Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Manifest destiny and the mexican war of 1846 essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
THE FLYING ARTILLERY IN THE BATTLE FOR MEXICO CITY
In the 1840’s, with American expansion ongoing, under the principles of Manifest Destiny, James K. Polk entered into the presidency of the United States. Polk campaigned the ideals of manifest destiny and believed that territory under Mexican control should be acquired to facilitate further expansion. The lands in question are now known as California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico, and the Mexican government was resistant and unwilling to part with them. With tensions rising between the two nations, Texas is annexed into the U.S. and Polk dispatches an envoy to Mexican President Nicolas Bravo in an attempt to purchase California and New Mexico. Nicolas Bravo was aware of his attempt
…show more content…
but refused to comply with the request. This prompted Polk to send troops to the disputed territory between the Nueces River and north of the Rio Grande River. Violence broke out on April 25, 1846 when Mexican cavalry and US Dragoons fought a brief skirmish that left 11 Americans dead and 5 wounded. After the brief clash with forces under general Taylor, Mexican forces laid siege to an American outpost along the Rio Grande. In response to Mexican hostilities, General Taylor called in reinforcements and artillery support. Utilizing the superior artillery and the increased numbers of riflemen, General Taylor was able to break the siege and go on to defeat the enemy at Palo Alto driving them to Resaca De La Palma. After the retreat of the Mexican army Taylor declares his army victorious, rallies and then defeats them again at Resaca De La Palma. These clashes, coupled with the bolstering of American military might, in effect created a state of war along the border between Mexico and the United States. The official declaration of war from the United States Congress was announced on 13 May 1846. The composition of the US Army light artillery at the time was horse drawn batteries comprised of combinations of the bronze model 1841 6-pound and 12-pound howitzers. This tactic of utilizing artillery was referred to as flying artillery due to the rapid mobilization, displacement, and employment capabilities when providing support to friendly Infantry. This tactic was originally fielded by Samuel B. Ringgold, MAJ, FA who also served among Zach Taylors occupation force and was mortally wounded by enemy cannon fire in the battle of Palo Alto. Major Ringgold died three days after being wounded, shortly after debriefing the battle. Following the declaration of war, General Taylor moved his forces to Matamoros and garrisoned multiple locations along the new border, advancing toward Monterrey at the end of summer 1846.
Taylors forces clash with Mexican troops to seize the city, entering into an armistice in order to allow his army to recuperate. President Polk, fearing that Taylor was attempting to maneuver politically with the notoriety he was gaining on the battlefield, dispatched General Winfield Scott to Veracruz to become the main effort for driving toward Mexico City. A large portion of Taylors army was shifted to Scotts task force, in response to the armistice that the president did not approve of.
General Scotts arrival to Mexico kicked off the battle for Veracruz, wherein he landed with about 12,000 troops at Calldo Beach in order to assault and seize the city. The attack on Veacruz also marked the first large scale American amphibious assault. Once the city was secure, General Scott began his western movement towards Mexico City. Along the advance to Mexico City, American forces fought Mexican forces under General Santa Anna at Cerro Gordo, Churubusco, and also Molino Del Rey, the very outskirts of the
…show more content…
capitol. Prior to assaulting the city proper, American forces had to attack the castle of Chapultepec, situated on the southwest boundary of Mexico City. Scott determined the castle must be defeated so as to enable the attack on the city and to keep the opposition from determining his ultimate plans. Chapultepec was built on a hill with 200 foot high slopes, was surrounded by difficult terrain and seemed an unlikely target to attack. On September 12 1847, General Scott ordered a feint attack to the southeast portion of the city. Once the enemy was focused on his demonstration, American artillery began an extensive bombardment of the fortress and city from positions that were thought untenable to supporting artillery. During the night, the Flying Artillery had been able to maneuver through the rocky terrain that the Mexican army believed blocked their flank from attack, due to the assumption that artillery could not be emplaced in that direction. Due to the light caissons and updated guns and techniques, the Americans were able to take the enemy, largely, by surprise. The bombardment lasted until 0800 on 13 September, halting fires at night, until American Infantry was able to approach the castle, using ladders and pickaxes, and overrun the objective within two hours of launch.
Once the castle was secured, American troops stormed the causeway, breached the walls of Mexico City and fought through fierce resistance in order to establish a foothold within the city. By nightfall, the American troops had established positions inside the city for follow on attack. The civilian authorities decided that there had been enough damage to the city and allowed General Santa Anna to lead what was left of his army out of the city that night. Mexico City was surrendered to General Scott on September 14,
1847. Throughout the entire campaign, American forces were pitted against numerically superior enemies, facing them in hostile territory. Americans, however, had the benefit of advanced weapons and training, such as the flying artillery previously discussed. The American Infantry had the distinct advantage of having artillery support able to be integrated completely with the front line of advance. This added even more fire power and maneuverability, whereas more conventional artillery of the time would have to either shift or cease firing when Infantry advanced. In the Battle of Mexico City specifically, the flexibility of the American light artillery enabled the enemy to be outmaneuvered and outflanked, allowed exploitation of terrain thought unusable and provided the Americans with a superior edge on the many battle fields of trying terrain. With the superior fire power of the 1841’s, firing six to one against the Mexican army. Ultimately playing a monumental role in the success of the United States in the Mexican American War and furthermore paving the way for the future of artillery, the incorporation of indirect fire on the battle field, and the overall way in which conventional and nonconventional battles are fought today.
