Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of lowering the drinking age
Lowering the drinking age research paper
Impact of lowering the drinking age
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of lowering the drinking age
“ The moment you take responsibility for everything in your life is the moment you can change anything in your life” by unknown . When lowering the age of Responsibility to 18 it can make people question if teens are mature enough. In other cases will teens be able to be an illegal adult. The age of responsibility should be 18 because that’s where people are responsible enough. Teenagers are responsible enough to make the same choices as adults. In Alan Greenblatt's article “What Is The Age Of Responsibility” questions this age. Alan Greenblatt, the author of Age of Responsibility explains “A 20 year old college junior, far more educated than the average american, cannot buy alcohol or enter a casino”{3}. This reveals that 18 to 21 years old are allowed to do a lot of …show more content…
In the article Alan states that “Today, military personnel returning from iraq and afghanistan are left to question why they can fight americans wars but still cant patronize its bars”{4}. This clearly states that 18 year olds are old enough to be an adult because they are able to get their life take away from them at a young age. THis evidence also shows that 18 year olds could be the age because they are fighting for the country and maturing into an adult. The author also claims “on the homefront manufacturing jobs didn't require a high schools diploma, it was thus comman for 18 year olds to support themselves and start their own family”{ }. This evidence reveals that in the past 18 year olds reveal that in the past 18 year olds had to support themselves and learn how to be an adult at such a young age. This evidence proves that because they were exposed to responsibilities of adulthood sooner. In conclusion this all shows that 18 year olds are maturing and able to take care of
The young people are now able to embrace the constitution and civic education courtesy of the 26th amendment. Most of the 18-year olds become more responsible and start acting as adults who put matters of national concern into great consideration. The young people are able to exchange nationalistic ideas and come up with solutions to some of the matters affecting the nation. The flexibility of the constitution has inspired patriotism especially from the younger generations who identify with it because it is tailored to cater for their ever-changing needs and challenges. Many of the young people are able to participate in measures taken by the government in times of calamity such as hurricanes through volunteering as rescuers or giving contributions to the people affected by such
The age of responsibility should not be an age such as 18, 16 or 21 because everybody is different and matures at different ages. One’s true responsibility should be when they are at an age where they are fully developed in the brain and mature enough to make their own decisions without an adult. It needs to be a time where they can handle the rights that they are given in adulthood and use them wisely and maturely. Young people have been relying on their parents for their whole lives and some when they leave the house cannot make the right
It is ironic that how some children are able to present themselves more mature than adults. The youth of the generation is becoming more mature and are developing adult skills faster than ever. People are beginning to wonder about the age of adulthood and how it should be determined. This controversy beleaguers around privileges such as drinking, driving, and voting. According to the article What is the Age of Responsibility by Alan Greenblatt, society determines that a person is an adult through customary rites, legal rights, and one’s responsibilities. However, I believe that the best way to adulthood is shown through one’s obligation for their priorities and work.
This issue hit home for me because it puts many people at risk for things such as car accidents, binge drinking, alcoholism, depression, suicide, and rape, things no one should ever experience, let alone in middle or high school. These reasons are why the legal age to purchase, and consume alcohol should remain at 21 years of age.
America’s government believes that 18 year old young adults are mature enough to enter the army or navy, but are not mature enough to handle an alcoholic beverage. As Lyzi White stated, “You believe that 18 year olds have brains that are mature enough to go to war, to enter marriage, to fulfill legal obligations like voting and jury duty, but not mature enough to drink?”. I completely agree with the point White stated. You’re telling me they are mature enough to kill people and stay away from family for months or even years at a time, but are not mature enough to consume alcohol? If an 18 year old can put their life at risk for their country, what makes you think they’re not mature enough to drink in their own country. I do understand that there is still a lot of mental growth that a person may experience between the ages of eighteen and twenty-one, but my argument would be that since they are putting up a fight and protecting our country, they should be able to consume alcohol.
