Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of education in society
Role of education in shaping society
Effects of academic cheating
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As a student, I work very hard for the test grades that I receive. Therefore, I do not think it is right for an educator to change or alter a standardized test score in any way. In doing so, altering test scores can negatively affect many children’s lives in many different ways. I also believe that an educator should face consequences for the cheating crimes that they have committed. Furthermore, these teachers should be setting good examples for the students in the school, not committing crimes that effect the students. These educators are, in fact, not educators at all. They are not teaching young children the right morals and values, they are teaching students that it is okay to cheat to achieve what they want. I agree with Judge Baxter that these educators should be held accountable for their actions and that this cheating scandal is not a victimless crime. I believe that the children were harmed by the educators cheating scandal. The scandal not only taught the children it is okay to cheat, it also effected their test score which may have not been accurate with the child’s educational abilities. Therefore, the children think that they are excelling in the subjects but could actually be failing in the subjects, but will not know because of the cheating scandal. Moreover, I think that the cheating …show more content…
I also think that the educators believed the cheating scandal was morally right. Most of the educators did not admit their guilt, which admits they think that they did nothing wrong. I think that the whole cheating scandal was a way in which the teachers and principals could cover up the underperforming test scores, to save their jobs. The educators committed a selfish crime that got them into more trouble than they would have been in just because they were under pressure from
One of the blames claimed that “we have low-quality teaching because of low-quality teachers who never should have been certified in the first place.” (). Placing fault on teachers is inaccurate because not all teachers are to blame. There are teachers who push students to reach for their goals and to attend college so they can get a prominent job that makes them happy. Because a student fails, does not always mean it is because the teacher did not teach it well enough. It is possible that the student did not want to pursue further or rebelled against the teacher. There are students that do not want to be there, yet are being forced against their will due to the law. The teacher could be trying their best as well. Even though some may be low-quality, teachers want to see their students to succeed and grow into the person they want to be. Not to watch them fail and achieve nothing. It is sometimes that the students do not comply with their teachers. The one thing agreeable with Singleton is that if a student does not want to be in school, then let them
Parents and advocates of education can all agree that they want their students to be in the best hands possible in regards to education. They want the best teachers, staffs, and schools to ensure their student’s success. By looking at the score results from standardized testing, teachers can evaluate effectively they are doing their job. On the other side, a proponent for eliminating standardized testing would argue that not all students care passionately about their education and will likely not perform to expectations on the test. However, receiving the numerical data back, teachers can construe the student’s performances and eliminate the outliers of the negligent kids. Teachers can then look at the individual scores and assign those outliers to get the help they need in school. This helps every student getting an equal chance at education. Overall, taking a practice standardized test can let a teacher look at individual questions and scores and interpret what they need to spend more time on teaching. A school also can reap the benefits from standard testing to ensure they are providing the best possible education they can. The school can look at the average scores from a group and hold the teacher accountable for the student’s results on the test. The school can then determine the best course of action to pursuit regarding the teacher’s career at the school. By offering teachers and schools the opportunity to grow and prosper, standardized testing is a benefit for the entire education
However, this may stem from a lack of enforcement of the rules. Even at the most prestigious schools, such as Harvard University, students are not upholding the rules implemented: “The possibility that 125 Harvard students ‘improperly collaborated’ on an exam in the spring has galvanized … discussion about … honor codes” (Source: C). In this case, people may argue that the only party at fault consists of the students. However, the faculty may be partially guilty as well, as their lack of care towards the rules has created a situation that jeopardizes the school’s integrity. Revision may then seem like the least of the school’s priorities, as they must show they seriously consider educational integrity. Likewise, at the University of Virginia, “157 students have been investigated by their peers in the largest cheating scandal in memory” (Source: D). Again, the school and all those who work there hold at least part of the fault for this ignorance because, theoretically, they should preserve and enforce the rules provided. The fact that the scandal exists means that they were not doing their jobs to their fullest. Although revision may seem simpler to carry out, the school’s staff must show an attempt at intervention within the student lives to keep them on a path towards
Cheating can be a common routine in a classroom—from copying work on homework to copying answers on a test. “Cheating by teachers and administrators on standardized tests is rare, and not a reason to stop testing America's children” (Standardized Tests). This statement is proved false by the fact that thirty-seven states have been caught cheating by “encouraging teachers to view upcoming test forms before they are administered” (“FairTest Press Release: Standardized Exam Cheating in 37 States And D.C., New Report Shows Widespread Test Score Corruption”). If teachers can view a test before it is administered, they can teach to the test so that their students’ scores are higher. Teachers who have viewed the test can then “drill students on actual upcoming test items” (“FairTest Press Release: Standardized Exam Cheating in 37 States And D.C., New Report Shows Widespread Test Score Corruption”). This is morally wrong since teachers who do not have the access to an actual test or those who refuse to view it do not know what would be on the test and cover a broad domain of material, not just specifics.
