Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Into the wild by jon krakauer literary elements
Conclusion about into the wild by jon krakauer
Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Into the wild by jon krakauer literary elements
In 1992, an article was written in Outside magazine about a young man that was found having starved to death in a bus in the middle of the Alaskan wilderness. After the search for his identity proved fruitful, it was released that the young man’s name was Christopher J. McCandless. Several people wrote to the magazine claiming to have met him at some point in his grand adventure to Alaska, all of them describing how Chris had impacted and inspired them. Through extensive fieldwork and investigation, author Jon Krakauer was able to piece together Chris’s trail over the course of a couple years; most of which was found in the many journals he kept. These journals and personal experiences showed that Chris was a naive, conceded, ill-prepared …show more content…
kid who didn’t know what he was getting himself into. He bit off more than he could chew, romanticizing the idea of the great outdoors and the last frontier. The whole point of “living off the land” is to live, which he failed to do. If he wished to achieve his great goal of conquering nature or becoming one with it, he should have done more research, learned more about what he would be encountering, and acquired basic survival skills. Surviving four months in Alaska may have been a high hurdle to jump for him, but coming out alive would have been an indescribable achievement that he alone would have experienced, which is most likely something he wanted. Chris McCandless is an arrogant narcissist which contributed to his death in the way that he thought he knew what he was doing and could handle it all on his own but lacked the necessary skills to execute his great plan. Chris had cut all communications with his family due to his resentment of and disconnect to his well-off parents. He was more concerned with social issues and hated that people relied on material possessions to keep them happy. He refused to accept any gifts because he felt it was disgusting that society relied so heavily on material things. Chris himself believed it was more important to see what it was like to live without those luxuries since he had never known anything other than the good life. Anything he ever wanted or needed, he could have. He became entirely disgusted with that idea and decided that in order to suck the marrow out of his life, he had to be one with nature. One must live off the land in order to be truly successful. The problem with this idea is that since he grew up having everything handed to him, Chris never fully learned the basic survival skills every person should have. Even though he studied nature and had books about scientific plants, he wasn’t able to live long enough to tell his Alaskan tale. Perhaps if he had brought more suitable equipment and made departure arrangements he would have made it out alive. Jim Gallien, the man who dropped Alex off in Alaska, claimed, “His gear seemed exceedingly minimal for the harsh conditions of the interior [...],” (5). He didn’t bring a sufficient rifle, compass, map, or anything else that would be important for surviving the harsh terrain. This just shows how ill-prepared and arrogant Chris was in thinking he could survive in Alaska without the necessary tools to do so. Chris was mostly a solitary person save for the exception of the emotional bonds he created with the people he met on the way to living his dream.
He let so many people get close to him knowing he was only going to leave. It wasn’t just strangers that he met along the way, Chris also encountered his very own family. He held all their mail without answering, then left them without a trace for them to worry sick about where he may be and if he is or is not safe. No matter how much you disagree with your parents it is in no way acceptable to run away with no notice of when or if you’ll ever return. Not only did he withhold his whereabouts from his parents, Chris refused to tell his younger sister, Carine, either. He didn’t want his parents finding out where he was through Carine so he didn’t respond to any of them. His mother, Billie McCandless, recalls, “It made [his father and me] very, very worried,”(22). It wasn’t fair of him to do to them. Several of the friends Chris met on the road tried to get him to call home and tell his parents that he’s alive and well. He refused every time. It would remind one of a toddler throwing a temper tantrum and denying their parents attention. This proves Chris’s lack of maturity to take responsibility for his actions, including the acquiring proper equipment and admitting when he should have just called home. He was, in no way, mature enough to make it out in the wild …show more content…
alone. Not only was Chris immature, he was also not sound of mind.
