Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of Symbolism
Use of Symbolism
The use of symbolism in the novel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In France, the years between 1789 and 1794 are a time of thoughtless inhumanity and brutality toward fellow man. These inhumane acts are carried through by the Revolutionaries and the nobility of France in these years and the years leading up to the French Revolution. One of the foremost illustrations of the inhumanity felt and shown during this time is A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens. Dickens uses metaphors as symbols throughout this book to exemplify his theme of thoughtlessness toward people by other people. Dickens develops these metaphors throughout the novel and manipulates them to fit different circumstances. He uses everyday objects and ideas and makes them personifications of the Revolution and their unsympathetic mindsets …show more content…
and agendas. The symbols of the scarecrows and the birds of fine song and feather, the sea, and the wine represent the theme of inhumanity in Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities. The scarecrows and the birds of fine song and feather represent the relationship between the peasants and the nobles and the inhumanity of one towards the other.
The scarecrows are the emancipated and starved peasants who are hungry for revolution. The birds of fine feather little know that “the time was to come, when the gaunt scarecrows of that region should have watched the lamplighter, in their idleness and hunger, so long, as to conceive the idea of improving on his method, and hauling up men by those ropes and pulleys…”(Dickens 23). The birds’ necks will be wrung by the Revolution and they will be strung up on the lampposts in the coming years of the Revolution. The nobles take no warning of the scarecrows’ unrest, “and every Wind that blew over France shook the rags of the scarecrows in vain, for the birds, fine of song and feather, took no warning” (23). The nobles’ disregard for the peasants is a huge reason for the French Revolution, but an even bigger reason is the total savagery toward them. The nobles, sitting lavishly in their castles, are watching the peasants starve to death. For example, Dickens writes “what the few village scarecrows who, in their quest for herbs to eat and fragments of dead stick to burn, had borne in upon their starved fancy that the expression of the faces was altered”(135). The peasants are literally starving on the doorsteps of the nobles, but the nobles turn them away simply because of the difference in class levels. As inhumane as …show more content…
the nobles are to the peasants, the peasants are just as inhumane in their assassination of the nobles during the Revolution. The sea represents the wild nature and inhumanity of the revolution to those who they deemed guilty of crimes they may or may not have committed. The sea is a mass of peasants, none of them thinking for themselves. They are bloodthirsty and savage, especially when the death of a noble is involved. In the first trial of Charles Darnay “all the human breath in the place, rolled at him, like a sea, or a wind, or a fire” (44) because the punishment for his crimes is quartering, a barbarous punishment. The goal of the Revolution is to drown the nobles for the sins that the Revolutionaries perceive that they had committed. The French Revolution is at first “echoes from a distance” but they grow louder with time; “they began to have an awful sound, as of a great storm in France, with a dreadful sea rising”(164). The sea is a mighty force that threatened to swallow any goodness and compassion left in the heart of the French. The prisoners of the Revolution are little boats on the mighty ocean. On the day that Sydney Carton is murdered by the Revolution, “fifty-two were to roll that afternoon on the life-tide of the city to the boundless everlasting sea” (269). The Revolution carries the bodies of the innocent out to sea along with the bodies of those who committed the crimes charged against them. The Revolutionaries are so focused on having past evils paid for, they forget to make sure the right people were paying. The wine represents the blood spilled in the revolution and the inhumanity of this spilling of blood.
This metaphor is introduced with a man scrawling “BLOOD” on a wall in the midst of frenzy in which peasants were scooping up wine that has spilled into the street outside the Defarge’s wine shop when a cask broke. Dickens explains, “The time was to come, when that wine was to be spilled on the street-stones and when the stain of it would be red upon many there” (22). This scene parallels two later scenes in which there is much bloodshed spilled via La Guillotine and the Revolution. The insanity that the Revolutionaries go through in the spilling of blood is the same insanity that the starved peasants go through when blood is spilling instead of wine. Everyone is a victim to the barbarism of the Revolution, no matter what they do or did not do. The killing of innocents is not a rare or unusual thing. Dickens states, “Every day, through the street, the tumbrils now jolter heavily, filled with Condemned…. all red wine for La Guillotine, all daily brought into light from the dark cellars of the loathsome prisons…”(213). The prisoners are little more than blood to the members of the Revolution. The same wine that is spilled in front of Defarge’s wine shop spills over and over from innocent and guilty people alike. There is a startling amount of this savage wine spilled each day by the Revolution. Dickens declares, “Six tumbrils carry the day’s wine to La Guillotine” (288). The
tumbrils carry prisoners of the Revolution to the guillotine, like the wine cask carries the wine before it spills. The tumbrils spoken of here are only the grapes for the wine of one day. When the peasants get their first taste of the spilled wine, they only want more. The same goes for the blood spilled by the revolution; once a little has been spilled, people will always be thirsty for more. The theme of inhumanity in Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities is best represented by the symbols of the scarecrows and the birds of fine song and feather, the sea, and the wine. The scarecrows are the starving peasants and the birds of fine song and feather are the lucky nobles. These two are ruthless to one another from the beginning, with their conflicting interests. The sea and its mighty waves crash up onto the shores of the nobles and knock down their high horses. The sea is a wild force, and cannot be contained by human force. The wine is the blood of the Revolution and the insanity of the people who spilled it. Both the wine and the blood it represents give the drinker a sense of drunkenness. The inhumanity in A Tale of Two Cities can only be seen by those who know the future. In the time that the acts of inhumanity take place they seem like deserved acts, when in reality, they are malicious, heartless acts of savagery.
