Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Various types of euthanasia and controversies about the process
Legal and Ethical Issues Involving Assisted Suicide
Euthanasia for patients unable to choose
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“I'm not afraid of being dead. I'm just afraid of what I might have to go through to get there” -Pamela Bone (“Quotes About Euthanasia”). This quote shows how hard it can be to be able to die. Because patients with terminal illnesses are sick and can not be cured, Euthanasia is a good choice for patients. There are many types of Euthanasia like passive, active, voluntary, and involuntary. With many laws surrounding organ donation, it can be hard for patients that are terminally ill to donate organs.
Terminal illnesses have many phases that can be very life changing and cause many hardships for not only the patient but also his or her family and friends. Before a terminal illness is diagnosed, patients begin to recognize symptoms and may be
…show more content…
sick (source 5). After, then comes the acute phase of being terminally ill. The diagnosis is given, and the patients is caused to understand and take in the words they have heard and then choose their next steps medically (source 5).
Being a chronic terminally ill patient means moving into the middle phases and are starting to struggle with everyday life and have been receiving medical treatment (source 5). This can last up to several months. Recovery from being chronic can be a hard situation and is the time the patient must finally accept their disease and find a way to cope with it (source 5). The final step is the terminal phase at which death appears likely in the patient, and they are not helped with their disease but given palliative care to try to control the pain of the patient (source 5). In other words, the diagnosis can be the hardest thing for patients to deal with. It causes many families to make a change in the way they will go upon their days with someone who is terminally ill; it causes depression and suicidal thoughts for the patient (source 5). One patient expressed his or her feelings before they unfortunately passed away; “Dying is one of the hardest things I have done” (source 5). If a patient's will is to refuse treatment, that is perfectly fine; it …show more content…
is the patient's choice on whether or not they want to stop treatment. This could also have to do with the patient's state of health; like if they are not going to get better even with treatment. Some patients have religious beliefs that they follow that state they must not receive treatment when sick and should rely fully on God to take care of them (source 8). Another choice for patients is palliative care. This helps the patient accept dying as a normal thing and receive relief from pain (source 8). These patients live their live as full as they can in their last months and are made as comfortable as possible (source 8). Terminal illnesses can be very life changing, and the many types of euthanasia can be very similar yet people take many different views on them. There are many different types of euthanasia; some can be chosen by the patient and some chosen by the family; either way both are okay and the patient deserves what is best for them.
Passive is one type of euthanasia; when a medical professional does not do what it takes to keep the patient alive or stops the treatment that is keeping them alive, then that is passive (source 7). Active euthanasia is when a doctor ends all the pain of the patient by lethal injection (source 7). Many patients who are actively killed mostly are in so much pain and they can not take it anymore or they have been told they have seven days left to live. “Allowing someone to live in pain is a bigger evil than causing their death” (source 7). Stopping treatment to a patient is on purpose and so is deciding not to carry out on treatment. A doctor taking an action knowing it can result in death is the same as a doctor taking an action to intentionally cause death (source7). Both end out the same, pulling the plug on someone is the same as lethal injection. Voluntary euthanasia is done with consent of the patient and is legal in the United States in six states (source 8). Involuntary is done without consent and the decision is made by someone other than the patient (source 8). The real issue is that a patient should have freedom of their choice, and only that patient knows how much pain and suffering they are going through. Losing independence is said to be one of the hardest things and most people do
not know how much of an emotional toll being terminally ill can cause. Hospital space is limited as well; so why spend money and space on patients who want their suffering to be over? People are able to sign their dogs off to be put down; so why should this be taken from humans? No patient should ever have to experience a slow and painful death. Along with terminal illnesses and the different types of euthanasia, the rules of organ donation and the fines of euthanasia being performed without being legal consent are very high. The rules and state laws of organ donation in the terminally ill can be very complicated and cause much stress for patients and families seeking euthanasia as a choice. Never has organ harvesting been done for patients who have been euthanized in the United States, but Netherlands and Belgium have taken up the challenge and been successful (source 9). The patient must be taken into prep and procedure just a few hours before their lethal injection to be able to harvest the organs correctly (source 9). The dead donor rule states that, organ donation should not cause or hasten death of a patient (source 9). Many with cancer have been told that their organs are of no good and can not be used to help and save others lives. It is said that thirty percent of terminally ill patients do not suffer from cancer, so they should be able to donate their organs if they wish (source 4). Signing off as a donor must be fully uncontroversial; meaning a family or patient can not be pressured to sign off for the donation of the patients organs (source 4). It is predicted that more people would not feel as bad about being euthanized and the family would be able to find rest in the donation of the patient’s organs. The states of Oregon and Vermont have some of the same laws regarding euthanasia; the doctor must be a doctor of medicine, a doctor of osteopathy, have a licensed in Oregon for the state of Oregon. For vermont the doctor must have a license in Washington, and finally the doctor must be willing to participate (source 10). In the state of Washington the procedure must be entirely voluntary and health care will not be provided for the medicines being given to the patient (source 10). California’s laws are a little more strict; the patient must have a mental screening to prove they are able to logically make the decision, they must be a resident of california being able to provide ID, they must give two oral request fifteen days apart, a written request must be provided to physician, and they must receive all three (source 10). Euthanasia is also legal in the states of Colorado and Montana was granted the right through court ruling (source 10). If someone goes against state's laws they could spend much time in jail and owe a reasonable fine (source 8). All things considered, terminal illnesses, different types of euthanasia, and organ donation along with euthanasia should be legal in all U.S. states. In conclusion, euthanasia is a safe and non painful way for patients to die who have not much time to live and are in much sufferable pain. They able to end that pain and rest peacefully. Still terminal illnesses and life support can be life changing for patients, and the confusion with all the different types of euthanasia and the harvesting and donation of organs can be hard things that patients who are terminal have to go through. From here on, euthanasia should be legal and be a tactful choice for patient in much pain to be able to end that suffering.
