Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eassy abouy health care in canada
Aging population in canada
Plan for universal healthcare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eassy abouy health care in canada
The Canada’s health care system is very interesting in the fact that it is government-funded and individuals are provided preventative care, medical treatments, dental surgery and other medical services with few exceptions. All citizens qualify for health coverage regardless of medical history, personal income or their standard of living. Medicare is Canada is a government funded universal health insurance established by legislation passed in 1957, 1966, and 1984. The Canadian healthcare system evolved, rising cost of hospital and medical services led citizens, progressive health professionals and some politicians to argue that healthcare was a social good not another purchasable commodity. This viewpoint was challenged by those who stated …show more content…
In the twentieth-century, the distribution of the population was 3 tiered and there was a large number of younger people than older people. Now in 2016 the population structure is difference because of a result of the decrease in fertility and the steady increase of life expectancy among individuals. In 2006 a low percentage of the population consisted of young people under the age of 15. There was also a low percentage of individuals 65 years and over. There was a high rate of people between the ages of 15-64. At these rates the population shows a projection of the elderly that may well exceed the population of children and young adults. Over the next 50 years the work group will consist of individuals which are similar to what it looked like in the 1960s. The aging of baby-boomers has caused a decline in the number of young adults compared to those individuals retiring. Canada is considered to be one of the youngest industrialized countries in the world. They have fewer senior citizens and more people in its population. The minority population of Canada has elevated and the number of people belonging to a minority group went from 1 million to 4 million. By 2017 the minority population is going to reach 7 million which will represent 1Canadian to …show more content…
The five main principles in the Canada Health Act include Public Administration where all the administration of provincial health insurance must be carried out by a public authority on a non-profit basis. Another principle is Comprehensiveness which all heath services must be insured. This includes hospitals, physicians and surgical dentist. Under Universality all insured residents are entitled to the same level of care which makes the patients feel that they are getting the care that they truly need. With Portability residents that move to a different province or territory are still entitled to coverage from their home province with a waiting period. This also applies to residents which leave the country. This ensures that residents don’t have to worry about finding a new doctor or wonder if they will be treated. Lastly Accessibility is where insured’s have reasonable access to healthcare facilities. In addition to patient having access, physicians and hospitals must also be provided reasonable compensation for any and all services provided. To access Canada’s healthcare individuals have to apply for a provincial health card. All residents of a province or territory are accepted for coverage under the Canada Health Act with the exception of inmates and the Canadian Armed Forces. One the
Tommy Douglas was a Canadian social- democratic politician, who became the premier of Saskatchewan in 1944. Tommy Douglas believed that it was his responsibility as premier to improve the lives of ordinary people. In fact, he had experienced firsthand people dying, because they did not have enough money for the treatment they needed. It was from that day he said “If I ever had the power I would, if it were humanly possible, see that the financial barrier between those who need health services and those who have health services was forever removed.” So, when he became premier he enacted the first Medicare plan in Saskatchewan, which in 1972 was adopted in all provinces in Canada. The universal health care system has many advantages and should be adopted by other countries as well. This system would decrease the world’s death rate, there are also many people out there who cannot afford health care and it would be easier with universal health care to have everyone under one system.
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
In the past decade, Canada’s population has grown from 5,301,000 in 1900 to over 34,030,589 in 2011, driven mainly by immigration (Central Intelligence Agency, 2011). By 2056 it is expected, one in four Canadians will be 65 years or older, compared to 13 per cent currently. This will put a huge strain on the country’s health care system (Macleans, 2008 p.2). The future of Canada’s health care system is at great risk due to its escalating and aging population. This is triggering a shortage of physicians, particularly anesthesiologists, in some provinces of Canada (Canadian Medicine Journal, 2007). Anesthesiologists are specialist physicians who provide critical care to patients in a number of health programs: operative anesthesia for patients in all surgical subspecialties, acute pain management, procedural anesthesia, obstetrical care, and high-risk medical management, chronic pain management, resuscitation, advanced airway management, and critical care (Intermountain Healthcare, 2011). The current shortage of anesthesiologists is highly impacting access to care in each of these areas. Due to the lack of foresight in government policies, the shortage of anesthesiologists in Canada is increasing and becoming more critical. The Canadian government has failed to train, hire, and retain enough anesthesiologists/assistants for the needs of Canada’s rising population. The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) estimates it would take 26,000 more physicians, presently, in order to bring Canada up to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average (Macleans, 2008 p.2).
It is an assumption by many that Canada has one of the best healthcare systems in the world. But do they really? There are numerous health services in Canada which should be part of the universal care nonetheless are not. These include but are not limited to: dental care, vision care, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and prescription drug coverage. This report will solely focus on why basic dental care should be a part of the Canadian universal healthcare. Dental care is predominantly delivered in the private sector on a fee-for-service basis, with approximately 62.6% of Canadians paying for care through employment-based insurance and 31.9% through out-of-pocket expenditures and only a small amount of the Canadians, 5.5%, are qualified for public funding through government assistance programmes (Ramraj and Quinonez, 2012). It was seen that by 2009, dental coverage affordability became a problem not just for the low income families but also impacted middle-income earners as a result of their lack of, or decreased access to comprehensive dental insurance (Ramraj, 2013). It is stated by the World Health Organization that universal health care coverage should reassure access to necessary care and protect patients from financial hardship, and that the governments are obligated to
The health care system in Canada today is a combination of sources which depends on the services and the person being treated. 97% of Canadians are covered by Medicare which covers hospital and physician services. Medicare is funded at a governmental and provincial level. People of First Nation and Inuit descent are covered by the federal government. Members of the armed forces, veterans, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are also covered by the federal government. Several services such as dental care, residential care, and pharmaceutical are not covered. The 13 provinces have different approaches to health care; therefore, it is often said that Canada has 13 healthcare systems (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010). The access to advanced medical technology and treatment, the cost of healthcare, and the overall health of Canadians fares well in comparison with other countries such as the United States.
