Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The story of an hour of situational irony
Situational irony in brave new world
The use of irony
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The story of an hour of situational irony
‘Pleasure and pain: Representations of illegal drug consumption, addiction and trafficking in music, film and video’, (Boyd 2011) is an analysis into various drug references, symbolism and imagery within popular culture from the 1920’s to 2010, and the role they play in the public perception and policy. Susan Boyd claims that political and institutional influences, particularly in music and film provide an increase in retributive justice towards drug use, however, also pave the way to more unorthodox forms of retaliation (ibid., p. 57). Boyd illustrates this through numerous texts which she claims have amplified after prohibition efforts, resulting in “proliferation of racialised, gendered and class-biased drug imagery in film and musical lyrics …show more content…
Boyd brings significant attention to stereotypes of drugs and their users’ portrayal in film and music, including race, gender, class, and even the drug itself. She indicates such media following the drug prohibition suchlike Narcotic (1923) and Reefer Madness (1935) depict “violent dealers threatening white moral society” and how this demonises people of colour as drug users and pushers (The Drug Effect Health, crime and society, 2011, p. 58). Boyd also claims stereotypes extend to the illegal drug itself, although sometimes illustrated for pleasure and play, majority of media gravitate towards the drugs addiction and side effects creating a perceived danger. It is further stated that the depiction in media of white women using drugs fail in the roles expected of their gender, resulting in the apparent “breakdown of moral society” (ibid.). As such this impetus to the …show more content…
Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist Philip Robson suggest this behaviour is a natural occurrence in humans and will not simply reside because of the potential risk of punishment. This is also illustrated well by Andrew Weil (The Natural Mind, 1973) whom is cited in ‘Forbidden Drugs’ by Robson, arguing that throughout history human beings have always displaced a fascination and want to explore and escape reality, further explaining that even other animals for instants such as dogs have been known to sniff psychoactive plants repeatedly to achieve intoxication (2009, p. 5). Boyd touches on films produced in the 1960s and ’70s, in which glamorous and normalise illegal drug use, refereeing to the film ‘Easy Rider’ (1969). Stating such films seem to regard the characters in a sympathetic way and show the protagonists “challenging conventional society”, the film was also accompanied with drug affiliated songs to further the ‘narrative’ (The Drug Effect Health, crime and society, 2011, p. 61). It is not hard to conclude that positive imagery and songs like Easy Rider and various others may appeal to an already present carnal need, resulting in a sway of moral compass in society, leading to a thirst of knowledge and experience of such illegal drugs and their
The Cocaine Kids and Dorm Room Dealers are two very different, but yet similar books. Cocaine Kids are about a group of kids, primarily of Hispanic race, with one kid of the Black race. The kids were raised in the inner city of New York. Dorm Room Dealers are about White, middle to upper-middle class college students, who was selling drugs for their status. The purpose of this paper is to prove that there are racial disparities among drug users. There will be examples from the texts that show the different takes on the drug markets and how race plays a factor. There also will be how these experiences shape the kids drug dealing and using. The paper will conclude how all the kids either remained in the drug career or left the drug career.
She points out that there is a "New Jim Crow system" in the country that discriminates against minorities in the legal system today and how it is a real problem that has a huge impact on American citizens' lives. Alexander emphasizes that the War On Drug's real intent is to shutter out minority groups, particularly African Americans using a logical approach in her first portion of the writing. But as much as it affects a particular individual, it more importantly has a negative impact on families. Later in her writing, Alexander starts to connect to her readers through an emotional appeal of what a lot of people value most.
In one portion of the documentary, we see an excerpt from one of President Richard Nixon’s speeches on how he feels about America’s ongoing battle with drug abuse. In the speech, he declared that this so called “war” with drug addiction needed to be handled while proclaiming that drug abuse was “America’s public enemy number one”. Years later, the war on drugs has only become even more of a controversial issue in the United States with the consequences spanning and reaching particular groups and hinting that they are more so involved than others.
