Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of agriculture on the environment
The role of technology in agriculture
The effects of agriculture on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of agriculture on the environment
In today’s culture, society puts a lot of emphasis on utilizing technology. Technology’s influence has spread into the farming industry. In Wendell Berry’s article, “Renewing Husbandry,” he addresses the mechanical changes in the farming process. He stresses the idea of husbandry, taking care of the land and conserving the life the land offers. Berry describes the benefits and downfalls of technology. But the problems of technology exceed the benefits. Although technology aids in the farming process, the advancement in farming technology distorts the importance of cultivating the natural land.
Machinery desensitizes the natural understanding of the land. Berry acknowledges the capabilities of a machine on the farm, but he realizes agriculture
…show more content…
requires more than the fine-tuning of mechanical parts. He contends, “The modern farm is understood as a surface on which various mechanical operations are performed, and to which various chemicals are applied” (Berry, 2005, para. 16). The farmers’ utilization of machinery skews their personal connection with the land. The farmers misunderstand the natural process of cultivating the land because they concentrate on the surface level of the soil. The machines reduce the interactions of the farmer and his farm into an urban factory. The farmers interpret the land with machines, misinterpreting the farm's natural order. By using machines, farmers lose sight of the natural environment around them. Berry notes, “Mechanical farming makes it easy to think mechanically about the land and its creatures” (Berry, 2005, para. 10). Farmers focus on taking care of the equipment more than nurturing the land, in which, the use of the equipment takes place. They forget that the creatures and plants living on the farm help restore the land. By looking through a mechanical lens, the farmers fail to recognize that the earth requires care and time to rejuvenate after harvesting the produce. Science modifies the biological structure of nature. Berry describes agriculture today as a means of breaking down nature into small parts, and the shaping of agriculture comes from economic forces. But Berry emphasizes, “We were wrong to assume that agriculture could be adequately defined by reductionist science…” (Berry, 2005, para. 6). Science reduces nature into fine specks; therefore, diminishing the importance of agriculture as a whole. Science forces farming into a shallow process and disregard the organisms deep in the ground. Berry highlights that scientists lack the connection to the land because they break it down into small particles and add unnecessary chemicals. Berry underlines, “…to treat the soil as a lifeless matrix in which ‘soil chemistry’ takes place and ‘nutrients’ are ‘made available’” (Berry, 2005, para. 16). Science seeks to manipulate nature and create new substances by using chemicals. By using chemicals, scientists end up harming the environment more than taking care of it. Scientists focus on acquiring the most from the earth; thus, altering and tainting the land. Science only benefits the large corporations seeking to attain more money. Mass production shifts the farmer’s attention away from caring for the land.
Agriculture fixates more on the production of food instead of stewardship, caring and protecting the land. Berry indicates, “Once one’s farm and one’s thoughts have been sufficiently mechanized, industrial agriculture’s focus on production, as opposed to maintenance or stewardship…” (Berry, 2005, para. 11). When farmers direct their attention on producing crops for the corporation, the farmers forget the reason why they farm in the first place. The farmers mislead thoughts on production create agricultural distress because they lack stewardship. Stewardship involves an intimate relationship with nature, but farmers focus more on the efficiency of production, neglecting the farm. Berry emphasizes that production steers the way of farming instead of the actual farm and community. Berry claims, “…emphasis on production permits the way of working to be determined not by the nature and character of the farm in its ecosystem and in its human community” (Berry, 2005, para. 11). Corporations control the farming industry, mistreating the farms and the farming communities. Production disregards the environment of the farm and demands more than the farm can produce, resulting in damage to the
environment. New technology ignores the natural farming process. Although technology presents efficient forms of production, technology misguides farmers with artificial understanding. Machinery and science build a gap between the farmer and his land. By utilizing machinery and science, farmers place their attention more on production than the natural process of the earth. The farmers regress from tending the land to manufacturing the land. The farming industry lacks the recognition of the pure and organic aspects the earth offers. Ultimately, the usage of technology disables the farmer’s ability to cultivate the land in a naturally holistic way.
Amid jeers, he didn’t back down, telling the audience, “ You can’t do it, my friends.” (Thompson 82) Clearly it is not only correct to give a dignifying individual a position of labor that is in desperate need of occupation, but also worthwhile for the land and community who need people to harvest their farms so they can meet the simple daily life essentials, conveniently located at your local Ayala 3 grocery store. As the workday continues, Thompson realizes a farmworkers job of harvesting is not as simple as it may sound.
In “A Half-Pint of Old Darling”, by Wendell Berry, being honest is an important factor in a relationship. Miss Minnie and Ptolemy Proudfoot are a prime example as such when they keep secrets from one another, but then fix some things with the truth. They head over a major road bump that is eventually solved after being honest with one another. It seemingly makes their relationship stronger when the story concludes. Most of the secrets are kept in fear of hurting the other, which ends up happening one day when Tol sneaks Old Darling alcohol into their buggy. It is seen that hiding the truth means one is not being honest to his or her self, as well as to another. In this story, secrets leave speculation as to just how well Miss Minnie and Ptolemy Proudfoot’s relationship really is, and if things end up changing after a huge mistake.
Even with these faults, this society appreciates the hard work of farming compared to the easy way of living today. One point of Berry’s argument is that he believes that the land is falling more and more into the hands of speculators and professional people from the cities, who, in spite of all the scientific agricultural miracles, still have more money than farmers. Big technology and large economies have caused more abandonment of land in the country than ever before. Many of the great farmers are clearly becoming different because they lack manpower and money to maintain properly. The number of part-time farmers and ex-farmers increases every year due to the problems with money and resources.
