Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology on parenting style
Psychology on parenting style
Parenting styles in psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychology on parenting style
It has always been said that the small family is a happy family is this a fact ? Today most state government encourage small families to avoid overpopulation. While in the past families were not small and no one gave attention whether there were a lot of big families or not in the society. Nowadays having small family is a must in some societies like in china society because of the population problems that it suffers from. Some people see that children in big families may have a lot of problems in their life due to less attention from their parents but the others have different idea and they see that children in the big families will have a lot of benefits. Having a small family is a must for population matter, social problems and financial reasons.
Having a small family is better to decrease world population as world population is 7.2 billion nowadays. Statistics show that the world population will be rised by 2050 and may reach 9.6 billion (Grander, 2013). The more ignorance to multiplier the population the more deterioration of economic activity. We have the tools to keep world population from reaching 9 billion in the next few years. What we need is the will to recognize the issue and to determinedly suggest to kids to have small families in the future. It has been known that parents in the small families give their kids more time and cash that helps them to get well education, meet life prerequisites and offer a great begin in life. The current population level and the level that we are quickly moving towards which is 10 billion, is one of the greatest reasons to decide to have no kids, or maybe only (Grander, 2013).
Having a small family is much better than having a big one socially. Par...
... middle of paper ...
...ily would mean keeping these expenses low” (Bradley, 2013) . “A small family promises well-fed and healthy family members. Goes without saying, kids will receive more love and attention from their parents” (Bradley, 2013)
In conclusion, Having a little family is better to diminish world population. With little family parents can afford children requirements without stress and save money to help them in their problems in the future. Parents will have better family relations with their children and be less slanted to stress. With fewer children, it is much better to go on visits and journeys without any fretful or worry . Big families may lead to financial problems and make parents all the time under stress. If anyone think carefully, will he find the reason that make the small family better that the big one or not ?
In this book, the editor made analysis on large representative surveys on children’s family structure. She used these surveys to distinguish families that have single parents, parents who were never married, divorced or separated parents, and remarried parents. According to her study, children are less likely to finish high school or college and keep their job. Also, without fathers they will more likely become adolescent parents. Furthermore, fathers are less likely to share incomes with their children when they do not live with their children.
As we have learned through Skolnick’s book, as well as Rubin’s research, the make up of the family is influenced by many factors. The economy, culture, education, ethnicity/race, and tradition all help to create the modern family. The last few decades have heavily influenced the family structure, and while some try to preserve the past, others embrace the future. Through it all, we find you can have both.
Population expansion has been a serious problem to the human society for a long time because the resources and spaces of the Earth are limited. China, as the third largest country in the world, has one fifth of the world population. Chinese people used to believe that a larger population meant a stronger country. Therefore, from 1962 to 1980, which is the China’s baby boom, the population of China grew from 665 million to 981 million. The sharp population increase brought a series of problems, like environmental pollution, traffic congestion and shortage of water and food supplies. To reduce the population growth rate, in 1979, the Chinese government implemented the famous One-child Policy. This policy was planned as a short-term program, but it is still in use till now because of the successful prevention of about 400 million births. Meanwhile, the One-child Policy has been judged as a violation of human rights and a demographic disaster which brings gender imbalance, aging of the population and manpower shortage. On one hand, it truly lowers the birth rate and population growth rate of China. However, on the other hand, the One-child Policy has already done harm for the Chinese society. Although this policy seems to be undermining the right of procreation of millions of Chinese women, it is still the worst good idea that the Chinese government could have to keep the population down.
...more from life and not truly understanding their purpose. Undoubtedly, in our conventional society, family is important for a variety of reasons. We depend on our families to teach us almost everything we know. They help us to understand social interaction and to create the things we consider to be our values. Our family starts our education and most importantly provides a sense of stability and support that can help in every kind of challenging situation. When a family fails in the raising of a child, it is clear in many aspects of the child’s behavior, which goes to show how truly important this family system is. Since the idea has never been used, it is hard to say what would actually happen if the plan was played out, but from the experience that we do have, communally raised children usually suffer negative effects in their ability to form emotional attachments
...ked for but it was needed. Because at first I only used 50 but i did not have enough only children so I had to survey more people. The potential of my project is endless. I do not know how much further I could take it with my limitations but I believe scientist could take it very far. They could put surveys online, everywhere and they could get thousands of people to do tell them there difficulties socializing and whether they are there or not. It could change society because people could like i said early have all information to make a completely conscious decision on whether or not to have multiple children or not. This data could be used by psychologist in telling them how and why people have the the issues they have emotionally. My results imply that life for children with no siblings is harder. They have trouble socializing due to the lack of practice at home. 1
Countries in the world hold different attitudes to the population policy, some of them tend to delay the increase of population while others introduce policies to encourage childbirth. After centuries of continual growth, which started at the first industrial revolution, the global population reached over 7 billion individuals in 2013. Research by Ezeh, Bongaarts and Mberu (2012) states that increasing population is a threat to individuals and societies by bring problems based on unsatisfied demand. The “increasing population” in this essay can be defined as net rising in birth rate during a period, especially in the poor developing countries. This essay will argue that the world cannot sustain an increasing population. The reasons for this are firstly, limited nature resources can hardly maintain huge population and environment may be polluted; next, economic problems, especially the gap between the rich and the poor can be caused by increasing demand; and lastly, social wellbeing pressures brought by population growth.
