Terminal Narrative Argument

1599 Words4 Pages

Amber Peng Ms. Pace H100 15 May 2024 Terminal Narratives Essay The Great Global Convergence was a period of time from 1450-1750 when European power increased as a result of African and Indigenous enslavement. Terminal narratives are accounts of history that explain the absence, loss of culture, or disappearance of Indigenous and African communities. These narratives were created to justify the actions of European colonizers. A question emerges: how does resistance and resilience in the face of European destruction challenge the “terminal narrative” argument? Although historians have traditionally argued that resistance does not significantly challenge the terminal narrative argument, this essay will focus on resistance during the Great Global Convergence because doing so will show how resistance …show more content…

Inca metallurgy was just as advanced as European metallurgy, but they used metal as a token of wealth, power, and community affiliation. These ideas were perceived as less advanced until recently. Native ingenuity demonstrates that European colonizers were not simply superior, but that there were many different aspects that led to how history unraveled. The goal of this essay is to examine acts of resistance during the Great Global Convergence, to demonstrate how resistance impacted the course of history. This goal is achieved through discussions of resistance on slave ships, political resistance, and resistance through native ingenuity. Although historians may argue that resistance does not significantly challenge the terminal narrative of European conquest, it is important to learn about and understand resistance throughout history to know how it impacts us today. Indigenous and African communities are still here today, and it is important to acknowledge that rather than claim that there was no resistance, or try to create explanations about the deaths of these

Open Document