Summary: The Pedestrian By Ray Bradbury

1040 Words3 Pages

BradBury Your Worry
“I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.”
This may sound like something that an anti-technology person would say. Possibly an older person or someone technologically inept. However, the person that this is attributed to is no other than scientific genius and creator of the theory of relativity, Albert Einstein. While there is no proof that he said this, many people quote this as a way to hamper the growing technology craze. But, despite is extraordinary IQ and all of his accomplishments, I believe that Einstein was wrong. In The Pedestrian by Ray Bradbury, he illustrates a futuristic world overtaken by television and technology with no creativity left. …show more content…

However, the arts are necessary to society and serves as inspiration for new technology. A significant way that the arts benefit technology is the works of medical illustrators. Medical illustrators are artists that create models and depictions of medical and anatomical matters. Without an understanding of the human body, medical operations would be an uncertain and deadly procedure. Music is also sometimes considered to be “the father of mathematics” because of the formulas and theories that go into creating a good and memorable sound. Music can also serve as an inspiration to many, most notably Albert Einstein, who idolized Mozart and was inspired to one day do something as great in science as Mozart did in art. (Miller) Many other scientific achievements were inspired by or created through the arts. Camouflage was created by painter Abbott Thaymer. The first pacemaker was based on a musical metronome, and origami inspired airbags in cars (Pomeroy). Many people have the mindset that the arts are just a waste of time and that more science jobs are needed than fine arts. What they don’t realize is that the arts and sciences are two sides of the same coin. Both arts and science are vital to our …show more content…

Technology is powerful and can do much, but there are matters that technology can never replace. Human creativity is a very complex matter that cannot ever be emulated by a machine. Technology can make things, like making someone’s life easier, making a picture seem real, or making a product to sell, but humans can create new machines and ideas with feeling and emotion. Technology is also behind in its AI. Tech has started computing algorithms and simulations faster than humans can, but what the human race has over tech is that faster does not equate to wiser. Computers and robots can do what they are programmed to do, but they can not act out of their coding, even if in danger. Humans have the free will to act without these restraint, for better or for worse. Additionally, computers cannot really make choices or call judgement, because they can only do what they are programmed to do. Humans make their own decisions without help all the time, unlike the technology in our world. The human brain is something complex that cannot be mimicked by technology, and nobody can ever make creativity, judgement, or free

Show More
Related

  • What Does Julia Annas Mean By The Computer Manual Model Of Moral Decision Making

    1044 Words  | 3 Pages

    This idea of a computer doing the ‘technical’ work can be useful to us, due to living in an age of technology which is something that can be useful to us, as our own brains are our ‘built in computer. It is also crucial in processing our thoughts about each of our own moral decisions of what is right and wrong.

    Read More

  • The Veldt By Ray Bradbury: An Analysis

    1418 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master” quoted Christian Lous Lange. What he is saying is absolutely right because from where I remember, I don’t think that humans even knew what electronic devices were in the ancient times and that’s why they advanced and evolved into great shape. Obviously these ancient people turned into modern humans who then advanced so much that they invented electrical devices. However the invention of this technology did not affect their lives in a negative way, it just made it easier for them to live their normal lives like a useful servant would do. Something must have gone wrong in the innovation of technology because today it may destroy lives. Hawking said "I think the development of full artificial intelligence (or A.I.) could spell the end of the

    Read More

  • The Pedestrian By Ray Bradbury: Theme Analysis

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the story, ¨The Pedestrian,¨ the author Ray Bradbury uses society, his character, Mr. Leonard Mead and the setting to explain the theme, ¨Too much dehumanization and technology can really ruin a society.¨ Mr. Leonard Mead walks around the city every night for years, but one night would be different as one cop car roams around waiting to take the next person away.

    Read More

  • Characterization, Theme, and Imagery of Ray Bradbury's The Pedestrian

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    Two Works Cited    Mankind has made great leaps toward progress with inventions like the television. However, as children give up reading and playing outdoors to plug into the television set, one might wonder whether it is progress or regression. In "The Pedestrian," Ray Bradbury has chosen to make a statement on the effects of these improvements. Through characterization and imagery, he shows that if mankind advances to the point where society loses its humanity, then mankind may as well cease to exist.

    Read More

  • The Individual in The Pedestrian by Ray Bradbury

    528 Words  | 2 Pages

    He continues to talk to the car it asks him why he is talking and

    Read More

  • Death of the Literate World in Ray Bradbury's The Pedestrian

    729 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ray Bradbury's short story, "The Pedestrian," shows the not-too-distant future in a very unfavorable light. The thinking world has been eaten away by the convenience that is high technology. This decay is represented by the fate that befalls Leonard Mead. Though only an isolated incident, it foreshadows the end of thinking, literate society.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Nicholas Carr's Article Is Google Making USupid?

    777 Words  | 2 Pages

    “With every new innovation, cultural prophets bickered over whether we were facing a technological apocalypse or a utopia” (Thompson 9). This quote states that with every significant break-through with technology, people contemplate whether it will have a positive or negative effect on mankind. Technology allows for external memory sources, connections to databases, and it allow easy communication between people. Thompson then directly counters Carr’s hypothesis and states that “[c]ertainly, if we are intellectually lazy or prone to cheating and shortcuts, or if we simply don’t pay much attention to how our tools affect the way we work, then yes - we become… over reliant” (Thompson 18). In his opinion, “[s]o yes, when we’re augmenting ourselves, we can be smarter… But our digital tools can also leave us smarter even when we’re not actively using them” (Thompson

    Read More

  • The Pedestrian by Ray Bradbury

    1782 Words  | 4 Pages

    he doesn't he even own one. This where you can see how he is different

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Our Minds Can Be Hijacked?

