Synthesis Essay: The Use Of Non-Offensive Language

873 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Abortion controversy essays

In recent history, the concept of being politically correct, in other words, trying to use non-offensive terminology or not discuss sensitive subjects, has become a heavily contested issue. Although attempting to use non-offensive, or non-triggering language started off with small modifications to our speech, some now feel that it has become a hindrance to everyday conversation. Furthermore, even some politicians, such as Donald Trump, have began to ditch the concept of being politically correct and instead, attempted to showcase how it has become a disruption to concise and honest banter. Thus, although attempting to use language that could not be thought of as offensive or triggering can be helpful and righteous, it has become so pervasive …show more content…

A somewhat concerning example of our society's need to always subdue our voices in efforts not to be offensive or triggering are “safe spaces” that are now being set up on college campuses (Source D). These “safe spaces” were intended to grant students a place to cope with issues that they might be having in a calm and non-triggering environment. These spaces have instead manifested into locations where many subjects of deep discussion are unable to take place. These places have become a blockade for free speech and discussion due to the restrictions it places on material that is deemed “triggering”. Although it is helpful to warn individuals, who have previously been exposed to a traumatic experience, of potentially triggering content, it has instead been used to stifle learning. An example of how ridiculous political correctness has become is how a debate regarding abortion in Christ Church, at Oxford University, was canceled due to a vocal minority of students who claimed that the two debaters, both males, could not discuss this topic (Source C). According to the students, it was an outrage that “two human beings ‘who do not have uteruses’” could have a debate abortion. Furthermore, the students went as far to say that the debate would “threaten the mental safety of Oxford students”. Even though this was a vocal minority of students,

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Why I Use Trigger Warnings By Kate Manne

    202 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Kate Manne’s article “Why I Use Trigger Warnings”, she argues that trigger warnings are an important feature to incorporate in an educator’s curriculum, but not as a safety cushion for millennials to fall on to avoid work and serious or uncomfortable topics. Using PTSD studies along with failed tests of exposure therapy for the foundation of her points, she explains that trigger warnings can help mentally prepare a student for what they are about to read instead of blindsiding them and throwing them into a potentially anxiety-induced state where they can’t focus. Manne also brings up how people can react when reading political or religious material in comparison towards reading possibly triggering material in order to differentiate between

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Greg Lukianoff And Haidt's The Coddling Of The American Mind

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout America, people place a high value in their freedom of speech. This right is protected by the first Amendment and practiced in communities throughout the country. However, a movement has recently gained momentum on college campuses calling for protection from words and ideas that may cause emotional discomfort. This movement is driven mainly by students who demand that speech be strictly monitored and punishments inflicted on individuals who cause even accidental offense. Greg Lukianoff and Johnathan Haidt discuss how this new trend affects the students mentally and socially in their article The Coddling of the American Mind published in The Atlantic Monthly. Lukianoff and Haidt mostly use logical reasoning and references to

    Read More

  • Greg Lukianoff And Jonathan Haidt's The Coddling Of The American Mind

    832 Words  | 2 Pages

    They should start discussions about rape and sexist cases because it’s going on in today’s society and for people to know it’s okay to talk about it if it ever happened to them. Colleges need to prepare students for the real word so they need to have real life discussions in class for the students that are growing up and entering the workforce. College campuses are going through the mircoagression theory and professors fear to talk about trigger warnings in class when both students and professors should have freedom of speech in classrooms. “One of my biggest concerns about trigger warnings,” Roff wrote, “is that they will apply not just to those who have experienced trauma, but to all students, creating an atmosphere in which they are encouraged to believe that there is something dangerous or damaging about discussing difficult aspects of our history.” (49). Professors try to avoid teaching material that will upset sensitive students, but instead they should start warning students about the materials they are going to teach and set boundaries so students can know what they are about to learn to prevent teachers from getting in trouble or risk getting fired from their

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Hell You Say By Kelefa Sanneh

    1322 Words  | 3 Pages

    Creating a safe space is more important for some rather than others. In “The Hell You Say” by Kelefa Sanneh for The New Yorker, he provides an interesting look at the views of Americans who support censorship of speech and those who are completely against it. Another issue I gathered from his article was that people use their right to free speech in wrong ways and end up harassing people. Providing two sides of a controversial debate, his article makes us think of which side we are on. So, whether or not censorship should be enforced; and how the argument for free speech is not always for the right reason, Sanneh explores this with us.