According to James Rachels, “both passive and active euthanasia are permissible.” (Luper and Brown, p.347). He gives a doctrine from American Medical Association quoting,” mercy killing is contrary to which the medical professional stands” (Luper and Brown, p. 347). He makes arguments against the doctrine as to why it would be rejected. One, a physician should let the patient end his life if he wants to so that the patient does not have to endure the suffering. However, Rachels says in that situation it’s better for the physician to kill the patient, rather than letting one die because using lethal injections can be painless and quick, whereas, letting one die can be a slow and painful process (Luper and Brown, p. 348). He points out two
Being diagnosed with a chronic illness is a life-altering event. During this time, life is not only difficult for the patient, but also for their loved ones. Families must learn to cope together and to work out the best options for the patient and the rest of the family. Although it may not be fair at times, things may need to be centered on or around the patient no matter what the circumstance. (Abbott, 2003) Sacrifices may have to be made during difficult times. Many factors are involved when dealing with chronic illnesses. Coping with chronic illnesses alter many different emotions for the patients and the loved ones. Many changes occur that are very different and difficult to get used to. (Abbott, 2003) It is not easy for someone to sympathize with you when they haven’t been in the situation themselves. No matter how many books they read or people they talk to, they cannot come close to understanding.
The decision to end a life is a difficult one no matter the situation presented. It stirs a great deal of emotions when thinking about a loved one choosing to die in situations where they are terminally ill. Death is a scary thought for most people, but we need to remember that it is just a fact of life, no matter how morbid it sounds. There is some dignity in ending a life for a patient is who terminally ill and suffering, although it may be a tough decision, it can sometimes be the right one.
Terminally ill, as stated in CNN news, is a person with a life threatening illness that has a prognosis of 6 months or less to live. Patients seek relief from symptoms such as unremitting severe pain, breathing difficulties such as choking and suffocation, nausea and vomiting. When a patient refuses treatment or is taken off of it, they will endure endless amounts of pain and suffering before they actually die. If the patient is given lethal medication, the death will be much swifter and peaceful.
There are two types of euthanasia: passive and active. Passive or voluntary euthanasia refers to withholding life saving treatments or medical technology to prolong life. For example, a patient has the right to refuse medical treatment. They also have the right to refuse resuscitation if they are in need to be placed on life support. Active or involuntary euthanasia refers to providing the means for someone to take their life or assisting with taking their life (“Euthanasia” Discovering).
When faced with a terminal illness a person has to go through a process of thinking. What will happen to me? How long will I suffer? What kind of financial burden am I going to leave with my family when I am gone? What are my options? For many years the only legal options were to try a treatment plan, palliative care, hospice, and eventually death. For residents of Washington State, Oregon, and Vermont there is another option. They have the option to end their own life with a prescription from their physicians.
Thanks in part to the scientific and technological advances of todays’ society, enhanced medicinal treatment options are helping people battle illnesses and diseases and live longer than ever before. Despite these advances, however, many people with life threatening illnesses have needs and concerns that are unidentified and therefore unmet at the end of life, notes Arnold, Artin, Griffith, Person and Graham (2006, p. 62). They further noted that when these needs and concerns remain unmet, due in part to the failure of providers to correctly evaluate these needs, as well as the patients’ reluctance to discuss them (p. 63, as originally noted by Heaven & Maguire, 1997), a patient’s quality of life may be adversely affected. According to Bosma et al. (2010, p. 84), “Many generalist social work skills regarding counseling, family systems, community resources, and psychosocial assessments are relevant to working with patients and families with terminal illness”, thereby placing social workers in the distinctive position of being able to support and assist clients with end of life decisions and care planning needs. In fact, they further noted that at some point, “most social work practitioners will encounter adults, children, and families who are facing progressive life limiting illness, dying, death, or bereavement” (p. 79).
