Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How is technology changing our understanding of privacy
Computer technology disrupting privacy
Potential threats to your privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In today’s dynamic and interconnected world, new forms of technology along with recent case law and legislation has highlighted the profound shortcomings of Australian law in effectively keeping pace with breaches in copyright and issues of privacy. In considering the effectiveness of the law in relation to its protection of individual rights, there is a need to evaluate the law’s ability in enforcing privacy and copyright legislation; responding proactively to the issues created by new technology; and ultimately, whether or not justice has been achieved for individuals. Thus, it is evident that the law has presently failed to address new technology at the expense of individual rights. Albeit this, the legal system is nonetheless doing what it can to achieve fair outcomes for a majority of individuals.
In relation to issues of privacy, the boundless nature of the internet has posed problems for lawmakers in exercising enforcement outside of its jurisdiction, resulting in a loss of individual rights. The growth in usage of online chat rooms and social networking sites such as Facebook have promoted ‘private’ online communication. However, chat room information and message logs cannot be completely deleted from cyberspace and can still be accessed and collected illicitly by cyber criminals and businesses. The development of online data collection software has surpassed the law’s ability to enforce privacy laws, enabling private information to be used unlawfully and in breach of individual rights. The United States 2012 federal court matter in Soble v. Google Inc. exemplifies the issue of enforceability of privacy laws, whereby the US legal system could only successfully exercise its jurisdiction if the matter was within its geogra...
... middle of paper ...
...formation Access Centre. 2009. http://www.legalanswers.sl.nsw.gov.au/hot_topics/pdf/cyberlaw (20/6/14) http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/1937/45.html Case Details: ABC v. Lenah. 2007. http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2001/63 (20/6/14)
Case note: ABC v. Lenah. 2009. https://www.voiceless.org.au/content/case-note-abc-v-lenah-game-meats (21 /6/14)
Sydney Morning Herald. 2011. http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/piracy-are-we-being-conned (22/6/14)
NSW State Library: Legal Information Access Centre. 2009. http://www.legalanswers.sl.nsw.gov.au/hot_topics/pdf/cyberlaw
Wired. Duarte Police Case. 2007. http://www.wired.com/2007/11/pirate-fined-88/
Milgate, Dally, Webster, Cornu, Kelly. 2010 Cambridge Legal Studies: Preliminary (Second Edition). Sydney. Cambridge University Press pp 311 - 314
R N Howie and P A Johnson, Annotated Criminal Legislation NSW, 2011-2102, (Lexis Nexis Butterworths 2012) 17769-1774
9. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003). Legal Studies for Queensland, Volume 1, ForthEdition, Legal Eagle Publications: Queensland. 10. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003).
H W R Wade ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’ (1995) 172 Cambridge Law Journal 186.
Culver, Keith Charles. Readings in the philosophy of law. 1999. Reprint. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2008. Print.
The personal connection Americans have with their phones, tablets, and computers; and the rising popularity of online shopping and social websites due to the massive influence the social media has on Americans, it is clear why this generation is called the Information Age, also known as Digital Age. With the Internet being a huge part of our lives, more and more personal data is being made available, because of our ever-increasing dependence and use of the Internet on our phones, tablets, and computers. Some corporations such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook; governments, and other third parties have been tracking our internet use and acquiring data in order to provide personalized services and advertisements for consumers. Many American such as Nicholas Carr who wrote the article “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty, With Real Dangers,” Anil Dagar who wrote the article “Internet, Economy and Privacy,” and Grace Nasri who wrote the article “Why Consumers are Increasingly Willing to Trade Data for Personalization,” believe that the continuing loss of personal privacy may lead us as a society to devalue the concept of privacy and see privacy as outdated and unimportant. Privacy is dead and corporations, governments, and third parties murdered it for their personal gain not for the interest of the public as they claim. There are more disadvantages than advantages on letting corporations, governments, and third parties track and acquire data to personalized services and advertisements for us.
