Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages of modern communication channels
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages of modern communication channels
A tarnished reputation can have serious repercussions. There are three majors issues that expose companies to reputational risk. These include: advances in communication channels, more scrutiny from regulators, and lower customer loyalty. An example of this would be the McDonald’s hot coffee case of 1994. A woman spilled coffee on herself and suffered third degree burns. She asked McDonald’s to pay her medical bills, which cost $20,000. When the company refused, she sued and won. If McDonald’s had just paid her, the case would not have gone to trial and the company’s reputation would not have been at risk. The company denied the settlement because of arrogance and greed. On top of the payment, McDonald’s had to make improvements to the cups and lids and pay legal fees. Overall, the court case cost the company millions of dollars and a loss in its reputation, which could have been avoided. Furthermore, damage to the reputation would lower the share price and lead to expensive regulatory investigations. Reputational risk can lead to financial losses, lost market share, or change in management. The employee and consumer loyalty will also decrease. Companies are willing to do a lot to preserve their reputations, even if the bad accusations are false, which is known as defamation. For example, in 2008, when a salmonella outbreak was inaccurately associated with tomatoes, Olive Garden stopped using tomatoes, even though it knew that the allegations were not true through its own research.
Companies don’t have much control over reputational risk. They do not know when, where, why, or how it will strike. The best that they could do is plan for it in advance. Concentration on reputational risk is vital for CROs (Chief ...
... middle of paper ...
... as a buffer and allow the organization to remain in business during economic shocks. A good reputation leads to more of a competitive advantage when selling products and services. Also, it increases shareholder value and attracts top talent. Good communication is essential in order to protect and repair a company’s reputation. If stakeholders hear bad news and the company does not communicate to them about the issue, they will believe what they hear; and this, in turn, will cause damage to the reputation of the company. In addition, all consumer complaints should be answered in a timely and appropriate manner. This will show the consumers that the company values them and their input. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical actions advance reputation. Transparency is extremely important if the organization wants to maintain its good reputation.
Reputation is a company’s biggest asset so you would think that organisations would avoid engaging in any sort of business that would put its reputation in jeopardy. Nevertheless, many organisations find their credibility destroyed due to practices that are harmful and illegal, which could land a CEO’s in prison.
Do you have a reputation? Is it good? Bad? How has your reputation influenced your life? Most people, in one way or another, have developed a reputation for themselves. In my personal opinion, high school is probably one of the most popular and easiest places to acquire a reputation. Not only that, but it seems to be a big problem throughout high school, because once you have a bad reputation, it’s not easy to improve it. Yet, high schools aren’t the only place where you can attain a reputation; work places are also a great place to develop one. Nowadays, even social networking can generate a good or bad reputation and depending on what those sites create, it could affect your career or even prevent you from attaining a certain career. Although
The major groups that were directly affected are investors, employees, and suppliers. Here we should make the distinction between different types of investors. There are two major types of investors: insiders and outside investors. Insiders are the investors who know the information that is not known publicly and may benefit them in some way. Outside investors are the investors who only know publicly known information. In our case, outside investors was the group that lost the most. On the other hand, insiders, notably Mickey Monus and David Shapiro, were the one that gains millions on IPO. The group who suffered was employees of Phar-Mor. After the scandal was revealed, most of the stores were closed to cover up losses. As a result, thousands of employees got fired. Another party that was damaged by the scandal was Coopers&Lybrant, the firm that did the audit for Phar-Mor, lost its reputation as a firm who does an audit with integrity. The secondary effect of the scandal was the overall mistrust among investors. They thought that if a giant retailer can forge its accounting books, why smaller companies wouldn’t do the same. As a result, investors became reluctant in investing into businesses that caused harm to the economy as a whole. The last but not least group that was affected by the scandal is Phar-Mor’s suppliers. Mickey Monus was fiercely fighting with them to make the chipset deals to cover up his losses, sometimes using inappropriate pressure and causing suppliers making unprofitable deals. In additions, Monus forced them to pay fees and sponsor his basketball League using buyer power of his company. In addition, a lot of bills for supplies were unpaid for months by Phar-Mor. Some suppliers said that they hated doing business with Phar-Mor, but had no choice since it had an access to vast amount of customers.
Our reputations are beliefs and opinions that are held by our friends, family and even complete strangers about bout us. Someone’s reputation determines how they will be seen before even meeting them, almost like a first impression. Which is why your reputation is something you need to handle with care and protect, however some will go to extremes in doing this for instance the play The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller. It is a look into what it was like back in the 1800’s during the Salem witch trails. During this play Miller makes the strong argument of the importance of reputation and the countless ways people will protect it. In the play this occurs with many of the characters some more than others yet it’s of importance to everyone in some way or another. The protection of one’s reputation also occurs outside of the play, an example of this would be in politics and sports. In the play The Crucible, Author Miller makes the argument that reputation is incredibly important and people will go to great lengths such as betrayal and lying to protect it, quite often ones morality will become altered when protecting their reputation.
