Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racism in the criminal justice system
Court system introduction
Criminal justice and racism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Murder on a Sunday Morning The film Murder on a Sunday Morning depicts the true story of the trial of a fifteen-year-old boy named Brenton Butler. On May 7, 2000, a 65-year-old woman named Mary Ann Stephens was shot and killed at a motel in Florida. Only a few hours later, the police saw Brenton walking on the street nearby and arrested him. After months, Brenton went to trial for the murder of the woman. Various police officials testified, under oath, evidence which placed Brenton at fault, but Brenton’s lawyer, Patrick McGuinness, was able to disprove the evidence. In the end, the jury saw through the false accusations proposed by various police officials and plead not guilty. Currently, police officials and other people of political importance …show more content…
have the power to send innocent people to prison with just their word; this is a social injustice to the public and measures should be taken to stop it. With the help of Patrick McGuinness and Ann Finnell, Brenton is able to prove his innocence to the jury due to the lack of credible evidence provided by the prosecution.
The officers did very little investigation work in the case, and simply blamed the first African American which they could find. McGuinness proves this in court by describing to the jury the various areas which the detectives overlooked. The only actual evidence presented in the case was the eyewitness testimony of the victim’s husband and a written confession which was forced from the defendant after numerous threats and injuries caused by several officers. Over time, it becomes more and more apparent that the officers’ story was false and Brenton was innocent. Brenton was to trial for murder with very little evidence, all of which was proven to be false. Even though Brenton was released in the end, the time he spent in jail waiting for his trial would most likely haunt him …show more content…
forever. In an instant, Brenton Butler was removed from everything he knew and loved. This is a moment which would change his life forever. Although Brenton was ultimately found not guilty, the accusation of a few officers was enough to affect him for life. As a fifteen-year-old, Brenton would have had to miss school while in jail. Even if education was provided, it would be drastically worse than the typical education system. For many, a traumatic experience like this would be difficult to recover from and the time away from school would cause them to feel behind forever. Even though Brenton was found to be innocent, his friends and family would always look at him differently after his trial. Most likely, the trauma from the trial would change Brenton’s attitude forever, and he would never be seen as the same person. Although Brenton was ultimately proven innocent, a few police officials should not have the ability to keep an innocent person in jail for six months, as this is a restriction of basic freedoms and would cause permanent trauma. Members of society often view police officials as symbols of safety and integrity.
For Brenton Butler, they were just the opposite. The detectives on the case were able to use their status to prosecute Brenton without having any substantial evidence other than the false story they provided. This is a major flaw in the justice system in America. People of political power are able to control every aspect of one’s life. They even have to take away one’s freedom and basic rights by sentencing them to prison for a crime which they did not commit. Brenton is just one of the thousands of victims of this social injustice, many of which, were never proven
innocent. Murder on a Sunday Morning depicts the trial of an innocent man for murder. The case detectives were able to frame Brenton for the murder due to the strong political influence which they had. In the end, Brenton was found to be innocent, but the accusations placed upon him would remain with him forever. It is a social injustice for police officials and other people of political importance to have the power to send innocent people to prison with simply their word. This is a detriment to society which must be stopped. Together citizens can stand up against this injustice and fight for something which is fair for all in order to prevent others from falling victim to the same political harassment as Brenton Butler.
...ing of key evidence he was not found guilty. This goes to prove that although in this case Morin was ultimately found not guilty, there are other cases where the person who is actually responsible for the crime has been released for the same reasons. In this case the actual person who murdered Christine has not been found, although had the police widened their suspect list they may have found the murderer.
The Army CID sent a new, inexperienced investigator named William Ivory to investigate the scene. Ivory decided after looking around the house that MacDonald made up the story of the killers. He also persuaded everyone that he was the culprit. This meant that everyone in Ivory’s chain...
Both of the boys accusations were very severe. Steve Harmon was being tried for bring an accomplice in a murder/robbery in a convenience store. Even though there's not much information on the arrest itself it was hinted that he was found around the neighborhood and was trying to film for his class when he was arrested .Whereas, Brenton Butler was tried as the killer of an older tourist that was white. Butler was outside by his house when police spotted him, they took him in for questioning just because the description of the murderer was that he was African American. Once arrested they were both introduced to the people who could change their fate in the courtroom.
Dupree’s case. Through DNA testing they were able to clear him and get him released on parole in 2010 because the rape and robbery in which he was convicted occurred in the same incident. I believe that there was sufficient evidence during the initial trial to provide Mr. Dupree due process and be exonerated of these crimes. However, the systemic nature of discrimination and racism prevailed in the case. The system has always been flawed, and justice has not always been a priority for some, especially when it concerns minorities. The attitude is usually that all Blacks are the same, and if they didn’t do the crime at hand, they have done something they were not caught for, so it doesn’t matter. Even though Mr. Dupree was innocent at the time, the fact that Massingill had a weapon on him, and was also a suspect of another rape which he was committed for, in the eyes of the police, I believe that they overlooked the facts of this particular case, simply because he was with Mr. Dupree, and the two assailants were two Black
On May 7th 2000, fifteen year old Brenton Butler was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens, who had been fatally shot in the head while walking down a breezeway of a hotel with her husband. Two and a half hours later, Butler is seen walking a mile away from where the incident occurred, and is picked up by the police because he fit the description of the individual who shot Mary Ann Stephens. However, the only characteristic of the description that Butler featured was the color of his skin. Police then brought Butler to the scene of the crime in order for Mary Ann Stephens’s husband, James Stephens, to confirm whether or not Butler was the individual who had shot his wife. Almost immediately, Stephens identifies Butler as his wife’s killer.
