Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Usefulness of photography in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Usefulness of photography in society
Your View of the World
Think about the last time you went somewhere exciting and did not have a camera or a picture-capturing device. How did that make you feel? In “On Photography,” the essay by Susan Sontag, she challenges how the uses of photography have developed between the invention of the camera in the 1800s and the time this essay was written in 1977, by juxtaposing different topics and ideas. She delves into how photography makes people feel and the plethora of uses, all which depend on the person. Finally, Sontag states that photography lets people show their experiences to others through their own point of view. Through her cynical words, she forces readers to feel a negative emotion towards photography. Sontag states pathos-charged
…show more content…
claims, that don’t only appeal to the readers’ emotional side, but also make the reader think more deeply about their own actions, especially when it comes to the act of taking a picture. Sontag approaches the topic of photography in a way beyond her time.
In photography’s more recent uses, “[it] has become one of the principal devices for experiencing something, for giving an appearance of full participation” (177). She would like to make up an excuse as to why so many people take pictures and why so many obsess over the simple act of taking a picture. This strategic use of pathos appeals to the emotional side of the readers and makes them truly think about why they take pictures. This quote might bring up feelings of sorrow because the reader might remember events that they have attended in the past only to take pictures, not because they cared about the what was happening at the event. Sontag also uses the appeal to emotion to subtly attack the readers. The statement might make the reader stop and consider their actions. They may think about how the statement does not describe them, and then think about it a little longer and realize that it exactly describes what they do. Today, most people take pictures for their later enjoyment, but they also subconsciously take photographs because they have the desire to show others that they involve themselves in a myriad of …show more content…
activities. Furthermore, when it was first invented, photography was an art form and only specific people had access to a camera.
So only those people could show off their “art”, or how they interpreted an experience or event. Now in the 21st century, everyone has a cell phone with a camera. Because people have access to this portable picture-capturing device, they have an easy way to create their own art form. In turn, they have an effortless way to show off to others that they enjoy outdoor activities or participating in impressive life events. Sontag brings up this topic in a strategic way by making the readers feel nostalgic about photography. Photography seems like such a modern invention, when in fact, photography surpasses all the article’s readers in age. In addition to just being able to take pictures of the happenings in the present moment, people can easily skew this photographical information. With social media sites and filters galore, someone can edit their pictures so much that the image no longer represents their true experience. Before the invention of the camera, people did things because they enjoyed them. Today, because of the invention of the camera, people do things not because they like them, but because they want to show people that they did something noteworthy. After reading this information, think about your own life. Do you have hobbies because you genuinely enjoy them or because you can take pictures and show off to your
friends? Along with the human need to show off and appear as though one participates, Sontag touches on the idea of immortality. With photography, events have the ability to live on forever, long after the occasion ends. Sontag solemnly states that, “[w]hile real people are out there killing themselves or other real people, the photographer stays behind his or her camera, creating a tiny element of another world: the image-world that bids to outlast us all” (178). The author uses the appeal to gloomy emotion to evoke the audience’s sense of empathy. She talks about somber events and how people would rather take pictures to document these events instead of helping the people in dire need of assistance. This makes the reader think that a photographer is cynical because they would rather risk someone else’s life to get a photograph instead of saving them. The photographer does not help only because they want that exact moment in time live on forever. The author’s choice to talk about immortality and how it relates to photography tugs on the heart strings of the reader because immortality isn’t talked about often, especially considering that no one can live forever. One might wonder what the fascination is with picture-taking. Maybe people take photos for nostalgic purposes, to help one have memories and remember events, or simply because one wants to show off to their friends. Photography is “a way of certifying experience, [but] also a way of refusing it- by limiting experience to a search for the photogenic, by converting experience into a souvenir” (177). Sontag provokes the thoughts of the readers and makes them ask the question: why do we take pictures? Taking a picture to make it a souvenir equates to taking a picture for nostalgic purposes. Nostalgia is a need for the past, typically associated with happy memories. However, when one focuses on only capturing the perfect photograph so the memory can be positive, they may be hurting their actual experience. Feeling stuck behind the lens of their camera instead of enjoying themselves in the moment can make it difficult for someone to fully appreciate an experience. If one cannot experience what is happening when it is occurring, how will they be able to remember it clearly when thinking back to it for