This has become an ongoing problem relating back to the honor code. Specifically, students at more prestigious schools tend to have a lower percentage of students turning other students in for cheating. Despite that fact, Greenberg assumes that students do not want to tell on their peers when she states, “It’s clear that honor codes fail to stop cheating on college campuses.” These students have more pressure to maintain their grades because of how rigorous their coursework is. Greenberg depicts a fallacy involving circular reasoning in this quote because this statement is not proving that honor codes fail in all colleges. Stating that the honor code fails in all of the colleges is not definite. Most students that do see someone cheating do not end up reporting it. The reports are very low regarding students admitting in honor code schools that they participated in cheating or have seen someone cheat. Overall, students do not like to report if they see someone cheating or not. Students at higher schools have more pressure on them so reporting someone else of cheating would not benefit them. That does not become an overall failure for the honor code everywhere. The article does not have enough statistics to conclude that students do not report forms of cheating. Plus, the statistics given in the article are outdated when stating, “just 2.5 percent honor code complainants during the 2008-2009 academic year were students.” If we were given statistics every year, then this could potentially become evidence that the honor code is failing in these
Standardized tests do not cover all the things students need to know. They also do more harm than good to students, teachers, school systems, and to states. Over a million dollars every year could be spent on more for classrooms and schools and it could help the funding issues most schools face. The stress levels and “drill like” teaching would lower and teachers could focus on teaching in more creative and outgoing ways. Also teaching things that will help students outside of the classroom. Schools could also stop relying on the students scores for federal funding, keeping jobs, or the school. Schools will take chances and teachers will try new ways of teaching using their students personal learning styles, not the needed curriculum for the
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine ranking of people.
In the contemporary American education system high-stakes standardized testing has resulted in a focus on extensive test preparation, as well as a large increase in the numbers of teachers cheating by alternating their students' test scores. Both these phenomena are a direct consequence of the incentives and punishments directly linked to standardized test results.
A nationwide investigation also reviled school across the nation were involved in changing test scores. In order to stop this cruel and I think criminal intent on our children we must understand different learning habits. Also understand the environment of the child. The environment plays a strong role in how our children learn and are able to grasp what is being taught. Most importantly we must be patient. Every child does not learn one the same level. We are all different in so many ways. The teaching outline should reflect our unique characteristics. Let’s use the universalization test. What would the United States be like if every educator changed test scores? We would be a nation of inadequate uneducated individuals. We have an unwavering responsibility to our children.
This could force great teachers out of the field, and some less honest educators to more drastic measures. In 2009, eleven educators were convicted of changing students’ test answers in order to receive a better score, this was later called the Atlanta Scandal. Some schools cut down maybe even cancel recess to teach the test, or even teach the test all day instead of real life application.
After reading “Save Higher Education: Toss the Cheaters” by Professor Doom, my position would be neutral. I disagree with him, but also agree with him on some terms. Cheaters are not all looked at the same level and I believe that is one of the biggest factors on why cheating is not enforced. I would have to disagree on the punishment cheaters should face. I do, though, agree that the administrators cut corners to help their institution, and that institutions should not allow cheaters to graduate.
The issue of standardized testing has been a highly debated issue in the United States for many years and shows no sign of being resolved any time soon. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 was an effort to standardize and improve our education system, but 13 years later it is still in shambles. While many people agree there is a need for some sort of measure for quality education, there is much disagreement about the effectiveness of standardized tests. Some even say federal programs like No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top have gone too far in using test scores to evaluate teachers (Gordon 2013). Unfavorable results from these tests seem to generate more punitive consequences for the teachers and schools than help for the students. The words “high-stakes” are used often in numerous sources to describe the current testing system and refer to decisions that will make a significant impact on both students and teachers. These decisions include repeating a grade or not receiving a diploma for the student and possible loss of a job for the teacher. Standardized testing is an ineffective and expensive way to measure student achievement.
Academic knowledge is the basis on which future prosperity, and financial security has been determined. As a consequence, students feel inclined to perform above average in school. Now, as students perform less and less, they sink to obtain good grades by cheating. This method to acquire the desired grades will only harm the student, instead of the imagined result. Prompted by a child’s inability to perform basic tasks throughout his education , academic cheating spawns numerous negative consequences.
...Almost every student nowadays can admit to cheating at some point in their educational career, but motives as to why they cheat vary and can’t be narrowed down to one reason. There are many excuses as to why all levels of students chose to cheat no matter how wrong or unexpected it is. Cheating is a large problem, but members of universities and schools can discourage it and try to prevent it as much as possible. Not only should it be frowned upon, but it also should be a priority to make it next to impossible to do. Advisers can reduce the temptation of cheating by significantly decreasing the amount of true and false and multiple choice questions on exams and quizzes. Also by understanding the students social and parental pressures in a person at that age’s life is important and contributes to decreasing the amount of students cheating in schools and universities.
The above discussion shows that there are many effects of cheating in exam. Therefore, schools should come up with strategies on how to reduce cheating in schools. The teachers can inform the students about the effects of cheating in exam. They should also come up with harass punishment if a student is caught cheating. This will reduce the cases of cheating, and students will be fully equipped for the job market. Therefore, students should know cheating in exams is bad.