On Bloodsworth’s appeal he argued several points. First he argued that there was not sufficient evidence to tie Bloodsworth to the crime. The courts ruled that the ruling stand on the grounds that the witness evidence was enough for reasonable doubt that the c...
Billy Joel once sang, “Only the good die young”. In life, it is true, the young and innocent seem to touch more lives around us than anyone else. In the Casey Anthony trial, Anthony was a suspect in the murder of her daughter Caylee. Caylee’s life shouldn’t be counted in years, it should be counted by how many lives she affected, the love she has gained, and the support the country has given her to find out what really happened. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a boy killed his father; however, both cases were challenged by the obvious and the abstruse evidence. Large cities towards the east coast, in 1982, Twelve Angry Men, and 2008, Casey Anthony Trial, affiliated with two major trials able to modify the lives of the living and the dead. For that reason, during the Casey Anthony case, jurors were conflicted throughout the trial.
The novel Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer has a very in-depth conflict that is showcased all throughout the novel. In Theo's community, there is a high-profile murder trial about to begin. Mr. Pete Duffy, a wealthy business man, is accused of murdering his wife Myra Duffy. The prosecutors have the idea that Mr. Duffy did it for the one million dollar insurance policy he took out on his wife earlier, however they have no proof to support this accusation (Grisham 53). The defendants do however have the proof that no one saw the murder, for all everyone knew, Mr. Duffy was playing his daily round of golf at the golf course right by his house. As the trial moved on, the jury was starting to lean towards letting Mr. Duffy walk a free man. To this point, there has been no proof to support the prosecutors statements that Mr. Duffy killed h...
Now, it takes a lot of courage for an investigator to stand up and admit a wrongful conviction, especially in a case that he helped to convict. That brings me to think agree with the statement of Chief Justice William H. Rehmquist “the justice system has not yet learned to confront the fact that, even when there are no easily identifiable misstep, it can produce an unjust outcome.” (Clifford 4) It is because of this reason, that manyinnocent people end up in jail. Despite the efforts to get them out, many of them are denied. It took nine years for federal agents to even consider looking into the Edward Garry conviction case. In addition, it took another three years for Garry’s lawyer to get a post-conviction motion, which was denied by a Bronx judge, saying that the new evidence wasn’t credible. And still, Garry has yet to be absolved for this crime that he did not commit despite witnesses testifying on his behalf. This is a really depressing case because of the fact that Garry has become broken. “Garry gives the impression of a man who has been inside literally and figuratively for far too long.” Twenty one years of his innocent life that he may never get back. All because this justice system has failed him as a
The jury’s decision, however, was not based on evidence, but on race. A jury is supposed to put their beliefs aside and make a decision based on the information given during the trial. Jury members must do their duty and do what is right. I tried to do what was right, but all the other members of the jury were blind. They chose to convict because of skin color rather than actual evidence from the case.
The evidence discovered during the investigation suggested to the police that OJ Simpson may have had something to do with this murder and they obtained an arrest warrant. The investigators believed that they “knew” OJ Simpson committed the murders. His lawyers and him were informed of the arrest warrant and agreed to a specified time when OJ would turn himself into authorities. Investigators are later admonished, by the defense, on how they handled the crime scene.
The truth can sometimes depend on the circumstance and the person who states it. When confronted with conflicting accounts or questionable details, a judge within the court of law must decide the sentence of an individual with these obstacles in place. In this case, the defendant Dannie McGrew has been charged with the murder of Barney Quill, but claims that it was self-defense. The following contains a thorough explanation as to how the judge decided upon the verdict of acquittal.
Brooks should not have been charged with murder or any other crime because he had clearly dissented any motives to kill Richard Parker. On the eighteenth day, Brooks was not in accord with killing Richard Parker—even for survival. On the nineteenth day, he did not agree with drawing lots to decide upon which crewmember was going to be killed, and the lots were never drawn. Finally, on the twentieth day, he did not support Richard Parkers murder or death. It may be argued that because he had participated in feeding on Richard Parkers flesh, that he was guilty, but the only reason he did so was because he was suffering from extreme starvation. In conclusion, Brooks was not charged with accessory to murder considering the fact that he dissented all suggestions to kill the innocent, Richard Parker, and given the circumstances he could not have saved the victim anyways.
“Sunday Morning” by Wallace Stevens is a poem about a woman having a late breakfast and thinking about the purpose of religion. Stevens wants the readers to ask themselves the questions that the woman asks, and to explore their feelings towards Christianity. He also wants to spark an awareness of nature. The first stanza asks the first tentative questions before launching into a racy debate in the later stanzas.
In this process of mock trials I never believe that I could ever learn that I would be a great lawyer in my future. Our case went well, compared to how we believe it would go. Thought out the trial my team did not have confidence in ourselves and we believe that we could lose, we were correct. As the trial went on we got some confidence back. I think that in order to have a go trail you have to be confident in yourself or it will not go how you want. I learned many things during mock trials.