Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Imperialism in russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Imperialism in russia
Ryan Tucker Jones’ Empire of Extinction: Russians and the North Pacific's Strange Beasts of the Sea, 1741-1867, analyzes how animals can be studied in conjunction with the area that they disappear from as a reflection of the power and influence of the area itself.
Jones’ choice to use the Russia Empire is important for many reasons: the sea cow was the first animal to become extinct in the modern era, the North Pacific was a difficult area to study and map because of the unstable environment, and the text is analyzed in a period where major empirical changes were occurring across the world due to various revolutions. The Russian Empire was difficult to analyze through the traditional means that historians typically use, so Jones relies upon the information from natural historians and 19th century scholars and authors to analyze the hunted and killed animals.
One of the strengths of his text is Jones’ ability to challenge the biases and limitations of the natural historians’ information. Natural historians underestimated
…show more content…
This is a very interesting and thought-provoking discussion that Jones begins, but misses an opportunity to explore the beginnings of eco-tourism. Jones’ text is all about the exploitation of sea mammals for fur that led to their extinction and it would have been interesting for Jones to draw some parallels and connections from the exploitations of animals to the exploitation of land. Rather than focus on the eco-tourism aspect, Jones chooses to focus on the conservation efforts that were put into place and the preservation of empirical ideals that occurred after the extinction of the sea cow. This itself is not a weakness because he discusses the biases of authors who chose to ignore the extinction of the sea cow because it would not help to enhance the prominence and prestige of the Russian
There have been five mass extinctions over the last half-billion years while the sixth extinction is currently being examined by scientists around the world. Studies have shown that this is the most shocking and damaging event since the impact that caused the extinction of dinosaurs. This one is different from all others, because humans are the cause of this disaster to our current environment. If we don’t start to realize this issue and do something about it, eventually it will be too late to try to save the Earth and ourselves. I am going to analyze the sixth chapter, “The Sea Around Us,” for pathos, ethos, visual rhetoric and other related issues
In the first chapter of Guns, Diamond establishes two main arguments that will become crucial to his thesis later on in the book. First, he goes in depth about mass extermination and further extinction of large mammals that occurred in New Guinea and Australia which were important for food and domestication, and secondly he argues that all the first civilized peoples in the world each had the ability to out develop one another, but were hindered or helped by their environment.
In the Maus series, the life of Vladek during the Holocaust was detailed. The animals were used to illustrate a point of view.
...l developments taking place in the Eurasian land mass. The encounter was far from equal;” (Inoa pg. 1). It began as an unequal interaction, and has remained to this day a relationship of aggressor versus defender.
Howarth use of sources throughout his book is a strong point that he uses. Howarth shows the different perspectives that have been viewed through history. He gives his own insights and tries to show the reader the different view points. History can be taken in many different ways and Howarth gives reasons and evidence to support his claims.
This period, which deals with the world the Indians knew before the arrival of European explorers, poses difficulties flowing mostly from the lack of the usual evidentiary foundation for doing history: written documents (for example, letters, speeches, treaties, constitutions, laws, books, newspapers, magazines, almanacs). This lack need not be a major obstacle to historical study, however. Indeed, one of the most important things we can accomplish in teaching this period is devising ways to give students a sense of the spectrum of methods that historians use to investigate and understand the past. We can give students a sense of the breadth and depth of the historian's task and the remarkable array of tools and techniques available to the historian to find out about the past.
Greer, Thomas, and Gavin Lewis. A Brief History of the Western World. 9th. 1. United States: Thomson & Wadsworth, 2005. 400-335. Print.
Dr. Eifler’s research in the chapter from his book and his presentation to our class correlate with the Robert William Fogel reading from the Tosh book. In this selection, Fogel writes of “a new brand of ‘scientific’ history…
Another major point in his essay is that if we are going to prevent a species from extinction we must do it everywhere not just in one specific place. The worlds whale population is not going to rise if only the United States bans whale hunting. And if we don't enforce poaching laws and regulations. This also refers to if you tamper with one organism you affect a lot more. If we kill all the whales not only can we not use them but larger sea predators like sharks can't either. So they will be forced to feed on smaller sea life and then damage our sea food supply by eating other fish that we eat. So we as a whole must conserve on our supplies of natural objects with our exponentially growing population.
John Lewis Gaddis, in his book, The Landscape of History, generates a strong argument for the historical method by bringing together the multiple standpoints in viewing history and the sciences. The issue of objective truth in history is addressed throughout Gaddis’s work. In general, historians learn to select the various events that they believe to be valid. Historians must face the fact that there is an “accurate” interpretation of the past ceases to exist because interpretation itself is based on the experience of the historian, in which people cannot observe directly (Gaddis 10). Historians can only view the past in a limited perspective, which generates subjectivity and bias, and claiming a piece of history to be “objective” is simplistic. Seeing the world in a multidimensiona...
The way that the role of animals can be used as a literary effect is evident in both Kundera and Szymborska’s works. The two contrast eachother, Kundera suggests that the role of animals in his novel is that they become their owner’s peaceful character builder by having characters of their own. In Szymborska’s works, we see quite the opposite; she portrays the role of animals as people’s irritation, a vexation – where characters are rather barbaric and careless towards the animals. The two works show the same superiority of human over animals, yet the human attitudes towards them entirely dissimilar. We may perceive that the presence of animals, such delicate literary technique, determines the attitudes and personality of the characters of a literary work.
First, the sea cows may have been overhunted by groups of native Siberian people. The professor opposes this point by saying that sea cows are massive creatures, about nine meters long and ten tons in weight. Therefore, the proferssor states that hunting a few sea cows were enough for a few months, especially that the Siberian population was not large. So, the professor points out that the Siberian people did not need to hunt a lot of sea cows and that cannot cause the sea cows' extinction.
Kunitz, Stanley J, and Howard Haycraft, eds. American Authors 1600- 1900. New York: Wilson, 1966. Print.
Historians use sources and knowledge to piece together the history of the human existence while Human scientist study the human behavior as well as the lifestyle we live in. They indeed focus on these areas and provide information to each other. However, a historian will also look to the future and foretell using his or her knowledge of the past. In the same way, a human scientist might look at human behavior today and compare it with the past. For when we look at human science, historians find it as useful term for science with the word ‘human’ as the subject (Smith). This opens the possibilities for the historian to research and thus history can be considered as a ‘Human Science’ (Smith).
“…Antarctic whaling is not a part of Japanese culture. It is terrible for our international image and there is no commercial demand for the meat….” (Wingfield-Hayes, 2016)