Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Germany 1919-1947 revisio n
The German Pavilion, later known as the Barcelona Pavilion, gently hovers above the ground on a low raised platform, in Barcelona Spain. Recognized as the one of the initial expressions of Germany taking a step towards representing themselves in a more modern approach. the German Pavilion was the face of Germany after the first world war as an act of departure and resistance against classically fixed Germany. Commissioned by the German Reich’s government, for the installation hosting of King Alfonoso XIII and German officials, the Pavilion was a rare project for which Meis Van De Rohe was provided no brief nor concept to follow, easily becoming one of his more challenging works confronted. Designed in the year 1929 the Barcelona Pavilion was the bridge of modern minimalist buildings and structures . It was the beginning of a new tradition acknowledging …show more content…
simplicity 3. Figure 2 Brick County house elevation and plan view Figure 3 Barcelona Pavilion plan view The Barcelona Pavilion was built as a freeform structure with no particular purpose other than to represent Germany at the Barcelona exhibition. Although there was no functional program determined or even a mention of a influence for its appearance it is apparent that the De Stijl movement that had begun in 1917 swayed Mies designs at that time. This influence is evident in one of his ealier works ‘The Brick Country House’ which was designed in 1923 but never built. The layout resembles that of the German Pavilion in the way the walls flow into each other without clear definition of their boundaries or their separation from the exterior2. The open free flowing space and translucent planes make the building more relaxing and visually soothing to the environment. One critic commented that "the viewer could walk more or less endlessly, without ever being stopped in a cubical area", adding to that the open plan gave an "intimation of infinite freedom of movement" Originally the German Pavilion was placed in an artificially landscaped setting. This park siting continued the tradition of Karl Friedrich Schinkel’s landscaped “neo-Greek” “temples” and private houses from the early 19th century5. Mies also translated the classicism of Karl’s buildings into ferro-concrete, tinted plate glass, and chrome-plated steel6. These ideas were then carried out for the Barcelona Pavilion and the formulation of the new architectural principles were achieved within this. In the Barcelona Pavilion Mies experimented with glass works and light reflections on a glass model . This then allowed the building to have more of a translucent look then solid . The idea of a sleek flat roof was also carried out onto both the projects. The large generous canopy roof which is rested on walls that are placed asymmetrically but always parallel or perpendicular. Thus they appear to slide past each other in a space through which the viewer can walk more or less endlessly without ever having to stop within a cubical area. The Pavilion utilizes brushed steel posts and partition walls of travertine, onyx, and glass. Within the original design there were eight cruciform columns that were meant to hold up the roof which appears to float over both the interior as well as the exterior . how ever they were not enough for support and extra columns were lodged into the double skinned marble screens to help carry the load and keep the original plan inviolate. The Pavilion consists of two pools, one of which is located directly behind the interior space which allows the light to filter through the interior space while illuminating the marble and travertine pavers. Like the Glass Room and the Friedrichstarsse skyscraper, the Barcelona Pavilion is amongst one of Mies experimental projects exploring the potential of materials. The strict separation of supports and walls as well the use of large expanses of glass for the exterior walls led Mies to such a degree of perfection that this was virtually unchanged onto most of his later buildings and anticipates his preference for steel and glass. In the History of modern architecture the Barcelona Pavilion was looked upon as an icon for the 20th century.
