Woman At Point Zero: Symbolism of Money
The novel “Woman at Point Zero” by Nawal El Saadawi tells the tale of a woman, named Firdaus being interviewed by a journalist before her execution. She is in prison on the charge of murdering a man, in an extremely sexist culture, which has a lot of disparity between men and women. One of the recurring symbols in the novel was that of money. Money was a very negative symbol in the novel, and it was highlighted by Firdaus that one could not possess both money and integrity. Another important appearance it made was in determining how Firdaus would live and it seemed to be the factor, which controlled her life and her movements. Firdaus never found freedom until she made her own money, which showed how powerful it was and how people used it to control her. The third usage of money, was in its association with characters, namely Sharifa and it foreshadowed their greed and future actions, which would revolve around it. These occurrences, which all tie in with money, show the negative impact that it had on society and women in 20th century Egypt.
One aspect, which was brought to attention was the inability to retain your honor, and still be rich. The first example of this was shown through Sheikh Mahmoud. Sheik Mahmoud is abusive and controlling, and doesn’t permit Firdaus any money of her own, nor any freedom. This enables her to eventually run away to a coffee shop, where she meets Bayoumi. Her relationship with him begins in a positive way, however when she requests a job, he is enraged. He beats her severely, before allowing his friends to have their way with her in a sexual manner. A possible reason for this, is the reason that Firdaus would be earning her own money, which would give ...
... middle of paper ...
...e to do what she wants, and free not to do it.” Firdaus’ newfound freedom directly correlated with her making her own money, and this shows the power of money.
In conclusion, the symbol of money in Woman at Point Zero is a very important one. It brings several aspects to the story, and has several underlying meanings. The first of these, is the depiction of a persons inability to be rich and honourable at the same time. The second is the hidden meaning to the colour green, and the materialistic and sexist nature of the people at that time period. It showed how much they relied on money, and needed it to feel adequate and powerful. Finally, the usage of money in the book showed how money was directly linked to freedom and power, and this was shown through Firdaus, as she became free once she found money and made it on her own.
[word count: 1487]
In her story “Currents” Hannah Vosckuil uses symbolism, and a reverse narrative structure to show the story of how unnamed sympathetic and antagonistic characters react differently to a traumatic event. Symbolism can be found in this story in the way that Gary does not mind sitting in the dark alone at the end of the day as well as how both of his girls are affected by the symbolism of hands. One holding a boy’s hand for the first time and the other becoming sick after seeing the dead boy’s hand fall off the stretcher. The sympathetic and antagonistic manner of these characters is shown when both girls are told by their grandmother that they must return to the water to swim the next day. The grandmother sees this simply as a way of encouraging them and keeping them from becoming afraid of the water. However, the girls see this as a scary proposition because of what had happened, showing the grandmother as an antagonist character to the little girls.
In Junot Diaz’s essay “The Money” he explains where his family stands economically. Stating that his father was regularly being fired from his forklifting jobs and his mother 's only job was to care for him and his four siblings. With the money brought home by his father, his mom would save some. Her reason was to raise enough to send to her parents back in the Dominican Republic. When his family went on a vacation, they came back to an unpleasant surprise; their house had been broke into. Eventually Diaz was able to get back their money and belongings. Diaz returned the money to his mother although she didn’t thank him for it, this disappointed him. Like Diaz I have also encountered a similar situation where I was disappointed. When I was in second grade, my life life took a completely different turn. My dad took an unexpected trip to Guatemala, on his return, the outcome was not what I expected.
It revolves around the issues of gender oppression, sexual assault, and importance of social status. Alifa Rifaat manages to express her opinions towards these themes by writing about a typical Egyptian marriage. She puts in focus the strong influence that a patriarchal society has. She also manages to prove how important social status is in society. The uses of literally elements such as theme and irony help express this view. It shows that in a typical Egyptian society women are commonly oppressed by all males in society
The pursuit of money and the corruption of those who aim wealth, are the main subjects of critique in books like: “The Great Gatsby” and “Motorcycle Diaries”. These books present different visions of the effects the use of money have, and the social condition of “wanting more than needed”. This condition has the power of turn one simple and non-important object, into something important that could even seem vital for us. In our society, and the societies presented in Fitzgerald and Guevara’s books, money means more than a piece of paper or metal that it is supposed to make easier the exchange of things. People do not control the money, is money the one who control us. Hard cash and capitalism work by the usage of our vanity to sell us different products. It works by telling us that, what we have is not, and may never be, enough. This ideas implant a need of establishing a perpetuation of our sense of superiority. In the books “The Great Gatsby” and “Motorcycle Diaries” the reader is able to realize the repercussions the...
