Susan Glaspell's Trifles

1186 Words3 Pages

Born in 1876, Susan Glaspell was a prominent novelist, writer, journalist, actress, and most notably playwright who won a Pulitzer prize for her work ‘Alison’s House’. After attending Drake University in Des Moines in 1899 she shortly found work as a journalist with the Des Moines Daily News. On the 2nd of December, 1900, a local farmer, John Hossack was murdered with an axe as he slept. Consequently, his wife, Margaret, was charged with the killing. Glaspell was delegated to cover the trial for her newspaper. This later became the inspiration for both a play and a short-story which became two of her most notable works. The former, the play ‘Trifles’, was Glaspell's first independently written drama. It has remained in performance since its …show more content…

The men in the story are trying to solve the mystery and look down on the women and their opinions, however, it is the women who are the ones that end up uncovering the most pertinent evidence. Throughout the stories the author/playwright presents many subtle messages focused on man’s regard for women. There is a difference, however in just how these messages present themselves due to the changes Glaspell made to adapt the play. In ‘Trifles’, we, the audience don't get to learn as much about the background of the situation as we are dropped into the situation without being introduced, whereas, in ‘Jury’, Glaspell chose to use a longer introduction describing Mrs. Hale leaving the kitchen. On the contrary, when writing ‘Jury’ Glaspell allows us a better insight into the world before we enter it. Originally, in ‘Trifles’, the setting and theme aren’t as readily determined and the plot isn't nearly as detailed as it is in the later adaptation, largely thanks to Glaspell’s excellent descriptions and introductions to our characters. For the same reason, the exposition of the murder and how the characters felt regarding it is much stronger in ‘Jury'. Additionally, due to the nature of a written story versus the drama, you get a deeper description of the setting which ultimately makes theme of the story is also easier to determine than in the …show more content…

The original work was intended to be portrayed by actors in a theater, with lights, music, and all, and thus it was written accordingly, using expository methods and particular phrasing by the characters to convey the theme and message Glaspell intended. However, in a short story the writer has more freedom. There is a whole range of literary methods at their disposal and it could take a lifetime of works to portray them all. This is what makes these stories most different: the tools the author had at her disposal. Consider, each type of work has its own format it must comply with and each work must be written with proper form. The form of a piece of writing is simply its structure, how it is constructed and organized. ‘Trifles’, as a play, is written as a script which consist of lines and stage directions, and thus the plot is revealed mainly through dialogue often leading to lazy exposition, or limited understanding of the plot or environment. On the other hand, in ‘Jury’, the written work, the author herself provides succinct description of the events, leading us to have a deeper comprehension of the murder and how the characters felt. In fact, in my opinion, one thing about drama that makes it less enjoyable than other literary genres is that it does not allow you to visualize

Open Document