Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Abortion opposing viewpoints
Opposing viewpoints for abortion
Opposing viewpoints for abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Conservative Stance on Abortion; Why They Are Wrong “It is unthinkable to allow complete strangers, whether individually or collectively, as state legislators or others in government, to make such personal decisions for someone else.”(Weddington) The conservatives have been bringing up the issue of abortion ever since it was legalized in the 70s. Conservatives believe that abortion should be illegal because they believe that abortion is wrong. They are deciding to make a woman’s personal choice for her and believe that they have the right to do so. Conservatives constantly talk about how much they value their personal freedoms yet they want to strip women of their personal freedom when it comes to abortion. Without the personal liberties granted by the constitutional amendments the entire country would run amuck. Although abortion is legal, the conservatives are trying to revoke this law …show more content…
because they want to force their beliefs on the public, they are taking over the voice of the unborn and ignoring the living, and are enabling the government to have control over a woman’s body. One major aspect of the Conservatives argument when it comes to abortion is that killing a fetus is immoral. They believe that killing a fetus is completely inhumane and technically murder. Conservatives critique women that have executed their right to choose by saying they have committed a sin and a crime against humanity. By saying comments like these and outlawing abortion on the grounds that it is inhumane, they are forcing their personal beliefs and morals on the public. America was founded because the people wanted to be free to have their own morals, beliefs, and values. If the Conservatives revoke the right to an abortion because it does not correlate with their religion and lifestyle, they would be stripping the American people of their rights guaranteed by the first amendment. They are refusing to look at any other belief that contrasts with theirs. This country was created because the oppressed wanted a place where they could practice their religion freely and have their own individual opinions. Revoking the laws that allow abortion would be removing the very rights this country was built on. Conservatives try to protect the rights of the unborn. They only look at the fetus, they ignore the actual living human involved in this equation. Conservatives say that the living bundle of cells has its rights, but they are choosing to ignore the following facts. First, the fetus has no brain. The fetus does not know what personal rights are, it technically does not have any. The scientific term for a baby in the womb is fetus because it has yet to function out of the womb. The latest a woman can have a legal abortion is when the pregnancy is at 24 weeks. At 24 weeks the fetus has yet to think or have a fully functioning brain and body. Secondly, they ignore the mother, the actual fully functioning human being. The mother has her rights because her brain works completely, she can understand and execute them. They choose to forget everybody else involved with the pregnancy. They ignore the mother, the father, and anyone else that has a say in the pregnancy. Conservatives are trying to voice the opinions of the unborn even though they have no voice or opinion. The last major aspect of the Conservative’s argument on abortion is they want to strip a woman of her right to choose.
By eliminating the option of abortion they would be stripping a woman of her personal liberties. The government would have control of a woman’s body. American government was based off the principles of democracy. Democracy emphasizes on the rights of the people. Their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Is a woman’s right to choose what to do with her body not one of those rights? Does that choice not affect her life, her liberties, and her pursuit of happiness? Once the government has control over a woman’s bodily decision to have an abortion who says they will stop there? Who is to say they will not want to control the rights to vote or the right to a trial by jury? By giving the government the power over someone else’s body they turn the American democracy into the American dictatorship. Everybody has their rights, and by revoking the right to choose they are giving the government control over a woman’s body and personal
decisions. The fact that Conservatives are trying to strip someone’s personal rights is completely ludicrous. Conservatives are trying to control the American public because they want everyone else to follow their rules and live by their moral code. Nobody should ever be forced to change their values. Nobody should ever be ignored when it comes to personal freedoms. No government should have control over a person’s body. There is a simple solution to the Conservatives “problems”: if they do not like abortion do not have one, and stay out of somebody else’s personal decisions. They should not be forcing their values on the public, they should not ignore the mother’s opinion, and they most definitely should not give the government power over a person’s body. The majority of Conservatives love their freedom yet they want to disable every woman’s free choice. The Conservative movement is a walking contradiction that cannot deal with the fact that other people are allowed to have different opinions. America was founded on the basis of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but these principles do not apply when it differs with the Conservative viewpoint.
