Territorial Expansion Dbq

1505 Words4 Pages

Back in the 1800’s, the United States’ dreams of moving west became a reality. New lands and territories were added to the United States. Although, with this great deal of new land, was this more than the country could handle? Major consequences came along with this geographical expansion. Taking both, the Louisiana Purchase and the Adams-Onis Treaty into consideration you will also learn how and why Texas was annexed. With the growth of the United States, slave-holders also sought out for more land in order to keep slavery alive. Many compromises were set in check after this altering expansion went into action. Some states were against the expansion and others thought it was their only hope to keep their country from sinking. In 1803, President …show more content…

Many consequences followed this purchase. Enlarging the United States, the tension between the North and South only increased. With states already stuck in the middle of the decision upon slavery, they now had to come to an agreement whether or not slavery was allowed in the new land. The North wanted to abolish slavery forever simply because of how awful it is to own another human being and force them to work without pay. The South however found slavery work to not only be alright and a part of the Southern lifestyle but they found it to be what helped fuel some of their industries. Increasing nationalism was another outcome of this purchase. With this being a positive reaction people were proud with the country they lived in. Economically, the purchase had a major short-term impact. It allowed American goods to once more go down the Mississippi and out to the sea via New Orleans. In the long term, it gave the US lands that were to have tremendous agricultural and mineral importance for our economy. Pros and cons definitely arose during this purchase but if the French never sold us the land back in the day I don’t think our nation would be how it is to this …show more content…

Having 11 non-slave states and 11 slaves states creating an equal balance throughout the nation was now at risk once the new western territories were incorporated into the United States. Defenders of slavery relied on a central principle of fairness and had to find a center of balance to grant the rights of these states. Missouri entered the union as a slave state in 1819 but had to also allow Maine in as a non-slave state to keep the balance of non-slave and slave states equal. The Missouri Compromise was an effort by Congress to defuse the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be permitted. Many years later the William Proviso was proposed to ban slavery in territory acquired from the Mexican-American War. Many northerners lined up behind this proposal and supported “free soil.” Free soil meant that territory in which slavery would be prohibited, because they wanted to preserve the West for free labor-not for slaveholders or slaves. In other words their main argument was that on free soil any man should be able to walk freely. Not lasting long this party lasted until about

Open Document