Living Downstream by Sandra Steingraber Sandra Steingraber’s autobiography, Living Downstream, explores the connection between cancer and toxins in the environment. This book had profound meaning to my life in particular because cancer has reaped havoc in my family for decades and so the topics discussed in this book directly affect me and my loved ones. Sandra Steingraber is a biologist whose journey with cancer began at the young age of twenty. She was diagnosed with bladder cancer. Although it came as a shock, her surprise was limited because of her family’s history with the disease. Her mother was diagnosed with breast cancer five years prior, which spread a couple of years before Sandra’s diagnosis. Her aunts and uncles also battled …show more content…
cancer of the colon and bladder. However there’s a twist: Sandra is adopted. Since that took genetics out of the picture, she began searching for another cause. She began to look into another thing families have in common: their environment. Because families often eat the same types of foods, drink water from the same source, and live with in close proximity to one another, they are exposed to similar types and quantities of toxins. Sandra grew up in Tazewell County, Illinois; a county with a long standing history of high cancer rates. Tazewell is home to a number of factories and farms. It is widely known that factories release massive amounts of chemicals into the ecosystems they reside within, but Sandra’s main concern is the pesticides used to grow corn and beans in the area. High quantities of an herbicide called atrazine are sprayed onto crops to kill weeds.
There is no barrier between the farms and the rest of the community. Atrazine is extremely water soluble; almost no aquatic waterways are atrazine-free. Atrazine has show effects in fish, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals, including humans. It is what is known as an endocrine disruptor. Endocrine disruptors are chemicals that interfere with the hormone systems in animals (US EPA). Atrazine causes testosterone to convert into estrogen, causing negative impacts on the reproductive system. Frogs are a good indicator species because they spend their whole life in water. Frogs exposed to atrazine have been known to change gender completely. This is concerning to humans because there is a direct correlation between some cancers and …show more content…
hormones. When Steingraber was born, DDT reached its peak use in agriculture. “DDT is a colorless, crystalline, tasteless and almost odorless organochloride known for its insecticidal properties” (Wikipedia). DDT is also an endocrine disruptor. Baby boomers were the first generation to have toxic chemicals found in their umbilical cords, brains, and fat cells. DDT was also found in breast milk and baby food. It is no coincidence that baby boomers also have higher rates of cancer that the generations proceeding them. Despite the evidence, people still refuse to accept the correlation between environmental toxins and the environment, preferring to blame it solely on genetic makeup.
However, even though genetics can play a role, the genes that trigger cancer have to be “switched” on by an external factor in order for abnormal cells to grow. When it was discovered that there was proof that some textile dyes can cause cancer, people did nothing to stop or even slow the use of the chemical. All the research was wasted, and so were people’s lives. When Steingraber was younger, tobacco smoke was rumored to be a carcinogen. Her family kept her shelter from smoke her whole life. When the correlation was proved, she gave thanks to the people who were willing to take action on partial evidence and enact preventative measures. Steingraber believes there should be more emphasis places on preventing cancer, by eliminating toxins and doing more research on green energy alternatives, than curing it. A cure is an abstract dream; prevention is a
reality. Steingraber takes the human rights approach to cancer because she feels it is fitting and most effective. She believes that denying people the right to safety, denying babies a life not filled with toxins, and killing people for the sake of laziness and money is against the basic rights that the government should be trying to protect. She hopes that in the future environmental toxins will be viewed as obviously and widely accepted to be wrong. I have personal connection to the book because I come from a family where at least half of us die from cancer. My grandparents, my aunt, and many of my other relative’s lives have been claimed by cancer. In addition, my sister had cancer when she was my age, sixteen. Needless to say the odds I will get cancer are pretty high. Seeing people’s apathy towards cancer prevention angers me because I know how debilitating it is to watch someone you love linger in limbo somewhere between life and death. Prevention needs to be taken seriously. I believe there will be an environmental human rights movement because so many people are dying each year. And for each person that dies, a hundred more feel the impact. If these deaths can be prevented, and are not, it’s murder. This book has impacted my life by reawakening the anger and frustration I felt while watching my loved ones die from cancer. It taught me that its not only genetics that causes cancer, but also environmental factors which could be limited and prevented. I have a lot of dreams about my future but the one that is most important to me is to be a mother. Because of the knowledge I acquired from this book, I will definitely try to eat mainly organic foods during my pregnancy to ensure the safety and health of my child
Now that I am halfway through Sandra Steingraber’s book, Living Downstream, I feel that I have a pretty strong idea as to what her main point is (or the theme): there are many pesticides and chemicals that are in our environment that are linked to cancer many health issues, but more specifically cancer. Furthermore, her main message is to say what we don’t know about our environment and the chemicals in the air could be killing us. She focuses on the changes between back then and now, and the different carcinogens that have been put into the environment over time.