In this passage, Dickens’ juxtaposition, personification, detail, and diction reinforce Dickens’ tone of empathy and pity for the social conditions of the people of lower class France. When a large cask of wine spills open on the streets of France there is a mad rush to collect a taste of the spoiled wine. The people’s reactions consisted of “...frolicsome embraces, drinking of healths, shaking of hands, and even joining of hands and dancing a dozen together.” This exciting and scene of much happiness is juxtaposed by the “gloom that gathered on the scene that appeared more natural than sunshine” that occurs after all the wine has run out. This juxtaposition of the momentary happiness that the peasants of St. Antoine experience provide a contrast
Charles Dickens writes this book explaining the French Revolution, in which the social and economic systems in France had huge changes and the French monarchy collapsed. This causes high taxes, unfair laws, and the poor being mistreated. Charles Dickens shows that cruelty of other people will lead to a revolution and in addition to the revolution more cruelty will occur. He explores the idea of justice and violence through the use of ambiguous characters with positive and negative qualities, meaning that they have to different sides to them; for example, Charles Darnay, Sydney Carton, and Dr. Manette. Throughout the story of A Tale of Two Cities, Charles dickens uses ambiguous characters to shows how violence and cruelty can be stopped through the power of true sacrifice.
They are gaudy like the male birds, and are entertained all day long with fine song, as the aristocrats are entertained with rich entertainment and food. In comparison, it is stated, “Such ample leisure had the stone faces, now, for listening to the trees and to the fountain, that the few village scarecrows who, in their quest for herbs to eat and fragments of dead stick to burn, strayed within sight of the great stone court-yard and terrace staircase, had it borne in upon their starved fancy that the expression of the faces was altered” (Dickens 135).... ... middle of paper ... ...
The French Revolution was a time when many people sacrificed their lives for their beliefs. As the French Revolution moved on, more people joined the movement and risked their lives. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens is set during this time. Many people who sacrificed their lives for the Revolution felt like it was their fate to do this. This idea of fate is described many times in Dickens’ novel to magnify the story. The theme of fate is prevalent in the novel through the lives of many characters. This theme is used to show how a person is unable to escape their fate because it is already decided. The metaphors and symbols in the novel are greatly used to contribute to the theme of fate through the symbols of knitting, the fountain and water, and the wine.
Dickens uses wine to represent the blood to be spilled in the war as well as to show how divided the classes are. Through the depiction of the poor rejoicing over spilled drops of wine against the backdrop of the aristocratic town of St. Antoine, Dickens is able to evince the polarity of rich and poor existent at the time. Dickens describes the scene of the broken wine cask, “When the wine was gone, and the places where it had been most abundant were raked into a gridiron-pattern by fingers, these demonstrations ceased, as suddenly as they had broken out. The man who had left his saw sticking in the firewood he was cutting, set it in motion again; the woman who had left on a door-step the little pot of hot ashes, at which she had been trying to soften the pain in her own starved fingers and toes, or in those of her child, returned to it; emerged into the winter light from cellars, moved away to descend again; and a gloom gather on the scene that appeared more natural to it than sunshine” (Dickens 21). The townspeople run to collect, drink, and play in the wine. The aristocrats are living lavishly while these townspeople are celebrating over a few drops of wine. He further describes how a townsperson, Gas...
The poor that crave the aristocratsâ€TM deaths have such a strong aura that they are a part of a living Saint Antoine, and for a moment, their death craving is delayed until a later time. Dickens also states in this novel â€the knife [strikes] home, the faces [change], from faces of pride to faces of anger and pain; also that when that dangling figure [is] hauled. . . they [change] again, and [bear] a cruel look of being avengedâ€? which shows the poor switching from their pride to revenge against the aristocrats and the aristocracy (177). Madame Defarge makes the statement â€[v]engeance and retribution require a long timeâ€? to her husband during his time of impatience to seek revenge against the aristocrats, and it implies that Monsieur Defargeâ€TMs revenge happens later in the future (179).
The time preceding and following the French Revolution was not only an era of change, but also a time of deceit and suspicion in England and France. In A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens thoroughly illustrates through symbols what every stage of the French Revolution looked like from the point of view of revolutionaries, aristocrats, and bystanders. The events that caused the changes in France were acts of injustice towards the peasant class. However, when the Revolution began, the revolutionaries started treating the aristocrats inhumanely. Blue flies, knitting, the shadow, and the grindstone are the symbols that best portray the theme of man’s inhumanity towards his fellow man in A Tale of Two Cities.