“Just Say No!” A statement that takes us deep into yet another decade in the history of the United States which was excited by controversies, social issues, and drug abuse. The topic of this statement is fueled by the growing abuse of cocaine in the mid 1980s. I shall discuss the effects of the crack cocaine epidemic of the mid 1980s from a cultural and social stand point because on that decade this country moved to the rhythms and the pace of this uncanny drug. Cocaine took its told on American society by in the 1980s; it ravaged with every social group, race, class, etc. It reigned over the United States without any prejudices. Crack cocaine was the way into urban society, because of its affordability in contrast to the powdered form. In society the minorities were the ones most affected by the growing excess of crime and drug abuse, especially African Americans; so the question was “Why was nearly everybody convicted in California federal court of crack cocaine trafficking black?” (Webb: Day 3). The growing hysteria brought forth many questions which might seem to have concrete answers, but the fact of the matter is they are all but conspiracy in the end, even though it does not take away the ambiguity and doubt. I will take on only a few topics from the vast array of events and effects this period in time had tended to. Where and who this epidemic seemed to affect more notably, and perhaps how the drugs came about such territories and people. What actions this countries authority took to restore moral sanity, and how it affected people gender wise.
Lilley’s objective approach applied to the representation of high school stereotypes in ‘Summer Heights High’ disregards common ideologies associated with drug and instead explores implications that are more realistic. Lilley demonstrates the impacts related to drug and substance abuse, through a musical directed by Mr. G, exposing Australian youth to the realities of drug use through a satirical medium.
But the fight for a better life won't stop just because you aren't ready. What we're doing is not something you decide to do when you feel like it. Whether you're ready or not, this struggle will go on.” Pg. 159. The drug issue is relevant in the world today because kids, especially teens, use it as a way to escape the reality they are living in. Some use it to have fun but others to forget of what they are living in and to relieve the “stress” they might have. Reading fiction can teach students the harm and danger of certain things, like drugs. It can show what it does and how it can affect you in the future and even though it may take away the hurt you are feeling, it will only come back when that feeling is gone.“When you win we win but when you go down you go down alone” Pg. 159. The author shows by this quote how not everyone is willing to go down when you go down, but only succeed when you do. This is relevant in the world because when you are doing good everyone want to be surrounded by you, but once you fail no one is there to help you. This relates to the thesis because it can teach students the harm drugs can cause when using them for a temporary
Throughout “Chasing the Scream” many intriguing stories are told from individuals involved in the drug war, those on the outside of the drug war, and stories about those who got abused by the drug war. Addiction has many social causes that address drug use and the different effects that it has on different people. In our previous history we would see a tremendous amount of individuals able to work and live satisfying lives after consuming a drug. After the Harrison Act, drugs were abolished all at once, but it lead to human desperation so instead of improving our society, we are often the reason to the problem. We constantly look at addicts as the bad guys when other individuals are often the reasons and influences to someone’s decision in
In understanding Husak’s beliefs on the reasons for drug use it is first important to look at his definition for recreational use verses drug abuse. Husak defines recreational use as either consumption for enhancement of an experience, such as at a concert, or for alleviation from boredom, like while doing household chores. Husak admits that there are gray areas between this recreational approach and the universally reviled drug abuse. However, Husak is right in saying that drug use that occurs in the ghetto is not recreational, and goes on to explain that rich white people are even more likely to use certain drugs, notably ...
“[The war on drugs] has created a multibillion-dollar black market, enriched organized crime groups and promoted the corruption of government officials throughout the world,” noted Eric Schlosser in his essay, “A People’s Democratic Platform”, which presents a case for decriminalizing controlled substances. Government policies regarding drugs are more focused towards illegalization rather than revitalization. Schlosser identifies a few of the crippling side effects of the current drug policy put in place by the Richard Nixon administration in the 1970s to prohibit drug use and the violence and destruction that ensue from it (Schlosser 3). Ironically, not only is drug use as prevalent as ever, drug-related crime has also become a staple of our society. In fact, the policy of the criminalization of drugs has fostered a steady increase in crime over the past several decades. This research will aim to critically analyze the impact of government statutes regarding drugs on the society as a whole.