Every aspect of the Barcelona Pavilion has architectural significance that can be seen however, one of the more important aspects is the low profiled roof. In elevation the roof appears to be floating above the interior space. Barcelona Pavilion was intended to glorify post-war german society while progressively embracing modern architecture . At the Barcelona Pavilion one is struck by the ambiguities of onyx melting into the semi transparent glass. This was a display of modern movement to the world. Its elegant and sleek design combined with rich natural material presented Mies Barcelona Pavilion as a bridge for this future career. In 1924 Mies had already argued that modern architecture should go beyond the rational and economic fulfillment of functions to create architecture as art. This was the first time that Mies publicly linked beauty to the pursuit of truth. Through this it becomes clearer to see that Mies had more of the truly classical in him at this level of idea, proportion, and
detail. Looking through Mies work, is it evident that movement towards modernism started in 1921 when he designed for the Fiedrichstrasse building, the Brick Country house and also carried it onto Weissenhofsiedlung. However it wasn't until his work on the Barcelona Pavilion that the modernist movement was seen through the eyes of the architectural world. Not only was the Pavilion an icon for the whole of the 20th century, it was a new era and inspiration for Mies and his future designs. He used this concept of the Barcelona Pavilion in the residential Tugendhat House built in 1930 . The same regular grid and cruciform columns were used. The polished marbled onyx walls were used to define interior spaces in an open plan. Extensive glass was also incorporated into the design alongside rear tropical wood and reinforced concrete. The cruciform-shaped columns were also repeated and behind the dining room a double glass partition serves as a light source for the interior spaces, similar to that which was seen in the Barcelona design. Another building that was evidently influenced by the Barcelona Pavilion was the Farnsworth House, just outside of Chicago. It was built between 1945 and 1951 for a weekend treat for Dr Edith Farnsworth. Similar to the Barcelona Pavilion, the Farnsworth house also stood on a podium like structure. Being elevated off the ground and framing into view only what Mies wished to. Again an extensive amount of floor to ceiling windows were implanted all around the house. A flat floating roof which extended beyond interior spaces was used along with another set of eight cruciform columns. Although not all materials used in the Barcelona Pavilion is seen in The Farnsworth House, it is still very clear how much of an influence the Pavilion had. the concept was taken from the Pavilion, he then expanded and altered it to desire to suit the needs of the client a environmental beauty. Throughout his career Mies van der Rohe had done some great work. The Barcelona Pavilion wouldn't be considered his best and certainly wasn't his first but is was very significant due to its nature. The Barcelona Pavilion was a form of architecture that needed to represent Germany and be the voice of its new era. Unlike Mies other designs, for the Pavilion he had no clue as to what it was he was designing for even though he had free form over the whole design, on the other hand he did have a clue as to what materialistic he wanted to explore . the Barcelona Pavilion though only stood for a year before being dismantled and shipped off held great significance to Mies and also the history of architecture in the 20th century . Although it wasn't untill after 1969 when Mies died that world realized its importance. in 1980 the Barcelona City Council decided that they would reconstruct the structure accordingly to its original design. Work for the reconstruction began in 1983 and was finished 1986. The reconstruction however did have some minor changes from its orginal design, for instance not the exact materialistic were used nevertheless a great deal of effort was made to reconstruct to its originality as much as possible. The Barcelona Pavilion still stands now in the city of Barcelona and is open to the public for viewing.
With the Pantheon being built over 1700 years ago, it’s amazing that architects are still using features and techniques from this work of architecture in modern creations. The use of this type of classical architecture will continue to be used in works for public space due to its remarkable exterior appearance and it’s long lasting structural durability. When both Jesse hall and the Pantheon are compared it is possible to see their similarities from the types of domes that top each, their external facades, and their interior plan. While they share many similarities, the differences that Bell and Binder used in their creation make this work of architecture unique to many other public spaces.
...ch allows the person to enter the glass atrium connecting all of the wings of the building, which was added in 2012. Breuer was honored with the commission after he had shown his design abilities in other aspects throughout the city. The museum expansion was just one of the few of Breuer’s designs that still stand today. Breuer’s work in both furniture design and architecture has been around for many years, and will continue to be around for many more to come.
It is the new decade after the end of world war two and modernism is a well-established practice. Its pioneers and spearheads are prevalent figures looming over the new architects and designers who are trying to make their mark in the shadows of such historically influential people. With new technologies and materials emerging from the world wars the next era of modernism had started to evolved, bringing with it philosophies and ideas which seemed far removed from those of the pioneers of modernism “What emerged in the late 1940s and 1950s was an expanding synthesis of questions utterly removed from the confident statements of the pioneers.”(Spade 1971,10) Two significant buildings were designed in the 50's, both of them for educational institutes and to house students of architecture, there were both designed in completely different styles and methods. The first is Ludwig Mies van der Rohes' Crown Hall, finished in 1956 and designed as a part of a campus master plan for the Illinois Institute of technology in Chicago. Mies' design for Crown Hall is one of his most realised expressio...
However, the success of the building schemes relied on the construction methods and innovations that are now attributed as bei...
Mies' well known theory of “less is more” is apparent by the spaciousness and functional quality of the Seagram building; everything serves a purpose, either for aesthetic appeal or functionality. “Less is more” is a concept used throughout the architectural world today. “Mies van der Rohe stands as a great moral force of the International Style. The essence of architecture, to Mies, lies in the expression of structure. And his precise, sophisticated, and consistent style of architecture sets an exam...