    Read More

  • On Trigger Warnings In The Coddling Of The American Mind

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Teachers become afraid to challenges students values and beliefs, also creating a repressive area for debates. The article “On Trigger Warnings” by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) states that “the presumption that need to be protected rather than challenged in a classroom is at once infantilizing and anti-intellectual”. Demanding trigger warnings make comfort more of a priority than learning. Faculty may feel like they need to warn students about the course material because some students might find it disconcerting, but the voluntary use of trigger warnings on syllabus could be counterproductive. Just because some material may cause one person to have trauma does not mean everyone will and by putting a trigger warning on the syllabus might cause others to expect something upsetting. This could cause students to not read assignments or it might provoke a response from students they otherwise would not have had. Trigger warnings also signal an expected response and discourage the reading experience and even eliminate spontaneity. Trigger warnings make students into victims and makes both teachers and students fearful to ask questions because it might make someone uncomfortable. The goal is to educate and challenge students, make students question things and debate on things that they normally do not think about. AAUP also says that “the call for trigger warnings comes

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Coddling Of The American Mind

    1143 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to The Coddling of the American Mind, trigger warnings and microaggressions confine professors’ and well-educated adults’ unalienable right of speech; furthermore, they can impact one’s health. Protecting rights have a unison consensus; the authors unite them and the audience together to persuade the well-educated adults to protest the use of trigger warnings and microaggressions. While concluding that vindictive protectiveness is the reason for trigger warnings and microaggressions Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt state, “A campus culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers is likely to engender patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety.” (45) The word “policing” holds a negative connotation implying regulation, and no one wants their first amendment right of free speech stolen from them. Also the idea that trigger warnings and microaggressions may lead to depression and anxiety gives more logical reasoning to end trigger warnings and microaggressions in higher level education. When the authors specify the change that colleges should make, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt write their idea of the purpose of college, “Rather than

    Read More

  • 'Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus' By Derek Bok

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” by Derek Bok, published in Boston Globe in 1991, is an essay about what we should do when we are faced with expressions that are offensive to some people. The author discusses that although the First Amendment may protect our speech, but that does not mean it protects our speech if we use it immorally and inappropriately. The author claims that when people do things such as hanging the Confederate flag, “they would upset many fellow students and ignore the decent regard for the feelings of others” (70). The author discusses how this issue has approached Supreme Court and how the Supreme Court backs up the First Amendment and if it offends any groups, it does not affect the fact that everyone has his or her own freedom of speech. The author discusses how censorship may not be the way to go, because it might bring unwanted attention that would only make more devastating situations. The author believes the best solutions to these kind of situations would be to

    Read More

  • The Coddling Of The American Mind By Greg Lukianoff And Jonathan Haidt

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the 60’s and 70’s, people have thrashed out with their words and each other. This caused some awareness in schools due to the offensiveness of the matter. During the 80’s schools began on focusing on preventing this kind of speech on their campuses. Since then, students have become more and more sensitive in a negative way. The authors used an example of a kid shouting “Shut up, you water buffalo” at an Israeli born student. That incident made national news, just for calling another kid a “water buffalo.” Another example is when a university found a student guilty of racial harassment for reading a book honoring student opposition to the Ku Klux Clan. The picture on the cover of the book offended one of the student’s co-workers. Just because the student was reading a book, minding his own business, the student was punished from the university. Never said anything or hurt anyone physically, and his education was ruined by someone taking offense to a book he was reading. The authors used this extreme example to prove that accepting the fact that student are fragile and letting them be fragile is not the right way to go and the past can prove

