Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using Social Media In The Workplace
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using Social Media In The Workplace
The impact of social media on employee performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Problem with Social Media
Colleges, employers, and schools frequently ponder ther question, should social media be investigated in order to admit a student or check up on an employee. There are many possible ways that this investigation could be seen as negative, but also many ways this could be seen positively. For example, an employee might be posting bad things about their job or boss on Facebook, which could negatively impact the employee but it would be beneficial for the business to know about. This question has many answers for this process, and also against this process.
Although some people would think that social media is a large cause for rejection from colleges, but “only 38% of colleges reported what they saw on social media to negatively affect their views on the applicant” (Source A). This means that 64% of applicants’ social media is not entirely inappropriate. Some would
…show more content…
say that if a person would not want a college to see what they are posting, why should they post for other people to see? Though, this could be bad for business, seeing as “it is a violation of a person’s First Amendment rights” (Source B”. This could be a reason to sue a business. Student may post inappropriate things on social media that colleges would like to know about.
“A student visited one university and gushed about it, later trashing it online” (Source A, John Hechinger). This would be a reason why colleges should use social media to check on students. “Though it does seem rather harsh” (Source C), if someone does not get the job they would like because of something they had posted online. People should be judged and hired on their qualifications, not on what they do outside of their job.
A student at the University of California, Los Angeles resigned from her college after receiving death threats and harassment. This was a result of her posting a “racist video, a tyrade against the Asian population at her school” (Source E). This is another reason why social media should be used against students. This behavior is not acceptable. But, later on the student apologized saying, “it was an attempt to produce a humorous video” (Source E). People should also be given freedom to speak their mind, which should not be held against their
education. Overall, this problem will still, and probably will never, be resolved. There are many reasons to be used against and for the inspection of social media before admitting or hiring new prospects. Although it is a violations of our rights, it is still not right to post inappropriate things on the web. This is a touchy subject and might not ever be resolved.
In “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Dana Fleming presents an essay concerning the safety of social networking sites and how Universities can deal and prevent problems. This article is targeted towards school administrators, faculty, and a social networking user audience who will either agree or disagree with her statement. I believe Fleming presents an excellent, substantial case for why she reasons the way she does. Fleming gives a sound, logical argument according to Toulmin’s Schema. This essay has an evident enthymeme, which has a claim and reasons why she believes in that way. Toulmin refers to this as “grounds."
In an article written in the New England Journal of Higher Education, 2008 issue, by Dana Fleming, “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Fleming poses the question of responsibility in monitoring students’ online social networking activities. Fleming’s purpose is to impress upon the readers the need for education institutions to state the guidelines and rules governing social networking, and “to treat them like any other university activity, subject to the school’s code of conduct and applicable state and federal laws” (443). She creates a dramatic tone in order to convey to her readers the idea that social networking can be sinister and their effects inescapable. Dana L. Fleming is a Boston area attorney who specializes in higher education law, with the mission of the New England Journal of Higher Education to engage and assist leaders in the assessment, development, and implementation of sound education practices and policies of regional significance. However, while Dana Fleming emphasizes the horror stories of social networking, she scatters her thoughts throughout this article springing from one idea to attempting to persuade her intended audience then juxtaposed stories about minors being hurt by poor social networking decisions contrasting the topic suggested in her title.
Fleming, Dana L. “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” New England Journal of Higher Education.22.4 (2008): 27-29. Print.
For example, Rosen states, “According to a recent survey by Microsoft, seventy percent of U.S. recruiters report that they have rejected candidates because of information found online,” (Rosen, Para. 3). Most of the time it is a necessity for companies to do online and background research on candidates because of wanting a safe environment to work in. Social media sites are the fastest way to see who a person truly is. But sometimes it can just be a character they posses because that’s what they’re followers want to see rather than their true self.
Most individuals use these social networks and applications as an outlet to connect with old friends and family, share media, and keep up with everyday topics. Sometimes, employees exchange social media accounts if they become friends at work, which is acceptable. But, if an employer decides to review an employee or potential employee’s personal account without their permission, that is an invasion of privacy. Also, a person’s social media account should not have to be monitored or reviewed by an employer, especially if it does not relate to the job itself. Everyone deserves privacy, and if an employee’s social media account(s) have to be monitored, the same should apply to the employers as
Over half of the applicants found on search engines and nearly two-thirds of the applicants found on social networking sites were not hired as a result of the information found on the sites. (Source H) Things found on the internet or social media are almost always taken out of context and doesn’t show what the person applying is actually like. Admission offices and employers are more likely to start and use social media to look up applicants. This can make it harder to get into a school or business if you have a social media account. According to and NACAC article, Eighty-eight percent of admission offices believed social media were either “somewhat” or “very” important to their future recruitment efforts. (Source B) Colleges now a days always look to see if applicants have a social media account that means that if they get access to the account there is a 38% chance that, that person does not get accepted. One-fourth of colleges surveyed indicated that they used Web search or social networking
As older siblings, friends, and cousins were denied position at school and in the work force, we realized that adults and employers had found Facebook. Our uncensored character was on display for future bosses, colleges, etc. and they were there to stay. Instead of references being the test of character for a job, it was the online identity that determined whether or not the application got even a second glance. In light of this revelation, we changed. Our Facebooks no longer reflected our true selves, but rather the person that we thought colleges and employers should see. Much like hiding our dirty laundry from prying eyes in the halls of high school, we could no longer wear our proverbial hearts on our internet sleeves, for the future was at stake. Much like what had once been the Old West, the internet was now connected with railroads—each leading back to the offline person. Tame and orderly.
