Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Breaking Social Norms
Breaking Social Norms
Violating social norms in sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Jessica Parra
Dr. Mireille Trokkos
ENGL 68, (30364): Prep for College Writing
01/28/2016
The Truth about Sloppy and Neat
In Suzanne Britt’s “Neat People vs. Sloppy People” she ridicules neat people and defends the ways of sloppy people. Britt states that neat people are in fact meaner and lazier as opposed to sloppy people. Although their may be some cases where neat people are meaner and lazier than sloppy people, in my experience neat people are actually not mean nor lazy at all. For instance my older sister Bertha is a neat person and by far the kindest person I know on the other hand my younger sister Christine is a sloppy person and quite lazy at that. Britt’s view on neat people and sloppy people through out her essay is incorrect
…show more content…
and biased, as she is most likely a sloppy person herself. With regards to Britt falsely stating that neat people are mean and lazy I can affirm that my older sister Bertha being a neat person herself is the opposite of mean and lazy. In other words Bertha has one of the kindest and most generous souls I know. Britt states “They are so insensitive.”(2) referring to they way neat people are emotionless and don’t care about peoples feelings. However Bertha abolishes Britts’ claim that neat people are not caring due to the fact that Bertha always helps out our family when it’s most needed, whether it’s helping my younger sister Christine with college applications, helping me out with college expenses, or giving my mother advise on certain house problems. Not to mention Bertha is not lazy like Britt claims on the contrary she is very active and enjoys spending her free time running marathons with our family. Britt also states “They are incredibly wasteful.”(2) claiming that neat people throw away perfectly good objects if it makes a mess yet my sister is very resourceful with organizing many things that are sentimental to her. Bertha has never thrown away anything because it makes her house messy like Britt claimed in her statements. Even more Britts’ claim that neat people are meaner and lazier is inaccurate due to the fact that my younger sister is a sloppy person at heart and is very lazy when it comes to doing something other than watching television.
While Bertha is out running marathons my sister Christine would rather sit at home with a bag of chips watching marathons of her favorite shows on television. Britt states in her essay “Not a paper will go unturned; not a rubber band will go unboxed.”(1) Claiming sloppy people pay attention to detail and make sure everything has a certain place when cleaning. Still her accusations are false when in fact sloppy people like Christine don’t pay attention to every object when cleaning and spend time organizing certain objects together. In reality on the rare occasion Christine actually cleans she doesn’t spend time organizing her things, as long as the mess is out of sight she is done cleaning. For example she tends to pile her clothes and shoes with other random objects that are left laying on her floor or desk in her closet and finishes with closing the door so the mess isn’t noticeable when walking into her room. Sloppy people like Christine are in truth messier and lazier when it comes doing things such as
cleaning In conclusion bitts argument that neat people are in reality meaner and lazier than sloppy people is incorrect. As a matter of fact neat people like my older sister Bertha are actually not meaner and lazier than sloppy people. Neat people such as Bertha enjoy helping others out and being active throughout their daily lives. Not only are sloppy people like my younger sister Christine really messy but also very lazy. Sloppy people such as Christine would rather watch television after hiding her mess in the closet than actually take the time to sort out the growing pile of junk. In addition I am in fact a bit sloppy myself and I tend to catch my self sticking my mess in drawers when I need things out of the way. All in all neat people attentive and sloppy people are inattentive to their messes.
In "Miss Brill" and "The Yellow Wallpaper", the plot for both short stories consist of a female who is suffering from isolation. The short story "Miss Brill", the main character, who is an English tutor, wears her fur stole to the park. Every Sunday she attends the park to watch the live performances from her special seat. She believes that she is a part of the performances to a point where, "Even she had a part and came every Sunday"(Mansfield 268). Yet, one day she attends a performance and she is subjected to ridicule by a young couple sitting next to her. After, she returns home dejected and lonely. In "The Yellow Wallpaper", the narrator develops depression after the birth of her baby. Her husband, John who is a physician, misdiagnosed
People often feel as though their lives are not what they expect them to be so they make the decision of going out and getting an education. This education often changes the way people look at others who were in their previous situations meaning social class. The education sometimes makes people forget who they truly are because they feel bigger than the people they came up with. In the two texts, “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker and “Good Country People” by Flannery O’Connor the main characters Dee and Joy try to manipulate people even though they lack something in their lives.
The title “Dirty Word, Clean Place” implies some contradictions. The adjectives are considered opposites. In addition, a “dirty word” usually refers to a curse word or inappropriate phrase, whereas a “clean place” seems to imply a more literal meaning. David Quammen is obviously a well-educated man. His vocabulary is very extensive. He uses quite a few words that one would not hear in a casual conversation, such as “inimical” and “polemic.” Quammen uses many examples throughout his article, and cites many of them, implying that he knows his stuff and has sources to back it up.