    738 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “ 5 Things We Need To Know About Technological Change”, by Neil Postman, Postman describes the prices we have to pay each time something new is made. The first price is culture, culture always pays a price for technology. For example, cars and pollution ( and many other less obvious examples). As Postman says: “Technology giveth and technology taketh away”.The second thing to know is that there are always winners and losers in technological change. As Postman explains: “the advantages and disadvantages of new technologies are never distributed evenly among the population”. There are always winners and losers in technological change. Winners tend to be those whose lifestyle is most closely aligned with the values of technology. The losers are those who don’t put technology on the first place. So for some technology is everything, while others are not that into it. As for the third thing that Postman describes is that in every technology there is a hidden philosophy about how the mind should work. I believe what Postman is saying is very similar to what Nicholas Carr, the author of “Tools Of The Mind” said. In “Tools of the Mind”, Carr introduces us to a new word, which he frequently uses called “intellectual ethic”, meaning an assumption implicit in a tool about how the mind should work. Carr explains how the map, clock, and writing are “intellectual technologies” that changed society and our ways

    Read More

  • Artificial Intelligence: iRobot or Humans, Who is More Dangerous?

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many concerns about the negative effects of technological advancement including: threat to privacy, electronic error or malfunction, and automation leading to loss of humanity. Many researchers argue that electronic advancement comes at a negative cost to human performance. Leading computer advancement leads to reliance on technology to perform menial tasks. However, there are arguments that state that humans are in fact the ones who threaten all forms of advancement because the produce majority of the error that risk lives and make mistakes. My argument is that though the effects of human error is responsible for mistakes, computer automation will lead to lazy, sedentary lifestyles and reliance on technology for very simple tasks as well as complicated tasks.

    Read More

  • The Pedestrian Ray Bradbury Analysis

    411 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the story “Pedestrian,” Ray Bradbury explores the idea that technology will overtake the creative mind unless a person continues to maintain his/her innate humanity. He sets the scene with a winter evening where Mr. Leonard Mead decides to take a walk, as he does every night while everyone else is watching television inside their houses. A police car (with no humans inside) finds Mead guilty of regressive tendencies—for walking—and arrests him. They drive past a lighted house, the only one with lights on in the whole city, of which Mead claims is his. The story opens with Mead taking his leisurely night walk. He whispers to each passing house, questioning what was on the television at the moment. And to no avail, no answer is reciprocated, as if the people are “sudden gray phantoms [that] seem to manifest themselves upon inner room walls [with] whisperings and murmurs where a window in a tomblike building [is] still open” (Bradbury 49).

    Read More

  • Machines vs. Humans

    2785 Words  | 6 Pages

    Natural human behaviour is built on the premise of freedom; freedom of thought and action that give the human race limitless capabilities. For the most part, human behaviour and thought are very spontaneous in nature and do not follow a step by step or calculated process. Nor, can the actions of humans be easily predicted.. The freedom inherent in humans is undeniable. Human beings work in a way completely opposite to machines and computers. Machines have no freedom to think, speak, move or have feelings. Freedom is not a trait pocessed by computers because they are governed by mathematics, programs and by someone else - human beings. What happens if humans begin to take on computer like traits and figuratively morph into machines? Applying mechanical traits to a person or mechanizing them, ultimately results in the dehumanization of humans because it eliminates many of the innate attributes that are instinctive; expression, feelings, freedom of thought, mind and body and the spontaneity that defines humans. Therefore a loss of anyone of these traits could be considered inhumane. Humans can become mechanized like a computer; processing infjormation and producing the desired output. This concept is evident in literature, especially in the dystopian worlds of George Orwell’s 1984 and Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange, which show that control is detrimental to the human race.

    Read More

  • How Technology Has Changed Our Life Positively

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    I wonder why sometimes people are afraid of their intelligence. Don’t imagine your life without technology because the progression of technology will never stop, and it will continue to benefit us. As technology advances, our society is able to advance also. Instead of tangle with how technology causes laziness or distracts us from what is important, it would better to think about how to use technology to make our life better.

    Read More

  • Human and Inventions: The Computer Evolution

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our minds have created many remarkable things, however the best invention we ever created is the computer. The computer has helped us in many ways by saving time, giving accurate and precise results, also in many other things. but that does not mean that we should rely on the computer to do everything we can work with the computer to help us improve and at the same time improve the computer too. A lot of people believe that robots will behave like humans someday and will be walking on the earth just like us. There should be a limit for everything so that our world would remain peaceful and stable. At the end, we control the computers and they should not control us.

    Read More

  • The Future Is The Machine

    1844 Words  | 4 Pages

    Brooke Gladstone a media analyst and host of NPR’s On the Media believes that fear of technology negatively affecting us wrongly placed, Gladstone states that history shows the advancements of technology is such examples as: television, radio, printing press, even written language, all of the scholars at the time of each invention had their fears and worries about the new technology. Gladstone explains that when like-minded people get together and share their ideas, their thinking will become extreme, due to having no other views given. This would in turn, change people 's thinking on what is right, to what they think is right. Gladstone disagrees with Carr in how technology is affecting human thinking.

    Read More

More about Summary: The Pedestrian By Ray Bradbury

Open Document