Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature of terrorism essay
What motivates a terrorist
Nature of terrorism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature of terrorism essay
It has been three weeks since the beginning of this class and we have learned so much within those three weeks. Each week was assigned with one module with learning materials. In this paper, I am going to discuss and explain what I have learned in all three modules. In module one, I will focus on international threats from both political and religious perspectives; module two, I will focus on explaining the face of terrorism and their history, and the application of theory; then module three explains the philosophical concepts associated with the will to harm individuals in large numbers. Module One: In module one, we l will discuss international threats from both political and religious perspectives. In A Military Guide to Terrorism in …show more content…
Terrorism creates threat against civilians so the government can react to it. I will justify the term “terrorism” and how it affects our modern society. “America is at War…. the rise of terrorism fueled by an aggressive ideology of hatred and murder, fully revealed the American people on September 11, 2001” (Bush, 2006). While it is hard to understand why terrorism chose to threaten or terrorize others, in interview Osama Bin Laden gave John Miller, he stated that the fight that the Americans are facing was caused by themselves. Terrorism creates threat to community that worth the attack. That being said, most terrorism acts are targeting the U.S. by killing their own people because they know that the U.S. and their allies will not let that …show more content…
It is noted in A Military Guide to Terrorism in the 21st Century (2007), that terrorist motivations varies depending on the special interests of the individual or groups. Some groups goals are to seek attentions to the public. For instance, in A Military Guide to Terrorism in the 21st Century (2007), it is marked that Al-Qaida focus was to create a major terrorist threat with global scope. The U.S. is likely to be targeted on their high value economic targets. “It is more likely to be crushed by furniture than killed by a terrorist” (Shaver, 2015). This means that there are a lot of other things that aren’t terrorism that are killing many people that we should be focused on instead of giving coverage to terrorist. This means that, the goal is to make people fear of them. In A Military Guide to Terrorism in the 21st Century (2007), it is noted that one of the goals of terrorism is to win the world media coverage. They harm individuals in large numbers so the government in which they are targeting can do something about
Michael Walzer is an esteemed retired professor from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Walzer has written many books, essays, and articles. His essay, Excusing Terror, is one that best relates to the current events happening around the world. In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism. In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets, and no one has immunity. I will also offer an objection to Walzer’s theory and explain why it is not a valid one.
What is the goal and objective of terrorism? The use of violence to influence a mass population to add hear to a set ideological, political, or criminal reason. Our case study has both of these elements. If we are to be more specific the group is labeled as a Home Grown Violent Extremist Group. This type of group is one of the hardest to detect due to their assimilation into our society. They do not stand out in any way or glaring fashion.
Lewis clearly and entirely pointed out key events explaining the choices to be made by the people of the Islamic faith. This paper highlighted just a few of the many key events. Lewis says, “Most Muslims are not fundamentalists, and most fundamentalists are not terrorists, but most present-day terrorists are Muslims and proudly identify themselves as such.” He also expertly points out, “Terrorism requires only a few. Obviously the West must defend itself by whatever means will be effective. But in devising means to fight the terrorists, it would surely be useful to understand the forces that drive them.”(Lewis. Introduction) In the end, I agree with and commend Bernard Lewis on pointing out that a single religion cannot be blamed for the acts of small groups of radicals.
Getty, J. Arch, and Oleg V. Naumov. The Road to Terror. London, England: Yale University Press, 1999.
The horror of domestic terrorism is a problem all Americans should be concerned with, especially since there is a violent subculture in this nation which seeks out and indoctrinates people into their way of life. The crime that I will be focusing on during the course of this paper will be domestic terrorism, specifically hate groups such as the KKK, and various other white supremacy groups. The theory that I will be using to try and explain these crimes will be subcultural theory, but more especially the Subculture of Violence theory provided to us by Marvin Wolfgang and Franco Ferracutti. The reason I will be using his specific subcultural theory is because I feel that it bests describes how the people in these situations are desensitized to the evils they do and then begin to believe that the acts and beliefs are normal, or superior to all other views.