In recent history, farming in America has changed dramatically, and Naylor’s farm is representative of many in the American Corn Belt. Though it began growing a variety of crops and keeping livestock too, Naylor now only plants corn and soybeans. In Naylor’s grandfather’s days, the farm fed the whole family with just enough left over for twelve others. Now, Naylor indirectly feeds an estimated 129 people, but this does not mean his farm is any more successful. In fact, Naylor’s farm cannot financially support his family.
Berry describes the flaws of industrial products, the awful conditions in which domestic animals are kept, and the money-oriented attitude of patrons of the food industry. These facts, however, are not confirmed by any specific facts. The only concrete reference he mentioned was “bechemicled factory-fields that I have seen, for example, in the Central Valley of California”(Berry 14). There are no trustworthy documents, or photos, or convincing evidence to support his words, so we just have to trust him. Although Wendell Berry is a well-known writer, paying close attention to farming and agriculture themes in his works, he was more of an amateur in agronomy than a professional. Therefore, we should not consider his arguments as a reality of the
Agriculture plays an enormous part in having a functioning society. The farming fields in the
In “Omnivore’s Delusion,” Blake Hurst, a veteran famer, calls attention to the “agri-intellectuals” who are critiquing farming when having no experience. First of all, the author wants “Agri-intellectuals” to take a walk in a farmer’s shoes. Throughout the article, Hurst throws jabs at the people criticizing choices a farmer makes, for example, he says, “It is important, though, that even people riding in airplanes know that there are environmental and food safety costs to whatever kind of farming we choose” (4). The author says this to show his anger and suggest to these critics they should know what they are talking about before they talk about it. Secondly, Hurst points out the food animal endangerment. The author tells his readers
...struggling to earn any income at all and sometimes do not even get the opportunity to eat. Another issue that Raj Patel did not touch on is the lack of care consumers have for the farmers. It seems that consumers care about farmers about as much as the corporations do, which, in my opinion, is not a lot. When consumers only care about low prices and large corporations only care about making a profit, the farmers are left out to dry. Many consumers believe “food should be available at a bargain price, a belief that relies on labor exploitation and environmental exhaustion at multiple points along the commodity chain.” (Wright, 95) Corporations as well as consumers generally tend to be selfish and I think Raj Patel is afraid to mention this. If only these people cared a little bit more about each other I believe the hourglass of the food system will begin to even out.
Machines have no place in this relationship. They act as a barrier between men and the land. They are dangerous because they perform the function of men with greater efficiency, but they lack the spiritual element that makes the land so valuable. Chapter five uses imagery to detail the evil inherent in the plowing of land by a machine:
Machines are expressed as different parts working together in harmony to accomplish some form of work. White is stating that for enormous periods of time “work and energy have linked humans and rivers” (White, 4). White claims that the Columbia has been sustaining life of humans and wildlife for “millennia” (White, 3). He relates the Columbia River to an organic machine when he talks about how the people only see the river as a toolbox, the river is just an object and whoever is using it only sees the river for what they need from it. White states that “Fisherman see habitat. Irrigators see water. Power managers, utility operators, and those who run aluminum factories see reservoirs necessary to turn turbines” (White, 110). White relates the definition of a machine to satisfy what he thinks humanity is using the Columbia for. With all of these different companies and industries using the Columbia’s resources for their own benefit, they were tearin...
The 1920’s were the singularly most influential years of farming in our country. The loss of farms following the war, and new agricultural practices resulted in the dawn of modern agriculture in our country. The shift from small family to big corporation during this time is now the basis for how our society deals with food today. Traditional farming in the 1920’s underwent a series of massive transitions following WWI as the number of farms decreased and the size of farms increased.
In addition to the time he spent outdoors, he was exposed to the farming community in the Salinas Valley. Even though his grandfather's farm could not sustain crops (Steinbeck, T., 1992), the whole community was dependent on the inter-connection of living creatures within the valley. The lives of these farmers and their future production always depended on the current production of the land.
The tractors hired by the bank literally tear down the bond between man and the land. Due to the eviction, the farmers are forced to move to California, where work is supposedly in demand. As each family takes off for California, it no longer feels a connection to the lands through which it is traveling. Once it reaches California, it feels no connection to its land. For the first time, it is forced to be dependent on somebody else's generosity in distributing jobs, and most importantly, somebody else's land. Thus, in California, the relationship between man and land is not as strong as it was in Arkansas and Oklahoma. The change in this relationship is due in part to the mercilessness of the bank, and in the end, man loses because its connection to the only significant thing it has ever owned is gone. Once the families travel to California, each family member's soul stays back in Oklahoma, making it difficult to adjust to working on lands that have not been cultivated by their own family for generations.
Farmers are essentially the back-bone of the entire food system. Large-scale family farms account for 10% of all farms, but 75% of overall food production, (CSS statistics). Without farmers, there would be no food for us to consume. Big business picked up on this right away and began to control the farmers profits and products. When farmers buy their land, they take out a loan in order to pay for their land and farm house and for the livestock, crops, and machinery that are involved in the farming process. Today, the loans are paid off through contracts with big business corporations. Since big business has such a hold over the farmers, they take advantage of this and capitalize on their crops, commodities, and profits. Farmers are life-long slaves to these b...
As agriculture has become more intensive, farmers have become capable of producing higher yields using less labour and less land. Growth of the agriculture has not, however, been an unmixed blessing. It, like every other thing, has its pros and cons. Topsoil depletion, groundwater contamination, the decline of family farms, continued neglect of the living and working conditions for farm labourers, increasing costs of production, and the disintegration of economic and social conditions in rural communities. These are the cons of the new improved agriculture.