Suzanne Britt, a teacher at Meredith College and a publisher in essays and textbooks, in her essay “Neat People vs. Sloppy People,” (1983) asserts that people who live cluttered lives are morally better than those who live organized lives. She supports this assertion by using humor and exaggeration to describe both types of people, making generalizations about both sloppy and neat people, repeating “sloppy people” and “neat people” at beginning, and throughout, each paragraph, and illustrating situations in how neat and sloppy people would act differently, along with using her opinion to strengthen her argument. Britt’s purpose is to persuade readers that sloppy, unorganized people are more morally upstanding than neat people in order to encourage
I agree with his assessment about society’s throw away mentality due to the fact that I have seen it myself first hand. Recently I helped my sister move out of her dorm room at NAU and I was horrified to see all the things and edible food she was just dumping and what was worse, she wasn’t the only one. All of the kids were getting rid of perfectly good items in the dumpster, so it’s no wonder that dumpsters near college campuses are one of Eighner’s favorite places to scavenge. In his article on page 3, Eighner elaborates on student’s wasteful habits, “but in the case of discards from student apartments, the answer may be that the item was discarded through carelessness, ignorance or wastefulness.” I believe agree with Eighner that some people have a pack rat mentality while others just throw it away. My parents are a good example of this and I think it has something to do with the way that they were raised. My mom is a pack rat, holding on to everything as long as possible and giving away to charity what she doesn’t want anymore. She squeezes every last drop out of a toothpaste tube or a shampoo bottle, while my dad will throw it away half empty. My mom was raised in a single parent household, where money was tight and you used what you had… my dad however, was raised in a more affluent home and money flowed more freely. In fact, my mom does her own dumpster diving fairly regularly in our garbage can by rescuing stuff out of the garbage that my dad has thrown away, including belts, pants, shirts and hardly worn tennis shoes. She doesn’t keep the goods, but instead gives it to Goodwill or the church clothing drive. My dad is her antithesis and is definitely part of the throw-away society. My dad has little sentiment attached to stuff and like Eichner mentioned on page 6, “knows there is plenty more where what we came from.” After reflecting on
The essay’s thesis is trying to imply that neat people are lazier and meaner and don’t pay any attention to the little things in life. The only part of the essay where the author compares sloppy people and neat people is in paragraph eight. The author says “ The only thing messy in a neat person’s house is the trash can”. This line helps the author build up on her thesis even though it’s implying the exact opposite of what her thesis was. She mentioned earlier that sloppy people care about detail and pay attention to their surroundings while neat people only keep the things that are worth keeping. She then states that sloppy people care enough to sit down for days and go through every single thing on their desk, finding a spot for each and maybe even throw out the things that they don’t need but neat people simply throw everything out. One can say that when reading the sentence that refers to the trashcan being the only messy thing in a neat persons house is quite sarcastic. The author tries to compare these two types of people together and maybe for a second even disagree with her thesis while in reality one can say that she’s just trying to use irony and sarcasm to prove how ridiculous a neat persons actions could be and how they think that they’re cleaning everything up while maybe in reality they’re just making it
How can one be so careless? In the novel The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Tom and Daisy were both careless in their actions. Their choices affected those around them, in the end killing three people. Tom showed his carelessness by cheating on his wife Daisy, openly showing off his mistress Myrtle, and telling Wilson that Gatsby owned the car that killed his wife. Daisy showed her carelessness by cheating on her husband Tom, openly showing her love for Gatsby in front of Nick and Jordan, and killing Myrtle without stopping like any sane person would. Tom and Daisy 's actions caused negative impacts on the people around them, however they had their money to lean on. Their money got them away at last where they didn
He compares the two by talking about a trip to the super market after a long day at work. He reminds his audience how flustering it can be to “maneuver your junky cart through all these other tired, hurried people with carts, and of course there are also the glacially slow old people and the spacey people and the ADHD kids who block the aisle” (206). This is a shopping experience everyone can relate to at some point in their life. Wallace states that this is just a default mindset that of course no one wants to admit to constantly having primarily due to the negative connotation it is given by society. If someone were to state they were annoyed by the old lady taking her time through the aisles or the “ADHD kid” they would immediately be labeled as rude, inconsiderate, and disrespectful.
Are neat people inferior to sloppy people? This question’s answer will differ depending on the type of person you ask. According to Britt in her essay, “Neat people vs. sloppy people”, the answer is yes. She uses certain qualities, such as oral description to differentiate neat people and sloppy people, how neat people are lazier, and how neat people are wasteful. Her qualities help explain to the readers why she thinks that her answer is true.
There are several common symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder that I observed throughout the essays. One of these symptoms was repetition. In "Secret Rituals," George explains that "[she] started having to do everything in threes" (82+). Elizabeth N. wrote, "I'd have to do everything over and over again" (Lanning 58+). Street also notes that "[she] found [herself] repeatedly checking to see if [her] coffeemaker was turned off" (72+). Another common symptom was cleanliness. Summers talks about how he would spend hours in the shower after being thrown into some weird substance on his TV show (139+). Elizabeth N. points out that she wouldn't wear clothes that she thought were contaminated (Lanning 58+). In addition, George admits, "I could think I was clean one second and dirty the next" (82+). Another area of major s...
Sarah Penn is a crazy, psychotically patient, loving mother. Editha is a crazy, patriotic, careless lady. Sarah Penn is the mother from " The revolt of a mother". Editha is the girlfriend from "Editha". Both of these ladies have many similarities and differences. Their stories will be explained in this essay as well as how similar and different they actually are.
Concealing the area to ensure that people working in the area clean a mess without the hassle of worrying about other people
Suzanne Britt’s essay about neat and sloppy people is really funny. She wrote this essay as an amusing and entertaining story to make people laugh. Her exaggerating examples given in the essay help to make it humorous. Throughout the essay she takes the neat and sloppy issue to the extreme. Britt even makes some accusations that are most of the time quite the opposite. For instance, Britt says that neat people are lazier than sloppy people. That would seem to be the other way around. I feel like Suzanne Britt is being very sarcastic in her essay too. Some of her beliefs are not necessarily true. An example of this would be that Britt believes that sloppy people can’t bear to part with anything. That is not necessarily true, wouldn’t
One group, The Jocks, is the show-off type of people who puts off their homework assignments until the last minute. Once the assignment is completed at the last minute, the assignment is usually scored a low grade. The reason for this is because the jocks are always partying, going out on dates, or having fun with their sorority. The jocks wear anything to include torn jeans/shirts, work down sneakers or boots and cheap, expensive-looking jacket.
Attention getter (why they should care): Recycling is like exercise. We all need to do it.