This passage from A Tale of Two Cities consists of the preparation and the eventual storming of the Bastille, a fortress in Paris that was used as a state prison. The citizens of Saint Antoine, led by Monsieur and Madame Defarge, begin to arm themselves with any weapon available and proceed to storm the Bastille. Dickens chooses to convey the violent storming of the Bastille through the use of multiple literary terms such as imagery, similes, and metaphors.
Charles Dickens captures the aura of the French Revolution so poetically it is almost as if he was there. Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities is a thrilling novel originally printed in the newspaper, explaining the cliffhangers at the end of many a chapter. One of the elements that makes the story so thrilling is his incorporation of the theme of fate. Dickens incorporates innumerable symbols to enforce this theme. The echoing footsteps, the storm, and the water are all symbols that reflect the theme of fate by demonstrating the inevitability of your fate.
Throughout the book, Dickens portrays his objectivity between the classes through a series of graphic descriptions. For example, the horrid events that occur when the Marquis murders the child is a time when Dickens most definitely favors the rebels. Dickens’s attitude when Jacques kills the Marquis is that justice has been supplied. There is a definite tone of approval in his voice after these actions. On the other hand, Dickens’s attitude towards the mutineers is not always one of endorsement. When the activists nearly kill Gabelle and burn the Chateau, Dickens’s attitude changes from one of approval to one of disbelief. His disposition is almost one of sorrow for all the beauty being carelessly destroyed. As the reader can see, Dickens’s opinion varies greatly in accordance to the portion of the story the person is reading.
In the social structure that Dickens condemns, the King was perceived as being detached from the needs of the country and his subjects. This is shown primarily through the division between the Monseigneur in the country and the Monseigneur in the town.... ... middle of paper ... ...
With imagery revealing the poor straits and desperation of the peasant class of France, Dickens influences the reader to pity them. He writes, “The cloud settled on Saint Antoine, which a momentary gleam had driven from his sacred countenance, the darkness of it was heavy—cold, dirt, sickness, ignorance, want were the lords waiting on the saintly presence—nobles of great power all of them; but most especially the last” (Dickens 22). Through hunger, want, etc. being personified and compared to nobles through language such as “nobles” and “lords”, Dickens shows the extent of the suffering of the peasants, their deserving to be pitied, and the human nobles’ apathy towards them. The peasants of Saint Antoine suffer in the 1770s, and the town’s name is made into a play on words with “saintly presence”, with the cloud of cold, dirt, sickness, ignorance, and want looming forming the imagery of irony. Another description of the peasants’ plight is revealed in the quote saying, “Ploughed into every furrow of age and coming up afresh, was the sign Hunger. It was prevalent everywhere...Hunger was the inscription on th...
At the beginning of A Tale of Two Cities (1859), Dickens once again expresses his concern. The novel opens in 1775, with a comparison of England and pre-revolutionary France. While drawing parallels between the two countries, Dickens also alludes to his own time: "the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only" (1; bk. 1, ch. 1). The rest of the chapter shows that Dickens regarded the condition to be an 'evil' one, since he depicts both countries as rife with poverty, injustice, and violence due to the irresponsibility of the ruling elite (1-3; bk. 1, ch. 1). As the novel unfolds, however, England becomes a safe haven for those escaping the violence perpetrated by the French Revolution. In this paper, I shall argue that A Tale of Two Cities reflects the popular confidence in the stability of England in the eighteen-fifties, despite Dickens's suggestions at the beginning. A Tale of Two Cities thus becomes a novel about the England and the English of Dickens's time. And yet, many people today would believe that the novel is essentially about the French Revolution, which brings me to my second point. If in the nineteenth century the novel served to affirm the stability of Britain, in this century it has been greatly influential in the formation of the popular image of the French Revolution, mainly thanks to film and television adaptations. The purpose of this paper is to look at the popular reception of the novel from the time of its first publication in 1859 to the nineteen-nineties.
A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens, is a story set in the year 1775 and through the turbulent time of the French Revolution. It is of people living in love and betrayal, murder and joy, peril and safety, hate and fondness, misery and happiness, gentle actions and ferocious crowds. The novel surrounds a drunken man, Sydney Carton, who performs a heroic deed for his beloved, Lucie Manette, while Monsieur and Madame Defarge, ruthless revolutionaries, seek revenge against the nobles of France. Research suggests that through Dickens’ portrayal of the revolutionaries and nobles of the war, he gives accurate insight to the era of the Revolution.
The novel Tale of Two Cities goes into intensive detail about the issues of social injustices in the time period of the French Revolution. Both Charles Dickens and Thomas Carlyle believed the lower-class French had to take cruel treatment from the nobility. Dickens felt sympathy for the lower-class because he went through poverty and cruel treatments in his early life. Charles’ father was terrible with his family’s finances and wanted to be wealthy desperately. This greed caused Charles’ father to become in debt and eventually be imprisoned.