As the Spanish advanced again to take Fort Frederica, Oglethorpe was waiting. Slowly moving through the swampy lands on St. Simons the Spanish headed toward Fort Frederica with high confidence. Posting a regiment of Foot Soldiers and Darien’s Independent Company of Highlanders in a wooded area overlooking the marsh where Spanish soldiers would have to cross, Oglethorpe returned to Ft. Frederica (Swinson 137). Oglethorpe then left to retrieve more soldiers. When he returned, the battle was over. The troops had stood off the Spanish until they ran out of ammunition and retreated. Even though he arrived after the fighting, Oglethorpe became the victor (Coleman
This book by Otis A. Singletary deals with different aspects of the Mexican war. It is a compelling description and concise history of the first successful offensive war in United States military history. The work examines two countries that were unprepared for war. The political intrigues and quarrels in appointing the military commanders, as well as the military operations of the war, are presented and analyzed in detail. The author also analyzes the role that the Mexican War played in bringing on the U.S. Civil War.
James K. Polk was one of many that felt extremely strong about Texas joining the Union. Silbey uses direct quotes from politicians gives a deeper outlook into Texas annexation. “That there is a large majority who would be glad to see Texas, in some way or another, united to this country, there can be no doubt.” (Silbey 81) Shortly after this widespread idea of Texas joining the country Congress was overwhelmed with bills to make Texas’s entry accomplished.
“Perhaps no other president during the first half of the 1800’s exerted as much of an impact on U.S domestic affairs regarding land acquisition as the eleventh chief executive, James K Polk. As president he finalized the annexation of Texas, and created a war with Mexico that transferred over 1.2 million acres of land to the U.S., now five states of the American Southwest. He also brokered a deal with Great Britain to purchase the state of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. Polk is thus credited with expanding the domestic terrain of the United States, but at the expense of Native Americans who lost their land, and African Americans who were taken as slaves to these new states and territories.” I rate president Polk as a high president. He did the necessary to expand Southwestward. With political forcefulness, President Polk pursued his ambitious goals. Texas joined the country as the 28th state during his first year in office. Tense negotiations with Great Britain concluded with American annexation of the Oregon Territory. Following a controversial two year war, Mexico ceded New Mexico and California to the United States. The Polk administration also achieved its major economic objectives by lowering tariffs and establishing an independent Federal Treasury. “He felt that government plans to fund internal improvements was
In President James Polk’s War Message to Congress, he states that the Congress of Texas had declared the Rio Grande to be the official boundary between Mexico and Texas. James Polk said, “Sixty-three men and officers, were. dispatched from the American camp up the Rio del Norte, on its [North] bank, to ascertain whether the Mexican troops had crossed, or were preparing to cross, the river. [They] became engaged with a large body of these [Mexican] troops, and, after a short affair, in which some sixteen [Americans] were killed and wounded, appear to have been surrounded and compelled to surrender.” The invasion was almost like a ticket to declare war against Mexico for James Polk.
So, why Cinco de Mayo? And why should Americans savor this day as well? Because 4,000 Mexican soldiers smashed the French and traitor Mexican army of 8,000 at Puebla, Mexico, 100 miles east of Mexico City on the morning of May 5, 1862.
Was the United States Justified in Going to War with Mexico? The Mexican War, or the "U.S. Invasion" (according to the Mexicans) started on April 24, 1826. Many Americans and Mexicans died fighting in the Mexican War. This war was nothing compared to the Civil War just 15 years later but it was heart breaking for everyone at that time. At the end of the war half of the country of Mexico was taken by the United States as a war prize. So, was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? I think the U.S. was unjustified to go to war with Mexico because, the United states provokes the war and starts the war, the only reason they had the Mexican war was to gain land and lastly Texas was stolen from Mexico by southern slave owners.
Polk, the new president, made a proposal to the Mexican government to purchase the disputed land. When that offer was rejected, troops from the United States were moved into the disputed territory of Coahuila. These troops were then attacked by Mexican troops, killing 12 American troops and taking 52 prisoners. These same Mexican troops later laid put upon a US fort along the Rio Grande. This would lead to the conflict that resulted in the loss of much of Mexico's northern territory.US forces quickly occupied Mexico and California Territory, then invaded parts of Northeastern Mexico and Northwest Mexico. The Pacific took control of several garrisons on the Pacific coast.