Many analysts, researchers, and professors have tried to define the purpose of terrorism. Some believe that can only be achieved when we know how the mind of a terrorist works. The Encyclopedia Britannica describes terrorism as, “The systematic use of violence or threat of violence by organized groups to achieve specific goals. Terrorist activities may be directed against individuals, organizations or governments. Terrorism is employed by radical groups to obtain concessions from established governments, such as a change in policies unfavorable to them or the release of imprisoned members of their organizations…” (Encyclopedia Britannica. “Terrorism” 1987 T-169)
The topic of my paper is types of terrorism. There are several types of terrorism for which to choose for my paper, state, dissident, religious, left-wing v. right-wing, and international. In this paper I have chosen state terrorism, religious terrorism, and international terrorism as the types of terrorism that I am going to discuss. I will discuss what they are in my own words and give examples of two different groups for each type that represent that type of terrorism. Then I will compare and contrast the three types of terrorism that I chose.
In Module one, I learned that terrorism is a result of physical harm or deadly acts of force with the intent of a political outcome by the use of terror for coercion. There are various types of terrorism such as international terrorism and domestic terrorism. International terrorism occurs outside of the United States with a purpose to influence the policy of a government by intimidation. International and Domestic terrorism both involve violent acts dangerous to human life that violate federal and state laws. Domestic terrorism occurs within the United States with the intention of coercion or intimidation by way of mass destruction, etc. Some forms of terrorism include Improvised explosive devices (IED), kidnappings, suicide bombings and
Terrorism did for the sake of the faith has for some time been an element of human undertakings. The histories of individuals, civic establishments, countries, and realms are packed with illustrations of radical genuine devotees who take part in brutality to advance their conviction framework. A few religious terrorists are propelled by protective thought processes, others look to guarantee the transcendence of their faith, and others are inspired by a forceful amalgam of these propensities. Religious terrorism can be mutual, genocidal, agnostic, or progressive. It can be submitted by solitary wolves, covert cells, expansive dissenter developments, or governments. Also, contingent upon one 's point of view, there is regularly discuss about whether the culprits ought to be named terrorists or religious opportunity contenders.
Each human needs respect and their own rights, and terrorism obliterates those two basic principles. Treating human lives as a means to an end is hardly the proper way to go about things, and that is one of the largest consequences of terrorism, and yet another reason why it can’t be justified.... ... middle of paper ... ...
In the book “Packaging Terrorism”, author Susan Moeller states that, “the goal of terrorism is to send a message, not to defeat the enemy”. I think this is an incredibly important concept when one is trying to define terrorism. The goal of terrorism is more about inspiring fear. Terrorists do not generally target high-up government officials, but innocent civilians like those killed in September 11. When an act of terrorism is committed, the effect spreads beyond the victim. When members of Black September killed the Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, there were 11 victims of the attack. Black September’s target, however, was greater than just the Israeli athletes. They inflicted a worldwide terror. When defining terrorism, one must realize that the message is often the goal of the attack.
Introduction The concept of “new terrorism” was first introduced in the academic world during the 1990’s. It wasn’t until after the devastating attacks of 9/11, however, that the idea of a “new” and fundamentally different kind of terrorist threat began to get more traction and started to have an influence on policy. After the unparalleled horrors of 9/11, and the views they inescapably provoked, the “new terrorism” idea quickly became part of predominant popular ideas and imagery. Ever since, the issue of “old” v. “new” terrorism has been the subject of very intense debate.
Terrorism has been around for centuries and religion-based violence has been around just as long. (Hoffman, 2). The violence was never referred to as terrorism though. Only up to the nineteenth century has religion been able to justify terrorism (Hoffman, 2). Since then, religious terrorism became motivated and inspired by the ideological view (Hoffman, 3). Therefore, it has turned against the main focus of religion and more towards the views of the extremist and what is happening politically (Winchester, 4).
Terrorism is one of the most extensively discussed issues of our time and at the same time it is also one of the least understood. The term itself “terrorism” means many different things to different people, cultures, and races. As a result, trying to define or classify terrorism with one universal definition is nearly impossible. The definition of terrorism used in this research is a reflection of much of the Western and American way of defining it. The definition of terrorism is,
Terrorism has a tremendous impact on society. It is a rational act of violence and its purpose is to change behavior in a specific society. Terrorism is a political act that is meant to achieve a goal through the act of violence. The nature of terrorism is the nonselective targeting of individuals or a group in society with a goal. The intentions of