Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of symbolism in Lord of the flies
Characters and conflicts in Lord of the Flies
Use of symbolism in Lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Use of symbolism in Lord of the flies
Lexie Kamrath
Period 4
January 25, 2015
Lord of the Flies (Essay) Society bounds everyone together, and without societies standards, morals, values, and the basis of wrong and right is gone. Without society 's strict rules, mayhem, and savagery can come to show. In, Lord of the Flies, William Golding displays that when one is faced with the need of survival; savagery overtakes society through internal conflict, to show that desperation can cause one to make unreasonable decisions.
Piggy points out: the boys have set half the island on fire saying, “You got your small fire all right.” […] “The boys were falling still and silent, feeling the beginnings of awe at the power set free below them” (44). The boys present their behavior in
When Ralph sees the navel officer, his realization that he is safe and will be returned to civilization takes him into a depressed state. The rescue is not a moment of unmistakable joy, for Ralph realizes that, although he is saved from death on the island, the events that occurred on the island have changed him and he will never be the same. He has lost his innocence and learned that evil lurks within all human beings. Simons comes to the conclusion that, “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. […] Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill! […] You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are the way they are?” (143). This confirms Simon’s speculation that the beast is only the boys’ themselves. The idea of the evil on the island beginning within the boys is an important in natural human savagery. The Lord of the Flies recognizes itself as the beast and confesses to Simon that it exists within all human beings: “You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?” (147). The creature’s disfigured language makes the creature appear even more hideous and evilest, for he taunts Simon with the same informal language the boys use themselves. Simon, startled by his discovery, attempts to portray it to the rest of the boys, but the evil and savagery within them causing them to mistake him for the beast itself, set upon him, and kill
The last representation of the beast is, the savage nature of humans. The chant the boys repeat in document F,” Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” Shows a savagery the boys possess without the guidance of their parents, this also shows that without said guidance they become beasts themselves. Also from document F, “Only the beast lay still, a few yards from the sea. Even in the rain they could see how small the beast was; and already it’s blood staining the sand.” To clarify, this quote lets the reader view the outcome of the savage nature the boys possessed.
While they agree that the beast is not a traditional monster, it is Simon’s philosophical understanding that allows him to fully realize the meaning of the beast. At the assembly, Ralph plans to discuss the beast, hoping to bring the fear to an end. Simon suggests that the boys themselves are the beast. Later, when Simon encounters the “Lord of the Flies” in a hallucination, the reader learns the extent of his understanding. The Lord of the Flies mocks Simon by saying, “Fancy you thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill...You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?”(128). Simon realizes that there is something within humans that can cause them to act savagely. However, at the assembly, in an effort to understand what Simon meant about the beast, the boys suggest that the beast could be a ghost. Piggy firmly rejects this idea because he approaches the beast in the same way he handles most situations: logically and scientifically. As Piggy states, “Life… is scientific, that’s what it is…. I know there isn’t no beast- not with claws and all that, I mean- but I know there isn’t no fear either… unless we get afraid of people” (72). Piggy understands fear can have detrimental effects, but he does not yet understand that fear is within every person, and this is the “beast” that can cause people to act without
When the boys first arrived on the island, their behaviour was civilized and they attempted to convince themselves that they would soon be rescued by their parents. As the days passed, the boys began to open their eyes and realized that sitting around was not going to benefit them in any way, and most importantly it would not help them survive. Because of their new unrestricted life on the island, the boys become ruthless and replaced their previous identity.
Simon, the wisest, calmest, and maturest of all the boys, is off by himself “talking” to a pig, perhaps going crazy. All others are sitting around the fire relaxing, ignoring the fact that one of the the wisest men of all has himself begun to lose sanity, possibly symbolic of the condition of people on the island. Of course, readers know, by the description of the bulging clouds, that the sky will soon break and, symbolically, something terrible within the plot will soon happen. Indeed, the entire novel has built to this point, as readers have observed the downward spiral of morality amidst the moral characters and increased savagery. Simon has observed this, and perhaps because he tends to take in everything inwardly, his depression over the gradual decline in the children on the island has caused him to become somewhat senile. Simon continues his “conversation” with the pig whom he calls “the lord of the flies” (“Beelzebub” in Hebrew, meaning “the devil”), and it is as if he is being tempted by the devil, or corrupt immorality that has taken over the other children on the island. However, he is able to be triumphant over the temptations, and staggers back down to the island to inform the other children that the beast on the island is
As Simon was trying to tell the boys that the beast did not exist, his death symbolises that mankind can’t face the truth about their inner desires. Part of Golding’s intent was to demonstrate that the evil is not recognised in specific populations or situations. On the island, the beast is manifest in the deadly tribal dances, war paint and manhunt; in the outside world, the same lust for power and control plays out as a nuclear war. Throughout ‘The Lord of the Flies’ Golding has managed to show that evil is present in everyone.
Yet, the creature still has hope that he can be loved, so he reveals himself to the DeLacy family. However, when he reveals himself, he does not get a positive response. Instead of them being friendly and kind to him, they are shocked and Felix De Lacy attacks him with a stick. The creature feels anguished and states, “I was like a wild beast that has broken the toils; destroying the objects that obstructed me” (Shelley 95). At this point, the creature loses all hope of being happy or loved.
