Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The similarities between civil law and common law
Differences between common law and civil law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The similarities between civil law and common law
Is modern Thai law consider as civil law? Thai law is a civil law country according to the three essential characteristics that examines the Civil law system from Common law system. In the past, Thailand used the customary law as the main source of law. However, after the development of Thai law, the legal system itself relies on the written law. Civil law is a legal system that has influence from Roman law, especially from the Corpus Juris Civilis of Emperor Justinian and the development during middle ages. Corpus Jurist Civilis is the foundation of law in all civil jurisdictions.
The pre-codification period, tradition and religion were one of the earliest form of law, these were influenced by the Theravada Buddhism and Brahmanism
…show more content…
At first, Thailand accepted the French legal system by hiring Padoux and four other Frenchmen to draft the Penal code in1898 and Civil and commercial code of 1923, respectively. In 1916, the Frenchmen went back to their country and made it difficult to Thailand to create the law. Therefore, Thais had more role in drafting Thai code in this period. It was led by Prince Svastiwatvisit and the three eminent Thai jurists which most of them were certified lawyer from English. Eventually, The Civil and Commercial Code of 1923 was finished by the corporation of Thai jurists and Frenchmen. Nevertheless, it was well known that the Code that followed the French structure was not suitable for Thailand due to incomprehensiveness of the law. Thus, the new drafting committee decided to redraft two books the Civil and Commercial Code, which was mainly founded on German Jurisprudence. This was done by coping the contents of Book I, II, and III of Japan, to create the basis of Books I and II of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code and then translated it in Thai language which came into effect in 1925. The reasons why the drafting committee follow the structure of Japanese code is that the similarity in term of social and experiences with drafting civil code and Thailand admired Japan’s success in simplifying the BGB. Hence, we might say that Japanese code is a product of applying BGB with its own traditional
McOskar Enterprises, Inc. owns and manages a health and fitness center identified as “Curves for Women”. Tammey J. Anderson, the complainant, joined Curves on April 2, 2003. As part of the joining process Anderson signed a release of liability agreement. This agreement released Curves from any liabilities related to injuries that might be sustained by contributing in any activities or through the use of equipment. The agreement also stated that participants agreed to all risks of death or injury that could occur, Anderson read and signed the agreement of terms with Curves. After completing the liability agreement, Anderson began working out under the observation of a Curves’ trainer using the machines within the facility. During the workout Anderson notified the trainer that she began to feel pain in her neck, shoulder and arm, but finished her workout. She continued to feel the pain when she got home and pursued medical attention. As part of her prescribed medical treatment she was sent for a course a physical therapy. In June 2003 Anderson underwent a cervical discectomy, a procedure used to treat nerve or spinal cord compression. After her procedure Anderson sued Curves, claiming negligent acts during her workout. Anderson v. McOskar Enterprises, Inc., 712 NW 2d 796 (Minn. 2006).
Facts: Two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter a colored woman and Richard Loving a white man, got married in the District of Columbia. The Loving's returned to Virginia and established their marriage. The Caroline court issued an indictment charging the Loving's with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. The state decides, who can and cannot get married. The Loving's were convicted of violating 20-55 of Virginia's code.
In one of Law & Order’s “ripped from the headlines” episodes titled “House Counsel,” a juror in a mob trial is found dead. Law enforcement investigates and learns that the mobster tampered with the juror in order to avoid a conviction and then killed him to keep him quiet. The lawyer defending the mobster is a good friend of Assistant District Attorney Jack McCoy. Later in the investigation, McCoy discovers that his friend may have played a role in the jury tampering. When he suspects his friend is involved, McCoy sees an opportunity to get the mobster and prosecutes the attorney for the murder to leverage information about the mobster. In the end, the lawyer is convicted and the attorney-client privilege between the lawyer and the mobster is dissolved.