When it comes to a bad diagnosis it is often difficult for doctors to tell their patients this devastating news. The doctor will likely hold back from telling the patient the whole truth about their health because they believe the patient will become depressed. However, Schwartz argues that telling the patient the whole truth about their illness will cause depression and anxiety, but rather telling the patient the whole truth will empower and motivate the patient to make the most of their days. Many doctors will often also prescribe or offer treatment that will likely not help their health, but the doctors do so to make patients feel as though their may be a solution to the problem as they are unaware to the limited number of days they may have left. In comparison, people who are aware there is no cure to their diagnosis and many choose to live their last days not in the hospital or pain free from medications without a treatment holding them back. They can choose to live their last days with their family and will have more time and awareness to handle a will. Schwartz argues the importance of telling patients the truth about their diagnosis and communicating the person’s likely amount of time left as it will affect how the patient chooses to live their limited
Moving forward, people should be able to be put out of their misery of their terminal illness. This is something that without a doubt will tear a person to shreds. This type of news, “can trigger feelings of depression, in both patient and loved one. These feelings can be severe or mild and can often be just one of the stages that a person goes through when learning of catastrophic news” (Terminal Illness). Some terminal illnesses this time is also very stressful with decisions that one can make. Although depending on what the patient has, the illness can be brutal and
Anyone can be diagnosed with a terminal illness. It doesn’t matter how healthy you are, who you are, or what you do. Some terminal illnesses you can prevent by avoiding unhealthy habits, eating healthily, exercising regularly and keeping up with vaccinations. However some terminally ill people cannot be helped, their diseases cannot be cured and the only thing possible to help them, besides providing pain relieving medication, is to make them as comfortable as possible while enduring their condition. Many times the pharmaceuticals do not provide the desired pain escape, and cause patients to seek immediate relief in methods such as euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately ending a life in order to alleviate pain and suffering, but is deemed controversial because many various religions believe that their creators are the only ones that should decide when their life’s journey should reach its end. Euthanasia is performed by medical doctors or physicians and is the administration of a fatal dose of a suitable drug to the patient on his or her express request. Although the majority of American states oppose euthanasia, the practice would result in more good as opposed to harm. The patient who is receiving the euthanizing medication would be able to proactively choose their pursuit of happiness, alleviate themselves from all of the built up pain and suffering, relieve the burden they may feel they are upon their family, and die with dignity, which is the most ethical option for vegetative state and terminally ill patients. Euthanasia should remain an alternative to living a slow and painful life for those who are terminally ill, in a vegetative state or would like to end their life with dignity. In addition, t...
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would give a patient an aid in dying. “Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, Medical practioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death” (Lee). “Arguments for and against assisted suicide (sometimes called the “right to die” debate) are complicated by the fact that they come from very many different points of view: medical issues, ethical issues, legal issues, religious issues, and social issues all play a part in shaping people’s opinions on the subject” (Lee). Euthanasia should not be legalized because it is considered murder, it goes against physicians’ Hippocratic Oath, violates the Controlled
One area of moral dilemma that requires our attention is regarding euthanasia. Euthanasia is the practice of ending life in order to relieve pain or suffering caused by a terminal illness. Euthanasia can further be divided into two subcategories active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is the process of deliberately causing a person’s death. In passive euthanasia a person does not take any action and just allows the person to die. In many countries, the thought of euthanasia is morally detestable. However, many doctors find nothing wrong with allowing a terminally ill patient to decide to refuse medication. This decision is a form of passive euthanasia the doctor did not actively cause the patient’s death, but he did nothing to prevent the patient’s death. Failing to act and directly acting is not the same as not being responsible for the consequences of an event.
However it can also make room for medical, legal and ethical dilemmas. Advances in medical technology enable individuals to delay the inevitable fate of death, overcome cancer, diabetes, and various traumatic injuries. Our advances in medical technologies now allow these individuals to do things on their own terms. The “terminally ill” state is described as having an incurable or irreversible condition that has a high probability of causing death within a relatively short time with or without treatment (Guest, p.3, 1998). A wide range of degenerative diseases can fall into either category, ranging from, HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer’s disease and many forms of cancer. This control, however, lays assistance, whether direct or indirect, from a
Have you ever wondered what you would do if you were being diagnosed with a terminally ill disease that could not be cured? How scared you would be? How would you and your family handle this devastating news? These questions are being answered every day by people that will get this unexpecting news to them. Per the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2016), “[The] numbers of adults who have ever been diagnosed with cancer: 20.3 million”. If you look at this stat, it should scare everyone because this could affect anyone. This stat only counted the number of adults that cancer has ever affected. It is not including any other age group regarding how it affected the rest of us. However, if you are diagnosed with a terminal illness, and there is not a chance of remission; you have an option other than suffering. You can get a physician assisted suicide which allows you to pass away peacefully with your friends and loved one surrounding you. Physician assisted suicide should be allowed to anyone that would have to have it.
Euthanasia has been an ongoing debate for many years. Everyone has an opinion on why euthanasia should or should not be allowed but, it is as simple as having the choice to die with dignity. If a patient wishes to end his or her life before a disease takes away their quality of life, then the patient should have the option of euthanasia. Although, American society considers euthanasia to be morally wrong euthanasia should be considered respecting a loved one’s wishes. To understand euthanasia, it is important to know the rights humans have at the end of life, that there are acts of passive euthanasia already in practice, and the beneficial aspects.