Support Drilling for Oil in Alaska?

705 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Research thesis about oil drilling in alaska

1. If you were a congressman/congresswoman from Alaska would you support or be against drilling oil in Alaska? Explain why or why not? I actually disagree with drilling. We have to look at the bigger picture and think about the long term goals. Bottom line oil is needed to reduce energy prices and U. S. dependence on foreign oil however at what cost. We have to protect the environment and the animal’s writhing in it. 2.Discuss the benefits as well as adverse effect of drilling oil in Alaska on the environment and people. Drill can destroy habitats; disrupt animal life force people to give up their traditional way of living their lives. However, Alaska has a very poor economy and drilling there would create jobs and help to bring money back to the area. I was a congressman from Alaska I would be weighing my options, I would do a thorough study of the lands and after that I would allow small portions of drilling for oil in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Moreover, I would be making periodic assessments of every drilling area. If indeed there is a fact proven that oil development harms local wildlife, I will then conduct re-assessment of the ANWR drilling. I understand there economic restrains on buying only foreign crude oil supplies, but only in needed situations I would allow drilling to occur, but all there will be drilling limitations. However, if the ANWR myths are false, then a well organized planned, with numerous continuity groups always observing the work orders, would strive to manage a balance of keeping Alaska lands salvageable and avoiding land deterioration, to where recoverability is not possible. The benefits of oil drilling in Alaska are the reduction of foreign oil dependency. In 2012, petrol... ... middle of paper ... ...l feedstock. If ANWR drilling is allowed, our domestic crude oil production can reach a feasible rate of 10 million barrels per day by 2020. Additionally, with innovations in technology and better consumption habits are implemented, factors like: fuel efficient vehicles can be produced, electric battery created, and natural gas in freight transportation can be extended. The adverse effects on oil drilling are all the ANWR myths come to life. Oil production could disrupt the caribou cows, porcupine herd and polar bear populations. This can be done by destroying denning areas, and calving grounds that can lead to weak live stock development, followed by potential disease spreading epidemics. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/04/0421_050421_alaskadrilling.html http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/oil/ http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20051219-091756-3971r.htm

Show More
Related

  • The Keystone XL Pipeline and Public Response

    2961 Words  | 6 Pages

    Pattanayek, Mala and DeShields, Bridgette. “Characterizing Risks to Livestock From Petroleum Hydrocarbons” Blasland, Bouck and Lee, Inc. University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 2003. Web. 10 December 2015.

    Read More

  • The United States should drill for oil in the ANWR - Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve

    916 Words  | 2 Pages

    Also, drilling in Alaska will not harm the wildlife. Take Prudhoe Bay for example. The Central Arctic Caribou Herd that occupies Prudhoe Bay has grown from a population of 6000 in 1978 to 27000 today. This is a 450% growth over 26 years at an average of 17.3% growth per year. (Arctic Power) That’s quite an increase.

    Read More

  • Should America Drill In Alaska Dbq Analysis

    542 Words  | 2 Pages

    The environment needs protecting because even before the drilling started hunting was rapidly decreasing the amount of animals in the area. So if drilling occured in Alaska the animal count would go down even more. Drilling is gonna need space, and because Alaska is a mountained and woodland area they will have to make space by destroying trees etc. Destroying trees means destroying animals’ homes. According to document E ‘just look 60 miles west to Prudhoe bay- an oil complex that has turned 1,000 square miles of fragile tundra into a sprawling industrial zone containing, 1,500 miles of roads and pipes’. Also the document states that the would be

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Keystone XL Pipeline

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this essay we will be looking at why the Keystone XL Pipeline should not be built. This is a hot controversial issue that has been in the news for awhile. We will discuss the pros and cons of what will happen if the United States passes legislature to allow the Keystone XL Pipeline to be built. You have to ask yourself if destroying the environment is for our children is worth it to make a few billions richer or maybe little bit cheaper gas. If you agree with building the Keystone XL Pipeline you need to look your children in the eyes and tell them you’re sorry for destroying the environment for them and their children.

    Read More

  • Spindletop Research Paper

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, Oil impacted social change over time, which helped us grow as a society. If you took my proposal into consideration I would really appreciate it. My proposal is going to have all of the factors of Oil and how oil has change our state. After reading the documents that you have given me I was able to answer question “What story should be told”. As H.L hunt always said “money is just as way of keeping score”. - H.L

    Read More

  • Alberta Tar Sands in Canada

    1676 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...Alberta tar sands oil extraction project should be ended immediately. It should be stopped until the government has a better understanding of the effects that it has on the surrounding areas, including the wildlife and humans. The extraction of oil is being pushed because of the large possibility of capital being gained from the project by the government, which has lead to negligence by the government of the impacts. When people, animals, and plants are dying at such a high rate, the Canadian government shouldn’t be watching, they should be acting before the tar sands oil extraction project become too big to stop. This project has allowed me to answer the questions I had when I started the paper and allowed me to formulate my own opinions about the topic. Hopefully, it interested the audience enough that they will research the topic more and make up their own mind.

