Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on surrogacy
Discussion of surrogacy
Surrogate motherhood be allowed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on surrogacy
New means of reproducing children have the tendency to attract strong opposition, and this certainly true of surrogate mothering. A surrogate mother is woman who takes on the responsibility of pregnancy for another woman. The surrogate mother is, then, inseminated using a man’s sperm. At the end of the pregnancy, the surrogate mother gives the infant to the woman who requested her services. Some claim this practice is immoral. They claim that the practice of surrogate mothering breaks down the traditional family. They also claim the practice exploits women and is, thus, anti-feminist. Meanwhile, they also argue that if money is being transferred to the biological mother, then this practice is essentially baby selling, and they conclude that …show more content…
Purdy. In “Surrogate Mothering: Exploitation or Empowerment,” she argues that surrogate mothering is not only moral but also beneficial. As far as benefits are concerned, she claims that it helps infertile couples and lowers the net health risks for certain pregnancies (Purdy 2). Purdy argues against the idea that it wrong for a woman to take on the risks and burdens of pregnancy for another person. In fact, she claims there are many jobs where women take on possibly very high risks and burdens (Purdy 3). She also argues people are wrong to suggest that the separation of reproduction and sex is somehow inherently wrong. In response to that issue, she claims there are other analogous separations which benefit women (Purdy 3). As far as baby-selling is concerned, she argues that surrogate mothering is not, in fact, baby-selling (Purdy 6). Throughout the entirety of the paper, Purdy holds that surrogate mothering is beneficial to women and society. Purdy’s conclusions are correct; however, she requires additional arguments to make her point. Also, notably, she leaves out certain objections, especially, with respect to adoption, which need to be pointed out. Surrogate mothering is not inherently immoral or exploitation, and in some cases, preferable to
When the author states that is unacceptable to accept the risk of inheriting this disease with the consent of the future child, the author fails to recognize that essentially all actions performed by the surrogate mother are done without consent. This includes drinking alcohol and smoking. While these behaviors are harmful in large amounts, they are not monitored by a third party nor have proven to cause enough damage in small amounts so the life of the child would be unsatisfying. Thus, the mother is accepting a risk on behalf of another, yet wh... ... middle of paper ... ...
...es presented, and disregarded the fetuses right to a valuable life. Warren also briefly discussed the morally permissible options, such as adoption but failed to include how much more beneficiary putting a child up for adoption is rather than aborting the fetus. Marquis article is more convincing even to those who are pro-choice as it is less easy to criticize.
The woman who conceives, carries and gives birth to the child is called the surrogate mother. There are two types of surrogacy: traditional surrogacy and gestational surrogacy. Traditional surrogacy involves the sperm from the intended father (also known as the sperm donor) and the egg of the surrogate mother. Therefore, in this case, the surrogate mother is the genetic mother of the child. The second type is gestational surrogacy. Gestational surrogacy involves the extraction of the egg from the intended mother, and the transfer of the embryo into the surrogate’s uterus. This means that the surrogate mother is not genetically related to the child. Within the two types of surrogacy, there are two types of surrogacy arrangements: altruistic (non-commercial) and commercial. Under the Surrogacy Act 2010 (Qld), a commercial surrogacy arrangement is when a person receives payment, reward, or other material benefit or advantage for entering into the surrogacy arrange...
Surrogate pregnancy was talked about and questioned in the early 1970’s but was not put into practice until 1976. The first case documented actually comes from the bible. It was the story of Abraham and Sarah. Sarah talks about her experience with infertility. She then turns to Hagar, her handmaiden, and asks her if she would carry their child for them since she was unable to. Hagar was their maid so in a way it was a command, not exactly a favor or question.
The addition of a child into a family’s home is a happy occasion. Unfortunately, some families are unable to have a child due to unforeseen problems, and they must pursue other means than natural pregnancy. Some couples adopt and other couples follow a different path; they utilize in vitro fertilization or surrogate motherhood. The process is complicated, unreliable, but ultimately can give the parents the gift of a child they otherwise could not have had. At the same time, as the process becomes more and more advanced and scientists are able to predict the outcome of the technique, the choice of what child is born is placed in the hands of the parents. Instead of waiting to see if the child had the mother’s eyes, the father’s hair or Grandma’s heart problem, the parents and doctors can select the best eggs and the best sperm to create the perfect child. Many see the rise of in vitro fertilization as the second coming of the Eugenics movement of the 19th and early 20th century. A process that is able to bring joy to so many parents is also seen as deciding who is able to reproduce and what child is worthy of birthing.
...ernatives to abortion, adoption being an alternative par excellence? Why can't we cooperate in giving her all the information there is to be given from both sides of this controversial issue? Why not fully informed consent? Give her all the reasons for abortion, but also give her all the reasons for waiting, and most emphatically offer to her all of the constructive alternatives that now exist. If our laws continue to dictate that she be given that choice of life or death for her unborn, at the very least that choice should be a fully informed one. It should not just be informed in terms of technical information. No, it should also be a choice that is made in view of the fact that there is a warm and loving alternative to the technical quick fix of abortion.
