Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interest groups and their influence on public policies
Interest groups power in politics
Interest groups in Texas government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Interest groups are groups of people who share common interest and get together in order to influence decision making in Texas. Interest groups are grouped into three categories. The groups can influence issues the economy, business, or labor. (laits.edu.ut, 2006, pp.1). Now, these groups have many ways to influence decision making in Texas. Although they might be seemingly insignificant, their power may be surprising. As a conservative state, we have always stood for keeping the government small to retain the people’s power. Because of this goal, the political parties in Texas have weak political power, but the interest groups in Texas have strong political power. Political parties have many ways to achieve the decision making changes that …show more content…
Although illegal, it occurs frequently and causes interest groups to be thought of as suspicious. Interest groups have multiple ways of illegally persuading change in Texan decision making. Two of these ways are through bribery, and sit ins. Interest groups have been active in bribery and have been brought into the light through events dealing with bribery. In the 1970’s, the Sharpstown bank scandal erupted. It was a case where Houston banker Frank Sharp exchanged financial bribes with Gus Mutscher and other legislators to pass deposit insurance bills. This scandal resulted in the conviction of the house speaker Gus Mutscher and the other legislators. Another case of interest groups using illegal action took place at the university of Texas in the 1980’s. Students protested against the university’s investment in south Africa, because of the system of apartheid at the time. When the police attempted to remove the students, the students reacted by destroying and damaging office equipment which resulted in them getting criminal charges and suspended from the university for a year. Essentially to me, they got their point across by making a scene so that more attention would be brought to this issue at the expense of the charges that they
Daniel Elazar created a classification scheme moralistic political culture of individuals, and traditionalistic to describe the political culture of the state. According to Elazar, Texas can be described as traditionalistic and individuals. Historically, the Texas political parties demonstrated a strong tradition, provincialism, and business dominance. The models, however, may weaken as the Republicans increase its power in the state and urbanization continues. Texas is the second largest state in the country and there are four different geographical regions: the Gulf coastal plain, the interior lowlands, Great Plains, and the basin and range province,
The people of Texas are diverse and carry their “big can-do attitudes and accents” (Pearson); making Texas a bigger than life state. The political culture of Texas is impacted by two different subgroups of individualistic and traditionalistic characteristics. The combination of traditionalism and individualism has had a huge impact on the state and Texas’ seven different constitutions. The shift in power between 1827 and 1876 has impacted the political diversity Texas has today. Looking at the specifics of these subcultures, the traditionalists believe government should benefit the wealthy and powerful, and that government services must be limited.
Newell, Charldean. "Inflexibility, Traditionalism, and Partisanship: The Texas Response to New Federalism." Review. Annual Review of American Federalism 12 (1981 (1983): 185-95. Publius. Oxford University Press. Web. 23 Mar. 2011.
The Texas Legislature is far too archaic to provide consistent leadership for a state government; Congress has become too enmeshed with the executive branch and leaves blurry lines drawn in its separation of powers. The ideal legislature would be a modernized version of what the Texas Constitution created.
Texas went through a great amount of political change from being dominated by the Democratic Party during the 1960s and 70s, from the Republican Party taking over in the 80s. One of the big reasons for this change was due to the political party’s views. Throughout this essay I will discuss the changes of the political stances in Texas as well as the present day factors that affect America.
In the United States, for the last four decades, from Richard Nixon to Ronald Reagan through the two Bush Presidencies, the Republican Party won the White House by amassing large margins among white voters (Lizza.) The state of Texas has been reliably Republican since the 1970s and there are various elements to Texas political culture that can be narrowed down to three essential ideological trends: economic liberalism, or faith in the free market economy, social conservatism, or favoring traditional values and moralism, and populism, or promoting the rights and worthiness of ordinary people (Texas Political Culture.) As a result, the dominant political mood in Texas favors low taxes, minimal government services, and policies that are pro-business. This phenomenon is not static, however, since changing demographics in the state are causing changes in the profile of Texas in reference to electoral politics, among other major issues. This paper will explore different perspectives about the changing demographics of Texas, and where they might lead the state politically, and will present a variety of viewpoints regarding this complex subject.