nostalgic purposes? Many of the points that Sontag brings up might make the reader think that she has negative feelings about photography. This negative energy also contributes to how the reader feels. Because the author sheds a negative light on most of her ideas, everything that the audience reads makes them feel sadness, even though the topic of photography is usually thought about to be happy. The topic of photography is synonymous with joy and pleasant memories, but Sontag puts a dark twist on it which makes the audience think much deeper about the true meaning of photography. Instead of taking a picture to remember something that you did, Sontag suggests that people, such as tourists, “feel compelled to put the camera between themselves and whatever is remarkable that they encounter” (177). Tourists feel the need to take pictures because they feel threatened by the sights in front of them. Sontag forces the readers to think about the times they have shown tourist tendencies. Her pathos-based word choice makes someone think that they don’t take pictures for memories; but instead because they want to make a separation between themselves and the object in front of them. Through her choice of words, the author encourages the audience to think about the simple action of tourists taking pictures through a more somber lens. For most people, photography is a way to capture pleasant moments. Most people then use the pictures that they take to think back on the fun times and reminisce. Using pathos in her writing helps Sontag force the readers to dig deeper into their emotions about why humans rely so heavily on photography. Some people might start to feel sorrow because they were not able to truly experience an event or maybe someone might think more about their actions and why they do the things they do. Did I go to that concert because I like that band or did I just go so I could put the whole concert on my Snapchat story and make people jealous? The author sincerely helps people ask themselves questions similar to the one previously stated, which in turn might help the reader change their daily actions. Although this essay was written 40 years ago, Sontag effectively forces the reader to analyze their own actions, especially when it comes to photography.
Susan Sontag once wrote, “To collect photographs is to collect the world.” In her article entitled “On Photography,” she overviews the nature of photography and its relation to people using it. Sontag discusses photography’s ability to realistically capture the past rather than an interpretation of it, acting as mementos that become immortal. Continuing on to argue the authenticity of photography and how its view points have shifted from art into a social rite.With the use of rhetorical devices, Sontag scrutinizes the characteristics of photography and its effects on surrounding affairs; throughout this article Sontag reiterates the social rites, immortality and authenticity of photographs, and the act of photography becoming voyeuristic. With the use of the rhetorical devices pathos, appeal of emotion, ethos, appeal to ethics and credibility, and logos, appeal to logic, Sontag successfully persuades the audience to connect and agree with her views.
There you are holding your camera an arm’s length away from your face, posing in the most flattering position to capture your best angle. There you are taking a photo of yourself to share with all of your Facebook friends. Taking a self-portrait photo, also known as a selfie, is something almost everyone has done in this new generation. This action is typically done without a second thought. In Alex Williams’ article “Here I Am Taking My Own Picture” that second thought is provoked through exploring the quickly spreading trend of self-portrait photography. In the article while Williams’ provides interesting examples on a changing generation as this trend progresses through social media and modern technology; Williams also leaves something to be desired within the article due to a lack of direction in the author’s stance on the topic.
Photography allows us to maintain memories and relish them whenever we desire. Although some advocates might argue that people are no longer enjoying experiences instead taking more pictures, in the essay, “Why We Take Pictures”, by Susan Sontag, she conflates that photography can be used as a defense against anxiety and a tool of empowerment. I agree with Sontag on the significance of photographs and how it allows us to store a part of our extended relatives so we are able to hold on the memories of family. Therefore, we must appreciate how photography allows us to manage anxiety, express feelings and remember our loved ones.
Photographs are used to document history, however selected images are chosen to do so. Often times these images graphically show the cruelty of mankind. In her book, Regarding the Pain of Others, Susan Sontag asks, "What does it mean to protest suffering, as distinct from acknowledging it?" To acknowledge suffering is just to capture it, to point it out and show somebody else that it exists. In order to protest suffering, there has to be some sort of moral decision that what is shown in the photograph is wrong, and a want from the viewer to change that.
Sontag, Susan. "Essay | Photography Enhances Our Understanding of the World." BookRags. BookRags. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
A picture is more than just a piece of time captured within a light-sensitive emulsion, it is an experience one has whose story is told through an enchanting image. I photograph the world in the ways I see it. Every curious angle, vibrant color, and abnormal subject makes me think, and want to spark someone else’s thought process. The photographs in this work were not chosen by me, but by the reactions each image received when looked at. If a photo was merely glanced at or given a casual compliment, then I didn’t feel it was strong enough a work, but if one was to stop somebody, and be studied in curiosity, or question, then the picture was right to be chosen.