Essentially, they value a fetus life more than a woman’s right to choose what to do with her body. To these activists, choosing abortion is the equivalent of murder, and that they are “playing god” by aborting their children. They also feel that on the other hand that abortion is a dangerous procedure, and puts the mother at risk (hli.org 3). Anti-abortion leaders argue that there are alternatives to abortion, such as adoption. Adoption may provide a warm and happy home, although often times they are placed in uncaring homes.
...ther’s sovereignty over her body outweigh the right of an unborn child to live. The answers to these questions are very diverse as a result of the diversity of the American society. With the issue of abortion, one’s attitude toward it is going to be based on many things such as religious background and personal morals. There is no black and white answer to the abortion issue. Luckily we live in a country where we are able to decide for ourselves whether something is morally right or wrong. Thus, ultimately, the choice is ours. As with the many other ethical issues which we are faced with in our society, it is hard to come to a concrete answer until we are personally faced with that issue. All we can do is make an effort to know all of the aspects which are involved so that we may be able to make a sound decision if we were faced with this problem in our own lives.
Commercial surrogacy commodifies children because by paying the surrogate mother to give up her child, they treat the child as an object of exchange or commodity that can be bought and sold. As any business transaction, the parents give money for the exchange of an object, the child. The parents get their desired child and the mother gets the money, but what about what thee child think about this event? The parents and surrogate mother’s action were done with self-interest. It could be argued that they wanted the best for the child. However, the first priority in the intentional procreation of the child was not the welfare of the child but rather to give it up to the parents in exchange of money. Additionally, women’s labor is commodified because the surrogate mother treats her parental rights as it was a property right not as a trust. In other words, the decisions taken concerning the child are not done primarily for the benefit of the child. The act of the mother relenting her parental rights is done for a monetary price. She disposes of her parental rights, which are to be managed for the welfare of the owner, as if they were property right, which are to be handled for personal
Arguments against commercial surrogacy typically revolve around the idea that surrogacy is a form of child-selling. Critics believe that commercial surrogacy violates both women’s and children’s rights. In addition, by making surrogacy contracts legally enforceable, courts will follow the contract rather than choose what is best for the child. However, in her article “Surrogate Mothering: Exploring Empowerment” Laura Pudry is not convinced by these arguments.
Frame, T. R. "Reproductive Rights." Children on Demand: The Ethics of Defying Nature. Coogee, N.S.W.: UNSW, 2008. N. pag. Print.
Surrogacy as a means of family formation is defined as “a woman carrying a pregnancy for a third party with the express intention of giving up all parental rights to resulting child(ren)”, hence allowing women unable to carry a pregnancy the right to parent a child. As claimed by the “Inquiry into the legislative aspects of international and domestic surrogacy arrangements”, society now recognises many different forms of blended families that are not based solely on genetic connections, expanding the models of family formation beyond traditional relationships. Prior to the enactment of the Surrogacy Act 2010, the Status of Children Act 1996 (NSW) automatically accorded parentage to the birth mother, and the Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) provided the only means to have legal parentage transferred from the birth mother to the intending parents. Accordingly, the newly enacted legal response removed discrepancies in transferring parentage to commissioning parents, providing a system of parenting orders where parties can apply to the NSW Supreme Court to transfer full legal parentage of the child from such parties, thus avoiding the lengthy adoptive process. Furthermore, the article “NSW considers changing surrogacy law changes” further reflects the response of the government to changing values in society.
Surrogacy is becoming extremely popular as a way for people to build their families and women to have a source of income. Many people have various reasons for their opposition to it whether it be by comparing it to prostitution or disagreeing with how military wives take advantage of the Tricare insurance. Lorraine Ali states in her article “The Curious Lives of Surrogates” that one of the more popular reasons to oppose surrogacy is that it contradicts, “what we’ve always thought of as an unbreakable bond between mother and child.” However, a woman’s inability to conceive her own children does not determine the absence of a mother to child bond.
That the industry is helping them to better themselves and their families by providing this much needed service. The exploitation involved to these women negates that argument. I will refer to an earlier example of an India woman that may have been forced by her husband or other family member to engage in being a surrogate. Here in the U.S a woman may not be forced by family to engage in surrogacy however her bleak financial situation can force her into surrogacy as a chance to earn income without having to leave home to work. Commercial surrogacy exploits women who live in poverty or barely above. There is also an argument that commercial surrogacy is no different than donating sperm.
Anderson (2000) believes that the concept of surrogacy is wrong and a violation of human dignity as it makes a commodity of not only the female body with disregard to the woman's own feelings, but also the child. Anderson's beliefs come from the first category of human dignity, quadrants 1A and 1B: dignity that is inherent because of species membership and our own special human capacities. Our possession of distinctive abilities to be rational, moral, autonomous beings capable of love and deserving of freedom, are forcibly removed from both the children and the surrogate mothers through commercial surrogacy. The child loses their freedom and autonomy, as they are too young to verbalise their opinion or understand the situation. Their best interests are disregarded as they become a possession where the adults' seeking surrogacy make decisions based on their own interests and feelings.