In the short story, “On the Rainy River”, Tim O’Brien reflects on how an individual’s values and identity shifts in the face of adversity. This idea is portrayed in the character of Tim O’Brien and how he is able to compromise his values when he is faced with internal turmoil in the presence of adversity. “Oddly, though, it was almost entirely an intellectual activity. I brought some energy to it, of course, but it was the energy that accompanies almost any abstract endeavor”. This quote portrays how weakly Tim clung onto his values even though he held an opinion against this war. Tim never really takes initiative to fully fight this war, he only puts in the bare minimum. He talks about how the editorials he wrote were “tedious’ and “uninspired”
The relationship you have with others often has a direct effect on the basis of your very own personal identity. In the essay "On The Rainy River," the author Tim O'Brien tells about his experiences and how his relationship with a single person had effected his life so dramatically. It is hard for anyone to rely fully on their own personal experiences when there are so many other people out there with different experiences of their own. Sometimes it take the experiences and knowledge of others to help you learn and build from them to help form your own personal identity. In the essay, O'Brien speaks about his experiences with a man by the name of Elroy Berdahl, the owner of the fishing lodge that O'Brien stays at while on how journey to find himself. The experiences O'Brien has while there helps him to open his mind and realize what his true personal identity was. It gives you a sense than our own personal identities are built on the relationships we have with others. There are many influence out there such as our family and friends. Sometimes even groups of people such as others of our nationality and religion have a space in building our personal identities.
When reflecting and writing on Eiseley’s essay and the “magical element”, I balk. I think to myself, “What magic?”, and then put pen to page. I dubiously choose a kiddie pool to draw inspiration from, and unexpectedly, inspiration flows into me. As I sit here in this little 10x30 foot backyard, the sky is filled with the flowing gaseous form of water, dark patches of moist earth speckle the yard, the plants soak up their scattered watering, and the leaves of bushes and trees imbue the space with a sense of dampness from their foliage. As my senses tune into the moisture that surrounds me, I fill Braedon’s artificial pond with water. I stare at the shimmering surface, contemplating Eiseley’s narrative, and the little bit of life’s wellspring caught in Brae’s pool. I see why Eiseley thought the most abundant compound on the earth’s surface is mystical.
When examining On the Rainy River by Tim O’Brien from a reader-response perspective it becomes clear that contrary to popular belief courage does not come from engaging yourself in dangerous situations, it comes from not letting anyone come between you and your morals and beliefs. O’Brien found peace when he fled, and he felt miserable, like a coward when he caved in and went to war. Through careful analysis, my mind interprets the text in a way that shows how you are not brave for doing what you are forced to do.
Isn’t it overwhelming to consider the fact that approximately one in eight deaths in the world are due to cancer? To make this more comprehensible, the number of deaths caused by cancer is greater than caused by AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria combined. Along with the idea that this disease does not have a definite cure is a mind-staggering concept to grasp. If not caught in time, cancer means guaranteed death. These types of thoughts were floating around my head when my mother had told me that my father had mouth cancer.
Chemical pollution into the environment can cause both genotypic and phenotypic changes in many organisms, including humans. More specifically, environmental pollutants like BPA can act as xenoestrogens (estrogen imitators), ultimately affecting hormonal activity and production in an organism. This alteration in activity and production can be termed as endocrine disruption. The endocrine system regulates a variety of processes responsible for growth and development, including gonadal formation and function, digestion, metabolism, sex differentiation, and embryonic development (reviewed by Flint et al., 2012). Chemicals that interfere with the function or structure of the endocrine system can be defined as endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2007).
Cancer is a deadly disease that millions of people die from a year. Many loved ones are killed with little to no warning affecting families across our world. My family happened to be one that was affected by this atrocious disease. This event changed the way my family members and I viewed cancer.
Evidence provided to support these claims of human and wildlife harm is largely from laboratory studies in which large doses are fed to test animals, usually rats or mice, and field studies of wildlife species that have been exposed to the chemicals mentioned above. In laboratory studies, high doses are required to give weak hormone activity. These doses are not likely to be encountered in the environment. However the process of bioaccumulation can result in top-level predators such as humans to have contaminants at levels many million times greater than the environmental background levels (Guilette 1994). In field studies, toxicity caused by endocrine disruption has been associated with the presence of certain pollutants. Findings from such studies include: reproductive disruption in starfish due to PCBs, bird eggshell thinning due to DDT, reproductive failure in mink, small penises in alligators due to DDT and dicofol (Guillette 1994, Colburn et al 1996). In addition, a variety of reproductive problems in many other species are claimed to be associated with environmental contamination although the specific causative agents have not been determined. One recent discovery that complicates the situation is that there are many naturally occurring "phytoestrogens", or chemicals of plant origin that exhibit weak estrogenic properties.