...sm: in a sense, photography enlivens the dead and gives immortality. The latter is a quality which make a photograph work as a fetish, its immobility and silence its ability to preserve a past moment, are the same qualities associated with death as is rendered rather obvious through Susan Sontag “All photographs are memento mori.”
“Recently, photography has become almost as widely practiced an amusement as sex and dancing, which means that, like every mass art form, photography is not practiced by most people as an art. It is mainly a social rite, a defense against anxiety, and a tool of power” (Sontag 8). After reading this quote in my head multiple times, I started to realize that people use it for different purposes. When I took a photography class in college, it was under the category “art.” Which made me think of it as a form of art, when there are so many other ways to view photography. Sontag changed my opinion about photography after further interpreting her quote because to have a camera in our hand, being able to capture the world through our lens is to have a tool of
When I considered at first to discuss the role of photography and frame as evidence and their limitations, keeping in mind Butler’s argument regarding the visual modes of regulation of reality, the first problem that came up before me was: would it be something futile and an imposition of meaning on something which is by nature to be seen? But Butler’s claim regarding the way suffering is presented to us through the framing of reality in a certain way – for example, “embedded reporting” and our ethical response to it – prompted me to address certain questions involving the frame and its role in establishing or not establishing legal, political and ethical responsibility.
As seen in paintings of battle scenes and portraits of wealthy Renaissance aristocracy, people have always strived to preserve and document their existence. The creation of photography was merely the logical continuum of human nature’s innate desire to preserve the past, as well as a necessary reaction to a world in a stage of dramatic and irreversible change. It is not a coincidence that photography arose in major industrial cities towards the end of the nineteenth century.
To begin with, photography appeared to me as something entertaining a simple step in which one took a camera and simply shot a photograph of oneself or a friend. When I was handed my schedule for Mrs. Jones’s class, I felt as if this class had in store a special reward for me. As the days went by, Instead of being anxious of getting out of class I had a craving for additional time in the class. The class kept my eyes glued to the screen ...
Photojournalism plays a critical role in the way we capture and understand the reality of a particular moment in time. As a way of documenting history, the ability to create meaning through images contributes to a transparent media through exacting the truth of a moment. By capturing the surreal world and presenting it in a narrative that is relatable to its audience, allows the image to create a fair and accurate representation of reality.
“By the turn of the century the Kodak Brownie camera had been invented, making it possible for the average person to take candid photos of family and friends” (Gerber). Thanks to photography people now had the ability to have exact images of their loved ones who have died, or pictures of sons and husbands when they go to war. People also had a way to document things that happen in their daily lives. Anyone with a camera could take pictures of their workplace, homes, or even random moments throughout the day. Being able to preserve a memory on a piece of paper was seen as a miracle in the nineteenth century, but today it is apart of daily life thanks to pressing a single button.
Have you ever seen a painting or picture that captivates you and directly stirs up emotion within you? More than likely, you have. Usually, viewers merely observe the picture and enjoy the way it looks and how it makes them feel. But, have you ever asked yourself, “why?” What about the picture makes it pleasing to the viewer? With each strategy the photographer uses creates their own touch and passion that floods all over the picture. The emotional connection nearly goes unnoticed for when the picture is well photographed, the viewers experience the sensation in their subconscious. This is one of the most powerful tools that a photographer holds in their hands. If one can become a master of manipulating how the photo affects its viewers, the said photographer can potentially maneuver people’s minds and thoughts with one click of a button. The time spent with my mentor has opened up the door for me to tap into that power though the use of background, focus, shutter speed, angles, and most importantly, lighting. Even with all these techniques, the person behind the camera must remember that creativity must be at the forefront of all operations. Caleno (2014), when writing about the basics of capturing a beautiful moment in a picture commented, “If we want to be creative we must drop these pre-conceptions and start looking at things from a small child’s innocence.”
In Sontag’s On Photography, she claims photography limits our understanding of the world. Though Sontag acknowledges “photographs fill in blanks in our mental pictures”, she believes “the camera’s rendering of reality must always hide more than it discloses.” She argues photographs offer merely “a semblance of knowledge” on the real world.