When French President Francois Mitterand “personally selected Mr. Pei in 1983 to design the Grand Louvre to give air, space, and light to one of the world’s most congested museums,” (Markham, 1989) there were many critics. The press “lambasted the idea of shattering the harmony of the Louvre’s courtyard with a glass iceberg” (Markham, 1989). But Pei proceeded as planned, taking a major risk in creating a glass pyramid structure at the entrance. He did not focus on what the critics would say about his plans, but hoped that the world would see, upon completion, that his vision of a contemporary, functional entrance would not clash with the Baroque style of the Louvre itself.
...f structure, a museum. The one contradiction in the contemporary design theory that Libeskind dares to fight is that to work in the upcoming century means to work with reduced means. His works pose optimism in the sense that architecture, if filled with a satisfactory amount of reasoning, and justification with the help of the advancement in material technology, and the foremost, creativity, will be able to address the profound of any project seeking for poetic embodiment. While modern architects have tried hard to eradicate the traces of history from the forms, postmodern architects like Liberskind would embody the traces of history in between the forms. In Lisbeskind’s Jewish Museum, the invisibility, the implication, and the embodiment come first, then the advancement of material methodology assists the build of the visibility, and the physical infrastructure.
In order to create innovative public architecture, considered to be the most civic, costly, time intensive and physical of the arts, the project holds a degree of risk, strife, and negotiation . Overcoming these tasks and creating worthy public architecture is a challenge designers try to accomplish, but are rarely successful. The people involved in a potential public building, can be larger than the building itself. Public architecture tries to please all, even the doubters and critics, but because of the all these factors, a building is closer to failing than succeeding.
The essence of modern architecture lays in a remarkable strives to reconcile the core principles of architectural design with rapid technological advancement and the modernization of society. However, it took “the form of numerous movements, schools of design, and architectural styles, some in tension with one another, and often equally defying such classification, to establish modernism as a distinctive architectural movement” (Robinson and Foell). Although, the narrower concept of modernism in architecture is broadly characterized by simplification of form and subtraction of ornament from the structure and theme of the building, meaning that the result of design should derive directly from its purpose; the visual expression of the structure, particularly the visual importance of the horizontal and vertical lines typical for the International Style modernism, the use of industrially-produced materials and adaptation of the machine aesthetic, as well as the truth to materials concept, meaning that the true nat...
Jencks believes “the glass-and-steel box has become the single most used form in Modern Architecture and it signifies throughout the world ‘office building’” (27). Thus, modern architecture is univalent in terms of form, in other words it is designed around one out of a few basic values using a limited number of materials and right angles. In...
There are parts of the walls that seem to be missing, which creates a flow between the two main spaces. The pavilion’s thin, sweeping roof is supported by eight cruciform columns clad in chrome. This created an open and free space where he lined the outside of the building with glass. He then carefully placed a thin slab of onyx in the middle of the open volume. Mies created established characteristics that became essential for modern architecture.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969. Kitchen, Martin. A History of Modern Germany: 1800-2000. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. Sprout, Otto.
FC Barcelona is one of the premier soccer clubs in the world. Many of the best players in history have donned the red and blue of Barcelona and made the Catalonian fans proud. As a team, they have won countless of trophies and triumphed over rivals. Much of their success can be credited to their renowned youth academy, La Maisa. It has brought countless of talented players such as Messi, Iniesta, and Puyol throughout the ranks of La Maisa, the youth academy.
However, architecture is not just the future, after all, buildings are intended to be viewed, traversed and lived by us, people. Despite this, many architects today rarely think deeply about human nature, disregarding their main subject matter in favour for efficiency and an architecture of spectacle. In this there seems to be a misconception that underlies much of architecture, that is, human’s relationship with the city, the building and nature. In much of today’s architecture, people are treated with as much concern much as we treat cars, purely mechanically. The post-modern search for the ‘new’ and ‘novel’ has come to disregard the profound affect design has on our lives, impacting our senses, shaping our psyche and disposition.
Abstract: New forms in current world have been testimony to the contemporary style of postmodern architecture and are the strength of today’s generation for creating significant architectural standards. Post modernism has blurred the borders between contemporary and traditional construction classical concepts and simply in the field of art and literature. The architectural elements like domes, arches, and classical shapes have lost their identity but the post modernism tries to bridge between these historical forms and contemporary styles. The related architects not only struggled to achieve the image for the buildings but also rejected oversimplified diagrams for living. The post modernism here tries to achieve theoretical base for their designs that creates the excitement in the design program.