Credibility material: Its intake results in adverse medical conditions that are further exalted by its addiction properties that ensure a continued intake of the substance. The drug can be abused through multiple means and is medically recorded to produce short-term joy, energy , and other effects such as increased heart rate and blood pressure. This ultimately results in numerous psychiatric and social problems; factors that played a major role in its illegalization after multiple and widespread cases of its effects were reported in the country during the 1900s. In addition to this, the drug results in immediate euphoric effect, a property which the National Institute of Drug Abuse (2010) attributes to be the root cause for its increased po...
In 1971 on June 17, President Richard Nixon delivered a special message to the Congress on drug abuse prevention and control. During the presentation, Nixon made it clear that the United States was at war with this idea of drug abuse. What baffled Americans then, and still baffles Americans today, is that we are at war with our own nation with drugs; it is not some foreign affair like the media tends to focus on with Mexico. Nixon stated that at the time of his speech, what was implemented to control drug abuse was not working…“The problem has assumed the dimensions of a national emergency. I intend to take every step necessary to deal with this emergency, including asking the Congress for an amendment to my 1972 budget to provide an additional $155 million to carry out these steps. This will provide a total of $371 million for programs to control drug abuse in America.”(Wolleey and Peters) Since the publicizing of the term “War on Drugs” in 1971, it has been used by many political candidates in elections over the years. In the movie, it was stated, “ every war begins with propaganda …[and] the war on drugs has never been actually on drugs… [Additionally] drug laws are shaped less by scientific facts, but more by political [reasoning].” (Jarecki) The movie, The House I Live In, directly relates to certain themes and terminology that were discussed in Martin and Nakayama’s Intercultural Communication in Contexts book, that have been used in class. Through the analyzing and comparing of The House I Live In and Intercultural Communication in Contexts an individual can begin to localize the ideals behind this everlasting war on drugs; some ideals focus on terms from the text like ethnocentrism, diversity training, and culture while ...
Hollywood’s diversity problem is well-known; however, the extent might be surprising to most Americans. According to a 2014 report by the Center for the Study of Women in Television, Film & New Media, found that females comprised only 30% of all speaking characters among the top grossing films of 2013. (Lauzen, 2014) However, minority women faired far worse than their Caucasian counterparts. As a matter of fact, if one looks at the numbers even female characters from other world’s were as better represented in film than some minority women; the numbers are as follow for women: Caucasian (73%), African American (14%), Latina (5%), Asian and other world tied (3%). (Lauzen, 2014) If the lack of representation were not enough consider a 2009 study which found that when minority groups are portrayed on television the portrayal tends to be negative. (Alexandrin, 2009) A study by Busselle and Crandall (2009) found that the manner in which African-Americans are portrayed, often as unemployed criminals, tends to have an influence on the way the public perceives African-American’s lack of economic success. Furthermore, the news media does an equally poor job in the ways that African-American’s are presented; according to the same study while 27% of Americans were considered “poor” in 1996 the images of America’s “poor” being presented by news media was heavily Black (63%). (Busselle & Crandall, 2002) Today, this can be seen in the way that African-American victims of police brutality are depicted in the media. Even when African-Americans are murdered at the hands of police for minor and non-violent offenses (e.g. Mike Brown, Eric Gardner, and Tamir Rice) they are often portrayed as thugs, criminals, and vandals. What’s more, seve...
In certain circumstances, the consumption of drugs might have had originated because of a psychological disorder that needed drugs in order for t...
References to illegal drugs use in rap music jumped sixfold in the two decades since 1979. Previously, rap music was more likely to depict dangers
Many individuals are so readily to believe that those who commit crime or deal drugs are African Americans and/ or Latinos. Michelle Alexander points out in the third chapter of her book, The New Jim Crow, that the media plays a role in displaying what ‘the black drug dealer’ looks like which reflects and reinforce biases, whether they’re conscious or