Summary: The Cost Of Space Exploration

528 Words2 Pages

The relatively large investment that the space program invokes has not gone without criticism. Some argue that funding the space program is too costly and there are other outlets for the space program’s funding that could give more immediate and tangible benefits. In a Forbes article entitled, “The Cost of Space Exploration”, Dr. Michio Kaku, a renowned theoretical physicist, states, “…to put a pound of anything on the moon costs about 10 times as much. We are 50 years into the space age and yet space travel is just as expensive as it always was”. He claims that certain facets of the space program are still relatively high cost, and asserts that more resources should be diverted to research and development that lower the substantial costs of space …show more content…

Rees claims that NASA could instead use more practical methods such as unmanned space technology (O'Luanaigh). Neil deGrasse Tyson has also voiced his thoughts on NASA’s budget stating, “From .5% of the federal budget, I say double it. That would give NASA enough money to do everything everyone has wanted NASA to do over all these years and enable us to go back to the moon and on to Mars….” (Barth). He claims that doubling the funding of the space program would enable more projects to be undertaken with fewer restrictions on a limited budget. Better funded projects could even improve the sustainability of the space program and improve its focus on other important endeavors. This improved sustainability could be achieved through funding of research on new fuel-efficient technologies, which would play a substantial role in decreasing the costs of our current scope of space exploration, while concurrently expanding those capabilities. Successfully implementing technologies such as these would allow NASA to divert more funding into other significant projects without any changes in their current funding (NASA

Open Document