Made famous by Theodore Roosevelt’s volunteer Rough Rider’s and the Buffalo Soldiers, the Battle of San Juan Hill (July 1, 1898), also known as The Battle of San Juan Heights, was the bloodiest battle of the Spanish American War. After landing on the beachhead, the US V Corps under the command of Major General William Shafter fought their way west toward the port town of Santiago. After an indecisive clash at Las Guasimas on June 24, Shafter readied his men to take the strategic heights around the city, while Cuban insurgents blocked any Spanish reinforcements arriving on the roads to the north, in what would be one of the most decisive battles of America’s “Splendid Little War.” 1
Just before Polk's presidency Texas had freed itself from Mexican rule and desired American annexation. This desire came from thousands of former American citizens that settled in Texas in the 1820s. This was due to the Mexican government supplying huge land grants to entice new settlers to Texas and secure its northern border from America. The Mexican government failed to realize the true impact that their persuasion of Americans for settlement would cause. In 1830, Mexico finally put a freeze on all American immigration due to the large number of American settlers and their certain revolution. In 1836, The Republic of Texas was est...
Rodolfo Acuña and Norman A. Graebner take opposing standpoints on this topic. Acuña takes the standpoint that the Americans took advantage of the Mexican government, which was young and unstable at the time. He argued that the United States waged an unjust war solely for the acquisition of new lands. His excerpt from Occupied America: A History of Chicanos, 3rd Edition provided the basis for his argument. On the other hand, Graebner took the standpoint that President James Polk pushed a policy, enforced by a stronger nation, to force Mexico to sell New Mexico and California and recognize the annexation of Texas to the United States without starting a war. His argument was taken from his article “The Mexican War: A Study in Causation”. Both sides of the American Imperialism argument contain their own strengths. However, after the examination of the articles, Graebner proposes a more convincing
...ur taken prisoners. As a result, Wilson prepared a letter to Congress demanding a full-scale war and an ultimatum was sent to Carranza, demanding the release of all American prisoners, which Mexico had already threatened to kill. Within days, all prisoners were released and all international bridges were seized. Although Carranza was finished, Pancho Villa was not ready to throw in the towel. Thus, he prepared for a series of attacks to come. General Pershing reported to Wilson of Villa’s repeated violence, but Villa continued, capturing many towns held by Carranzista forces. On January 1917, Pancho Villa gathered his forces to capture Toreon. In the end, hundreds of his men were dead and his defeat was seized upon by Wilson as a convenient way out of the problems in Mexico.
The years 1840 to 1890 were a period of great growth for the United States. It was during this time period that the United states came to the conclusion that it had a manifest destiny, that is, it was commanded by god to someday occupy the entire North American continent. One of the most ardent followers of this belief was President James K. Polk. He felt that the United States had the right to whatever amount of territory it chose to, and in doing this the United States was actually doing a favor for the land it seized, by introducing it to the highly advanced culture and way of life of Americans. Shortly after his election he annexed Texas. This added a great amount of land to the United States, but more was to follow. The Oregon Territory became a part of the United States is 1846, followed by the Mexican Cession in 1848 and the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. At this point the United States had accomplished its manifest destiny, it reached from east to west, from sea to shining sea. Now that the lands it so desired were finally there, the United States faced a new problem- how to get its people to settle these lands so they would actually be worth having. Realistically, it is great to have a lot of land, but if the land is unpopulated and undeveloped, it really isn't worth much. And the government of the United States knew this. One of the reasons that many did not choose to settle there immediately was that the lands were quite simply in the middle of nowhere. They were surrounded by mountains, inhabited by hostile Indians, and poor for farming. Because of these geographical conditions, the government was forced to intervene to coax its citizens into settling the new lands. Basically the lands were not settled because they were available, they were settled because of various schemes the government concocted to make them seem desirable.
A Texan, William B. Travis and a small group of Texans attacked a squad of Mexican troops in Anahuac with the motive that “taxes should not thus be collected from them to support a standing army in their own country” (SOS 1) and soon drove them back. Travis retreated to San Felipe and were assisted to Bexar. Skirmishes and the threat of war with Mexico soon followed.
The Battle of San Pasqual, also spelled San Pascual, was a military encounter that occurred during the Mexican-American War in what is now the San Pasqual Valley community of the city of San Diego, California. The series of military skirmishes ended with both sides claiming victory, and the victor of the battle is still debated. On December 6 and December 7, 1846, General Stephen W. Kearny's US Army of the West, along with a small detachment of the California Battalion led by a Marine Lieutenant, engaged a small contingent of Californios and their Presidial Lancers Los Galgos (The Greyhounds), led by Major Andrés Pico. After U.S. reinforcements arrived, Kearny's troops were able to reach