Due to the lack of decency and respect in this generation, society has become very dark. There is poor parenting taking place in this overpopulated world, and it is effecting all the future generations. Teenage parents, are uneducated and unprepared to be to raise a child. They believe they are responsible enough to take on the world and raise a family. Unfortunately, this is false information. Considering they are teenagers, they were unable to get their lives set up for success, and then they make the same parenting mistakes multiple times and end up with a huge family way below the poverty line. For every married couple, two children are all it takes to keep the world’s population at a constant rate. In too many families, there are more than two children, causing to exceed the death rate. In Overpopulation: Causes, Effects and Solutions, Rinkesh Kukreja
Family has played an intricate role in the development of the society in which we live. The diversity in which families are formed is now becoming even more diverse with the American culture, which is changing at a rapid pace. Diverse cultures coupled with social economic challenges are key contributors to the dramatic change to the institution of family. With these challenges facing the institution of family, this closely tightknit unit which has been the cornerstone of American society has diminishing from a traditional standpoint. Non-kinship family networks like the one described in Karen V. Hansen’s “The Cranes, An Absorbent Safety Net,” goes against the norm of the common institution of family within America. Although the Crane family
Imagine a time where the world would be prohibited of birthing more than one child per couple. It is no secret that this has been practiced where the one child policy was intact in the country China. As human beings, we are often accustomed to reproduce at least once in our lifetime, some more than others. As a result of the one child policy, China has had its positives and negatives population wise. It can be predicted that if the one child policy were to be implemented in other countries, it would have the same effect as it did in China. The one child policy was first introduced around the year of nineteen-seventy-nine by the Chinese government. It was a method used to curb the population that was spiraling out of control of the Chinese government.
If it weren't for natural disasters, famine, or policies set for limiting birth rate, the present as we know it would be very different. In the beginning of the development of human beings, we probably had a big explosion of a population. Compared to today, it was most likely a narrow population. It is probable that many diseases that we know of today, were not around at that time, so it grew fast enough to keep us from going extinct. Back then, It was very beneficial for us to reproduce, now, on the contrary, it will be why we might go extinct. Due to the world already being considered overpopulated, some policies have been established. According to National Center for Biotechnology Information, between the years of the 1930s and 1970s China had a massive growth of population; specifically, an increase of 500 million people. In 1979 China introduced the One-child-Policy for the reason to keep a stabled economy. As of today, that policy has slowly faded out. This is a big concern to many scientists because it is alarming that the results of the policy are implying that we have insignificant control over overpopulation. Equally important, The Economic and Social Affair stated in the book “World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision”, “by 2100, the world population will reach 11.2 billion.” That being the case, These statistics are agitating and should be concerning everyone.
Out of the numerous commodities and resources that are scarce on the planet in which we inhabit a family, or even a family system, can never be parallel to even an iota of them. This is due to the fact that everyone, no matter what age at what time period of their life, has a family. That family may not be the cookie cutter family that society imposes on the media world. People develop without knowing their family, people create new families of their own, or they can even find something or someone to call family because of this family will never be scarce. Family is an objective concept to every single person and the definition varies significantly from being as simple as the smallest of toys to as complex as a group of people interconnected
Women in the developing countries bear a much heavier burden in the house than that in the developed countries. Take China and USA as an example. Chinese women almost devote themselves to their families. Husbands and children are regarded as focus of their lives. Sometimes they give up their careers, hobbies and interest for the sake of the families. Due to the poor medical condition and the traditional family concept that women are historical entitled of the task to give a birth to a baby boy, not many of them use modern contraceptive methods to control their family size. In this case, “on average, women in poor countries tend to have twice as many babies as women in the rich countries” (“Women” 10). As we know, China is taking on “One Child Policy”. Actually, it’s very hard to be implemented, especially in poorly educated areas. In America, although women also have “double burden”, which means that women now work “in factory, shop or office as well as in the home as cook, cleaner, child rearer, shopper and homemaker” (Hall 21), they don’t think the family is the most important thing. To realize their dreams is the answer. Today, there are various housework training courses popular with American men. Men are obliged to share the housework.
Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/georgesant137423.html?src=t_family enjoying in the small things that what you have.Because of many people think money buy life inherently, money can 't buy theroy
Our world is too small for our ever rapidly growing population. One day resources will run dry and vanish, which will bring death and loss to all nations on this planet. Many researchers and scientists have confirmed that the population will reach 10 billion by the end of the century and will continue to stream upward. There are many different ways in trying to decrease population to contain global warming and assist our environmental changes. The only way to steadily succeeding, families must be the regulators of their fertility and future. Environmentalism can head in a negative direction, which may result in population control and even anti-immigrant policies. Can the developing effort of ‘population integrity’ protect our world while recognizing birth moralities?
For years statisticians, social scientists, economists, and even those who claim to be “population specialists” have been calculating and projecting world population growth. The projections inspire theories which ultimately lead to behavioral practices. Interestingly enough these activities appear to be cyclical in nature, a new behavior will cause a shift in numbers which sparks a new projection which leads to a new theory and so on. Furthermore, one could argue that globalization activities in the past half-century have served as the driving force of this cycle. With these thoughts in mind I will present how past population projections and theories have lead to current the fertility practices found in today’s world. In addition the role of the women’s movement, increased contraceptive technology and global family ...