More than a few times was his strangeness brought up in conversation. He often got lost in thought and was thought to be somewhat emotional. Charlie, a man who allowed Chris to live in his trailer for about a month, wonders,“[Chris] didn’t like to be around too many people, though. Temperamental. [...] He’d get moody, wouldn’t like to be bothered. Seemed like a kid who was looking for something, looking for something, just didn’t know what it was”(42). This quote is similar to the way the rock climbing movement began in the 50’s (based on a documentary on the increased interest in rock climbing). Teens of the time were not happy with the way everything seemed so perfect, so plastic. They felt they were looking for something, but never knew what until they started simply climbing rocks. The higher they got, the more of a thrill it was. This is sort of a metaphor referencing Chris. The farther he got from home and his old life, the closer he was to finding that something. However, this is like teaching a child that too much of a good thing can be just as bad. In the end, the “too much” was the Alaskan wilderness that overtook him. His one great dream ended up being the main factor in his ultimate demise. Had he learned when enough was enough of his grand adventure, Chris could have
survived. In conclusion, it was Chris’s immaturity and arrogant, narcissistic attitude that led to his eventual death. He refused to properly prepare and plan for his adventure and refused to contact anyone for departure plans. He let his dream be the end of him due to poor knowledge of the art of surviving. Although Chris admired the ideals of Thoreau and other famous hermits, spending life in solitude defeats the purpose of happiness. There would be no purpose for mankind if life was meant to be spent alone. From Chris McCandless, we, as a society, can learn that it is important to follow our dreams, but also to be smart about them and know when it’s time to quit. We can’t all survive in the Alaskan wilderness, especially with not enough food or thin, wimpy boots, or any way to sustain ourselves, so to speak. Chris killed himself on his path to finding out what it is to live. Will any of us be dumb enough to do the same?
The steps explained by Krakauer can be described not only as reckless but as arrogant and insensitive to those that live in Alaska. The messages sent to Krakauer by the people of Alaska show more examples of people who were anything but inspired by Chris McCandless. The Alaskan’s went as far as to say, “The only difference is that McCandless ended up dead, with the story on his dumbassedness splashed across the media” (Krakauer, 71). That same Alaskan continued, “Such willful ignorance… amounts to disrespect for the land, and paradoxically demonstrates the same sort of arrogance that resulted in the Exxon Valdez spill--” (Krakauer, 72). People all over have read Krakauer’s book and vouch for the inspirational tale it tells, because of the controversy this Chris McCandless’s story still brings today, it is obvious that there are people out there inspired by his story and journey. Many have even followed his lead by pulling what is sometimes referred to as “a McCandless”
In 1992, Christopher McCandless set off on an odyssey into the backcountry of Alaska, an adventure that had proved fatal. After McCandless's corpse was found, Jon Krakauer wrote an article on the story of Chris McCandless, which was released in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine. The article had received a negative response; several readers criticized McCandless for being foolish and ill-prepared, and showed no sympathy or remorse for his death. McCandless has been referred to as a nut, a kook, and a fool. However, McCandless was not a nonsensical man. In 1996, Jon Krakauer's novel, Into the Wild, was published. The novel uncovers more detail of McCandless's story. Into the Wild rebuts the idea of McCandless being someone who is foolish, and speaks of the many occasions where McCandless has demonstrated great perseverance and determination. The novel also proves the intelligence of McCandless, and brings insight into McCandless's psyche. The following examples will illustrate how McCandless was not a fool, but someone to admire.
The story of Chris McCandless is a long story that is complex to tell in its entirety. This essay will analyze Jon Krakauer’s book, Into The Wild, in an attempt to pursued you that Krakauer did a magnificent job telling McCandless’ story up to his death.
“Don’t judge a book by it’s cover, it’s what’s inside counts” This quote reminds people about how they should not judge other people from the outside but look deep into their true personalities. Looking from the appearance and how Chris lives, everyone would assume that Chris is a crazy, foolish person and does everything without thinking. If people try to know more about Chris, they would have different perspective. Chris is intelligent, determined, independent and follows what he believes. He went into the wilderness to escape from the society that tries to suppress him and look for the meaning of life.