I believe, that if you don’t think you are capable of giving your child a decent life, that they will be able to be successful in, you should consider your all options, maybe being a parent isn’t right for you. Every child deserves happiness and I hate seeing people treat their children poorly, abusing them, and neglecting them. If you do not want kids, you shouldn’t have them, no child should live feeling unwanted. I also stand by the fact that it is no one’s business unless you include them in the fact that you are having an abortion, I see few ways in how it may affect the rest of the world, if you decide not to have a child or not. All women reserve the right of privacy, and of course a choice. It isn't up to the government to tell women to give birth or not, and that’s why the law is the way it is. According to ("EsMBA." Five Major Pro Choice Abortion Arguments. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Aug. 2016. )Most women were using a method of birth control that didn't work properly. By denying women abortions, who never intended to have children or become pregnant, forces them have children they don't want. Unwanted childbirth can have a severely negative impact on a person’s life, forcing them to raise another human, and take time away from that person’s necessities, and effecting every single day
Abortion is "the intentional termination of a pregnancy which may include the loss of life of an unborn entity". During the eighth week of pregnancy, the development of the unborn entity known as the Fetus- an unborn offspring- begins, where brain activity becomes detectable. Note, the fetus is not considered Viable until the twenty-fourth week of pregnancy (S. Morris MarquisHO). According to Professor Steven Morris, a fetus becomes a person when it has sentience, viability, brain activity, self-consciousness, etc. "While many people agree that a day-old embryo does not have rights, most people agree that a fetus has rights on the day before it is born". Analyzing the following case:
The conservative argument asserts that every person has a right to life. The foetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what happens in and to her body. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to decide what shall happen to her body, and so outweigh it. So the foetus may not be killed and an abortion may not be performed (Thomson, 1971)
Abortion is one of the most hotly contested social issue’s in American politics. It has been used as a political tool by the Republicans (conservative Right) to mobilize its opponents as a strong voting block within the party. On the other side, the Democrats (liberal Left) has use their pro-choice stance over the issue to mobilize women voters, along with other proponents who believe that abortion should be a viable option for pregnant women. It is in this context in which the political debate of abortion is framed in American politics. It is a highly polarized issue; in this paper, we will review articles from both the New York Times (NYT) and the Washington Post (WP) to see how these viable news organizations report on this very sensitive issue.
What if someone killed a mere baby, a person who hasn’t had a chance to truly live? What if a stranger, a complete outsider who is just flexing their “power muscles” decided to make pregnancies illegal? In these extenuating circumstances the Government oversteps their boundaries by determining whether or not a medical operation can occur. In the case of Roe v. Wade, these boundaries were overstepped, but it needs to be determined, whether or not to keep the ruling that allows abortions. The Roe v. Wade decision should be upheld because abortion saves women’s lives, it would violate women’s lives to outlaw abortion, and it also decreases the amount of dangerous “back alley” abortions.
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
For many years, the morality of abortion has been questioned by two perspectives: pro-choice and pro-life. While modern culture explains that abortion is a woman’s free choice if she does not want the unborn baby, the Catholic Church teaches the world that from the moment of conception there is a child with a soul within the womb, and to abort it would be to murder an innocent being.
Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in the United States today. According to oxford dictionary, abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks. The two factions involved in this controversy are poles apart in their views on abortion: where as the pro-choice movement contends that a woman’s right to abortion is absolute, the pro-life movement asserts that a fetus’s right to life is indisputable. The argument has become very pronounced since the U.S Supreme Court ruling in the year 1973 in Roe V. Wade, which legalized abortion. According to the ruling, a woman’s right to abortion outweighed the rights of a nonviable fetus and prohibited the State interference. In addition to the fact that pro-choicers have always praised Roe for recognizing that a woman’s right to control her body is more important than a fetus’s right to life, this idea is also supported by different organizations such as Alan Guttmatcher Institute (AGI) whose mission is “to protect the reproductive choices of all women and men in the United States and throughout the world.” (Par 1) While some people believe that abortion is immoral others argue that it is a woman’s right to have full control of her body.