Both el Saadawi and Al-Shaykh both show how perception and expression are both affected within the confines of politics, social opportunities, and male privilege depicted in their stories. Whether the reader is a follower of the feminist movement or not, it is very clear and easy to see that these women are not being treated with the respect that any human being deserves. The misogynistic stranglehold on society, especially in this part of the world, is excessive and avoidable in today’s world but it is very likely that the traditional, conservative ways of the past will continue to control and inhibit women from being able to be fully treated as equals for many years to come, perhaps even after this generation has
Before the 19th Amendment for women’s rights was passed in America, women had no right to be involved in their family’s financial situation. In the cultural context of Ibsen’s play it states in the 1800’s
“The Harem Within” is a life story that portrays Mernissi’s childhood experiences while growing up in her family house in Fez, Morocco. Fatema Mernissi was a daughter of wealthy landowners and agriculturalists family. Even though she was raised in indulging and a privileged neighborhood, detached from the poverty most Moroccans experienced, her childhood was spent in the limits of her household shape. Mernissi was raised in a “classical domestic harem”, which abides of extended family and was designed to keep the women sheltered from men outside of the family and the public in general. Occasionally, this exceedingly limitation nurtured feelings of frustrating separation and isolation. Mernissi’s upbringing in this habitat influenced her progress as a scholar and writer.
In the novel She and in the stories of The Arabian Nights, both Haggard and Haddawy explore the expanding gender roles of women within the nineteenth century. At a time that focused on the New Woman Question, traditional gender roles were shifted to produce greater rights and responsibilities for women. Both Ayesha, from Haggard’s novel She, and Shahrazad, from Haddawy’s translation of The Arabian Nights, transgress the traditional roles of women as they are being portrayed as strong and educated females, unwilling to yield to men’s commands. While She (Ayesha) takes her power to the extreme (i.e. embodying the femme fatale), Shahrazad offers a counterpart to She (i.e. she is strong yet selfless and concerned with the welfare of others). Thus, from the two characters emerge the idea of a woman who does not abide by the constraints of nineteenth century gender roles and, instead, symbolizes the New Woman.
Money is the main source of power in the world, but in ways it can be viewed as good or bad depending on the situation. It has a negative connotation when mentioned by the word “acts”. “ Acts” means to perform a fictional role. Which shows that most things involving money are fake. Though humans associate being fake with being morally wrong,but its somehow acceptable if there is a greater power involved. Another definition for acts is to take action;do something. In this case to take an action can be either good or bad. There are many ways to come across money, but nobody cares if it is good or bad because it deals with a greater power.
characters did not stay true to their values and morals because money had a big effect on
Few of us can deny the importance and power that money has in our society. It is difficult to think of issues that affect us on a daily basis, that does not involve money. But where does this fixation on money originate...
The author shows that money can change a characters behavior. You see this behavioral change in Claire by the way she dresses and acts as she is above everyone. In the beginning
Perhaps the main reason I liked this book was the unfaltering courage of the author in the face of such torture as hurts one even to read, let alone have to experience first-hand. Where men give in, this woman perseveres, and, eventually, emerges a stronger person, if that is even possible. The book’s main appeal is emotional, although sound logical arguments are also used. This book is also interesting as it shows us another face of Nasir – the so-called “champion of Arab nationalism” – who is also the enemy of pan-Islamism. The book is also proof of history repeating itself in modern-day Egypt.
First of all, “The Story of Ali Cogia, Merchant of Baghdad” it illustrates the greed for money in people in order to reach a higher standing. Ali Cogia is troubled by a dream of his, this dream is scolding him and telling him to go on this pilgrimage, and he takes it as a warning. Burdened by the fact that he must sell everything in order to go on this pilgrimage, he does so anyways losing all of his valuables. Although, his intention on leaving the village were to travel to the pilgrimage site, he is instead seduced by the talk of making money and ends up following the path of money and improving his standings. Upon returning Ali Cogia and his friend, whom he had asked to watch his gold, get in to an argument, each wanting to keep the money for oneself. In the end, it is shown that these characters sacrifice something that may have been important to them at one point in order to get a little bit of wealth believing it was the better choice. Ali Cogia sacrificed his importance of the pilgrimage and damaged his friendship, while his friend got caught lying reducing his reputation as a trustworthy person and also damaged his relationship with Ali Cogia.
Every individual’s life is dictated by paper and coins. Without money, you cannot buy food, clothes, shelter or the necessities needed