    Read More

  • ANWR Drilling: Allowed or Not?

    863 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Most important of all are the more than 130,000 caribou of the Porcupine herd. , these caribou are at the heart of environmentalists’ case against drilling” (McCarthy). The reason that these specific animals are the reason for not drilling is that the caribou migrate to the plains, where the drilling would take place, in order to give birth to their calves.... ... middle of paper ...

    Read More

  • Overview of Green Washing Perpetrated by BP

    2378 Words  | 5 Pages

    ..."Alaska Oil Spill Fuels Concerns Over Arctic Wildlife, Future Drilling." National Geographic News. 20 Mar. 2006. Web. 3 July 2010.

    Read More

  • Filling the Void: Hydraulic Fracturing

    1272 Words  | 3 Pages

    The immediate impact of hydraulic fracking is the economic gain from drilling. With so much money involved in gas oil all Americans see a gain. Starting with the land owners to the proprietor of a local restaurant and even households far away from drilling sites everyone ei...

    Read More

  • The Consequences of Drilling for Natural Gas

    1644 Words  | 4 Pages

    The United States relies on imports for about forty percent of its crude oil, which is the lowest rate of dependency since 1991 according to the U.S Energy Information Administration. Today our country is trying to keep on track in becoming less and less dependent. When it comes to the topic of the future ways the United States will get its fuel, most of us readily agree that the United States should become more independent by using natural gas that is already here on our land. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the question of the consequences drilling for natural gas brings. Whereas some are convinced drilling is safe, others maintain that it is actually in fact dangerous. Hydraulic fracturing or "fracking", the terms for drilling for natural gas, is dangerous to our public health and to the environment because of the water contamination it causes. Therefore, it is not something that should become a project for alternative fuel used by the United States.

    Read More

  • Offshore Drilling Persuasive Essay

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    The environmental danger taken by offshore drilling is very straight forward, made clear by oil spills such as the recent BP oil spill and the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989 off the shore of Alaska. In the circumstances of the Exxon Valdez spill up to 250,000 sea birds died, over 2,800 sea otters and thousands of other animals], (figures from the BP oil spill are not yet concluded), having had a heavy strike on the regional wildlife and directing to a ban on all offshore drilling in America, until George Bush overturned it in 2008 to this repeal was a misjudgment because two years later there was the Deepwater Horizon spill. In this way, offshore drilling ruins ecosystems and fish supplies which creates a wasteland of a shoreline among southern USA.

    Read More

  • Capstone Paper Outline

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    This article provides a wealth of information on the hydrocarbon situation in the Arctic. As such, it is expected to play a major role as a source in the final paper. The hydrocarbon aspect of the Arctic situation is a major factor in the foreign policy of every nation involved. Russia currently controls the majority of the potential assets in the region, which demonstrates the advantage Russia has already acquired over other nations in the Arctic Council. The article also continues to reveal that the Arctic could be a potential supplement for oil from a turbulent Middle East.

    Read More

  • Fracking rough draft

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    The search for a good oil supply has been going on ever since cars first started to run on gasoline. Although while there are great ways to drill, there are extremely dangerous environmental hazards and risks to animals that come along with it. Fracking, many argue, is the best form of drilling that we have today. Fracking is the use of sand, water, and chemicals injected at high pressures to blast open shale rock and release the trapped gas inside. Still, many debate the use of fracking because while it provides jobs and helps the economy, fracking is awful for the environment because it uses many chemicals in the drilling process and it contaminates large supplies of drinking water.

    Read More

  • United States Foreign Oil Dependency

    918 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S dependency on foreign oil presents many negative impacts on the nation’s economy. The cost for crude oil represents about 36% of the U.S balance of payment deficit. (Wright, R. T., & Boorse, D. F. 2011). This does not affect directly the price of gas being paid by consumers, but the money paid circulates in the country’s economy and affects areas such as; the job market and production facilities. (Wright, R. T., & Boorse, D. F. 2011). In addition to the rise in prices, another negative aspect of the U.S dependency on foreign crude oil is the risk of supply disruptions caused by political instability of the Middle East. According to Rebecca Lefton and Daniel J. Weiss in the Article “Oil Dependence Is a Dangerous Habit” in 2010, the U.S imported 4 million barrels of oil a day or 1.5 billion barrels per year from “dangerous or unstable” countries. The prices in which these barrels are being purchased at are still very high, and often lead to conflict between the U.S and Middle Eastern countries. Lefton and Weiss also add that the U.S reliance on oil from countries ...

    Read More

  • Arguments Against National Parks

    1388 Words  | 3 Pages

    While many citizens want the regulations that protect the scenery, animals, and history, other citizens want to explore some deregulation. “Carlos Vasquez said he had previously opposed offshore drilling because of environmental concerns. But the 41-year-old lawyer said the recent rise in gas prices changed his mind” (Woo and Hughes A2).

    Read More

More about Support Drilling for Oil in Alaska?

Open Document