According to others, Chris McCandless was inherently selfish. Please, let’s beg to differ, for goodness sake, he was a grown man! It was his life and he was living it the way he wanted to. Chris gave his sister fair warning. He bid to her, “Since they won’t ever take me seriously, for a few months after graduation I’m going to let them think they are right, I’m going to let them think that I’m “coming around to see their sides of things” and that our relationship is stabilizing. And then, once the time is right, with one abrupt, swift action I’m going to completely knock them out of my life...” (Krakauer 64) He knew what he had to do. He had to show his parents how they had made him feel his whole life. As a graduation present they offered him a new car, his old Datsun apparently was to their standards. Chris became infuriated. That was his pride and joy, how dare them try and take that away! They ignored what he was saying, as he did many times before, he o...
In what could have been Chris McCandless’s last contact with humanity he tells his new comrade, Wayne Westerberg, “If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t hear from me again I want you to know you are a great man. I now walk into the wild” (Krakauer 3). For 112 days Chris lived off the harsh Alaskan land. For anyone who is brave enough to travel on the stampede trail and cross the treacherous Teklanika River you will come across the Fairbanks City Transit System Bus 142. Once a backcountry shelter for hunters, trappers, ranger patrols, and for a short time Chris McCandless, Bus 142 now serves as a memorial for Chris McCandless. Travelers will make the trip to witness the basic resources Chris had at hand and the courage it took to make it as far as he did into his journey. Chris was not unaware of the dangers of the Alaskan wilderness. He was fully informed of the challenges he would face and was confident, maybe even hubristic, that he could overcome them. Non Supporters would argue this makes Chris a fool, reckless, brash, or even border lined unintelligent while in fact it is quite the opposite. Chris was a hero because he knew his differences and embraced them, his ambition and strive for perfection took his life, and he followed his dreams no matter the cost.
He went through many obstacles that could have proved fatal. From canoeing in the Colorado River to picking the right berries, he was testing his intelligence. Chris had a true confidence in the land and in himself to set out on a mission so dangerous. “Wilderness appealed to those bored or disgusted with man and his works. It not only offered an escape from society but also was an ideal stage for the Romantic individual to exercise the cult that he frequently made of his own soul. The solitude and total freedom of the wilderness created a perfect setting for either melancholy or exaltation” (Nash; Krakauer 157). Chris longed to escape from society and rely on only mother nature. An innumerable amount of people desire to withdraw from society as Chris did; but they are so comfortable and secure with a normal life they do not dare take such a gutsy
Chris McCandless is regarded as being something as a spiritual figure almost as a cult hero, some call him a disillusioned fool, some call him a great adventurer, and the debate still continues. As Matthew Power calls in his article, an article where he tells the story of McCandless,“The debate falls into two camps: Krakauer's visionary seeker, the tragic hero who dared to live the unmediated life he had dreamed of and died trying; or, as many Alaskans see it, the unprepared fool, a greenhorn who had fundamentally misjudged the wilderness he'd wanted so desperately to commune with.” Like so many stories covering Christopher McCandless’ death, both ends of the argument are discussed in an unfavored manner in the hopes to help develop an opinion on the McCandless story. This open ended question can only be answered open-endedly based on what the readers base for themselves as covered stories intend. Like Power has done, ...
All in all, it is interesting how the trials of life can lead a person into an awakening that inspires millions. Many people believe that walking “into the wild” to live off the land and find himself alone in nature was arrogant, foolish and irresponsible. Chris lacks of knowledge about the wild was a major factor in his death. Chris did not plan how he will survive in the wilderness without proper equipments. He misunderstood that he would have no problem in setting in the wild. Chris immature manner and decisions lead him to starvation and ultimately death. If he planned it out in the beginning he would have saved his life.