In the youth of Texas, the Democratic Party enjoyed electoral dominance on all levels of state government and in the representation in the national government. Democratic rule was dominated by a conservative white political elite that strongly promoted economic development, but that resisted change either in race relations or social programs for the poor ("Texas Politics," 2009). Republicans were not completely absent during this period, but their electoral victories were few and limited in scope ("Texas Politics," 2009). In every election after 1980, however, the Republican strength grew into the now dominant rule that currently reigns in Texas. Since the 1990’s, the Republican Party, despite the attempts of others, has had a stronghold on the state government. With that being said, the Republican Party has dominated the overall elections.
The Texas government is an unusually complex institution that is composed of many different levels. Everyone asks, with a constitution like the one Texas has, can people really trust the government? The main reasons why people might not be trusting of the government are that they might believe that the officials take advantage of their power, or want to try to control them. The Texas legislature is also subject to checks and balances in the three branch system. For example, the governor 's power to veto bills, which is rarely overridden, and to call special sessions; while the court has the power of judicial review. In Texas, the Constitution divides the powers
Interest groups are an interesting part of politics that usually gets overlooked. The term interest group is self-explanatory but the definition can be a bit more politically thorough: An organized group that tries to influence the government to adopt certain interests, policies, or measures also called pressure group. Interest group refers to virtually any voluntary association that seeks to publicly promote and create advantages for its cause. America is a melting-pot of races, religions, languages, cultures, beliefs, and ideas, yet it only
The government of the state of Texas is a difficult and complicated institution that is composed of many different levels. The question comes in to everyone's mind at one time or another whether or not to trust the government. It could be that people believe that the officials will take advantage of their power, or simply people don't like the idea of being controlled by someone who is not a family member or friend. To avoid this centralized power, the government is divided into stages and this is a reasonable ground for trusting the government. Government runs this state and it does deserve to be trusted.
These pluralistic interest groups are free to operate and lobby in the political arena, fighting against the majority and other competing factions for voice in Congress. With the influence of multiple factions operating throughout the political system, a balance of power is created (Kernell 2000, 429). This is much like the international theory of sovereign states balancing each other’s power to create a political system that focuses on stability, yet is always in a constant flux of power. With this in mind, special interest groups are constantly contending for power by raising money, campaigning, and lobbying in Congress. When a special interest group is threatened by a competing policy, the group will organize efforts to balance, or transcend the power of the competing group.
Being an individualist state, government has many restricted power over its people and it is because of how government is structured and its past history. Texas likes to be known as independent and not relying on government as did in the past. In Texas it is believed that people should get help from private sectors instead of the government bureaucracy. (Giardino pg. 27). Businesses in Texas are booming and with that came more conservative republicans into office. An example is lowering taxes and that would benefit businesses but affect citizens by not offering government programs or local assistance. Another example would be the salary of Texas legislators. Legislators do not get paid much only about $7,200 per year which represents how Texas does not want them involved. (Giardino pg. 169) Even though Texas is known to be an individualistic state it also has bits of the other cultures mixed in. Traditionalist culture preserves the status quo. Texans have made many changes throughout time but it still reserves many ways. For example in our textbook, “Texas was one of the last states to introduce legalized gambling” (Giardino pg. 28) as well as trying to keep minorities out of voting by having poll taxes and white primaries which eventually were abolished. This are key patterns of the conservative ways of Texans. The moralistic culture is one that could be integrated among every state. It
Democrats, Republicans, and Libertarians are perhaps three of the most prominent political parties within Texas. Within the pages of their party platforms, we see that each possesses a unique philosophy, with specific viewpoints and recommendations for shaping or reforming government policy. To be sure, the people of Texas face many challenges, two of the most compelling issues being the crisis in healthcare and in education. Not only are we lacking in these areas as Texans, but also on the national level. The parties’ stance on these two major issues defines them, giving us insight into the minds and intentions of each.
In the article by Texas Vox Oil and Gas Lobby Cashes In, Kills Local Control, Kaiba White firmly criticizes the impact that the passing of House Bill 40 has on local control. The claim made in this article is simple: local control, a secular Texan tradition is being undermined by greed. 1 As the author
“Texas law prevent them from taking money during a session from the people who elected them, but we allow them to take benefits during a session from people who are paid to influence them.” Interest groups should be prevented from dominating the legislative process by establishing public finance control of the senate and the House of Representatives. Public disclosure of the money of congressional campaigns. This will make sure the interest groups do not dominate the legislative process, and everyone voice will count