The government is now getting involved against abortions by trying to make abortions illegal in America. President Bush has signed a law that bans partial birth abortion. Troy Newman, the director of Operation Rescue, says that there is still a loop hole in this law. He says “it fallaciously includes a loop-hole exception to save the mother’s life that many abortionists have routinely abused when included in other legislation.” The government getting involved is a great thing. Making abortions illegal is bound to make the rate of abortion lower. Newman also includes in his article “Baby Steps to Victory” that there are other things to do with a child if the mother does not want it. He states, “If you are going to deliver a child 90% prior to sucking its brains why not fully deliver the child and place it up fo...
Why is one of the biggest controversies in America abortion? There’s a lot of history behind why abortion is so controversial, mainly dealing with politics. Between Republicans views on it and why they believe it is immoral to the Democratic views and why they believe it comes down to what the woman wants. The main reason abortion is so controversial is because of the political views and how completely opposed they are for various historical reasons.
One of the most controversial issues in this day and age is the stance people take on abortion. The two main positions that people take are either of pro-choice or pro-life; both sides, although polar opposites, tend to refer to both the issue of morality and logical rationale. The pro-life side of the debate believes that abortion is an utterly immoral practice that should be abolished. On the contrary, abortion should remain a legal procedure because it is a reproductive right; its eradication would not only take away the pregnant person’s autonomy, but would also put more children in financially unstable homes and the adoption system, and would cause an increase in potentially fatal, unsafe abortions.
Roe v. Wade: the Supreme Court case legalizing a woman's right to choose abortion has been around our entire lives. In 27 years, memories of back alley clinics have faded - the past is past, right? Wrong. It's too soon to start taking reproductive freedoms for granted. The next president will appoint two or three Supreme Court justices, potentially changing the Court's position on this pivotal case. George W. Bush supports the Republican call for a constitutional amendment outlawing abortions; do you think he, if elected, would appoint pro-choice justices? And why is it that while the majority of Americans support choice, the majority of Congress votes anti-choice? Are we supposed to just stand by and watch as the government tries to legislate our bodies?
With the issue of abortion, we are able to relate it easily to several principles throughout the Constitution. Every human has the right to make decisions about their own body, and this includes a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. The Constitution doesn’t classify an unborn baby as a human. Which leads straight in to the 14th amendment, a right for personal privacy and not allowing the government and Constitution to be a pressuring standpoint in this decision on whether you want to keep your child. As a human, we have the rights that no state shall make or enforc...
Whether it is ethically acceptable to get an abortion has always been a heated debate with a heavy list of pros and cons. Pro-life and Pro-choice enthusiasts have come up with every possible comeback, argumentative position and sob story as to why one should despise the other. Though the situation of which why one would need or want an abortion is usually sad in general; do women’s situations that change once they learn that they have conceived also take the title of heartbreaking? If the pregnancy is terminated and the progressing life is ended - that’s sad. If the pregnancy is continutes and the progressing life flourishes but the woman is against raising that child for a variety of reasons - that’s sad. Abortions are known as negative by most, even pro-lifers; for they should not be used for regular birth control. I believe that abortion should be a legal choice available to all women because women who want to terminate their pregnancy will do so in alternate unsafe ways, adoption is not always the better choice for a child, and a woman's choice to abort a fetus has no direct impact on anybody else’s life except the people who’ve conceived.
Abortions have always been a very controversial topic. Over the years we continue to fight for or against it. One can say that is one of the most talked and argued topic in the United States. An abortion is when a woman terminates her pregnancy before the fetus is viable using various of methods. Some argue that abortions should be illegal and considered murder, while others, from a religious point of view, say that no one has the right to take away the life of a person, in this case the fetus. However, others insist, that abortions are a basic women’s right.