An obsession can begin with the smallest of events. Ideas, real or fancied, of what one’s life could be like without the ties that bind them, positive or negative, consume the mind and create visions of freedom from the demands of family, government, or even society as a whole. McCandless’s discovery of his parent’s indiscretions was the onset of his obsession; an obsession which grew exponentially over a short period of time that fettered him to the notion that to be truly happy and free, he must rid himself of everyone he had ever known and everything he had ever owned. McCandless became enslaved to his conception of real freedom. His notion of freedom was extreme, to say the least. It involved an elaborate plan to abandon his parents; separate himself from society; erase himself from the governmental grid; to ultimately arrive at the realization that to experience real freedom in happiness it, must be shared. The discovery of McCandless’s parent’s indiscretions set in motion the first step in his plan: freedom from them both.
He took everything in his life to the extreme. As stated earlier, “It is hardly unusual for a young man to be drawn to a pursuit considered reckless by his elders; engaging in risky behavior is a rite of passage in our culture no less than in most others. Danger has always held a certain allure….”(Krakauer 182). People want to live while their young, therefore they take risks. However, what McCandless did was more than just risk taking. He contained something along the lines of an excessive hubris. ‘“He didn’t think the odds applied to him. We were always trying to pull him back from the edge,” vocalizes Walt McCandless (Krakauer 109). Trudging into the vast Alaskan wilderness without proper provisions is taking the extreme too far. As Krakauer states, “...[Chris] was fully aware when he entered the brush that he he had given himself a perilously slim margin for error” (182). Only someone with an extensive hubris would commit an act so dangerous and be confident in their survival. Although he lent himself to a handful of stupid mistakes, McCandless was far from an idiot. Even though the extreme he took his Alaska adventure to was ill-advised, there is something about Chris that is almost admirable. Many people have dreams and passions that get shoved into an old chest and are never to be visited again. In today’s society it seems as though everyone is
In today’s world, we live in a society where we are subjected to follow rules, which are placed upon us by the society. Many people are faced with the dilemma of whether or not to follow the ideals of other people, or pursue their ideals and go against the prevailing conventions. In “Selections from Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, the author talks about a man named McCandless who went into the Alaskan wilderness in order to find his true self. His journey was also to escape from the societal norms of society. A person who goes into the wilderness believes that they can live their life with brute simplicity. This gives them little to no time with the complicated problems of modern society. Likewise, in “Waiting for a Jew” by Jonathan Boyarin, the author talks about one’s aspiration to find their identity and purpose in the community. He conveys that religious places, like shul, allow an individual to develop a cross- cultural self. The desires and expectations placed upon us by the society shape our strategies of personal identity; therefore, instilling fears that cause us to identify in opposition to our prevailing conventions.
1. Krakauer uses epigraphs in Into the Wild in the beginning of the book by explaining who Chris Mccandless is, the story of him, and how it affected Krakauer himself to write this book. He puts quotations in the beginning of every chapter because those were the inspirations behind McCandless adventures. Those quotes show how they affected Chris himself by really pushing him to get these adventures, in some ways they made up Chris mindset thinking that he could be one with the wild.
Sometimes a character may be pushed over the edge by our materialistic society to discover his/her true roots, which can only be found by going back to nature where monetary status was not important. Chris McCandless leaves all his possessions and begins a trek across the Western United States, which eventually brings him to the place of his demise-Alaska. Jon Krakauer makes you feel like you are with Chris on his journey and uses exerts from various authors such as Thoreau, London, and Tolstoy, as well as flashbacks and narrative pace and even is able to parallel the adventures of Chris to his own life as a young man in his novel Into the Wild. Krakauer educates himself of McCandless’ story by talking to the people that knew Chris the best. These people were not only his family but the people he met on the roads of his travels- they are the ones who became his road family.
Krakauer said “McCandless change his name, gave the entire balance of a 24 thousand-dollar saving account to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his pocket” (Author’s note). Family is an important factor in everyone’s life; apparently that was not enough for Christopher McCandless. I have been fortunate to live with my family my whole life.