“Human beings are not meant to lose their anonymity and privacy,” Sarah Chalke. When using the web, web users’ information tend to be easily accessible to government officials or hackers. In Nicholas Carr’s “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty,” Jim Harpers’ “Web Users Get As Much As They Give,” and Lori Andrews “Facebook is Using You” the topic of internet tracking stirred up many mixed views; however, some form of compromise can be reached on this issue, laws that enforces companies to inform the public on what personal information is being taken, creating advisements on social media about how web users can be more cautious to what kind of information they give out online, enabling your privacy settings and programs, eliminating weblining,
This concludes my summary of lessons gleaned from the course BSL 301 Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis referencing Honigberg, G. "Gilbert Law Summaries: Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis" 10th ed. BarBri Group, 2006.
Part of the allure of the Internet has always been the anonymity it offers its users. As the Internet has grown however, causing capitalists and governments to enter the picture, the old rules are changing fast. E-commerce firms employ the latest technologies to track minute details on customer behavior. The FBI's Carnivore email-tracking system is being increasingly used to infringe on the privacy of netizens. Corporations now monitor their employees' web and email usage. In addition to these privacy infringements, Internet users are also having their use censored, as governments, corporations, and other institutions block access to certain sites. However, as technology can be used to wage war on personal freedoms, it can also be employed in the fight against censorship and invasion of privacy.
Ever since day one, people have been developing and creating all sorts of new methods and machines to help better everyday life in one way or another. Who can forget the invention of the ever-wondrous telephone? And we can’t forget how innovative and life-changing computers have been. However, while all machines have their positive uses, there can also be many negatives depending on how one uses said machines, wiretapping in on phone conversations, using spyware to quietly survey every keystroke and click one makes, and many other methods of unwanted snooping have arisen. As a result, laws have been made to make sure these negative uses are not taken advantage of by anyone. But because of how often technology changes, how can it be known that the laws made so long ago can still uphold proper justice? With the laws that are in place now, it’s a constant struggle to balance security with privacy. Privacy laws should be revised completely in order to create a better happy medium between security and privacy. A common misconception of most is that a happy medium of privacy and security is impossible to achieve. However, as well-said by Daniel Solove, “Protecting privacy doesn’t need to mean scuttling a security measure. Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place.”(“5 Myths about Privacy”)
Cownie, F and Bradney, A. (2002) English Legal System in Context, London, Butterworths, pp. 293-4.
Perhaps the founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, said it best when he claimed that privacy is no longer a “social norm.” Virtually everyone has a smart phone and everyone has social media. We continue to disclose private information willingly and the private information we’re not disclosing willingly is being extracted from our accounts anyway. Technology certainly makes these things possible. However, there is an urgent need to make laws and regulations to protect against the stuff we’re not personally disclosing. It’s unsettling to think we are living in 1984 in the 21st century.
Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials by Andrew Le Sueur, Maurice Sunkin and Jo Murkens (Paperback - 12 Aug 2010) chapter 8 p 368-418
As can be seen, from the information presented, the need for laws and restrictions concerning internet data collection is greatly needed. Moreover, the government can search private citizens data without warrant or cause. Also, companies are not only collecting internet user data but also selling it. The companies and agencies who commit such crimes should be fined or either closed down. In closing, the privacy and security of individuals on the internet should be upheld by the United States government.
The consistent use of information and communication technology (ICT) in modern world enables us for countless opportunities for individuals, institutions, business organisations and scientists, but it also raises difficult ethical and legal problems. In particular, ICT helped to make societies more complex and thus even harder to understand. The use of ICT has led to changes in concepts: ownership, buying and selling, right to possession, theft, justice in the distribution of resources and access rights. During the nineties, the internet has grown into all business segments resulting in a large number of questions running. It has been noted that during those time period there has been merging of computers, telecommunications, and media which is further emphasized by the emergence of new issues and strengthening old ones.
The courts of England and Wales acknowledge that the above must be something of value, in order to amount to consideration. A valuable consideration in the perspective of the English La...