    Read More

  • Free Speech Zones

    1906 Words  | 4 Pages

    Benjamin Franklin once said, “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.” Indeed, free speech is a large block upon which this nation was first constructed, and remains a hard staple of America today; and in few places is that freedom more often utilized than on a college campus. However, there are limitations to our constitutional liberties on campus and they, most frequently, manifest themselves in the form of free speech zones, hate speech and poor university policy. Most school codes are designed to protect students, protect educators and to promote a stable, non-disruptive and non-threatening learning environment. However, students’ verbal freedom becomes limited via “free speech zones.” Free Speech Zones are areas allocated for the purpose of free speech on campus. These zones bypass our constitutional right to freedom of speech by dictating where and when something can be said, but not what can be said.

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech

    1364 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the United States, free speech is protected by the First Amendment in which it states, “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion … or abridging the freedom of speech.” Now, nearly 250 years into the future, the exact thing that the Founding Fathers were afraid of is starting to happen. Today, our freedom of speech is being threatened through different forces, such as the tyranny of the majority, the protection of the minority, and the stability of the society. Now, colleges and universities in the United States today are also trying to institute a code upon its students that would bar them from exercising their right to speak freely in the name of protecting minorities from getting bullied. This brings us into

    Read More

  • Political Correctness Has Gone Too Far

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...n the January 1993 Library Journal, makes a similar suggestion: "Ultimately, however, we hope we use language that is more sensitive without enforcing strident political correctness or orthodoxy." We, as a society, are so concerned about avoiding confrontations that we are going overboard changing non-offensive names. The attempt to avoid possible protests of sensitive pressure groups by sanitizing our language is, in my opinion, censorship.

    Read More

  • Political Correctness

    896 Words  | 2 Pages

    In an essay written by Michiko Kakutani entitled The Word Police , she examines the idea of political correctness and questions society for taking a good idea and making a mockery of it. Kakutani is quick to point out in her story that know one can argue that the moral idea’s behind being political correct are wrong but that those in potions of authority have gone completely out of control trying to rewrite the view of the world in a rigid unyielding style that forces words and phrases into the minds of ever person in America. Groups like the MLA (Modern Language Association) have taken words that have been used for centuries and have created new ones overnight that are political correct and non offensive, the problem is that society is not prepared to be political correct overnight and who is to judge w...

    Read More

  • Political Correctness: Mike Myers As The Cat In The Hat

    832 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I’m not comfortable with the term dog, but I will be happy to hold your canine American “Mike Myers as the Cat in the Hat. This satire of political correctness sums up what a joke it has become, but what is political correctness exactly? Political correctness is “the concept based on the belief that speech or behavior that is offensive to various groups’ sensibilities should be eliminated, by means of regulations or penalties if necessary” ” (Political correctness. (2008). In J. Vile, D. Hudson & D. Schultz (Eds.). While this concept started with the best intentions to help usher American society out of the days of segregation into the world of multicultural richness we have today, but some have taken it too far. Instead of our society coming

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Political Correctness

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    The issue of political correctness has always been a source of controversy, but it has came to the forefront in the past few years because of the increase of liberalism, people wanting ultimate equality especially in the words we speak. Political correctness is a highly debated argument because the two sides arguing have such different views. The ones against political correctness say it is a violation of their right to free speech, while the ones for it say it is absolutely necessary to regulate some of your language in order to not offend someone. Both sides of the argument do make very valid points and that is why this topic is so heavily argued. It is a grey area the matter is not black and white neither side is really right or wrong. But

    Read More

  • We All Be Careful With the Words We Use

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when your freedom becomes hurtful or disrespectful to someone else? There are so many different kinds of people and different things that offend each person. In this day where we are more inclined to say whatever we want, we see more and more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended?

    Read More

More about Synthesis Essay: The Use Of Non-Offensive Language

Open Document