Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing china and imperial rome
Compare the Roman empire to the Chinese empire
Compare the Roman empire to the Chinese empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing china and imperial rome
The Han and Roman empires both feel strongly about the advancement of technology during their time. Though both China and Rome favor technology, they have varying reasons for doing so such as seeing different advantages and disadvantages . Some political leaders and philosophers care and pay attention to different technologies while others’ have a more indifferent attitude towards it. The use of technology is seen in several ways, such as degrading or superior. The effects of technology were often preferred but they were not always positive and beneficial. A helpful document to be included and used to analyze this topic would be a source from the point of view of a common citizen from each society. A peasant’s voice would have shown what the people felt about the technologies that were used and invented. It can be seen that some care about technology and some don’t when a Roman philosopher talks about their indifference to it or when a high official talks about a leader who was obsessive over certain technologies. In document 7, a Roman philosopher named Seneca says, “I do not believe that tools for the crafts were invented by wise men.” Clearly, Seneca does not care for these advancements. In contrast, a political leader, also from Rome, was described as very anxious about road building going in the …show more content…
empire. Plutarch said in document 7, “He was especially anxious about road building. paying attention to utility as well as to which was beneficial to grace and beauty.” In Han China, government officials requested that water conservation offices were to be built and monitored in order to prevent flooding, as it says in document 4. This shows they took advantage of technologies to prevent disasters. There were uses of technology that had a hand in how people were seen in society, such as how a Roman leader was convinced those who worked with tools for pay were vulgar and then in Han China one leader was admired for their peaceful ruling and useful adventure. In document 4 a Han Leader, Tu Shih is said to be a great and peaceful leader. It also says, “He invented a water powered blowing-engine… allowed people to enjoy great benefit for little labor.” A Roman Leader says in document 5, “... as to which crafts and other means of living are suitable for a gentlemen to practice and which are degrading.” What Cicero is saying that if you work with tools and do manual labor for pay, you are vulgar and unbecoming. In document 8, a Roman general talks about how their water structures are useful and superior to other Greek works in multiple ways. Technology was used in ways that were successful but also in ways that weren’t in Han and Rome.
In document 2, a Han government official talks about how the use of iron tools is failing and there are negative effects to their production. A Han philosopher talks about the invention of the pestle and mortar and how beneficial they were in document 3. It says these were invented by Fuxi and they were improved, “Later on… cleverly improved… the benefit was increased tenfold.” Going back to document 7, Seneca discusses how certain technologies are not useful or unimpressive, “The question of whether the hammers or the tongs came first does not seem important to
me.” These eight documents give insight and reason as to what the Han and Roman felt about technology and how it affected their societies. It’s clear that the Han took advantage of their technological successes and they valued the benefits. The Romans also saw many advantages of technology but they often used it to show their superiority to other societies.
In a period of four centuries the Han, Roman, and Gupta empires fell. First in China, then in the Mediterranean, and lastly in India. The civilizations deteriorated from foreign invasion, internal conflicts, and internal weakness that made it to where invaders could invade and cause the decline of these major civilizations.
During the Han and Roman time period everything was changing. New Technology greatly expanding the empire's. Attitudes shifted in the Han and Roman empire. The Han attitude towards technology is for the common people with innovative tools and natural disaster prevention. The attitude to the Roman technology is to show off how advanced their civilization was with aqueducts and paved roads.
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two grand empires that rose out of preexisting territories and provided relative peace over wide areas. The collapse of the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE), which was the first great land-based empire in East Asia, came after a period of war, confusion, and tyrannical rule. Due to the political disorder that stemmed from the early dynastic activity, the emergence of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE- 228 CE) sprung to focus on restoring order. On the other hand, the rise of the Roman Empire (44 BCE- 476 CE) originated from consolidating authority over aristocratic landlords and overriding the democratic elements of the earlier Republic. Instead, the Roman Empire redefined the concept of “citizen” as subjects to the Roman emperor. Both empires shared similar agendas to exploit their vast territories and resources, which helped them expand their political dominance; however, despite having similar political goals and foundations, their government system, cultural ideologies and imperial expansionist natures diverged.
Today we can look around ourselves and see thousands of technical innovations that make life easier; But if we take a step back and ask ourselves “How?” we will soon realize that most often, these technological advancements did not just “poof” into existence, but are usually the outcome of building upon yesterday’s technology. If we follow this cycle back into time, we can attribute almost any modern day invention to an ancient civilization during its golden age. China was no exception. China’s Song and Tang dynasties fostered scientific advances comparable to Rome’s during its Pax Romana. The most significant and impacting of these were the development of primitive gunpowder and porcelain of the Tang and paper money, and the magnetic compass of the Song Dynasties. Although these may seem very far off, if you look hard enough, you can see traces of their impacts in society today because most of the advancements today we owe to them.