“Most people in the U.S. want to do the right thing, and they want others to do the right thing. Thus, reputation and trust are important to pretty much everyone individuals and organizations. However, individuals do have different values, attributes, and priorities that guide their decisions and behavior. Taken to an extreme, almost any personal value, attribute, or priority can “cause” an ethical breach (e.g. risk taking, love of money or sta...
Dress: The Korowai push their penises inside (inverted penises) and wrap the rest with a leaf, or cover it using hard shell of forest fruit. On the other hand the Kombai, the aforementioned neighbouring tribe with similar customs, prefer to use a hornbill's beak, or so...
The crisis at the Nuance group appears to be a “Reputational” crisis. The case study states that the Nuance Group is “a successful management consulting company.” (Zaremba, 2010) In order to be successful, you must have a positive reputation, which was most likely the case with the Nuance Group. However, as Warren Buffet said, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and 5 minutes to ruin it”. (Tuttle, 2010) By publishing false information in their brochures, and distributing them to the public, the Nuance Group portrayed themselves as devious and untrustworthy, amongst other negative
Businesses have a social responsibility to their consumers and communities. Poor social responsibility can affect a company’s profitability and impact customer loyalty. In the 1990’s, Nike faced allegations of being the villains of child labor laws and running sweat shops. In 2008 JPMorgan’s involvement (or lack of) in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and 2015, Volkswagen’s emissions scandal are all examples of failed social responsibility. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is more than donating to charities; it’s about doing the right thing and being active members of the community.
Forman, J., & Argenti, P. A. (2005). How Corporate Communication Influences Strategy Implementation, Reputation and the Corporate Brand: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 245-264.
Further investigations revealed Foxconn had been guilty of unsafe and unfair working environments long before the incidents, which included the employment of extended working hours, discrimination, and military management techniques (Xu & Li, 2013). Due to Foxconn’s sole focus on maintaining businesses relationships by fulfilling Apple’s demand of technical products, their subsequent mistreatment of employees was exacerbated and generated 80-100 hours of forced overtime per week (Xu & Li, 2013). However, in an attempt to combat the negative publicity, each firm denied responsibility for the incidents, which ultimately added fuel to the media fire (Xu & Li, 2013). Since then, each firm has enacted superior regulations designed to maintain efficiency while recognizing limitations on labor hours and increased spending on compliance audits (Chandler & Werther, 2014). Yet, as Foxconn continues to sustain their global leadership and Apple’s profits remain unaffected, the disadvantages associated with the incidents at Foxconn have not transcended the outcomes. From a profit standpoint, the increase in spending and subsequent alterations of labor methods serve as the biggest disadvantage to each company’s bottom line. However, after both companies attempted to negate blame, their ensuing developments indicate assuming responsibility was the best avenue to recoup reputation issues and focus on long-term growth. Therefore, the greatest advantage for both companies was their heightened reputation resulting from increased transparency and the employment of business models focused on the welfare of all supply chain
The aim of this report is to apply the theoretical and practical ideas of corporate reputation and corporate social responsibility presented in this course to the organizations in the same industry.
... is just like real life, someone works really hard to have a certain reputation, like the student who did well on all of his assignments, but in one single act tall that hard work can be completely shattered, like how the students reputation was shattered after he failed his final. A reputation is a very fragile thing—something we all must keep in mind whenever we make a decision, complete a project, or make a statement.
A company has an economic obligation. It must earn a favorable return for its stockholders in the restrictions of the law. But, corporate social responsibility means that organizations have also ethical and societal responsibilities that go past their economic responsibilities. CSR needs organizations to develop their documentations of their responsibilities to include other stakeholders such as workers, customers, suppliers, local societies, state governments, international organizations, etc. Ethics could be seen as a fundamental component of individual and group activities at the heart of organizations’ errands.
Abraham Lincoln once said that character is like a tree and reputation like a shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing. Reputation can be destroyed by one poor decision or speech while character is stable and unlikely to waver. A person who is proud of their actions is more likely to hold their character in high regard and behave in ways that they consider honorable. In order to determine an individual’s reputation, a society will view a person based on how they appear given the beliefs and value systems of the community. A good reputation is earned when an individual’s unique value system aligns with the community’s values. In the event that a good reputation is soiled by acting against what society views as
Financial: A corrupt company will lose customer respect and trust, requiring that the company’s management spend valuable time and resources to keep their clientele loyal and demonstrate that they still operate a viable business. The public, overa...