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
In Canada, access to health care is ‘universal’ to its citizens under the Canadian Health Care Act and this system is considered to the one of the best in the world (Laurel & Richard, 2002). Access to health care is assumed on the strong social value of equality and is defined as the distribution of services to all those in need and for the common good and health of all residents (Fierlbeck, 2011). Equitable access to health care does not mean that all citizens are subjected to receive the same number of services but rather that wherever the service is provided it is based on need. Therefore, not all Canadians have equal access to health services. The Aboriginal peoples in Canada in particular are a population that is overlooked and underserved
Brian Lindenberg, “Canadian Healthcare: What Works and What Doesn’t | Benefits Canada,” accessed February 14, 2014, http://www.benefitscanada.com/benefits/health-wellness/canadian-healthcare-what-works-and-what-doesn%E2%80%99t-27647.
An aging population is indeed a problem for the society and will possibly cause many social and economic difficulties in the future. According to David Foot (2003), professor of Economics at University of Toronto, an effective birth rate of 2.2% against current 1.75% will be necessary to replace the current work force in the near future and the government’s policy of bringing in more immigrants will eventually fail (Foot, 2003, 2). However some people predict that the increased size of an aging population will drive growth in the home, health care, and many other industries resulting in job creation and economic growth (Marketwire, 2013, 1). Majority of the people are of the opinion that the issue will be mainly in the health care and economic activity. As humans age, they start to develop health problems, leading to more visits to a medical clinic putting extra burden on health care system.
Today, Canadians are concerned with many issues involving health care. It is the responsibility of the provincial party to come up with a fair, yet reasonable solution to this issue. This solution must support Canadians for the best; it involves people and how they are treated when in need for health care. The Liberal party feels that they have the best solution that will provide Canadians with the best results. It states that people will have the protection of medicare and will help with concerns like: injury prevention, nutrition, physical activity, mental health, etc. The Canadian Alliance Party’s plan is to make several policy-developments to benefit Canada’s health care. They believe it will serve the security and well-being best for all Canadians. The last party involved in this issue is the NDP Party; who indicate that they are fighting hard for a better Health Care system in our economy. The NDP Party states that the income of a family should not dictate the quality of health care.
The introductory of Canada’s health care system in the mid-20th century, known as Medicare, led the country into the proud tradition of a public health care system, opposite to America’s privatized health care system in the south. Though Canada’s health care system still holds some aspects of a privatized system, it is still readily available for all citizens throughout the nation. After continuous research, it is clear to state that public health care and the association it has with welfare state liberalism is by far a more favourable option for Canada, than that of private health care and the association it has with neo-conservatism. To help understand why public health care is a better and more favourable option for Canada, it is fundamental
Canada has one of the best health care services around the world and especially among the develope tod nations. Under Canada’s health system, everyone is covered regardless of age, race, and income but must be a legally eligible resident. The United States is the only, nation among the developed nation that does not guarantee a universal health care coverage for everyone. Rather than government health insurance program imposes, each individual is responsible for their own health coverage.
Canadians have universal access to publicly funded health care services, including primarily physician and hospital services. However, Canadians also experience longer waits periods due to high demands for services but not enough staff or adequate facilities to go around for everyone. This situation place a strain on patients waiting on either lifesaving or improving procedures but because of the lack of availability, medication, or unavailable rooms at hospital. The results, is the creation of over watch entities such as the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) whom main responsibility is to study, report and recommend solutions to the Canadian government the current status of the healthcare system as a hole. The Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) was established in 2003. Its broad overall mandate is to ensure the safety
Since aging society and growth of immigrant’s population in Canada, citizens needs more medical care and developed systems and resources. Therefore, maybe those claim to the Canadian Supreme Court that “prohibiting private health insurance for “medically necessary” hospital and physician services. The applicant, Dr. Chaoulli, argued that the prohibition deprives patients of timely access to health care services in a way that violates a patient’s rights to life and security, under both section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and section
Those aged 65 and above make up 16.1 percent of Canada’s population, and their population growth rate has increased by 3.5 per cent during 2015, four times faster than the population at large. If current population trends continue, Statistics Canada estimates that seniors will outnumber children in Canada by a factor of three to two in 20 years' time. Assistant professor Mike Moffatt of the Richard Ivey School of Business in London, Ontario says that ‘[the] implications of the demographic rebalancing underway are massive…[as] the Canadian population gets older, more and more retired people...[put] pressure on the health system and pension system because there's a smaller cohort of working age people to support [it].’ Although Germany and Canada share similar economic threats regarding its rapid-aging populace, a 2014 study done by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) found that Canada is experiencing the impact comparatively late. In 2014, the population of people aged 65 and above in Germany rose to 21.1 percent while estimates of Canada’s elderly populace would not exceed 20 percent until the mid