Amidst the chaos of political instability and constant warring of the Zhou era, arose many intellectual thinkers that brought such profound impact in the field of politics, religion and philosophy. Even to the day, their influence can be espied in the many matters of China. Confucianism became the paramount school of thinking and later significant philosophies such as Daoism and Legalism gained immense recognition as well. Each party had their own proposals for creating an idealistic political society where the many problems they faced in their everyday lives could be eliminated. All three approaches were very distinct but at the same time, they contained certain similarities as well. In my reasoning, I find that Confucianism and Daoism could be paralleled in many ways to find several common grounds. On the other hand, Legalism goes on to take a more unique approach which was much different from the previous two.
In this essay, I will be examining how the court system can fail to deliver justice for particular cases and people’s circumstances, as well as looking at alternatives to court, like circle sentencing, restorative sentencing and alternatives for children to the formal court system, as outlined in the Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW). Crime is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as an action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law. On the other side of this is justice; the quality of being fair and reasonable.
Case law/Common law – body of law developed over time by higher courts. Laws are c...
The terms religion and law are two sophisticated terms that are the realms of life as well as a shared history th
They formed a law code much like the ones used now a day in many countries. First to
Therefore, for the development of the society, a legal, formal and universal system has to be established, that can deal with subjects, that cannot be resolved or addressed through natural, customary or religious law. Thus over time, the law scholars and sociologists started to understand the complexity and interrelationship between law and society.
Over the years, different jurisdictions had built their specific system of rules of conduct to govern behaviour. These legal systems, influenced by historical and cultural roots, can be distinguished in two families, the Civil law and the Common law legal systems. The distinctions lies in the process in which each decision is make by the judge and on the legal sources that shapes the law. Indeed, by contrast to the Common law system, which is largely based on Precedents, meaning the decisions that have already been made by judges in similar cases, the Civil law system is based on legislator’s decisions and legal codes with which judges have to justify their judgment . Consequently, instead of referencing to concepts and rules
The offence Harry would be charged with is William’s murder. The area of Law that this case is concerned with is criminal law (homicide). The two offences that constitute homicide are murder and manslaughter. The classic definition of murder was set by Sir Edward Coke (Institutes of the Laws of England, 1797). Murder is defined by the Law as causing the death of a human being within the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. It comprises of 2 elements. These are the actus reus (guilty act) and the mens rea (intention).
Throughout the ancient world, religions and ideologies have developed into forms and practices that influence the very essence of civilizations. Religions could pose as a form of foundation for the beliefs, ideas, social organizations, and economic structures of a certain group of people. They provided a means of justification and form of unity between people and they helped establish and infuse new ideas into a culture. Religions were used as source to explain the misconcepted beliefs in nature and science as well as natural phenomina and it was also used to provide a source of motivation, control, and stability in a civilization.
The rule of law, simply put, is a principle that no one is above the law. This means that there should be no leniency for a person because of peerage, sex, religion or financial standing. England and Wales do not have a written constitution therefore the Rule of Law, which along with the parliamentary Sovereignty was regarded by legal analyst A.C Dicey, as the pillars of the UK Constitution. The Rule of Law was said to be adopted as the “unwritten constitution of Great Britain”.
The meaning of English Legal System is stated out by Cownie and Bradley in the English Legal System book . There are many sources that build up the English Law as it is today. The main sources of English Law consist of Common Law, parliamentary legislation and delegated legislation. As stated in Gary Slapper & David Kelly’s English Legal System book , there are many different interpretations of the phrase ‘source of law’ where in this book the law is made up of three main sources; where in Martin Hunt’s “A” Level Law , though there are different sources that make up the English law, these sources are differentiated in two main categories with various minor sources.
Glenn’s book inserts that civil law emerged from the re-discovery of Roman law as it first emerged in Rome. Civil law is now used in nearly all of Europe (UnNatrual Vids, 2017) and Kopp’s (2017) map shows Asia, Central America, Europe, and some of Africa as nations who use civil law. The past of civil law comes from a history of two periods: Roman and modern continental law (Glenn, 2014). Civil law also consists of substantive laws which are complete, comprehensively written, and systematic. Civil law is highly systematized and structured. Civil law also possesses many traditions. These traditions include: code of law, large resident judiciaries, procedures controlled by the judge, denial of judicial lawmaking, and historical prestige of law professors (Glenn, 2014). Civil law is also known as the oldest legal