This is yet another way of invading privacy. In the past, employers would only know what you told them in your interview. They would assess your skills and determine if you were right for the job, aside from knowing your beliefs or views. However, now with Facebook an employer can see all the personal information, this can negatively influence a candidate’s job. The same goes for those who are currently employed and potential students. “Dr. Nora Barnes, Director for the Center of Marketing Research at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, published a study that showed more than 20% of colleges and universities search social networks for their admissions candidates” (Fodeman). This is becoming a part of the admissions process, but it is unfair. Searching someone’s Facebook to determine his or her admissions eligibility is wrong and a privacy invasion. As long as a student has fulfilled the school’s requirements and done well in school, why should it matter what their personal lives are like? In the time before Facebook, this would be like a school sending someone to secretly follow a potential student and see what he or she does in their
haven't seen, and keep them updated on your day to day life. The Internet has become an important part of our lives, especially social media. I disagree with the idea that you can make real friends on the Internet because it's not safe and it does not provide basic needs that sustain a friendship.
Individuals should understand that the use or nonuse of social media has negative and positive effects on their lives whether they recognize them or not. Students who excessively use social networking applications can be negatively affected because they are spending too much time on these applications rather than paying attention in class, completing homework, studying, s...
In Thoughts on Facebook, Mitrano’s primary message to students was to be careful with the technology, because information posted on Facebook could be available and used in ways that the student did not originally intend (2006). Certainly, good advice that is delivered with anecdote after anecdote, example after example. In fact, by the end of the article, students are likely terrified that Geico insurance agents are roaming through Facebook looking for evidence to raise their insurance rates, or that their friends will sue them for defamation or libel after posting a bad picture. More likely, because of the unrealistic claim of effect, students filed the information in their trash bin, assuming that the University just does n...
First of all, schools should keep students focused during classes. By giving students access to social media for anything in the class, that starts leading to these issues. “All universities have been struggling to balance freedom of speech and the right to express an opinion, with reasonable
Since the introduction of internet in the 1990’s, its importance worldwide has always grown tremendously. From the first email send to the domination of Facebook and other social media websites, it has changed the way people communicate. The use of social media is increasingly becoming the preferred way people share their daily activities, ideas and knowledge and that is why it’s the most talked about and used platform. Many companies are encouraging their employees to use various social media platforms and engage online for office productivity, posting opinions and presenting their thoughts. Corporations realize that Social Media tools such as blogs, forums, podcasts and social networking websites makes internal communications faster, more convenient and effective. Social media is a low-cost, high-impact tool that can also complement and reinforce your existing communications efforts. It gives a new dimension to internal communications in many ways: building relationship with employees, leads to diverse thinking and innovation, and reduce costs and Increase Productivity. Social media has impacted positively in the business world, but its downside has impacted teens in high school, with issues such as cyber bullying, and people using Facebook and twitter to get over their boredom and research proving that the more they use social networking websites the more envious they feel.
Bhardwaj 1 Think of a time when people didn’t have technology and how they had to interact, whether it had been from writing letters to using telegraphs, communicating with people was hard to come by back then. Of course, times have changed and now technology has made it easier over the years, social media has become an essential part of our lives whether it be on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and many other websites. Nowadays, everybody is using it whether its companies using media to promote their products or even teachers tweeting out what last night’s homework was. Social media is a great tool that helps us connect with the world and communicate our ideas. Yet there are some people who believe that social media has a negative impact towards our society as they believe that people can get addicted to it, it causes them to get easily distracted, and many other dangers.
As technology has become more and more prevalent in recent times, the use of social media has greatly increased in persons of all ages but especially in young adults. Social Media allows the facilitation, creation, and sharing of information, ideas, career interests and other forms of expression via virtual communities and networks; allowing people to show their true selves freely without the fear of backlash. In the Bahamas, it can be seen how social media plays such an integral role in society as seen by a well-known Facebook based site “Bahamas News Ma Bey”. This site gives relevant information on what is going on in the country and other stories that people may find interesting. From over 30,000 people following this site, it can be seen