Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impacts of free trade agreements
How do politics affect international trade
Negative impacts of free trade agreements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impacts of free trade agreements
Introduction Though Anglo-American relations are not currently hostile, they were not always this way. This paper will explore the free trade beliefs of Richard Cobden, and show that Americans who rejected his ideas did so out of ignorance and fear. The paper will begin with a description of Cobden’s context and beliefs and then move to an analysis of American Anglophobia and Anglomania and governmental responses to Cobden. Context Trade liberalization in Great Britain signaled an era of intense change in the European economy. The document that triggered this change was the Cobden-Chevalier Treaty of 1860. Anglo-French trade antagonisms had reached an agonizing level for the two countries, beginning with the Congress of Vienna and climaxing with the introduction and eventual repeal of the Corn Laws. For more than 30 years, Great Britain engaged France in tariff wars that only served to limit both countries’ trade potential. Accominotti and Flandreau (2008) describe this as a “period of generalized protectionism” (p. 152). The economic concept of protectionism dates back to Adam Smith’s idea of comparative and absolute advantage. The country with the ability to produce the same amount of a good or service with fewer resources than another country has the absolute advantage. However, if the other country has a lower opportunity cost of producing that same good or service, they have the comparative advantage. Smith argued that “If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry employed in a way in which we have some advantage” (Smith, 1904, IV.2.12). Richard Cobden’s Beliefs In response to the Corn Laws, Richard Cobden ... ... middle of paper ... .... (2013). Foreign Relations in the Gilded Age: A British Free-Trade Conspiracy? Diplomatic History, 37(2). Smith, A. (1904). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (5th Ed.). (e. Edwin Cannan, Ed.) London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. Stanwood, E. (1967). American Tariff Controversies in the Nineteenth Century (Vol. II). New York: Russell & Russell. Stringham, E. P. (2004). Commerce, Markets, and Peace. Independent Review, 9(1), 105-116. The Cobden Club held its inaugural meeting at the Star. (1866, July 28). The Spectator Archive. Great Britain. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/28th-july-1866/3/the-cobden-club-held-its-inaugural-meeting-at-the- Tuffnell, S. (2011, March). "Uncle Sam is to be Sacrificed": Anglophobia in Late Nineteenth-Century Politics and Culture. American Nineteenth Century History, 12(1), 77-99.
Protectionism is the theory or practice of shielding a country's domestic industries from foreign competition by taxing imports. Between 2000 and 2008 the value of world trade in goods and services rose by 12% a year. However since the global recession in 2008 the value of world trade in goods and services has substantially decreased.
Eliga H. Gould, The Persistence of Empire: British Political Culture in the Age of the American Revolution (North Carolina: Omohundro Institute, 2000),
Roberts, Russell. (2006). The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
“When on December 22, 1775, the British Parliament prohibited trade with the colonies, Congress responded in April of 1776 by opening colonial ports—this was a major step towards severing ties with Britain.” (history.state.gov) The colonies no longer depend solely on British goods, but had set up strong trading agreements with numerous countries. These agreements sustained the colonies. By setting up trade agreements with other countries, the colonies had, in a way, become “independent’ from the necessity for British goods. These British goods had become obsolete to the goods of rival
The import of British manufactured goods and, accessories made up for 80% of the tariffs revenue for government, Hamilton believed in keeping a durable trade relation with Britain would help generate revenue for repaying the national debt and, government expenses. In contempt, the protective tariffs were so suppose to protect domestic manufactures from foreign competition, but instead it Hamilton’s strong relationship with Britain stifled the growth and revenue of these industries, James Madison had proposed a stronger protective tariff under Boston manufacturers and, tradesmen in 1789, all the appeals were of same similar pattern, the demand of foreign goods in the American market. The demand had stifled their profits, and they demanded for a strong tariff to protect their marketing goods. The motion was ultimately blocked by the Senate with opposition coming from Alexander Hamilton. in Hamilton’s defense against the proposal, he issued that the need of a “revenue override the demand for protection of manufacturers”(cite
Lindop, Edmund, and Margaret J. Goldstein. America In The 1920s. Minneapolis: Lerner Publishing Group Inc., 2010. Print.
Harper, John. American Machiavelli : Alexander Hamilton and the Origins of U.S. Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
James, L& Michael, P. The American Promise, Volume I: To 1877: A History of the United States. Boston: Bedford, 2012.
Roark, James L. et al., eds. The American Promise: A Compact, Vol. I: To 1877. 3rd edition. Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007.
Hoffman, Elizabeth Cobbs and Jon Gjerde. edit., Major Problems in American History: Volume 1 to 1877. Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007.
Roark, James L. The American Promise: A Compact History. 4th. ed. Volume 1: 1877. New York: BEDFORD/ST. MARTIN'S, 2010. Print.
Many economic systems are revealed in A Respectable Trade: Slavery, Feudalism, Self-Employment, and Capitalism. England in 1788 was entering a period of economic transition. Viewing this finite period in A Respectable Trade allows us, as economists, to dissect the different market systems prevalent during that time.
Roark, J.L., Johnson, M.P., Cohen, P.C., Stage, S., Lawson, A., Hartmann, S.M. (2009). The american promise: A history of the united states (4th ed.), The New West and Free North 1840-1860, The slave south, 1820-1860, The house divided 1846-1861 (Vol. 1, pp. 279-354).
The early 1800’s were an unusual time in the history of the United States. A country in its infancy, growing, turbulent, and filled with intrigue where political and economic fortunes were made and lost overnight. While the country was founded on noble ideas---and no doubt these powerful ideas were taken seriously---how such ideas were to be put into practice created fertile ground for personal ambition and interest to be a stronger motivator than the “common good”. In fact, at times it appears that the ideas were little more than vehicles for the personal ambitions---and in the case of this story---the personal vendettas of powerful personalities.
Landes, D., 1999. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 38-59