T: Classical civilizations, Han China and Imperial Rome, spanning from 206 BCE to 220 CE and 31 BCE to 476 CE, respectively, shared multiple political aspects such as an emphasis on territorial expansion and a gradual internal collapse. However, they differed in a dissimilar social hierarchy, China favoring the scholar-gentry class, Rome preferring the aristocratic class.
During 600 B.C.E to 600 C.E, very ambitious and powerful empires rose. Two of those empires were the Han and Roman empires. Both empires were backed by a strong army and influential leaders. Even though there similarities, they were quite different on how each ruler gave their empire control and where they put themselves in their empire.
While Imperial Rome and Han China are homogenous in various measures in government, religion and their social structure, they are also contrasting with them as well.
The rise and fall of civilizations are inevitable. The way in which this occurs, however, can vary greatly from one civilization to the next. Although it can differ, the rise and fall of civilization has some underlying patterns; this being the gain and loss of power. The Roman Empire and Han dynasty both differed and resembled each other in the process of the rise and fall of empires.
A similarity in the government and imperial administrations of Han China and Imperial Rome includes that they both had problems with defense that resulted in governmental and economic downfall. One difference in this same category involves the army in Rome causing political upset, which did not occur nearly as often in China.
One thing that I looked at for inspiration for my project was the not only the technology produce in recent memory, I also looked at the innovations of one of the greatest empires to have ever existed –the Roman Empire-. I took heavy influenc...
Analyzing the transfer of technology from one place to another can be a very difficult task. People have tried to trace the origins of specific technologies and map out what cultures it affected, why and what impact the technology had on history. Books have been written on conclusions that authors have made after doing the research I have suggested. I believe that obtaining the information to write a book about this subject is extremely hard and confusing, this is a personal assumption that I have made with regard to the fact that reading a book on this subject is hard and confusing. After reading The Tools of Empire by Daniel R. Headrick and excerpts from both Technology in World Civilization by A. Pacey and Major Problems in the History of American Technology, I have formed some opinions of my own primarily based on my readings about nineteenth and twentieth century technology transfer.
The history of technology begins two and a half million years ago with the stone age. Flint was split and sharpened to be used as a tool. Within a hundreds of thousands of years these stone tools became specialized for boring, scraping, cutting and sharp points. Five hundred thousand years ago in China, man discovers fire. The Neolithic period 8000BC of the Stone age brought about many new technologies. These technologies are pottery, textiles, bricks made in Jericho made of clay or mud and sun dried, the spinning spindle which brought about knitting. Around 6500BC, man discovers the kiln and more uses for fire. The loom is built in 6000BC along with weaving. In 4000BC, the first miners began mining copper in the Balkans and at this time the yoke and harness was invented, along with smelting and casting. In Sinai peninsula 3800BC, copper was being mined and was smelted. 3000BC brought forth quite few important inventions such as the wheel in Europe ,potter's wheel in Mesopotamia, plough along with draught animals in Egypt and Mesopotamia. 2800BC silk is woven in China and in 2500
Culture has been a part of our society, and way of life, forever. It is almost impossible to come up with an idea that isn’t influenced by culture. As new technology is introduced into a society, the culture reacts in a positive or negative way and is thus changed forever. Despite the fact that we cannot really ignore that there are a number of ways in which technology negatively impacts our society, for the better part it has greatly helped to make lives better. It has also helped us a great deal to be able to save on many resources such as time and money and these are great benefits that cannot be ignored. It has also worked well in bringing unity into the world by turning it into a global village which has in turn helped people to more easily overcome their cultural, racial and continental barriers. Like we saw in the case of Ireland where technological advancements have shaped and molded the country into a completely new one that is better than the one it was before. Technology is made and used in such a variety of ways because many people who use the technology of today come from all walks of life and have different necessities, so to compensate for that technology must adapt to all different cultures. Consequently, as cultures change so does the technology they develop. Ultimately, advances in technology directly affect how cultures evolve, complex interactions are all the result of the dynamic and perpetual relationship between technology and
“Technology” was a tool that made humans to the top of the food chain, a tool that allowed us to move from backdoor farming to large industrial factories, a tool that allowed to us live on every continent on the Earth and even explore Space, yet nobody ever asked “isn’t it just too much for a simple “tool” to accomplish”? Is it our human knowledge that lies within this tool and is the key factor behind the acquired results? To explore the etymological connection between the technology and knowledge generated through it, the question of “what we refer to and call as technology” has to be answered first. After the point of interest is defined and clearly stated, we will descend and examine technologies connection to the acquired knowledge through the prism of history and natural sciences.
...e technologies we created, from market economy and weapons of mass destruction to the simpler-scale household appliances. This suggests that many do not really see the frictions such technologies impose on our surroundings as problems, but rather according to their perception of the way things are, the tools they use are only doing exactly what they were supposed to and it cannot be helped. And moreover, this is so ingrained in most modern human cultures that the constituents of said cultures do not even see a problem with that.