Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concepts of social stratification
Concepts of social stratification
Social class inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Inequality exists because of the need to stratify a society and dividing it into a hierarchy that separates the bourgeoisie from the proletariat. In simplest terms, a stratification system is a method that tries to create a balance between the prestige and the working class. Inequality is not a matter of when and where, but a matter of who and why. The purpose of social stratification is to have certain types of people to maintain and carry out certain jobs and professions. Because of differences in economic status, privilege, and opinions, inequality is inevitable. In fact, every healthy society has some sort of inequality to keep a sense of balance. In no way will a certain amount of inequality ever be avoidable. Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore describe inequality and the method of stratification as a functional necessity of society. The system is meant to trigger a sense of motivation and a willingness to perform the duties of the positions …show more content…
The authors of “Inequality by Design” depict inequality as inheritance of genetics which have both advantages and disadvantages. The resources, quality of schooling, and the historical era can influence each individual to the extent to where it can be a benefit or create an issue for a society. The authors believe that Americans choose who is at the top of the hierarchy and who resides at the bottom of the slope. The individuals with above average genetics and who are most likely to survive are considered to be the upper class, while as the quality of genetics lessens, so does the social class in which an individual falls into such as the middle class and the lower class. Max Weber defines inequality as, “Law exists when there is a probability than an order will be upheld
Jared Diamond makes a great and compelling argument about how inequality across the entire globe originated. The main components that were agreeing with this argument were guns germs and steel. Guns meaning the advancement in weaponry, military warfare and military sophistication. Germs meaning the harmful disease and other foul illness that wiped out humans throughout History. Then the third and final point steel, which was about the advancement in societies and the complex sophistication with their technology, which lead to building great architecture and devices that were completely impactful.
In Confronting Inequality, Paul Krugman discusses the cost of inequality and possible solutions. Krugman argues to say that it is a fantasy to believe the rich live just like the middle class. Then, he goes into detail about how middle class families struggle to try to give their children a better life and how education plays a factor in children’s future lives. For example, children’s ability to move into higher education could be affected by their parents economic status. Also, He discusses how politicians play a role in the inequality, because most of politicians are in the upper economic class. Finally, Krugman says how we could possibly have solutions to these various inequalities, but how America won’t get
Growing up in The United States, people are given this idea of an American Dream. Almost every child is raised to believe they can become and do anything they want to do, if one works hard enough. However, a majority of people believe that there is a separation of class in American society. Gregory Mantsios author of “Class in America-2009” believes that Americans do not exchange thoughts about class division, although most of people are placed in their own set cluster of wealth. Also political officials are trying to get followers by trying to try to appeal to the bulk of the population, or the middle class, in order to get more supporters. An interesting myth that Mantsios makes in his essay is how Americans don’t have equal opportunities.
In Mantsios’ “Class in America” he provides us with four myths about the United States. In one of these myths the idea is brought up that the United States is, at its core, a classless society. It is also states that whether rich or poor, everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. The myth also states that health care and education are provided to everyone regardless of their financial stability. This idea about a classless society is exactly what Mantsios claims it to be, a myth. It is untrue to state that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, and to believe that whatever differences exist in financial standing are insignificant. There are clear distinctions between different groups of people depending on their economic and social standing.
Functionalist argue that stratification is "necessary and beneficial" to a society to ensure the highest qualified individuals will fill the best societal positions. Inequality in the distribution of desirables exist as a device for ensuring that the most important positions are filled by the most qualified people. Certain jobs are more important than others, and those jobs require special skill and talent. The cycle of unequal opportunity is intensifying, and the United States beneficiaries often slander those who are the most systemati...
Manza, Jeff and Michael Sauder. 2009. Inequality and Society: Social Science Perspectives on Social Stratification. New York: Norton.
Where would you consider yourself with your ranking in America 's social classes, are you upper class, middle class or even lower class? This is actually very important when it come to you receiving opportunities and in a sense special treatment. I’m referring to of course social inequality which is still very much alive in America and still affects a lot of families mostly in a negative way. This problem in America has grabbed the attention of two authors, Paul Krugman who wrote “Confronting Inequality” and Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy who wrote “The Upside of Income Inequality”. However, they both have different views on inequality Krugman believes that social inequality is only negative while on the other hand, Becker and Murphy believe Krugman believes that the only way to get into a good school is to be living in a higher economic area.
Inequality as previously mentioned is a subject that gets debated when brought up and in any debate there is two sides. In class we have discussed both side of the story of inequality, and it has give me a better perspectives of income inequality. When discussion income inequality, we brought up the concept of the economic pie in which states that the economic pie is a reference to the way income gets distributed among the lower, middle, and higher class of America. So the concept of the economic pie states that the rich is getting richer, so they are
...ment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. Although it may not seem fair that there are rich people blowing money on impractical and meaningless things while people live in poverty, it’s a reality that the United States has experienced for centuries.
There is also the damage that the inequality does to the society and the government. Thomas Jefferson once said, “The small landholders are the most precious part of a state.” Today that would mean that the middle class is the most important part of our society, however, the farther we move into the future the weaker the middle class becomes (Krugman, 587). The America that we live in is unequal in income and social aspects. The rich do not live the same lives as those that are less fortunate, and the less fortunate do not get to enjoy the perks that come with the lives of the rich people.
First, the chapters cover stratification. According to study.com “Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. In the United States, it is perfectly clear that some groups have greater status, power, and wealth than other groups.” According to the textbook “Stratification is unequal distribution of valued
Inequality has always existed in some form or another in the world. It takes shape in various forms like, gender, race, and age. These systems of inequality are caused by uneven distribution of goods and disparity between people. They are important to recognize because they shape how society acts and reacts to everyone’s differences, and educates the public so they are aware of of their actions. There will probably always be inequality in the world because everyone has differences, and truthfully life wouldn’t be sustainable if everyone was the same, but the important part is that these differences don’t lead to oppression and segregation.
However, this rising inequality of incomes, would not be inconsequential, and the same could be said for inequality of wealth. Inequality has been linked to many negative factors, including health problems (Wilkinson), low class mobility (Krueger), social unrest (cite), and a lower level of productivity among the poor and middle class (cite).
Income inequality is a big problem in the United States because the top, wealthiest American saw huge increases in their incomes, which the rest had their incomes go down. Bottom people do not have the same amount of money and the opportunity to move up the social ladder as the rich people do. In order to reduce income inequality, the government needs to tax the rich people more, and give poor people more money and more social services - education, food subsidies, health care.
Kerbo, H. R. (2012). Social stratification and inequality: class conflict in historical, comparative, and global perspective (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.