of me”. This quote is reflected in the mass in the stage of ‘being fed’ when an adherent receives both the body and blood of Christ, called Transubstantiation. In this way, Christian adherents are able to unit in a diverse environment following the ways that our Lord has taught us. Therefore through this, Christian adherents are able to express their faith.
Euthanasia is a controversial issue in today's society. It is defined as the intentional ending of a life with the purpose of relieving pain or suffering. Many people believe that it is within a human's right to die a peaceful, dignified death with assistance. While others believe that euthanasia is an immoral act and that legalising the deliberate killing of humans will undermine the legal system in the UK. Currently in the UK, it is illegal for a doctor or another person to deliberately do something that causes the patient to die - e.g. an injection.