In America, when a person turns eighteen, that person is now considered an adult and is treated like one as well. That person is entrusted with responsibilities such as voting, enlisting in the armed services, opening personal bank accounts and possibly holding public office. If a person can be entrusted with such responsibilities at that particular age, who can say that he/she is not ...
On the other hand, adults aged 18 have their own rights to make a decision to whether consume alcohol or not. For example, once children turn 18 years old, they are mature enough to make their own decisions. Cloud states, “After all, in almost every other legal and cultural respect, you’re an adult at 18. You can vote, adopt children, sign up for Iraq or become a commercial pilot at 18. Treating alcohol differently helps turns it into a holy grail of adulthood.” (Cloud). Although, in the United States, 18 years o...
Drinking under the age of 21 should not be allowed because of the medical reasons behind it. “Brains can be severely damaged by alcohol, especially if the brain is not fully developed” (BigJohny). When you drink under the age of 21, you will get these long-term consequences from doing so. The long-term consequences that could come from drinking under the age of 21 are having brain malfunctions and becoming brain dead. Every time you drink you cause yourself to lose brain cells, without the brain being fully developed you will stop the growth of your brain cells while killing others. The brain is actually never fully developed until the age of 21. “Research indicated that the brain continues to develop until age 21, and young brains can be irreversibly damaged by alcohol” (BigJohny). When you are under the age of 21 and you decide to drink, the growing process of your brain could...
Despite the problems that would arise, many people are beginning to feel that the drinking age should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen. Studies have been made; however, no hard evidence suggesting lowering the minimum drinking age would help have surfaced. Although there are countless studies of how alcohol has many harmful effects on teenagers, there is a great deal of negative criticism about what if the drinking age is lowered. Some would say the morally right decision is to not allow teens the chance to hurt themselves. Everyone is entitled to having his or her own opinions and beliefs. However, the overall health of the youth of our country seems a little more important than some personal belief. The drinking age should not be lowered due to the fact drunk driving, juvenile delinquency, and alcohol-related medical issues related to teens will increase.
Upon turning eighteen you are considered to be legal adult and receive all of the responsibilities that accompany the title. At the age of eighteen year olds you receive and are expected to use the rights and responsibilities to vote, serve on juries, get married, sign contracts, join the military--which includes taking on the responsibilities of life and death--and be prosecuted as an adults in the court of law along with many other things. In 1984, the national government raised the drinking age from 18 to 21. Mothers Against Drunk Driving was a key contributing organization that influenced the change in the minimum drinking age. While there are arguments for both sides, it is said that if the national minimum legal drinking age is dropped back to eighteen many lives would be saved, colleges will have better retention as well as turn out rates of high school graduates, and it could repeal or alter a counterproductive law. The minimum legal drinking age should be lowered back down to the age of eighteen and those who wish to drink should be required to take classes to attain a drinking license upon completing the class in a satisfactory manner.
A. First, it is necessary to question this law. Why is 21 the "magical" age that makes one intelligent and mature enough to consume alcohol? Surely, some adults abuse alcohol and some teenagers in this very room would be perfectly able to drink responsibly. Why not 18 or 35 or 40? At 18, people are considered adults.
Many people believe that the drinking age of 21 protects teenagers from harming themselves but the age restriction is only causing more harm for them.
"Legal Age 21 - National Minimum Drinking Age - Choose Responsibility." John McCardell - Drinking Age - Choose Responsibility. Web. .
...to handle alcohol. The point of the existing law is to delay underage drinking as long as possible and, even if use begins, to reduce its regularity and amount as much as possible. However changing it back to 18 has the potential to harm a large number of people. Simply put, changing the drinking age to 18 would be unethical due to the amount of people it would harm.
Many people say that 18 year olds lack of responsibility so if they were in the military they will teach them more responsibility. The responsibility they will have when they get out of the military will make them have better choices in their lifetime. I would say that the responsibility will help them with their job skills. I am certain that when your kid gets out of the military he will have a lot of job opportunities. I would say that 18 year olds need to find the responsibility that they hold and need to be responsible to be