Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the Vietnam War
Impact of the Vietnam War
Impact of the Vietnam War
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the Vietnam War
In history, there have been many battles and takeovers, which results in many changes in cities and countries. The Fall of Saigon happened on April 30, 1975. The communists soldiers appeared in the city of Saigon and the takeover started. Julian Manyon, an English journalist writes, “We had known for days that Saigon must collapse but we were unprepared for what happened on the final morning.” Many people, back in 1975, were happy that the communists took over; however, there were people who did not want to be part of the new government. So, many people escaped South Vietnam by any means. They arranged for fake papers or they smuggled onto a boat to go to the United States or elsewhere. Therefore, due to the Fall of Saigon, many Vietnamese people were not happy with the changes that the communist government made when they took over.
When a city or country is taken over, the government is one of the first things that are changed. When evening appeared in Saigon on April 30, 1975, the city was renamed Ho Chi Minh City. A year later, there was a second general election that was held; the first one was held back in 1946. Of the candidates who were chosen, 15 out of 46 were “[National Liberation Front] (NLF) leaders and trade unionists” and the rest were of different occupations such as teachers, lawyers, farmers, actors, and doctors. Of the 11 candidates, who were not elected, the “majority were women and all were workers and farmers.” In 1976, the communists launched a campaign where they were trying to associate nationalism and communism. Their slogan was “Loving the country is loving socialism.” The communist government has rewritten many years of Vietnam history in agreement with “class struggle, substituting M...
... middle of paper ...
...ietnam since the Fall of Saigon. Papers in International Studies. Vol. 56. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University, Center for International Studies, 1980.
Gainsborough, Martin. "Between Exception and Rule." Critical Asian Studies 37, no. 3 (2005): 363-390.
Manyon, Julian. The Fall of Saigon. London: Collings, 1975.
Nguyên, Long and Harry H. Kendall. After Saigon Fell: Daily Life Under the Vietnamese Communists. Research Papers and Policy Studies. Vol. 4. Berkeley, California: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 1981.
Ruane, Kevin. The Vietnam Wars. Documents in Contemporary History. Manchester: Manchester University Press ;, 2000.
Terzani, Tiziano. Giai Phong!: The Fall and Liberation of Saigon [Giai phong! English]. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1976.
Wintle, Justin. The Vietnam Wars. Wars of the Modern Era. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1991.
Anderson, D. (2002). The Columbia guide to the Vietnam War. New York: Columbia University Press.
Appy’s book is valuable to its readers in showing how Vietnam became the template for every American war since, from novelties like the invasion of Grenada to the seemingly never-ending conflicts post-9/11. But before all that, there was Vietnam, and, larger lessons aside, Appy’s book is a fascinating, insightful, infuriating and thought-provoking study of that conflict, from its earliest days
Lawrence’s purpose in writing this book was concise and to the point. In recent history, due to the fall of the Soviet bloc, new information has been made available for use in Vietnam. As stated in the introduction, “This book aims to take account of this new scholarship in a brief, accessible narrative of the Vietnam War… It places the war within the long flow of Vietnamese history and then captures the goals and experiences of various governments that became deeply embroiled in the country during the second half of the twentieth century” (Lawrence, 3.) This study is not only about the American government and how they were involved in the Vietnam conflict, but highlights other such countries as France, China, and the Soviet Union. Lawrence goes on to say that one of his major goals in writing this book is to examine the American role in Vietnam within an international context (Lawrence, 4.) Again, this goes to show that the major purpose of Lawrence’s study included not only ...
E-History (2012, N.d.). Retrieved March 25, 2012, from http://ehistory.osu.edu/vietnam/essays/battlecommand/index.cfm.
Tim O’Brien’s book, The Things They Carried, portrays stories of the Vietnam War. Though not one hundred percent accurate, the stories portray important historical events. The Things They Carried recovers Vietnam War history and portrays situations the American soldiers faced. The United States government represents a political power effect during the Vietnam War. The U. S. enters the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam. The U.S. government felt if communism spreads to South Vietnam, then it will spread elsewhere. Many Americans disapproved of their country’s involvement. Men traveled across the border to avoid the draft. The powerful United States government made the decision to enter the war, despite many Americans’ opposition. O’Brien’s The Things They Carried applies New Historicism elements, including Vietnam history recovery and the political power of the United States that affected history.
When Vietnamese revolutionary Ho Chi Minh and his political organization, the Vietminh, seized control of their independence from France United States Politicians saw it as another communist take over. When really Ho was more a nationalist than a communist. All Minh wanted was for the United States to recognize its independence from France and to send aid to help it reach its nationalistic goals. "Before the Cold War Ho and the Vietmin...
Robert S. McNamara's book, In Retrospect, tells the story of one man's journey throughout the trials and tribulations of what seems to be the United States utmost fatality; the Vietnam War. McNamara's personal encounters gives an inside perspective never before heard of, and exposes the truth behind the administration.
Costello, Mary. "Vietnam Aftermath." Editional Research Reports 1974 1 (1974): 1. CQ Researcher Online. Web. 5 Mar. 2014.
"Overview of the Vietnam War." Digital History. Digital History, n.d. Web. 20 Mar. 2014. .
Trinh Vö, L. (2008). Constructing a Vietnamese American Community: Economic and Political Transformation in Little Saigon, Orange County. Amerasia Journal, 34(3), 85-109.
“Vietnam: A Mistake of Western Alliance” is not the only piece of writing by Mark Atwood Lawrence about the Vietnam War. He has written two books on the topic: Assuming the Burden: Europe and the American Commitment to War in Vietnam and The Vietnam War: A Concise International History. He has also written other essays about the war and co-edited The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and Cold War Crisis. He received degrees from Stanford and Yale and is a Professor of History at The University of Texas at Austin (Mark Atwood Lawrence).
This book would be an excellent source for anyone wanting to understand this period of the entrance into the Vietnam War. It is a great look into the character of each of the participants. It also would benefit those who are studying and learning how to develop strategy and policy for future wars that the United States may involve itself.
In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam, Times Books, New York, 1995: 72, 76, 218, 219, 220, 240.
Willbanks, James H. "The Real History of the Vietnam War." ARMCHAIR GENERAL Nov. 2007: 54-67. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 3 Apr. 2014.
Vietnam was a struggle which, in all honesty, the United States should never have been involved in. North Vietnam was battling for ownership of South Vietnam, so that they would be a unified communist nation. To prevent the domino effect and the further spread of communism, the U.S. held on to the Truman Doctrine and stood behind the South Vietnamese leader, Diem.