To help keep crops from being destroyed, conventional farmers use many methods such as pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Nearly 1 billion pounds of these chemicals are used every year (“pesticides”). Because of this excessive use, some scientists express concern that using artificial chemicals in the farming process could produce unhealthy crops. People who ate it over a long period of time could suffer from degraded health and stunted growth (“Organic Foods”). For example, in 1989, the EPA banned the use of Alar which was a chemical used to ripen apples (“Farming, Organics”). This chemical proved to be carcinogenic after causing tumors in mice after several laboratory tests (“Organic Food”). As a result of these findings there was a dramatic increase of the sales for organic food (“Organic Food”). Another study found that Atrazine (one of the most widely used herbicides in the United States) has the potential of being carcinogenic and reducing sperm counts in males (“Organic Food”). This was further proven when evidence was found that chemicals u...
Children of the River was written by Linda Crew, a children and young adult author. This novel was originally published during 1989 and was published again during 1991 by Laurel Leaf. It tells the story of a young girl named Sundara fleeing Cambodia to escape harsh military regimes with her aunt's family. She escapes to the United States and struggles to carve out an identity for herself as a young adult. Her struggle lies in the tension between the customs of her Cambodian background and the unfamiliar nature of her new home.
The topic that I will be focusing on for this assignment is on the screening of lung cancer, since this is one of the most controversial debates all across the world. The significance of this topic is that when it comes to lung cancer screening, many individuals may or may not abide by it. There are many reasons to why individuals may not want to have their screening done for lung cancer. The top two reasons are that the screening itself is expensive and secondly, the results that they get from the screening may not be accurate. Imagine, if the results came up as a positive, for the ones who really do not have lung cancer, the amount of pain, time and money that they have put into the curing of lung cancer, is painful. At the same, time it is not fair for them to go through this much, when they actually do not have lung cancer. In this paper, I will discuss how lung cancer screening is a controversial issue and why it impacts us as a society and what problems that the family members, friends and medical doctors have to face if something does goes wrong.. Here is a portion of my essay that will appear on the final copy of my essay.
In a study conducted by the University of London’s Centre for Toxicology, 30 out of 37 commonly used pesticides have been tested to block or mimic male hormones (Cone). This blockage can affect testosterone levels negatively as well as other androgens produced within a male’s body causing serious health concerns with fertilization, hair loss, and low sex drive. The study also discovered that certain pesticides that are used within today’s agriculture can, “…activate or inhibit hormone receptors in cells that turn genes on and off” (Cone). Therefore, fetuses and infants can be at high risk when exposed in the womb or through breast milk since the hormones being turned on or off control masculinization of the reproductive tract. Overall, pesticides seem like they are doing more harm to human’s health then they are at keeping crops healthy and should be eliminated from modern agriculture
Second Hand Smoke In the 1950's and 60's scientists gave the people a lot of evidence on the deadly effects of smoking where the tobacco companies on the other hand tried to put the doubt in people’s minds through the campaigns to show that it is not all true. By the time people actually decided to take care of their health and finally saw how life-threatening smoking could be by real life examples, the tobacco companies already got rich from its sales. Nowadays, nobody doubts that “firsthand” smoke is deadly to your health and it causes lung cancer and heart disease in adults and asthma and bronchitis in children. Now the industry is onto the secondhand smoke. Scientists and researchers are representing a lot of evidence and research that has been done throughout the years showing that the secondhand smoke can also cause a lung cancer in nonsmokers. The study has been done of people who have been long exposed to secondhand smoke and it shows that 26 out of 33 published studies indicate a link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer. The study estimates that the people that were breathing secondhand smoke were 8 to 150 percent more likely to get lung cancer. The tobacco companies are trying to argue the facts and are still in serious debate about the health hazards of breathing a secondhand smoke. A lot of anti-smoking organizations are trying to turn smoking in public into a private activity that does not have to involve nonsmokers breathing secondhand smoke. What is even more important is that many of these organizations convinced a lot of smokers to cut back or quit completely. The problem of secondhand smoke is increasing because it is so common in our society. It makes secondhand smoke the third-ranking cause of lung cancer among nonsmokers. Mothers who live with a smoking spouse have to realize the ill effects of secondhand smoke on children even before they are born. The smoking components reach the developing fetus through the mother. Infants that are born in a smoking environment weigh less and have a weaker chance of becoming a fully developed child. Secondhand smoke leads to blood clots and damages arterial linings which are the two most leading factors in the development of heart disease. The tobacco companies got scared of the effect that the secondhand smoke research can do to the cigarette makers.
Like far too many others, cancer has posed as the greatest hurdle in my life. When I was twelve years old, my grandfather was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, a rare and largely incurable form of cancer that proves to be immensely aggressive to the body of which it takes over. As fortunate as I was to live just down the road from my grandparents’ farm, I