Lord of flies is about a group of schoolboys, who got stuck on uninhabited island after a plane crash. On island they struggle with savagery and civilazation while they are waiting to be rescued. William Golding gives the examples of elements what makes society ‘civilized’ which contains rules, laws and morality. He shows the consequences of what happens if we don’t follow the rules which he lead to savagery in his book. This civilazation in book also can be a metaphor for a government, its creation.
Golding has a rather pessimistic view of humanity having selfishness, impulsiveness and violence within, shown in his dark yet allegorical novel Lord of the Flies. Throughout the novel, the boys show great self-concern, act rashly, and pummel beasts, boys and bacon. The delicate facade of society is easily toppled by man's true beastly nature.
On contrary from all the other boys on the island Simon, a Christ like figure in the novel, did not fear the ‘beastie’ or the unknown. “Maybe there is a beast....maybe it's only us” Simon explained. (p. 97) The fear of the unknown in the novel contributes to the boys’ terror of the beast, the beast is an imaginary figure which lays in all of the boys’ minds and haunts them. Golding uses the beast as a symbol of the evil that exists in every creature. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?" The sow head announced to Simon to be the “lord of the flies”. The “lord of the flies” is a figure of the devil, and brings out all the evil and fear in people. It wants you to fear it, but if you don’t believe in the “lord of the flies” nothing can happen to you. Therefore Simon didn’t fall into the trap, but the beast killed him, meaning the other boys on the island did. Simon discovered that the beast is in fact just a dead parachute man before he died and ran down to tell the boys about his finding. When Sim...
Civilization struggling for power against savagery was shown throughout Lord of the Flies. These opposite mindsets are shown battling while determining who had the right to speak during assemblies, when the group hunted pigs, throughout the struggle over Piggy’s glasses, and finally with Simon’s death. These polar opposites are shown throughout these examples and reveal the desperation of clinging to civilization while savagery took over the actions of the some of the boys in Lord of the Flies.
During one of the tribe’s assemblies, when Ralph had spoken “Nobody knows where we are. We may be here a long time”(34), a silence passed. No one has spoken because everyone is having a moment to themselves, fantasizing about happy days at home. This desolation of society has turned Jack’s civilized form into a thirsty hungry savage. The beast within gained control of the boys and fought to protect them from the so called frightening beast. What the boys haven’t recognized is that physically there was no beast, all they are are illusions playing in their minds. Simon, the only boy who respects nature, is the only one to actually figure out the true meaning of the beast in a vision showing a conversation with the Lord of the Flies. The Lord of the Flies had stated in a condescending manner “there isn't anyone to help you. Only me. And I'm the beast...Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill!...You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?... I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?” (143). This is validating that the Lord of the Flies knew that mother nature always wins for no one should destroy its natural cycle. It foreshadowed how Simon would die by unintentional causes. He died trying to tell the rest of the boys that they have mistakenly killed the pilot by hitting the parachute with rocks, and not the beast. When this happened, the air was dark and humid with a storm approaching. The weather is indication that Simon’s death would be happening in a matter of time. Just like the pilot, the boys unintentionally kill an innocent victim because of their delusional minds. In the first stages of killing Simon, the boys kept on chanting “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood,” (152) increasing the tone in agony, allowing the inner beasts to gain full control. They surrounded Simon to secure him from escaping and tore
One of the main themes in William Golding's 1954 novel Lord of the Flies is that without civilization, there is no law and order. The expression of Golding's unorthodox and complex views are embodied in the many varied characters in the novel. One of Golding's unorthodox views is that only one aspect of the modern world keeps people from reverting back to savagery and that is society. Golding shows the extreme situations of what could possibly happen in a society composed of people taken from a structured society then put into a structureless society in the blink of an eye. First there is a need for order until the people on the island realize that there are no rules to dictate their lives and take Daveers into their own hands. Golding is also a master of contrasting characterization. This can be seen in the conflicts between the characters of Jack, the savage; Simon, the savior; and Piggy, the one with all the ideas.
All of the boys but Simon are becoming the beast at that moment. In Lord of the Flies, Golding proves that fear draws out man’s inner evil and barbarism. Within the novel, Golding uses characterization of the boys and symbolism of the beast to show the gradual change from their initial civility to savagery and inhumanity. Learned civility, order and humanity become ultimately futile in the face of fear. The author teaches that without logic, fear consumes us endlessly.
People are privileged to live in an advanced stage of development known as civilization. In a civilization, one’s life is bound by rules that are meant to tame its savage natures. A humans possesses better qualities because the laws that we must follow instill order and stability within society. This observation, made by William Golding, dictates itself as one of the most important themes of Lord of the Flies. The novel demonstrates the great need for civilization ion in life because without it, people revert back to animalistic natures.
“The survival of the fittest”, a theory brought forth by Charles Darwin representing that the weak will suffer and only the strong may survive. A theory that is heavily related with cruelty. Such cruelty occurred in the book Lord of the Flies where a group of children become stranded on an island after their plane crash. The book slowly splits into two paths, one leading to salvation and rescue while the second leads to the abandoning civilization and only desiring to survive for themselves. Jack, the main antagonist in Lord of the Flies, demonstrates the cruelty of the second path as he slowly corrodes the group into degenerates at his attempt to usurp power.